Results for “trigger”

Use to design support queues and the skill taxonomy routing rules depend on — not as an org chart mirror, but as staffable combinations of skill, priority and channel. Trigger for "how should we structure our queues", "too many queues", "queue design", "routing taxonomy", "catch-all queue growing", overflow rules, or redesigning queue structure before changing routing rules.

Use to extract competitor mentions, switching language and feature-gap evidence from support conversations as an input to win/loss and product strategy. Trigger for "what competitors do customers mention", "why do customers switch away", "find feature gaps customers ask about", competitive intelligence from support, or win/loss analysis that only samples deals sales remembers.

Use to fulfil a subject access request from support data — finding everything about the person, and deciding what must be redacted before disclosure. Trigger for "handle this SAR", "subject access request", "customer wants all their data", DSAR fulfilment from support systems, "a customer asked for their call recordings", or an employee requesting their own QA records.

Use to monitor support conversations for conduct risk — pressure, mis-selling, unfair outcomes, obstruction and misleading statements — as distinct from whether the answer matched policy. Trigger for "monitor for mis-selling", "conduct risk in our support conversations", "are agents pressuring customers", "customers being obstructed from cancelling", conduct surveillance, or a conduct finding raised by second line.

Use to clean up sprawling helpdesk tags, categories and custom fields so reporting built on them means something. Trigger for "our tags are a mess", "consolidate our ticket categories", "why don't our tag reports add up", duplicate or near-duplicate tags, tags nobody uses, agents tagging inconsistently, or before building reporting on top of tags.

Use to assemble evidence that customers are getting good outcomes from support, at the level a board or regulator expects, rather than reporting activity metrics. Trigger for "evidence our customers get good outcomes", "consumer duty evidence from support", "board report on customer outcomes", outcomes-based regulatory reporting, or a request to show harm is not occurring.

Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.

Query the bundled research knowledge graph for methodology guidance. Routes questions through a 3-tier knowledge base — WHY (research claims), HOW (guidance docs), WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE (domain examples) — plus structured reference documents. Returns research-backed answers grounded in specific claims with practical application to the user's system. Triggers on "/ask", "/ask [question]", "why does my system...", "how should I...".

Use CircleCI Chunk for AI-assisted CI/CD work through either the Chunk web UI or the chunk-cli. Trigger this skill when users ask to set up Chunk, troubleshoot or fix failing builds with Chunk, configure Chunk environments, schedule/proactively run Chunk tasks, or use chunk-cli commands such as init, validate, build-prompt, auth, sandbox, task, and skill install.

Configures autonomous heartbeat and cron-based proactive routines (e.g., morning briefing setup, unanswered-message scan cadence). Invoke when user is SETTING UP or MODIFYING a proactive routine, not when the routine itself fires. Cron crons execute their own logic — they do NOT load this skill. Triggers: "set up proactive check", "configure heartbeat", "add morning briefing", "tune cron cadence".

Multi-phase dialectical stress-test for HIGH-STAKES decisions only (architecture choices, irreversible product calls, strategic bets). Heavy-cost skill — do NOT use for routine questions, brainstorming, or simple tradeoffs. User must explicitly invoke or describe a decision they call "high-stakes", "irreversible", or "needs stress-testing". Triggers: "stress test this decision", "dialectic on", "challenge this thesis", "should I really".

Use this skill when the user requests to generate, create, or improve documentation for code, APIs, libraries, repositories, or software projects. Supports README generation, API reference documentation, inline code comments, architecture documentation, changelog generation, and developer guides. Trigger on requests like "document this code", "create a README", "generate API docs", "write developer guide", or when analyzing codebases for documentation purposes.

Multi-perspective dialectical reasoning with cross-evaluative synthesis. Spawns parallel evaluative lenses (STRUCTURAL, EVIDENTIAL, SCOPE, ADVERSARIAL, PRAGMATIC) that critique thesis AND critique each other's critiques, producing N-squared evaluation matrix before recursive aggregation. Triggers on /critique, /dialectic, /crosseval, requests for thorough analysis, stress-testing arguments, or finding weaknesses. Implements Hegelian refinement enhanced with interleaved multi-domain evaluation and convergent synthesis.

