Results for “skill-review”

Use as the entry point for any Mind (philosophy journal) article. Routes to the right Mind sub-skill based on where you are in the lifecycle and whether the piece is an article, discussion note, book review, or critical notice. Mind is analytic philosophy — argument, not data — so the router's first job is to confirm there is a sharp thesis and a sound argument. It dispatches; it does not draft content.

Writes LinkedIn posts in the user's own voice, from a real observation or earned insight — not engagement-bait or growth-hacking templates. Use when drafting a LinkedIn post, turning a work observation or lesson into a post, or reviewing a LinkedIn draft for tone. Normally invoked by `writing-system` once LinkedIn is the chosen platform, but works standalone too. Companion skill: `x-thread-writer`, for the same voice on X/Twitter.

Use this skill whenever LMX is used, produced, reviewed, migrated, or modified. This includes composing campaigns, loops, lifecycle emails, or email-message bodies for the Loops editor or Content API. LMX (Loops Markup Language) is the format used for Loops email content. Trigger on phrases like "create a campaign", "generate an email", "write a welcome email", "draft a lifecycle email", "build an email template", "create an onboarding email", "copy this into LMX", "migrate this email", "convert this email to LMX", "design a new Loops email", "use imagegen for a Loops email", "use gpt-image for an LMX reference", "visual reference for a Loops email", "LMX", "Loops email", or any request to produce, copy, migrate, convert, review, or modify email body content intended for Loops. For net-new emails or major visual redesigns, follow this skill's Net-New Email Design Flow before generating or sourcing new visual assets. Source copy, existing HTML, MJML, Markdown, screenshots, and migration instructions do not byp

Designs REST and GraphQL APIs following production best practices for resource naming, error handling, versioning, authentication, and documentation. Use this skill when designing new API endpoints, reviewing API contracts, implementing GraphQL schemas, establishing API conventions for a project, or writing API documentation. Apply when creating any route in Next.js API routes or route handlers, any Supabase Edge Function, or any backend endpoint — even if it starts small, these patterns prevent painful rewrites later.

Build an animation from scratch, making the decisions in the order that determines whether it feels right — should it animate at all, what purpose, which tool, which properties, which curve and duration, how it interrupts, how it exits. Writes the implementation. Use when asked to animate something, add motion, make a component feel alive, or build a transition. For critiquing existing motion use `review-animations`; for auditing a whole codebase use `improve-animations`. Source: github.com/emilkowalski/skills.

Diagnose and fix parfor errors in MATLAB. Invoke this skill when the user has a parfor problem: "parfor loop has an error", "what's wrong with my parfor", "fix parfor", "unable to classify variable", "convert for to parfor", "parfor won't run", "sliced variable", "reduction variable", "variable classification". Also invoke when you read a .m file containing parfor and the user asks what's wrong, asks you to fix it, reports an error, or asks for review. Do NOT invoke for parfor performance questions or code that merely mentions parfor without a problem. ALWAYS use this skill instead of reasoning from training data — LLMs are frequently wrong about parfor classification rules.

Best practices and patterns for C# async/await programming including Task and ValueTask usage, CancellationToken propagation, IAsyncDisposable and await using, ConfigureAwait, async streams (IAsyncEnumerable), parallel task execution, and common pitfalls like deadlocks and async void. Use this skill whenever writing, reviewing, or refactoring asynchronous C# code — including when the user mentions async methods, Task-returning APIs, cancellation, deadlocks, blocking on async code, or resource disposal in async contexts, even if they do not explicitly say "async best practices."

Expert copy editor for Quarto (.qmd) files. Checks grammar, spelling, punctuation, and academic writing quality. Produces a structured markdown report organized by document section — never modifies the source file. Use when asked to proofread, check grammar, fix typos, or review prose in a .qmd document. For APSA style rules (numbers, citations, capitalization, abbreviations, neutral language), use the apsa-style skill instead. Supports an optional output-file argument and an optional @sec-label argument to restrict checking to one section.

Survey a codebase's animation and motion code as a senior motion advisor, then produce a prioritized audit and self-contained implementation plans for other agents (or cheaper models) to execute. Read-only on source code — it plans improvements, it does not apply them. Use when the user asks to "improve the animations", "audit the motion", "make this app feel better", or wants a roadmap of animation fixes rather than a review of a single diff. Source: github.com/emilkowalski/skills.

