Results for “grant-review”

Write competitive research proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, and Taiwan NSTC with agency-specific formatting, review criteria, budget preparation, and compliance guidance.

Write grant reports with progress, financials, and outcomes. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with grant-report related tasks.

Create grant budgets with line items and justifications. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with grant-budget related tasks.

NIH grant research skill for clinical researchers. Grill-me intake (research idea + career stage + preliminary data + environment + submission posture + known institute targets) locks down the funding strategy before any search runs. Runs a 5-facet Consensus positioning analysis (with draft Significance/Innovation language), maps the research to the right NIH institutes and study sections via RePORTER, finds NOSIs and funded overlap, and produces an editable Word document (.docx) with budget/scope-aware mechanism recommendations, submission timelines, and a mandatory program officer recommendation. Use when the user asks about research funding or makes any grant-related request (e.g., 'grants for [topic]', 'find grants for my research idea', 'what grants match my research', 'help me find NIH funding', 'grant opportunities for my research'). NIH-only scope — non-NIH funders (PCORI, DOD CDMRP, VA, foundations) are out of scope and flagged at intake.

Write grant reports with progress, financials, and outcomes. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with grant-report related tasks.

通用跨模型审查：Review LLM 对任意研究制品进行独立评审，输出结构化评分、wiki 实体映射与改进建议

Draft a structured grant proposal from research ideas and literature. Supports KAKENHI (Japan), NSF (US), NSFC (China, including 面上/青年/优青/杰青/海外优青/重点), ERC (EU), DFG (Germany), SNSF (Switzerland), ARC (Australia), NWO (Netherlands), and generic formats. Use when user says "write grant", "grant proposal", "申請書", "write KAKENHI", "科研費", "基金申请", "写基金", "NSF proposal", or wants to turn research ideas into a funding application.

NIH grant research skill for clinical researchers. Grill-me intake (research idea + career stage + preliminary data + environment + submission posture + known institute targets) locks down the funding strategy before any search runs. Runs a 5-face...

Search for business grants, government funding, startup accelerators. Auto-fill applications.

Create grant budgets with line items and justifications. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with grant-budget related tasks.

Generates a strategic NIH funding overview as an editable .docx file, including research positioning analysis, institute mapping, targeted grant discovery, and strategic recommendations for clinical researchers.

Search Grants.gov for federal funding opportunities by keyword, agency, category, and eligibility, and retrieve detailed grant information.

帮助用户撰写高质量的文献综述类论文。提供从选题、文献检索、评估筛选、结构规划到最终写作的全流程指导。适用于需要撰写独立文献综述论文或学术论文中文献综述部分的用户。

Analyzes state merit review for non-covered securities offerings, applying NASAA Statements of Policy to cheap stock, promoter equity investment, voting rights, and promoter compensation. Produces examiner-ready comment responses with cap table analysis and negotiation strategy. Use when filing Reg A, Rule 504, intrastate, or direct public offerings in merit review states, responding to Blue Sky examiner comments, structuring offerings to avoid conditioning, or analyzing NASAA SOPs. Also trigger on cheap stock analysis, promoter equity tests, unequal voting rights review, state examiner correspondence, or phrases like "merit review issues" or "the state examiner sent comments."

Eng manager-mode plan review. (gstack)

针对 Modular RAG MCP Server 项目的老师式复习 Agent。按章节带领用户系统复习项目知识点，每道题互动问答、给出参考答案，复习结束后记录掌握进度，每次开始时回顾上次进度并建议继续或复习。Use when user says '复习项目', '帮我复习', '带我复习', '开始复习', '项目复习', 'review project', 'study review', '学习复习', '复盘', or wants to systematically review and study the project.

针对 Modular RAG MCP Server 项目的老师式复习 Agent。按章节带领用户系统复习项目知识点，每道题互动问答、给出参考答案，复习结束后记录掌握进度，每次开始时回顾上次进度并建议继续或复习。Use when user says '复习项目', '帮我复习', '带我复习', '开始复习', '项目复习', 'review project', 'study review', '学习复习', '复盘', or wants to systematically review and study the project.

Use `review-agent` for a high-risk Engineering Brief when a critical path, architecture boundary, material risk, or multiple downstream tasks need deeper design evidence. Skip ordinary work without those signals.

Runs a multi-perspective review of a pull request, including code quality, tests, and potential silent failures, then reports findings ranked by severity.

Spec Craft

Search, summarize, and synthesize economics literature. find research gaps, position your contribution.

Perform a read-only, defect-first review of a specified code change and return every actionable finding. Use when another agent delegates review of uncommitted changes, a base-branch diff, a commit, or custom review instructions.

Perform a read-only, defect-first review of a specified code change and return every actionable finding. Use when another agent delegates review of uncommitted changes, a base-branch diff, a commit, or custom review instructions.

Turn interactive commit reviews back on for the current herdr workspace.

Conduct systematic literature reviews by searching multiple academic databases, synthesizing findings, and generating professionally formatted documents with verified citations.

Dispatches a code-reviewer subagent to evaluate work against requirements and plan, then acts on the feedback before merging.

Use when a commit's changes are finished and about to be presented for review. Runs the checks that catch the objections the user would otherwise raise, before they spend time reviewing.

Requesting Code Review

Comprehensive code review using specialized agents — orchestrates code, comments, tests, errors, types, and simplify agents sequentially.

Runs read-only parallel review of a PR, branch, commit, or diff across bugs, security, tests, maintainability, performance, and UI.

Orients researchers to an unfamiliar academic field by searching Consensus, building a strategic search plan with PICO or other frameworks, and synthesizing findings into a formatted Word document.

Transforms uploaded course materials into exam-oriented study notes, practice questions, and scoring-focused explanations.

Review a pull request and POST the review to GitHub via `gh pr review`. Use when asked to review a PR, or when the github-activity poller fires a PR-opened / PR-review-requested event. Always submits after drafting — a review that stays in turn output and never reaches GitHub is a non-review.