Results for “lawsuit”

The Sovereign Litigation Protocol (SLP-2026). A recursive, high-fidelity framework for autonomous advocacy, multi-jurisdictional discovery, and the algorithmic resolution of civil and commercial disputes.

Drafts professional legal letters for personal injury litigation including settlement demands, cease-and-desist, notice letters, and response correspondence. Tailors tone by recipient type. Use when drafting demand letters, pre-suit correspondence, insurance claim letters, cease-and-desist notices, or litigation response letters.

Evaluates whether suing is worthwhile, explains the litigation process from filing to resolution, and guides case preparation and settlement negotiations.

Drafts a Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court under Rules 10, 13, 14, and 33. Enforces Rule 10 criteria (circuit splits, precedent conflicts, important federal questions), jurisdictional verification under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1254/1257, timeliness, document structure, and booklet formatting. Use when seeking discretionary Supreme Court review, filing a cert petition, or drafting a writ of certiorari.

Searches the web, legal databases, case law, patents, and case.dev knowledge base via the casedev CLI. Use when the user mentions "search", "legal research", "find cases", "case law", "patent search", "web search", "fetch URL", "webfetch", "legal skills", or needs to research legal topics, find similar cases, or retrieve web content.

Drafts legal briefs with case law citations, argument structure, and jurisdictional considerations

Search US federal court opinions, dockets, and judges via CourtListener through an MCP server.

Think through any legal situation like a lawyer. Issue spotting, jurisdiction, risk assessment, actionable conclusions.

Drafts a Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict (JNOV) under FRCP 50(b) or state equivalents, with alternative new-trial request. Builds element-by-element evidentiary insufficiency arguments using transcript citations and preserves the appellate record. Use when drafting JNOV motions, post-trial motions, renewed judgment as a matter of law, or challenging jury verdicts for insufficient evidence.

Drafts cognovit promissory notes with confession of judgment provisions, gated by mandatory jurisdictional enforceability research, usury compliance, and statutory disclosure requirements. Advises on alternatives where cognovit clauses are prohibited. Use when drafting cognovit notes, confession of judgment instruments, or loan documents requiring waiver-of-defense provisions.

Bereitet Verkehrsunfall-Mandate im Zivilprozess vor: Haftungsanalyse, Schadensaufstellung, Schmerzensgeld und Klageschrift-Entwürfe nach StVG, BGB und VVG.

Root reference for litigation practice spanning civil, criminal, and administrative proceedings. Provides sub-area taxonomy, core principles, and routing guidance. Use when classifying litigation work, routing to a sub-practice skill, or applying general litigation standards.

Provides verified official legal references for business formation, labor, and privacy across the USA, Canada, and all 27 EU member states, with links to government portals and gazettes.

Drafts litigation-ready U.S. pre-suit demand letters that function as settlement instruments and defensible future exhibits. Enforces element-driven narratives, verified authority, damages methodology, and ethics guardrails. Use this skill when the user mentions demand letter, pre-suit demand, breach and cure notice, settlement demand, insurance policy-limits demand, Stowers demand, FDCPA collection letter, notice of intent to file, cease and desist demand for payment, or pre-litigation correspondence. Also trigger when the user asks about FRE 408 framing, contractual notice compliance, statutory pre-suit prerequisites, evidence preservation notices, or quantifying damages for a demand package. Skill includes 14 verified real-letter exemplars referenced from `references/ARCHETYPE-INDEX.md`.

Draft a legal document — a pleading, motion, brief section, or contract clause — with verified citations, flagged assumptions, and mandatory supervisor review before filing.

Drafts U.S. internal legal memoranda using IRAC structure to analyze issues, synthesize authority, assess risks, and recommend strategy. Use when asked to draft a research memo, internal memo, issue analysis, case strategy memo, or any IRAC-based legal analysis.

Drafts formal responses to governmental Notices of Violation, covering acknowledgment, factual timeline, legal defenses, mitigation, and proposed corrective action. Use when responding to environmental enforcement actions, regulatory citations, compliance violations, or governmental NOVs from agencies including EPA, OSHA, state environmental departments, or local code enforcement.

Draft an internal legal research memo for the supervising attorney with verified authority and flagged open questions.

Validate user claims against codebase and git history, trace to root cause, and propose a fix

Write legal memoranda with analysis and conclusions. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with legal-memo related tasks.