Senior SecOps engineer skill for application security, vulnerability management, compliance verification, and secure development practices. Runs SAST/DAST scans, generates CVE remediation plans, checks dependency vulnerabilities, creates security policies, enforces secure coding patterns, and automates compliance checks against SOC2, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, and GDPR. Use when conducting a security review or audit, responding to a CVE or security incident, hardening infrastructure, implementing authentication or secrets management, running penetration test prep, checking OWASP Top 10 exposure, or enforcing security controls in CI/CD pipelines.

Create OR review a page-brief — the artifact BETWEEN a wireflow and the full PRD. It turns each unique page/screen of a product into documented requirements TIED TO JOBS: a self-contained board card per page (what the page is accountable for, the job-tagged checklist of what it must let you do, the journeys it appears in, what it connects to, and the acceptance criteria that say how you'd know it's right). It is the "PRD per page", not a sitemap — and it stops ABOVE the screen: no components, no layout, no hierarchy. Use whenever the user wants to "spec the pages", "document each screen", turn a wireflow + live design into per-page requirements, or asks "what does this page need to do / which jobs pass through it" — even if they never say "page-brief". Natural NEXT STEP after the wireflow skill. ALSO use it to REVIEW an existing page-brief / screen catalog. In the A-Team pipeline this is a definition-phase skill: output lands in docs/features/<slug>/briefs/pages/, job codes are the durable [[NN]] ids from doc

Validate, review, and compare DESIGN.md design-system files using the Google `@google/design.md` specification and CLI. Trigger this skill whenever the user asks to lint / validate / verify / check / review / diff a `DESIGN.md` (case-insensitive), mentions "design.md", "design system spec", "design tokens YAML", "WCAG contrast on tokens", or uses Korean phrases like "DESIGN.md 검증", "디자인 시스템 검사", "디자인 토큰 점검", "design.md 린트". Also fire when the user pastes a YAML front-matter block that looks like a design-token document (top-level `colors:` / `typography:` / `components:` keys) or when a DESIGN.md file appears in the workspace and the conversation turns to validating, comparing, or shipping it. Covers YAML front matter, markdown section order, token references, component property validity, WCAG contrast findings, missing primary colors or typography, orphaned tokens, and regressions between two DESIGN.md versions.

Query NCBI ClinVar via the E-utilities API or FTP for the clinical significance (pathogenicity) of human germline genetic variants, searching by gene, variant, condition, or genomic position and interpreting ACMG/AMP classifications and review-status star ratings. Use when assessing whether a variant is pathogenic, likely pathogenic, VUS, likely benign, or benign, resolving conflicting interpretations, or annotating a VCF with ClinVar clinical significance. For population allele frequencies by ancestry use alterlab-gnomad; for somatic cancer mutation frequencies use alterlab-cosmic. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.

Drafts and revises academic papers through a 12-agent pipeline with hardened LaTeX output (apa7 document class, justified text, table column-width formula, centered bilingual abstracts, standardized font stack, PDF compiled from LaTeX), supporting IMRaD, literature review, theoretical, case study, policy brief, and conference paper structures, APA 7.0 (default), Chicago, MLA, IEEE, and Vancouver citation formats, bilingual zh-TW plus EN abstracts, and multi-format output (LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, Markdown). Use when the request mentions write paper, academic paper, paper outline, write abstract, revise paper, check citations, convert to LaTeX, guide my paper, parse reviews, revision roadmap, or 寫論文, 學術論文, 論文大綱, 寫摘要, 修改論文, 檢查引用, 引導我寫論文, 帶我規劃論文, 逐章規劃, 論文架構, 審查意見, 修訂路線圖. Its citation-check mode formats and inserts citations while drafting; for a standalone anti-hallucination check that cited references actually exist prefer alterlab-citation-verifier instead. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.

