Results for “skill-review”

Use this skill when the user asks about FMCSA investigation types — Focused Investigation vs Comprehensive Review vs Compliance Review (CR) vs Investigation, when each is triggered, scope differences, on-site vs off-site, and how to prepare for each. Cite 49 CFR 385 Subpart C + D.

Guides HIPAA-specific healthcare privacy and security work, routing to implementation and review skills with decision gates and guardrails.

For analysis/task/review agents using a Professional Skill on devices, firmware, edge protocols, updates, or safety; not for work without device, firmware, or physical impact.

For analysis, task, or review agents using a Professional Skill on payments, trading, ledgers, settlement, refunds, or reconciliation; not for non-financial or Web3-only work.

For analysis/task/review agents using a Professional Skill on kernels, drivers, ABI/FFI, memory, concurrency, or syscalls; not for work without a native boundary.

Use this skill when adding authentication, handling user input, working with secrets, creating API endpoints, or implementing payment/sensitive features. Provides comprehensive security checklist and patterns.

Use this skill when adding authentication, handling user input, working with secrets, creating API endpoints, or implementing payment/sensitive features. Provides comprehensive security checklist and patterns.

Use this skill after completing code changes to review for reuse, quality, and efficiency. Simplifies and refines code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality.

Use this skill after completing code changes to review for reuse, quality, and efficiency. Simplifies and refines code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality.

This skill should be used when the user asks to "write an article", "help me write a blog post", "draft a technical article", "review my article", "check my writing", "improve this draft", "give me writing feedback", "find a topic", "what should I write about", or mentions "writing coach". Provides comprehensive guidance including topic selection, 17 writing skills, and reviewer collaboration from "Writing for Developers" by Piotr Sarna & Cynthia Dunlop.

Capture structured feedback on the Han skills and agents used in the current session and optionally post it as a GitHub issue to testdouble/han. Use at the end of any session where one or more han-* skills or agents ran, to rate a run, log what worked and what didn't, or submit observations for maintainers. Does not review code, investigate bugs, or research options; use code-review, investigate, or research for those. Does not provide feedback on skills or agents from non-Han plugins.

Conduct a design interview, generate 5 distinct UI variations in a temporary route, collect real click-to-comment feedback on the live rendered variants via human-review, and produce an implementation plan. Use when the user wants to explore UI design options, redesign an existing component/page, or create new UI with multiple genuinely different approaches to compare — before writing production code or committing to a direction. For a lighter, single-component variant picker with no interview, use `prototype` instead. For reviewing a UI that's already real (not exploring new directions), use `visual-review`. Source: adapted from github.com/0xdesign/design-plugin's design-lab skill (interview + 5-variant structure), with feedback collection replaced by this repo's own `visual-review` skill (human-review) instead of a bespoke overlay component.

Self-contained code review checklist — formatting, type safety, duplication, readable conditions, logic-out-of-UI, test coverage, comment quality. Adapts to whatever tooling the project actually has (skips Prettier/TypeScript/test-runner checks if unconfigured). Use before merging, after completing a feature, or any time you want a second pass on code quality. In Claude Code, prefer the official `code-review` skill or `pr-review-toolkit`/`feature-dev` code-reviewer agents instead — both are real, installed, and go deeper than this checklist. This copy exists for Codex/Cursor portability, where those agents aren't available.

When the user wants to edit, review, or improve existing marketing copy. Also use when the user mentions 'edit this copy,' 'review my copy,' 'copy feedback,' 'proofread,' 'polish this,' 'make this better,' or 'copy sweep.' This skill provides a systematic approach to editing marketing copy through multiple focused passes.

When the user wants to edit, review, or improve existing marketing copy. Also use when the user mentions 'edit this copy,' 'review my copy,' 'copy feedback,' 'proofread,' 'polish this,' 'make this better,' or 'copy sweep.' This skill provides a systematic approach to editing marketing copy through multiple focused passes.

When the user wants to edit, review, or improve existing marketing copy. Also use when the user mentions 'edit this copy,' 'review my copy,' 'copy feedback,' 'proofread,' 'polish this,' 'make this better,' or 'copy sweep.' This skill provides a systematic approach to editing marketing copy through multiple focused passes.

When the user wants to edit, review, or improve existing marketing copy. Also use when the user mentions 'edit this copy,' 'review my copy,' 'copy feedback,' 'proofread,' 'polish this,' 'make this better,' or 'copy sweep.' This skill provides a systematic approach to editing marketing copy through multiple focused passes.

AI-powered Claude Code skill that performs deep code review using formal logic and reasoning frameworks to detect bugs, anti-patterns, and security risks beyond what linters catch.