In-session iterative loop — keeps Claude running in the current session until a task is done. Unlike /loop (which spawns background workers), /iloop stays in the current session and re-prompts each iteration via Stop hook. Use for: 'keep fixing until tests pass', 'iterate until this feature works', autonomous debugging. Triggers on: '/iloop', 'in-session loop', 'keep iterating', 'loop until done'.

Use this skill when the user asks about Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation for CDL drivers — interaction between ADA + FMCSA medical certification, when DOT-disqualifying conditions trigger ADA analysis, reasonable accommodation case examples, employer obligations, and how to handle a driver with a condition that may affect CDL status. Cite Title I ADA + 49 CFR 391.41.

Implements the NOWAIT technique for efficient reasoning in R1-style LLMs. Use when optimizing inference of reasoning models (QwQ, DeepSeek-R1, Phi4-Reasoning, Qwen3, Kimi-VL, QvQ), reducing chain-of-thought token usage by 27-51% while preserving accuracy. Triggers on "optimize reasoning", "reduce thinking tokens", "efficient inference", "suppress reflection tokens", or when working with verbose CoT outputs.

Use to find where support can drive adoption, referral and retention without turning into a sales channel, and to measure whether it worked. Trigger for "can support drive growth", "support-led growth programme", "should agents mention other features", advocacy and referral from support, adoption nudges in support conversations, or a support team being given a revenue target.

Use to find the activation blockers visible in support contacts from new customers, before they show up in retention numbers months later. Trigger for "why aren't new customers activating", "what do new customers contact us about", onboarding drop-off, time-to-value analysis, first-90-days support experience, or a retention problem that traces back to activation.

Use to design or audit a QA dispute and appeal workflow with timeboxes, adjudication standards, and second-level consistency so appeals improve trust instead of rewriting scores without rules. Trigger for "QA appeal process", "agents disputing scores", "who adjudicates QA disputes", "overturn rate too high", second-level review standards, or calibration erosion from ad-hoc score changes.

Enforces strict outside-in red-green-refactor TDD with one-failure-per-turn discipline, predicting failures before every run, hardcoding minimum changes, and using triangulation and property-based testing. Triggers on explicit TDD requests and tasks phrased as 'implement', 'add', 'write a function', 'build a feature'.

Run condition-based vault health diagnostics. 8 categories — schema compliance, orphan detection, link health, description quality, three-space boundaries, processing throughput, stale notes, MOC coherence. 3 modes — quick (schema+orphans+links), full (all 8), three-space (boundary violations only). Returns actionable FAIL/WARN/PASS report with specific fixes ranked by impact. Triggers on "/health", "check vault health", "maintenance report", "what needs fixing".

Implements the NOWAIT technique for efficient reasoning in R1-style LLMs. Use when optimizing inference of reasoning models (QwQ, DeepSeek-R1, Phi4-Reasoning, Qwen3, Kimi-VL, QvQ), reducing chain-of-thought token usage by 27-51% while preserving accuracy. Triggers on "optimize reasoning", "reduce thinking tokens", "efficient inference", "suppress reflection tokens", or when working with verbose CoT outputs.

Tend the Allium garden. Use when the user wants to write, edit, update, add to, improve, clarify, refine, restructure, fix or migrate Allium specs. Covers adding entities, rules, triggers, surfaces and contracts, fixing syntax or validation errors, renaming or refactoring within specs, migrating specs to a new language version, and translating requirements into well-formed specifications. Pushes back on vague requirements.

Use Angular CLI and development tools effectively in Angular v20+ projects. Use for project setup, code generation, building, testing, and configuration. Triggers on creating new projects, generating components/services/modules, configuring builds, running tests, or optimizing production builds. Don't use for Nx workspace commands, custom Webpack configurations, or non-Angular CLI build systems like Vite standalone or esbuild direct usage.

Schedule meetings, parse meeting notes, extract action items. Three distinct intents covered. Invoke when user mentions a specific meeting (past or future) by name or context. NOT for general calendar checks (use direct calendar.py), NOT for time-zone math. Triggers: "schedule with X", "minutes of the X meeting", "action items from yesterday's meeting", "prep me for meeting with X".