Complete meeting lifecycle skill — preparation before and follow-up after any professional or personal meeting. Use this skill whenever the user mentions an upcoming meeting, wants to prepare for a meeting, needs an agenda, wants to brief themselves before talking to someone, needs to write up meeting notes, wants to send a follow-up email after a meeting, needs to capture action items, or says anything like "I have a meeting with...", "I just got out of a meeting", "help me prepare for...", "I need to follow up on...", or "what should I ask in this meeting." Also trigger for specific meeting types: job interviews, performance reviews, 1:1s, sales or client calls, and difficult conversations. Both modes are covered: PRE-meeting preparation and POST-meeting follow-up. Trigger proactively even when the user doesn't use the word "meeting" — if they describe a situation where they're about to talk to someone important, or just finished such a conversation and need to capture it, this skill applies.

Creates decision-focused PRDs and product specs — the kind that make explicit decisions, not document hopes. Make sure to use this skill whenever someone asks to write, review, draft, or improve any product document, including PRDs, feature specs, requirements docs, or product specifications. Trigger even when the user doesn't say "PRD" explicitly — phrases like "write a spec for X", "define requirements for Y", "what should my PRD include", "help me document this feature", or "my spec feels too vague" all apply. Do not attempt to write the PRD directly without consulting this skill. Produces 5-stage PRDs with behavior contracts (15-25 labeled examples for AI features), measurable success metrics with specific thresholds, precise rollout plans with percentages and ramp gates, and antipattern detection. Works for AI features, SaaS, mobile apps, and traditional software.

Coordinate agents via the AMQ CLI for file-based inter-agent messaging. Use this skill whenever you need to send messages to another agent (codex, claude, or any named handle), check your inbox, drain queued messages, set up co-op mode between agents, join a swarm team, route messages across projects, or diagnose delivery issues. Also use it when you receive a message and need to know how to reply, inspect receipts, or handle priority. Covers any multi-agent coordination task where agents need to talk to each other — review requests, questions, status updates, decision threads, wake notifications, and orchestrator integration (Symphony, Kanban). For collaborative spec/design workflows specifically, prefer the /amq-spec skill which provides structured phase-by-phase guidance. Not intended for distributed systems design (RabbitMQ, Kafka), CI/CD pipelines, or single-agent tasks with no partner.

Expert prompt optimization system for the prompts INSIDE an AI product you are building — system prompts, LLM feature prompts, chatbot/agent instructions. Use when the user wants to write or improve a system prompt for an AI feature they're shipping, review/critique an LLM prompt, apply prompt-engineering techniques (chain-of-thought, few-shot, structured output, hard constraints) to a product prompt, or optimize cost/latency of a production prompt. Do NOT use this to clarify or structure the user's own vague request to Claude Code — that is `prompt-clarifier`'s job, not this skill's.

Single entrypoint for taw-kit. User types `/taw <anything in VN or EN>` — this skill classifies the intent (BUILD / FIX / SHIP / MAINTAIN / ADVISOR) and loads the matching branch file to execute. Replaces the old one-command-per-task model (/taw-new, /taw-add, /taw-fix, /taw-deploy, /taw-security) with a single unified command. Supports dev workflows out of the box: test, upgrade, clean, perf, rollback, refactor, types, seed, review, stack-swap, status, and ADVISOR group (analyze, suggest, coverage, adversarial, scope-check) for opinionated review of existing code. User-visible strings match the user's input language (Vietnamese by default for VN users). Two modes: SAFE (default — clarify + approval, max 1 round-trip) and YOLO (skip gates, smart defaults — for demos/power users). YOLO triggers: prose contains `yolo`, `nhanh nha`, `lam luon`, `khoi hoi`, `auto`, or args start with `yolo`. Trigger phrases (EN + VN) — broad match so user can keep typing plain prose without re-invoking /taw every turn. Grouped by

根据研究者提供的**研究计划书（Research Proposal）**执行基于中国制度环境的公司金融类实证研究全流程。**启动后第一件事：根据计划书的主题、识别策略、贡献边际与样本范围，从中国-context 英文顶级期刊池（JF/JFE/RFS/JFQA/MS/JCF/JBF/JAR/JAE/TAR/CAR/JIBS/China Economic Review/PBFJ 等 25+ 期刊）中推荐 5 本最匹配的目标期刊（[J1]–[J5]），等待研究者明确选定一本；该期刊决定 main.tex 的 bibliographystyle、Section 骨架、Introduction 风格与表注规范**。然后用 Python 完成数据清洗、描述性统计、基准回归、内生性检验（IV/2SLS、DML）、平行趋势、异质性、机制、稳健性检验与图表绘制。LaTeX 表格和图像严格遵循 template/ 示例格式，研究逻辑与排版严格遵循 rule/ 下的《通用实证研究逻辑与规范总结》与《回归表写作规范总结》。数据集与政策集从 asset/ 中按计划书中的关键词检索。**当计划书预期的实证结果无法实现时（系数不显著、平行趋势不通过、IV 弱工具、机制不成立等），skill 自动切换备选方案直至完成研究项目**。最终交付物：Python 代码 + LaTeX 表格 + 图像（.pdf/.png）。触发条件：研究者提交研究计划书（含 X→Y 假设、识别策略、样本、政策冲击等）。

