Results for “assertion-manifest”

Analyzes test suites to measure assertion diversity, detect shallow or trivial assertions, and identify tests that lack meaningful verification.

Apag Advantage Framing

Use to sign off a QA period for audit or governance — stating what is being attested to, on what evidence, and with which limitations. Trigger for "sign off the QA period", "attest to our quality results", "monthly QA governance pack", "certify the quality figures", or being asked to confirm quality was assured for a period.

Create a Geoffrey Moore-style positioning statement to clarify target customers, unmet needs, product category, and differentiation from alternatives.

Find and own a defensible market position by testing positioning claims, running crawl-walk-run rollouts, and auditing competitor messaging.

Turn a refined research proposal or method idea into a detailed, claim-driven experiment roadmap. Use when the user asks for a detailed experiment plan, ablation matrix, evaluation protocol, run order, compute budget, or paper-ready validation that supports the core problem, novelty, simplicity, and any LLM / VLM / Diffusion / RL-based contribution.

After any AI-generated explanation, require the learner to identify one place it could be wrong, one thing to check, and one source to consult. Builds epistemic vigilance — treats AI output as a claim to evaluate, not truth to absorb.

Maneja exibicao de documento ou coisa — contra a PARTE (CPC 396-400: pedido 397, resposta em 5 dias 398, recusa nao admitida 399, presuncao de veracidade se recusa ilegitima 400) ou contra TERCEIRO (CPC 401-404: citacao em 15 dias, audiencia especial 402, deposito/apreensao 403, escusas 404) — e a arguicao de FALSIDADE documental (CPC 430-433: suscitada na contestacao/replica/15 dias da juntada 430, motivos e meios 431, exame pericial 432, coisa julgada se questao principal 433; onus da prova 429). Use quando o operador disser exibicao de documento, obrigar a apresentar documento, incidente de falsidade, documento falso nos autos, parte esconde documento, exibicao de coisa.

Turn a refined research proposal or method idea into a detailed, claim-driven experiment roadmap. Use after `research-refine`, or when the user asks for a detailed experiment plan, ablation matrix, evaluation protocol, run order, compute budget, or paper-ready validation that supports the core problem, novelty, simplicity, and any LLM / VLM / Diffusion / RL-based contribution.

Produces a decision-grade dossier on a specific company, person, nonprofit, or government org by testing the user's hypothesis rather than confirming it. Outputs an editable Word document with verdict, identity facts, 12-month activity timeline, network and reputation signals, and red flags.

Enforces running verification commands and confirming output before claiming work is complete, fixed, or passing, ensuring evidence precedes any success claims.

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

Automated test validation, coverage checking, and quality metrics with aggressive defaults

Redige acao reivindicatoria — o proprietario nao-possuidor reivindica a coisa de quem injustamente a possui ou detem (CC 1.228), com presuncao de propriedade plena e exclusiva (CC 1.231) e possibilidade de reivindicar de terceiro apos cancelamento do registro inexato (CC 1.247 par. unico), distinguindo a PETITORIA (fundada no dominio/titulo registrado) da POSSESSORIA (fundada na posse), respeitada a vedacao de alegar dominio na pendencia da possessoria (CPC 557). Use quando o operador disser acao reivindicatoria, reaver imovel, sou dono mas estao na posse, petitoria, ou reivindicar propriedade.

Draft an internal legal research memo for the supervising attorney with verified authority and flagged open questions.

Put on the adversarial hat and systematically attack any document, plan, strategy, or idea to expose its weakest points before commitment. Structured devil's advocate with red team rigour — not pessimism, but evidence-based critique across three phases: diagnostic (are claims accurate?), creative (is the problem artificially constrained?), challenge (are solutions robust?). Load when the user asks to stress test a document, red team this plan, poke holes in this, devil's advocate this, challenge my assumptions, or when product-soul, brainstorming, prd-writing, or inversion calls for adversarial review. Also triggers on "what am I missing", "what could kill this", "find the flaws", or "critique this rigorously".

