Results for “iv-rank”

Monitor a list of tickers for key changes in price, IV rank, unusual activity, earnings dates, and score changes. Supports custom watchlists and a default hot options list.

Provides a single 0-100 cycle score blending VIX, SPY IV Rank, Put/Call ratio, and valuation percentile to determine offense vs. defense posture, based on Howard Marks' market cycle framework.

Ranks any list of impediments and their countermeasures using a value-stream scoring model (ROI, Cost to Implement, Ease of Deployment, Risk Factor) and a fixed prioritization formula.

Turn a pile of accounts into a stack-ranked priority list with a reason on every row. A layered score (gates first, then an evidence-weighted base rank over the signals you actually have, then bounded boosts for product usage and buyer intent) that stays fair across channels and never scores a blank field as a zero. Built for B2B GTM teams, customizable to your signals and your ICP. Trigger on "score these accounts", "rank by fit", "composite ICP score", "stack-rank my list", "who should I work first", "prioritize these leads", or any multi-signal account qualification.

Econometrics skill for instrumental variables and treatment effect estimation. Activates when the user asks about: "instrumental variables", "IV estimation", "2SLS", "two-stage least squares", "endogeneity", "weak instruments", "first stage", "Sargan test", "overidentification", "propensity score matching", "PSM", "average treatment effect", "ATT", "LATE", "local average treatment effect", "endogenous regressor", "instrument validity", "工具变量", "两阶段最小二乘", "内生性", "弱工具变量", "倾向得分匹配", "平均处理效应", "处理效应", "局部平均处理效应"

梳理IP网络信息并进行多维度评估打分。适用于评估小说、剧本等IP的改编价值、分析市场潜力和创新属性

Layer 4 of the keyword research pipeline. Spawns a "skeptical SEO" adversarial sub-agent to argue against every survivor of Layers 1-3. Catches mechanical-classifier blind spots — wrong SERP intent, hidden link-graph gauntlets, AIO trajectory shifts, vanity-rank metrics. Same pattern as quality-check's adversarial draft read, applied to keyword selection.

Calculate CVSS scores, interpret vector strings, and prioritize vulnerabilities using CVSS alongside EPSS and CISA KEV for effective risk-based remediation.

Rank a backlog of feature ideas by impact, effort, risk, and strategic alignment to identify the top 5 to pursue.

Perform a read-only, defect-first review of a specified code change and return every actionable finding. Use when another agent delegates review of uncommitted changes, a base-branch diff, a commit, or custom review instructions.

Reranking retrieved documents with cross-encoders and LLM rerankers. Cohere Rerank v3, Voyage rerank-2, BGE reranker, ColBERT late interaction, Jina reranker. Cost and latency tradeoffs, top-K in / top-N out strategy. USE WHEN: user mentions "rerank", "reranker", "cross-encoder", "Cohere Rerank", "Voyage rerank", "BGE reranker", "ColBERT", "Jina reranker", "bi-encoder" DO NOT USE FOR: initial retrieval - use `advanced-retrieval` or `hybrid-search`; query rewriting - use `query-transformations`; agent decisions - use `agentic-rag`

PASS/FAIL eval rubrics and alignment loops for Sid Orchestra (global). Use when the user says sid evals, @sid-evals, grade this, eval gate, alignment score, or wants to stop AI slop. Works in any workspace; bootstraps EVALS.md from ~/.cursor/skills/sid-orchestra/templates if missing.

Multi-dimensional lead qualification scoring. Evaluates leads against BANT criteria, firmographic fit, behavioral signals, and intent indicators. Outputs qualified/disqualified verdict with detailed reasoning.

Ranks weekly token unlocks by Absorption Ratio (unlock value / 7d avg volume) instead of supply percentage, with per-event cliff vs linear classification, recipient category, and a one-line market read.

Design and implement evaluation harnesses for models, agents, and code. Use when creating benchmarks, designing eval metrics, or comparing system outputs.

PASS/FAIL eval rubrics and alignment loops for Sid Orchestra. Use when the user says sid evals, @sid-evals, grade this, eval gate, alignment score, or wants to stop AI slop with evaluation gates.

Challenge decisions, surface counter-arguments, flag assumptions. Trigger: 'should I', 'is this right', 'critique', 'poke holes', 'second opinion', 'devil's advocate'. Auto-fired by ijfw-intent-router.

Identify what to measure, test, or track to de-risk a product or AI idea across internal and external risk dimensions.

Conduct internal audits against ISO/IEC 42001:2023 by identifying AIMS gaps, building an AI risk register with Annex A control mappings, and generating a 12-month Clause 9.2 audit plan.

High-performance graph analysis for beads issue tracker using 9 metrics (PageRank, Betweenness, HITS, Critical Path, etc). Provides AI-driven task prioritization, dependency analysis, and architectural health monitoring via robot protocol.

Prüft die Sanierungsfähigkeit eines Unternehmens im Insolvenzverfahren anhand von Fortbestehensprognose, Krisenursachen und integrierter Planung; liefert eine Fristen- und Risikoampel mit Sofortschritten.

VS-Enhanced Literature Review Strategist - Comprehensive support for multiple review methodologies Full VS 5-Phase process: Prevents Mode Collapse and presents creative search strategies Supports: Systematic Review (PRISMA 2020), Scoping Review (JBI/PRISMA-ScR), Meta-Synthesis, Realist Synthesis, Narrative Review, Rapid Review Use when: conducting any type of literature review, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, scoping reviews, finding prior research Triggers: literature review, PRISMA, systematic review, scoping review, meta-synthesis, realist synthesis, narrative review, rapid review

Evaluate and rank agent results by metric or LLM judge for an AgentHub session.

Ranks mutual connections by bridge value for warm introductions, using a weighted graph model with decay and engagement bonuses.

Score and iteratively improve marketing content with an expert panel until 90+. Use for content quality gates, expert panel reviews, editorial scoring, or when another skill needs a content QA loop.

Identify and prioritize risks by impact and controllability. Use for risk management, project planning, and strategic decision support.

Score and rank options contracts for any ticker using a multi-factor model covering liquidity, IV attractiveness, Greeks balance, and risk/reward. Returns scored option chains with the best contracts highlighted.

Use `review-agent` for a high-risk Engineering Brief when a critical path, architecture boundary, material risk, or multiple downstream tasks need deeper design evidence. Skip ordinary work without those signals.

Agent validation v4.3.0 — Make agents act effectively by disabling harmful actions, lowering gates, and injecting cross-run learning

Evaluate and rank agent results by metric or LLM judge for an AgentHub session.

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.

NIH grant research skill for clinical researchers. Grill-me intake (research idea + career stage + preliminary data + environment + submission posture + known institute targets) locks down the funding strategy before any search runs. Runs a 5-facet Consensus positioning analysis (with draft Significance/Innovation language), maps the research to the right NIH institutes and study sections via RePORTER, finds NOSIs and funded overlap, and produces an editable Word document (.docx) with budget/scope-aware mechanism recommendations, submission timelines, and a mandatory program officer recommendation. Use when the user asks about research funding or makes any grant-related request (e.g., 'grants for [topic]', 'find grants for my research idea', 'what grants match my research', 'help me find NIH funding', 'grant opportunities for my research'). NIH-only scope — non-NIH funders (PCORI, DOD CDMRP, VA, foundations) are out of scope and flagged at intake.

Expert en croissance virale (K-factor, network effects, referral loops, embedded virality)