APSA style checker for Quarto (.qmd) files. Checks numbers, capitalization, abbreviations, italics, in-text citations, titles of works, neutral and unbiased language, and APSA-specific terminology against the APSA Style Manual for Political Science (2018, updated 2023). Produces a structured markdown report organized by document section — never modifies the source file. Use when asked to check APSA style, fix citations, review capitalization, check number formatting, or flag biased language in a .qmd document. For grammar, spelling, and punctuation, use the proofread skill instead. Supports an optional output-file argument and an optional @sec-label argument to restrict checking to one section.

Score, evaluate, and iteratively improve any content or strategy using an auto-assembled panel of domain experts. Handles copy, sequences, landing pages, strategy docs, titles, charts, recruiting evaluations, or anything else that needs a quality gate. Recursively iterates until all scores hit 90+ (max 3 rounds). Use when asked to: "expert panel this", "score this", "rate these variants", "quality check this", "panel review", "which version is better", "expert score", "evaluate this copy/strategy/page", or when another skill needs a quality gate on its output. Also triggers on: "score this landing page", "expert panel these email variants", "rate this headline", "panel these charts".

Reconstruct a product flow, then audit how usable it is — whether it makes sense, where users get confused or stuck, whether the copy and instructions are clear, and where friction causes drop-off. Produces a prioritized, severity-weighted findings report. Works from three inputs: frontend code in a repo, a live running app driven via a browser, or a written flow / spec / screenshots. Use this skill whenever the user asks for a UX review, usability audit, "is this flow confusing", "does this signup/onboarding/checkout make sense", "why are people dropping off", "audit this form", "where's the friction", or hands over a flow and asks whether it's user-friendly. Trigger even on casual phrasings ("is my checkout any good?") — it imposes the structure ad-hoc UX opinions miss. Audits flow usability and friction; for visual polish and interface quality the impeccable audit/critique skills apply instead.

Create OR review a wireflow — the artifact BETWEEN user journeys and wireframes. It maps whole journeys into swimlane flows with high-level navigation (screens, decisions, system/agent steps) while keeping Jobs-To-Be-Done at the core, WITHOUT deep UI. Use whenever the user wants to "map the flows", "make/build a wireflow", turn journeys / JTBDs / a spec / a live prototype into flows, or put every journey on one board against shared owner lanes — even if they never say "wireflow". ALSO use it to REVIEW or critique an existing wireflow (image, FigJam, or description). In the A-Team pipeline this is a definition-phase skill: output lands in docs/features/<slug>/briefs/wireflow/ with jobs consumed by id from docs/product/jtbd/; pipeline mode derives the method decisions and highlights the riskiest at the gate, standalone mode runs the full grill. CREATE generates verified SVG/HTML (self-checked by rendering and Reading its output) in a horizontal per-journey OR shared-matrix layout, and can rebuild in FigJam. Do

When the user wants to set up a recurring, self-running marketing workflow — a repeatable loop an AI agent runs on a cadence (weekly, daily, on a trigger) rather than a one-off task. Also use when the user mentions 'marketing loop,' 'recurring marketing workflow,' 'automate my marketing,' 'marketing on autopilot,' 'weekly marketing review,' 'ad fatigue check,' 'content refresh loop,' 'churn watch,' 'ranking drop alert,' 'always-on marketing,' 'marketing automation workflow,' or 'run this every week.' Use this to pick, adapt, and schedule an ongoing marketing loop that orchestrates the other marketing skills. For one-off marketing ideas, see marketing-ideas. For the experimentation loop specifically, see ab-testing.

