Results for “corrections”

Audits colour decisions on a screen for contrast ratios, palette coherence, semantic meaning, and accessibility, flagging deviations and recommending specific corrections.

Polishes existing motion against the transitions.dev motion-token scale by auditing duration, distance, scale, blur, and easing values and suggesting token-based corrections.

Update or correct an existing skill file based on judge feedback or improved understanding.

Amend approved research artifacts through a bounded alignment-gated workflow

When reviewing code, generate the complete corrected version — not just the issues, but the exact fixed code ready to copy-paste.

Check a screen's brand expression by comparing it against mood, voice, and design token reference files, flagging divergences and suggesting corrections.

Audit and fix HTML accessibility issues including ARIA labels, keyboard navigation, focus management, color contrast, and form errors.

Review local code changes for concrete correctness, regression, security, and test gaps before shipping.

Captures learnings, errors, and corrections to enable continuous improvement. Use when: (1) A command or operation fails unexpectedly, (2) User corrects Claude ('No, that's wrong...', 'Actually...'), (3) User requests a capability that doesn't exist, (4) An external API or tool fails, (5) Claude realizes its knowledge is outdated or incorrect, (6) A better approach is discovered for a recurring task. Also review learnings before major tasks.

Audit and fix HTML accessibility issues including ARIA labels, keyboard navigation, focus management, color contrast, and form errors. Use when adding interactive controls, forms, dialogs, or reviewing WCAG compliance.

Audit and fix HTML metadata including page titles, meta descriptions, canonical URLs, Open Graph tags, Twitter cards, favicons, JSON-LD structured data, and robots directives.

WCAG 2.1/2.2 compliance, auditing, and remediation.

Redige a acao revisional de contrato civil — revisao por desproporcao manifesta superveniente (CC 317), resolucao/revisao por onerosidade excessiva (CC 478-480), sempre nos limites da funcao social e da intervencao minima (CC 421 + 421-A, Lei 13.874/2019 — contratos presumidos paritarios) e da boa-fe objetiva (CC 422). NAO cobre revisional bancaria. Use quando o operador disser revisar contrato, acao revisional, onerosidade excessiva, reequilibrio contratual, clausula abusiva em contrato civil, ou rever os termos de um contrato civel.

Correct grammar errors, typos, and improve academic readability in LaTeX, Markdown, or plain-text manuscripts. Scans the document once, then walks through every issue one-by-one asking for approval before applying each fix. Trigger when the user says "readability", "check grammar", "fix typos", "proofread for grammar", "improve readability", "polish wording", "语言润色", "修语法", or asks you to clean up the prose in a paper/chapter/section without wanting full content restructuring.

Improve unclear UX copy, error messages, microcopy, labels, and instructions to make interfaces easier to understand. Use when the user mentions confusing text, unclear labels, bad error messages, hard-to-follow instructions, or wanting better UX writing.

Review git diffs or file scopes for code reuse, quality, efficiency, and clarity issues, then optionally apply safe, behavior-preserving fixes.

Align a technical document with the actual code implementation and correct drift. Use when a user asks to update docs to match current behavior, audit a technical document against the repository, or fix stale architecture, API, workflow, or operator documentation.

Review a code change for changed behavior that could regress without reliable verification catching it. Use when checking whether a change is adequately verified.

当一段改动已经写完、要在收尾或合并前对它做一次独立审查时使用——如"审一遍这条分支、review 这次改动、这批代码有没有问题、帮我把关再合"。先把 BASE..HEAD 生成一份审查包一次读完，再按 correctness / readability / architecture / security / performance 五轴加测试质量逐项判定，输出带 file:line 的 Critical / Important / Minor 分级 findings。composable 层能力单元，通常由 execute-task 在整体验收时调用。不要用于：改动还没写完、只想跑测试、要的是动手修复而不是审查、评审需求或技术方案本身。

Continuous self-improvement through systematic logging, pattern detection, and behavioral updates. Use when: the owner corrects you, a task fails, you discover a better approach, or you notice a recurring pattern. Store raw learnings in .learnings/, update the specific skill or workflow that caused the issue when appropriate, and avoid vague promises to do better.

Improve unclear UX copy, error messages, microcopy, labels, and instructions to make interfaces easier to understand. Use when the user mentions confusing text, unclear labels, bad error messages, hard-to-follow instructions, or wanting better UX writing.

Manage significant changes during sprint execution. Use when the user says "correct course" or "propose sprint change"

Audits icon usage in a codebase, enforcing lucide-react as the single icon library, correct sizes, semantic colors, and accessibility standards, then applies fixes.

Improve unclear UX copy, error messages, microcopy, labels, and instructions. Makes interfaces easier to understand and use.

Manually improve corpus quality by adding missing docs and filling retrieval gaps

Improve unclear UX copy, error messages, microcopy, labels, and instructions. Makes interfaces easier to understand and use.

Audit and fix HTML metadata including page titles, meta descriptions, canonical URLs, Open Graph tags, Twitter cards, favicons, JSON-LD structured data, and robots directives. Use when adding SEO metadata, fixing social share previews, reviewing Open Graph tags, setting up canonical URLs, or shipping new pages that need correct meta tags.

Adapt a historical primary source for classroom use — modifying complexity and length while preserving features for sourcing, close reading, and corroboration. Use when a primary source is too complex for the target age group.

Reconcile canonical declarative documents under docs/ with verified implementation discoveries after a FULLY_IMPLEMENTED moonspec-verify verdict. Use when an orchestration run must decide whether verified discoveries show the owning canonical document is impossible, unclear, or inconsistent, apply the smallest correct doc update, or escalate ambiguous authority conflicts and deliberate divergences instead of editing.

根据用户要求增删 raw sources 或更新 wiki 内容