Police the project's vocabulary — bust vague terms, keep the CONTEXT.md glossary sharp, and lock in decisions worth remembering as ADRs. Use when the user debates naming, says "what should we call this", asks to pin down terminology, wants a decision recorded, or when another skill (hot-seat, whiteboard) surfaces a decision that clears the ADR bar. Just reading the glossary for vocabulary is NOT this skill — trigger only when the words or decisions are being changed.

Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team.

Generates production-grade Kubernetes manifests including Deployments with probes and security contexts, Services, Ingress with TLS, HPA, PDB, NetworkPolicy, ConfigMaps, and Secrets, with optional Helm charts, Kustomize overlays, Istio mesh, and ArgoCD GitOps.

Provides a catalog of sales prompts covering pipeline management, prospecting, closing, proposals, objections, retention, and sales intelligence, with behavioral frameworks like SPIN, Challenger, and MEDDIC.

安欣（刑侦剧虚构）认知与表达框架（压缩蒸馏）：理想主义耗损、程序正义执念、白发象征… 触发：狂飙 等。禁止刑侦违法教程；虚构

Use when designing or auditing the evaluation of an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) paper, covering real subject systems, fair runnable tool baselines, task-matched effectiveness metrics, ablations that isolate a learned component, oracle and correctness validation, contamination-aware LLM handling, and provenance for mining.

Drafts a Notice of Alibi Defense under Fed. R. Crim. P. 12.1 or state equivalents. Triggers on alibi notice drafting, alibi defense filing, Rule 12.1 disclosure, or pre-trial criminal defense notice tasks.

Chai BDD/TDD assertion library reference for JavaScript testing. Covers expect/should/assert styles, deep equality, type checks, string/array/object matchers, error assertions, chai-as-promised, chai-http for API testing, sinon-chai, and custom assertions.

The Sovereign Litigation Protocol (SLP-2026). A recursive, high-fidelity framework for autonomous advocacy, multi-jurisdictional discovery, and the algorithmic resolution of civil and commercial disputes.

Claim-driven 实验设计：界定目标 claims → 设计实验块（baseline/validation/ablation/robustness）→ 构建执行顺序 → 可选 Review LLM review → 写入 wiki

Active Directory security audit using the MITRE ATT&CK framework. Full domain enumeration, trust mapping, GPO analysis, ACL abuse paths, ADCS attacks (ESC1-ESC8), delegation abuse (constrained/unconstrained/RBCD), fine-grained password policies, LAPS deployment, service account security, and Kerberos configuration. Uses enum4linux-ng, netexec, impacket, ldapsearch, certipy-ad, bloodhound-python, and rpcclient. Produces attack path diagrams, prioritized risk register, and PoCs. Chains into /gh-export for issue filing.

Calculate TAM, SAM, and SOM with explicit assumptions, methods, and caveats for market sizing.

Use to design and audit how customers are told they are interacting with AI, or that AI was involved in a decision about them, and to evidence that it happened. Trigger for "do we tell customers it's a bot", "AI disclosure requirements", "should the bot say it's not human", "customer asked if they were talking to a person", AI transparency obligations, or evidencing that an AI-assisted decision was explained.

Stress-test a feature idea for an existing product by surfacing risky assumptions across Value, Usability, Viability, and Feasibility using multi-perspective devil's advocate thinking.

实验判决门：Review LLM 独立评判实验结果 → 4 种判决路径 → 自动更新 claims confidence、ideas status、graph edges

当需要制作详细的推广材料（如销售页、促销邮件）时

马东（综艺制作人）认知与表达框架（压缩蒸馏）：赛制叙事、金句剪枝、辩论产品化 触发：奇葩说、乐夏 等。非操纵舆论教程

沈墨（悬疑剧虚构）认知与表达框架（压缩蒸馏）：创伤反杀叙事、时代灰雾、钢琴意象 触发：漫长的季节 等。虚构；禁止犯罪模仿

Adversarial one-question-at-a-time questioning to verify deep reading comprehension of alignment pages, specs, or any document