Results for “llm-judge”

Evaluate and rank agent results by metric or LLM judge for an AgentHub session.

Build automated evaluation pipelines for Python LLM applications using real LLM calls and structured test datasets.

Orchestrator for the eval-output skill suite — evaluate LLM and agent outputs for quality, accuracy, helpfulness, and safety using structured rubrics and LLM-as-judge techniques. Load when the user says "evaluate this output", "score this response", "run an eval", "LLM as judge", "evaluate agent output", "how good is this response", "rate this answer", "eval this", or provides an LLM output that should be assessed for quality. Single entry point for all output evaluation workflows.

LLM output evaluation — automated metrics, LLM-as-judge, A/B testing, regression testing. Use when measuring LLM output quality, comparing prompt or model versions, building an automated eval pipeline, setting up regression tests for prompt changes, or evaluating RAG systems and bias/safety.

Run evaluation tasks against a NeMo Platform server using the Evaluator plugin CLI and Python SDK.

Build evaluation frameworks for agent systems, covering rubric design, test set creation, and automated evaluation pipelines.

Run Comet's Opik — open-source LLM observability, evaluation, and optimization — from one routing-first skill: install the Python/TypeScript SDK, stand up a server (Comet.com cloud, Docker Compose via `./opik.sh`, or Kubernetes/Helm), wire tracing through `@opik.track` or one of 50+ framework integrations (OpenAI, Anthropic, LangChain, LangGraph, LlamaIndex, CrewAI, DSPy, Ollama, Bedrock, Vercel AI SDK, …), score outputs with LLM-as-a-judge metrics (Hallucination, Moderation, Answer Relevance, Context Precision), and run Datasets/Experiments evaluations including PyTest CI gates. Use when the user wants LLM tracing, prompt evaluation, production LLM monitoring, agent optimization, or guardrails with Opik. Triggers on: opik, comet opik, opik configure, opik.sh, llm observability, llm tracing, llm as a judge, hallucination metric, prompt evaluation, opik dashboard, opik guardrails, agent optimizer.

Turn observed run outputs into eval-spec Artifacts, paired Gates, and policy bindings. Use when creating or calibrating automated, human, or LLM-as-judge eval gates for processkit workflows.

Evaluate and rank agent results by metric or LLM judge for an AgentHub session. Use when the user runs /hub:eval or asks to score, compare, or pick a winner among completed AgentHub agents.

Evaluate and rank agent results by metric or LLM judge for an AgentHub session. Use when the user runs /hub:eval or asks to score, compare, or pick a winner among completed AgentHub agents.

Evaluate RAG pipelines with Ragas — measure faithfulness, answer relevancy, context precision/recall, and noise sensitivity using LLM-as-judge metrics; run automated test suite generation with TestsetGenerator; integrate with LangChain, LlamaIndex, and CI pipelines.

Build evaluation frameworks for agent systems with deterministic checks, regression suites, multi-dimensional rubrics, quality gates, production monitoring, and outcome measurement.

Implement iterative evaluation and refinement loops for AI agent outputs, using self-critique, evaluator-optimizer patterns, and rubric-based scoring to improve quality.

This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment.

实验判决门：Review LLM 独立评判实验结果 → 4 种判决路径 → 自动更新 claims confidence、ideas status、graph edges

Benchmarks long-context language models across 20 sub-tasks spanning 3k–200k tokens, covering retrieval, reasoning, summarization, and instruction understanding, with exact-match accuracy as the primary metric.

Build and improve AI or probabilistic software through evaluation-driven development. Use for LLM applications, agents, prompts, RAG, tool use, classifiers, model migrations, quality regressions, golden datasets, LLM-as-judge rubrics, benchmarks, or requests to add evals and measurable release gates. Pair with TDD for deterministic code; do not use as the primary guide for ordinary unit testing without model behavior.

選択肢(A/B/C)の深掘り比較→淘汰→推奨で判断負担を下げ判断の質を上げるスキル。5段階（L1固定3点/L1.5案拡張Diverge・自動/L2評価軸マトリクス/L3複数LLM弁証論/L4過去判断照合）。 「比較して」「深掘りして」「メリデメ教えて」「お勧めは？」「徹底的に」「過去の判断と照合」「前にどう決めたっけ」「/sentaku」等で発火。teian(浅)の深掘り要求を受け取り、brainstorming(深:設計全体)と棲み分け。

Meta's 7-8B specialized moderation model for LLM input/output filtering. 6 safety categories - violence/hate, sexual content, weapons, substances, self-harm, criminal planning. 94-95% accuracy. Deploy with vLLM, HuggingFace, Sagemaker. Integrates with NeMo Guardrails.

Meta's 86M prompt injection and jailbreak detector. Filters malicious prompts and third-party data for LLM apps. 99%+ TPR, <1% FPR. Fast (<2ms GPU). Multilingual (8 languages). Deploy with HuggingFace or batch processing for RAG security.

Expert in Langfuse - the open-source LLM observability platform. Covers tracing, prompt management, evaluation, datasets, and integration with LangChain, LlamaIndex, and OpenAI. Essential for debugging, monitoring, and improving LLM applications in production. Use when "langfuse, llm observability, llm tracing, prompt management, llm evaluation, monitor llm, debug llm, langfuse, observability, tracing, llm-monitoring, evaluation, prompt-management, debugging, analytics" mentioned.

Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team.

Meta's 7-8B specialized moderation model for LLM input/output filtering. 6 safety categories - violence/hate, sexual content, weapons, substances, self-harm, criminal planning. 94-95% accuracy. Deploy with vLLM, HuggingFace, Sagemaker. Integrates with NeMo Guardrails.

Provides expertise in Langfuse for LLM observability, including tracing, prompt management, evaluation, and integration with LangChain, LlamaIndex, and OpenAI.

通用跨模型审查：Review LLM 对任意研究制品进行独立评审，输出结构化评分、wiki 实体映射与改进建议

Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team.

Optimizes LLM inference with NVIDIA TensorRT for maximum throughput and lowest latency on NVIDIA GPUs (A100/H100).

Expert in Langfuse - the open-source LLM observability platform. Covers tracing, prompt management, evaluation, datasets, and integration with LangChain, LlamaIndex, and OpenAI. Essential for debugging, monitoring, and improving LLM applications in production.

Expert in Langfuse - the open-source LLM observability platform. Covers tracing, prompt management, evaluation, datasets, and integration with LangChain, LlamaIndex, and OpenAI. Essential for debuggin

Evaluates LLMs across 60+ academic benchmarks (MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, HellaSwag). Use when benchmarking model quality, comparing models, reporting academic results, or tracking training progress. Industry standard used by EleutherAI, HuggingFace, and major labs. Supports HuggingFace, vLLM, APIs.