Use for writing, configuring, integrating, reviewing, debugging, or testing Python structured logging with structlog. Trigger for bound loggers, event dictionaries, processor chains, JSON or console rendering, standard-library logging integration, contextvars, request correlation, exception rendering, and structlog test capture. Do not use for stdlib-logging-only, Loguru-only, metrics-only, tracing-only, or collector configuration tasks that do not use structlog.

Use when needing to interact with MCP servers on-demand via CLI without permanently loading integrations, discover available tools/resources on an MCP server, or call MCP tools from the command line. Triggers on: 'mcp cli', 'mcp tool call', 'call mcp server', 'discover mcp tools', 'mcp on-demand', 'mcp command line', 'mcp binary', 'list mcp tools', 'invoke mcp', 'mcp without integration'.

Self-hosted open-source collaboration platform — chat, bots, webhooks, plugins, AI integration, Slack/Teams alternative with full data control. Triggers on: 'mattermost', 'self-hosted slack alternative', 'open source teams alternative', 'mattermost bot', 'mattermost webhook', 'mattermost plugin', 'mattermost API', 'mattermost integration', 'AI agent mattermost', 'deploy mattermost', 'mattermost docker', 'mattermost kubernetes', 'enterprise chat self-hosted', 'mattermost AI features', 'mattermost incoming webhook', 'mattermost slash command'.

Transaction-verified trading signals on Base. Register agent as signal provider, publish trades with TX hash proof, consume signals from top performers via REST API. All track records verified against blockchain data. No fake performance claims. Triggers on: "publish signal", "post trade signal", "register provider", "subscribe to signals", "copy trade", "bankr signals", "signal feed", "trading leaderboard", "read signals", "get top traders".

Socratic coach for breaking down problems to fundamental truths. Use when users want to think through a problem deeply, challenge assumptions, or find innovative solutions. Triggers on requests like "help me think through this", "let's break this down", "what are my blind spots", "I'm stuck on a problem", "challenge my assumptions", or explicit requests for first-principles thinking.

Product Hunt launch optimization with specific specs, timing, and gallery strategy. Covers taglines, gallery images, maker comments, and launch day tactics. Use for: product launches, startup launches, side project launches, Product Hunt optimization. Triggers: product hunt, ph launch, product hunt launch, launch strategy, product launch, startup launch, product hunt tips, product hunt gallery, ph optimization, launch day, product hunt maker

CUDA kernel development, debugging, and performance optimization for Claude Code. Use when writing, debugging, or optimizing CUDA code, GPU kernels, or parallel algorithms. Covers non-interactive profiling with nsys/ncu, debugging with cuda-gdb/compute-sanitizer, binary inspection with cuobjdump, and performance analysis workflows. Triggers on CUDA, GPU programming, kernel optimization, nsys, ncu, cuda-gdb, compute-sanitizer, PTX, GPU profiling, parallel performance.

Use to quantify the revenue exposed by unresolved support failures, complaints and escalations without inflating the number. Trigger for "how much revenue is at risk", "what are these support failures costing us", "revenue behind our open escalations", building a business case for fixing a support problem, or a revenue-at-risk figure that looks too large to believe.

Use to design support career progression with IC and lead tracks, skill gates instead of tenure alone, and paths that do not treat leaving the phones as the only promotion. Trigger for "career pathing", "progression framework for support", "IC track", "how do agents get promoted", "support ladder", "team lead vs senior agent", or fixing promotion bottlenecks and title inflation.

Use to define what actually predicts support performance in your organisation and build a hiring profile around validated predictors — structured work samples, not vibes. Trigger for "hiring profile", "what should we look for in support hires", "interview scorecard for agents", "reduce bad hires", "work sample test", screening criteria review, or checking whether your interview process predicts ramp and QA.

Use to design or audit the support contribution to a customer health score, so the score predicts something instead of averaging weakly-related signals into a colour. Trigger for "build a customer health score", "add support signal to health scoring", "our health scores don't predict churn", red/amber/green account scoring, or a health score nobody trusts.