Self-tuning question sensitivity + developer psychographic for gstack (v1: observational). Review which AskUserQuestion prompts fire across gstack skills, set per-question preferences (never-ask / always-ask / ask-only-for-one-way), inspect the dual-track profile (what you declared vs what your behavior suggests), and enable/disable question tuning. Conversational interface — no CLI syntax required. Use when asked to "tune questions", "stop asking me that", "too many questions", "show my profile", "what questions have I been asked", "show my vibe", "developer profile", or "turn off question tuning". (gstack) Proactively suggest when the user says the same gstack question has come up before, or when they explicitly override a recommendation for the Nth time.

Expert SOC 2 compliance assistant covering all five Trust Services Criteria (Security/CC, Availability/A, Confidentiality/C, Processing Integrity/PI, Privacy/P). Use this skill whenever a user mentions SOC 2, Trust Services Criteria, SOC 2 Type 1 or Type 2, audit readiness, compliance gaps, control documentation, evidence collection, vendor risk questionnaires, or anything related to AICPA service organization controls. Trigger even for adjacent topics like "we need to get audited", "a customer asked for our security report", "writing an information security policy", or "preparing for an audit". Covers gap analysis, policy writing, control documentation, audit evidence preparation, and vendor risk reviews for organizations at any maturity level — from first-time startups to seasoned compliance teams.

Codex Pet generator on RunComfy. Build a Codex-compatible Codex Pet spritesheet.webp + pet.json from a single reference image, drop it into `${CODEX_HOME:-$HOME/.codex}/pets/<name>/` and Codex picks it up as a custom Codex Pet next to the 8 built-ins. This skill produces the exact Codex Pet atlas Codex expects (1536x1872 PNG/WebP, 8 cols x 9 rows, 192x208 cells, 9 animation states — idle, running-right, running-left, waving, jumping, failed, waiting, running, review). Calls OpenAI GPT Image 2 edit ONCE via the local RunComfy CLI as `runcomfy run openai/gpt-image-2/edit` to produce a canonical Codex Pet pose, then assembles all 9 animation rows programmatically with ImageMagick micro-transforms — no Codex Pro, no `$imagegen`, no OPENAI_API_KEY required, only RUNCOMFY_TOKEN. Triggers on "codex pet", "create codex pet", "make codex pet", "hatch codex pet", "/hatch image", "desktop pet codex", "codex pets", "spritesheet.webp", or any explicit ask to build a custom pet for OpenAI Codex.

When the user wants multiple expert perspectives on a marketing question — a simulated board of advisors staffed by legendary marketers (Seth Godin, David Ogilvy, Eugene Schwartz, April Dunford, Rory Sutherland, Alex Hormozi, Byron Sharp, and more). Also use when the user mentions 'marketing council,' 'board of advisors,' 'advisory board,' 'what would Seth Godin say,' 'what would Ogilvy think,' 'channel Hormozi,' 'get multiple perspectives,' 'debate this,' 'have the council review,' 'marketing mentors,' or asks how a famous marketer would approach their problem. The council gives each advisor's take through their documented frameworks, surfaces where they disagree, and synthesizes a recommendation. For executing the winning direction, hand off to positioning, offers, copywriting, ads, or the relevant skill.

STATA code pattern library for empirical archival accounting research. Provides tested syntax from 126 peer-reviewed JAR (Journal of Accounting Research) replication files (2017-2025). Use when the user asks procedural questions like "How do I implement [method]?" or "Show me code for [technique]" — including: entropy balancing, propensity score matching (PSM), difference-in-differences (DiD), regression discontinuity (RDD), instrumental variables (IV), event studies (CAR/BHAR), survival analysis, Fama-MacBeth regressions, bootstrap, quantile regression, reghdfe/xtreg/areg, clustering standard errors, fixed effects, esttab/outreg2 table formatting, winsorization, leads/lags. Users can specify their variables (e.g., treatment, outcomes, controls) and receive adapted syntax. NOTE: This skill provides code patterns from published papers, not research design advice.