Use this skill when a driver does not meet federal medical standards and needs to apply for a variance. Covers application steps, required documentation, and review timeline.

Applies principles from Robert C. Martin's 'Clean Code'. Use this skill when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to ensure high quality, readability, and maintainability. Covers naming, functio...

Search the bioRxiv preprint server and retrieve paper metadata or download PDFs via its API. Use when finding life sciences preprints by keywords, authors, DOI, date ranges, or categories, or when conducting a biology literature review of not-yet-peer-reviewed work. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.

When the user wants to edit, review, or improve existing marketing copy. Also use when the user mentions 'edit this copy,' 'review my copy,' 'copy feedback,' 'proofread,' 'polish this,' 'make this better,' or 'copy sweep.' This skill provides a systematic approach to editing marketing copy through multiple focused passes.

Orchestrates the full academic research pipeline (research, write, integrity check, review, revise, re-review, re-revise, final integrity check, finalize), coordinating alterlab-deep-research, alterlab-paper-writer, and alterlab-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Use when the request mentions academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, or complete paper workflow. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.

Runs a 13-agent deep research pipeline for rigorous academic work on any topic across 7 modes (full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis), covering research-question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk-of-bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial and devil's-advocate review, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Use when the request mentions research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, or 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.

Use this skill when a driver is being screened for sleep apnea. Covers FMCSA Medical Review Board (MRB) recommendations, BMI thresholds, sleep study referrals, and continued certification.

Two-layer memory architecture for board meeting decisions. Manages raw transcripts (Layer 1) and approved decisions (Layer 2). Use when logging decisions after a board meeting, reviewing past decisions with /cs:decisions, or checking overdue action items with /cs:review. Invoked automatically by the board-meeting skill after Phase 5 founder approval.

Write, review, or improve SwiftUI code following best practices for state management, view composition, performance, macOS-specific APIs, and iOS 26+ Liquid Glass adoption. Use when building new SwiftUI features, refactoring existing views, reviewing code quality, or adopting modern SwiftUI patterns.

Creates comprehensive GitHub pull requests with automated quality validation and security scanning, then hands off to /github:review-pr for CI monitoring and reviewer-comment triage. This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a PR", "submit a pull request", or needs to merge completed work with full compliance checks.

Use this skill when creating a new Claude skill from scratch, editing or improving an existing skill, or measuring skill performance with evals and benchmarks. Invoke whenever the user says things like 'make a skill for X', 'turn this workflow into a skill', 'test my skill', 'improve my skill', 'run evals', 'benchmark this', or 'optimize my skill description'. Also use proactively when the conversation has produced a repeatable workflow that would benefit from being captured as a skill. Covers the full lifecycle: capture intent, draft SKILL.md, run evals, review with user, iterate, optimize description, package. NOT for general coding help, debugging runtime errors, building MCP servers, writing Claude hooks, or creating plugins - use domain-specific skills for those.

Universal code quality principles applicable to all languages. Covers Clean Code, SOLID, complexity metrics, and quality standards. USE WHEN: user mentions "clean code", "SOLID", "code smells", "refactoring", "complexity", asks about "cyclomatic complexity", "cognitive complexity", "code review", "maintainability" DO NOT USE FOR: language-specific linting - use ESLint/Biome skills, security - use OWASP skills, testing - use testing skills

Audit agent skills, plugins, prompts, manifests, scripts, dependencies, and bundled assets for provenance, prompt-injection, permission, execution, exfiltration, persistence, and update risk. Use when evaluating a third-party skill before installing, enabling, updating, publishing, or distributing it; reviewing an untrusted SKILL.md, agent configuration, MCP integration, archive, or repository; comparing a package with a known-good version; or investigating unexpected tool, network, credential, or filesystem behavior.

Triage and review open GitHub issues and PRs against project contribution templates, producing a compliance report and optionally labeling, commenting, or closing items.

Security audit skill — systematic OWASP + STRIDE review of a project. Covers attack surface, secrets archaeology, dependency supply chain, OWASP Top 10, threat modeling, and false-positive filtering. Outputs a prioritized findings report.

Use for designing, creating, reviewing, or packaging GitHub Copilot and Agent Plugins for Visual Studio Code, including plugin.json, portable skills, MCP components, client-specific agents, commands, and hooks. Do not use for a single standalone skill, ordinary VS Code extensions, or installing an unreviewed plugin.

Enforces language-specific coding rules, style guidelines, patterns, security, and testing standards by referencing a built-in guidelines bank.

Use when designing, implementing, or reviewing APIs to ensure consistent, reliable, and developer-friendly interfaces. This skill provides standardized API design principles and patterns across all companies and services.