Produces an attorney-ready memo from a corpus of legal documents supplied by the user. Use when a user shows up with a folder, zip, or vault of case documents and asks for a case summary, case evaluation, litigation package, intake memo, matter overview, or "can you summarize this case for me." The skill ingests the corpus into a searchable index, OCRs anything non-searchable, inventories and diagnoses the practice area, loads the appropriate practice-area playbook module(s) (PI/tort, commercial litigation, IP infringement, or user-authored extensions), iteratively searches the corpus across eight core dimensions plus any module-specific dimensions, defers specialized document clusters (depositions, medical records, discovery, liens) to dedicated sibling skills, and synthesizes a cited memo.

Investigates insider threat incidents involving employees, contractors, or trusted partners who misuse authorized access to steal data, sabotage systems, or violate security policies. Combines digital forensics, user behavior analytics, and HR/legal coordination to build an evidence-based case.

Use to audit how payment disputes, chargebacks and unrecognised-transaction claims are handled against scheme deadlines and evidence standards. Trigger for "audit our dispute handling", "chargeback quality review", "are we meeting scheme deadlines", unrecognised transaction claims, provisional credit decisions, or a customer complaining their dispute was rejected unfairly.

Prepare a DMCA 512(c) takedown notice or a 512(g) counter-notice for online copyright infringement with all statutory elements.

Use to reconstruct what actually happened to one customer across every conversation, channel and handoff, for an escalation, complaint, post-mortem or goodwill decision. Trigger for "build a timeline for this customer", "what happened on this case", "summarize the back-and-forth before I decide", "when were they first told", escalation summaries, complaint investigations, or a case spanning several tickets.

Produce a decision-ready legal briefing — daily digest, topic research, or incident write-up — scoped to what a non-lawyer stakeholder needs to decide or act on.

Preparation guideline for organizing a US provisional patent application with the USPTO

Supplements general deposition preparation with IP-specific examination frameworks for patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret cases. Covers witness strategies for inventors, accused infringers, licensing witnesses, and experts. Use alongside @deposition-preparation and @deposition-expert-witness when planning IP depositions, drafting outlines, or analyzing witness strategy.

Use to design or audit a QA dispute and appeal workflow with timeboxes, adjudication standards, and second-level consistency so appeals improve trust instead of rewriting scores without rules. Trigger for "QA appeal process", "agents disputing scores", "who adjudicates QA disputes", "overturn rate too high", second-level review standards, or calibration erosion from ad-hoc score changes.

Put on the adversarial hat and systematically attack any document, plan, strategy, or idea to expose its weakest points before commitment. Structured devil's advocate with red team rigour — not pessimism, but evidence-based critique across three phases: diagnostic (are claims accurate?), creative (is the problem artificially constrained?), challenge (are solutions robust?). Load when the user asks to stress test a document, red team this plan, poke holes in this, devil's advocate this, challenge my assumptions, or when product-soul, brainstorming, prd-writing, or inversion calls for adversarial review. Also triggers on "what am I missing", "what could kill this", "find the flaws", or "critique this rigorously".

Use when practicing family law.

Draft privacy policies, terms of service, disclaimers, and legal notices with GDPR, CCPA, and other regulatory compliance.

Prüft Prozessportfolio-Status: Fristen, Form, Zuständigkeit, Rechtsweg und Sofortmaßnahmen; liefert eine Fristen- und Risikoampel mit Sofortschritten.

Patent prior-art and landscape intelligence skill — not generic patent help. Commits to one of five sub-use-cases via forcing intake (novelty search / freedom-to-operate / competitive landscape / acquisition diligence / litigation prior-art) before any search runs. Searches Google Patents, Espacenet, USPTO, and optionally Lens.org for citation-graph signals. Output is an editable Word document (.docx) with verdict, ranked closest art (claim-text extracted), CPC-class-aware landscape, family-resolved hits, geographic coverage, FTO flags where applicable, strategy recommendations, and full audit log. Use when the user asks for patent searching or analysis (e.g., 'prior art search for [invention]', 'freedom to operate analysis for [product]'). Produces search signal, not legal advice — always recommends consulting a patent attorney before filing or licensing decisions. Trademark, copyright, and trade-secret questions are out of scope.

Redige a acao para desfazer contrato civil — distingue resolucao por inadimplemento (CC 474-475 — clausula resolutiva expressa opera de pleno direito, tacita exige interpelacao judicial; parte lesada pede resolucao + perdas e danos), resilicao por vontade (distrato 472, denuncia unilateral 473) e resolucao por onerosidade excessiva (CC 478-480). Inclui excecao de contrato nao cumprido (476-477). Use quando o operador disser rescindir contrato, resolver contrato, distrato, inadimplemento contratual, quebra de contrato, ou desfazer um contrato civil.