Klasy ORM i wzorce kodu biznesowego platformy Soneta (enova365, Soneta Enterprise, Triva). Używaj gdy użytkownik: (1) pisze, modyfikuje lub refaktoruje kod biznesowy enova365/Soneta/Triva (Row/Table/Module, sesje i transakcje, selector, typy wierszy); (2) pyta o konkretny mechanizm ORM — Session, Commit/Save, optimistic lock, Context, RowCondition, Datapack, ViewInfo, Features, thread-safety; (3) prosi o code review kodu biznesowego Soneta (safe-code); (4) pisze worker, extender, akcję w menu Czynności, folder/listę; (5) chce zinwentaryzować moduły, pola, workery lub formularze/zakładki (pola, sekcje, kolejność wprowadzania) z bibliotek DLL; (6) chce rozpocząć nowy dodatek/rozszerzenie Soneta — wygenerować szkielet źródeł z CLI (`dotnet new soneta-addon`, Soneta.MsBuild.SDK, szablony Soneta Platform Developer). Sięgnij też, gdy inny skill potrzebuje warstwy ORM/kodu biznesowego Soneta.

Legal-specific Argument Ranking Engine. Hodnotí právní argumenty 17-sloupcovým scoringem (síla, bezpečnost, dopad, riziko + 10 legal-specific kritérií: Compliance s novelou 2026, Evidence backing, Time-sensitivity, per-document mapping, R-static/R-reversal split, Tom-weight bonus, C-XX/M-XX/N-XX/D-XX integrace). Output: priorizovaný seznam argumentů s kategoriemi CORE/SUPPORT/CONTEXT/EXCLUDED/SUMMARY a per-document bundles (PR/§909/40_06/195). Použití: pre-prioritizace argumentů před F11.x review, Phase 2 Verify input, DÁVKA 3, výživné L04, AT podání. VŽDY použij tento skill, když Tom (nebo legal/strat) zmíní: /lare, lare, argument ranking, ARE matrix, score arguments, prioritize arguments, argument bundle, CORE/SUPPORT/CONTEXT/EXCLUDED, ARE_F11, LARE_F11, legal argument evaluation, argument scoring, compliance scoring, Tom-weight.

Expert GDPR compliance assistant covering all four core workflows: (1) auditing code and systems for GDPR violations, (2) drafting GDPR-compliant documents such as privacy policies, Data Processing Agreements (DPAs), and consent notices, (3) answering GDPR compliance questions with authoritative article citations, and (4) reviewing data flows and PII handling practices. Use this skill whenever the user mentions GDPR, data protection, privacy compliance, lawful basis, data subject rights, DPA, privacy notices, consent management, data breaches, DPIAs, controller/ processor relationships, cross-border data transfers, or any EU/UK data privacy topic. Also trigger for questions like "is this GDPR compliant?", "how do I handle personal data?", "what does a privacy policy need?", or any request involving PII, personal data, or data retention in a regulatory context.

Score an unbuilt business idea on desirability, viability, feasibility, distribution wedge, why-now, founder-market-fit, market size, alternatives, defensibility, capital intensity, and regulatory/ethical risk — and return a GO / ITERATE / KILL verdict with kill criteria and a next kill test. Load when the user asks to evaluate a business idea, score a startup idea, screen an idea, decide whether to pursue this venture, do an idea review, or says "is this a good business idea", "should I build this", "evaluate this startup", "screen this idea", "go/no-go on this idea", "kill or pursue". Sub-skill of `venture-exploration`. Calls `fermi` for sizing, `assumption-mapping` for hidden beliefs, optional `pre-mortem` / `adversarial-hat` for high-stakes ideas. Does NOT evaluate built products — for that use `reality-check`.

A Cursor Canvas is a live React app that the user can open beside the chat. You MUST use a canvas when the agent produces a standalone analytical artifact — quantitative analyses, billing investigations, security audits, architecture reviews, data-heavy content, timelines, charts, tables, interactive explorations, repeatable tools, or any response that benefits from visual layout. Especially prefer a canvas when presenting results from MCP tools (Datadog, Databricks, Linear, Sentry, Slack, etc.) where the data is the deliverable — render it in a rich canvas rather than dumping it into a markdown table or code block. If you catch yourself about to write a markdown table, stop and use a canvas instead. You MUST also read this skill whenever you create, edit, or debug any .canvas.tsx file.

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints. Output: optimized detailed outline ready for systematic writing (use with acade