Results for “plan-reviewer”

Use this when reviewing a full system design, architecture plan, or cross-service implementation for operational risk, boundary clarity, security posture, deployability, and maintainability.

Dispatches a code-reviewer subagent to evaluate work against requirements and plan, then acts on the feedback before merging.

Compare, cross-review, and merge competing plans from multiple agents into one executable direction with a clear handoff.

Eng manager-mode plan review. (gstack)

Use this when reviewing a feature, service, API, auth design, integration, job system, or deployment plan for security weaknesses, unsafe trust assumptions, input risks, or privilege issues.

Routes ambiguous review or planning to one leaf workflow. Do not use for a clear code, security, UI, architecture, or migration review.

Sharpens and stress-tests an existing plan file through multiple codebase-grounded review passes, editing it in place and recording every finding and iteration in cross-referenced companion files. Use this skill whenever the user wants to iterate on, refine, tighten, or improve a plan. Also use it when the user asks to verify, validate, or confirm feasibility of an approach. Does not implement plan steps, write test plans, review code, or investigate bugs, and does not generate new plans from scratch — use plan-a-feature for a new plan. Runs its review rounds to completion without pausing between them; to review each round as it lands, use pairing.

Reviews development plans for gaps, hidden assumptions, critical misses, and XP violations, then presents prioritized findings for confirmation.

针对 Modular RAG MCP Server 项目的老师式复习 Agent。按章节带领用户系统复习项目知识点，每道题互动问答、给出参考答案，复习结束后记录掌握进度，每次开始时回顾上次进度并建议继续或复习。Use when user says '复习项目', '帮我复习', '带我复习', '开始复习', '项目复习', 'review project', 'study review', '学习复习', '复盘', or wants to systematically review and study the project.

Comprehensive code review using specialized agents — orchestrates code, comments, tests, errors, types, and simplify agents sequentially.

Auto-review pipeline — reads the full CEO, design, eng, and DX review skills from disk and runs them sequentially with auto-decisions using 6 decision principles. (gstack)

针对 Modular RAG MCP Server 项目的老师式复习 Agent。按章节带领用户系统复习项目知识点，每道题互动问答、给出参考答案，复习结束后记录掌握进度，每次开始时回顾上次进度并建议继续或复习。Use when user says '复习项目', '帮我复习', '带我复习', '开始复习', '项目复习', 'review project', 'study review', '学习复习', '复盘', or wants to systematically review and study the project.

Revisa criticamente as especificações geradas pelo reversa-writer — encontra inconsistências, reclassifica confiança e gera perguntas para validação humana. Use na fase de revisão de uma análise de engenharia reversa.

Read, create, and review PDF files with visual rendering checks using Poppler, reportlab, pdfplumber, and pypdf.

Transform text plans into interactive visual documents with diagrams, code snippets, and review surfaces for coding agents.

Review and refactor code according to project-specific coding guidelines and instructions.

Use for thorough code review before merging changes.

CEO/founder-mode plan review. Rethink the problem, find the 10-star product, challenge premises, expand scope when it creates a better product. Four modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), SELECTIVE EXPANSION (hold scope + cherry-pick expansions), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials). Use when asked to "think bigger", "expand scope", "strategy review", "rethink this", or "is this ambitious enough". Proactively suggest when the user is questioning scope or ambition of a plan, or when the plan feels like it could be thinking bigger. (gstack)

CEO/founder-mode plan review. (gstack)

Analyze the available skill set and recommend candidate groups that could be consolidated into sub-skill bundles. Read-only — proposes a plan, does not move files.

Strategic planning with optional interview workflow

Build a compact, validation-gated implementation plan for multi-step, risky, or ambiguous work — typically when phases need explicit checkpoints, the change touches multiple files/services, or the user wants alignment before execution. Output goes to `.claude/plans/<topic>.md` (or `.agents/plans/`) with goal, in/out-of-scope, phased steps, validation per phase, and replanning triggers. Skip for trivial single-file fixes, bug investigations (use `tracer`), or open-ended exploration (use `explore`). Pair with `ship` once the plan ends and merge work begins.

Automates code review for pull requests across 14+ languages, analyzing complexity, risk, code quality, and generating structured review reports.

Design grading plans. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with grading-plan related tasks.

`analysis-agent`/`task-agent`/`review-agent`: use when code needs correctness, security, performance, maintainability, or hallucinated-API review; skip when no review is needed.

通用跨模型审查：Review LLM 对任意研究制品进行独立评审，输出结构化评分、wiki 实体映射与改进建议

Review governed memory proposals, policy tags, tombstones, and effective memory.

PRISMA Scoping Review Pipeline

Simulates a complete international journal peer review process with 5 dynamically configured reviewers, producing structured editorial decisions and revision roadmaps.

PR Review Expert