Results for “review-gates”

Provides reviewer-style audit and deep review for academic papers in LaTeX, Typst, and PDF formats, producing structured issue bundles, pass/fail gates, and revision roadmaps.

Use only at validation, integration, completion, release, or drift-review boundaries. Do not load for every implementation step.

Orchestrate autonomous AI development pipelines through your Kanban board, managing multi-worker Claude Code dispatch, deterministic quality gates, adversarial review, per-task cost tracking, and crash-proof pipeline execution.

Gates a git branch before merge by running code review, security, test, and accessibility passes on the diff, then emits a single verdict.

Coordinates five specialized agents (planning, research, code, review, deploy) into a pipeline that ships features from spec to production with automated gates.

Structures a bounded spec-build-review development loop with explicit scope, stop conditions, and human approval gates for risky or ambiguous work.

Creates actionable work plans through interactive interviews, direct planning, consensus loops, or plan review, with quality gates and optional multi-agent deliberation.

Runs a bounded spec-build-review development loop with explicit scope, stop conditions, and human approval gates for risky or ambiguous work.

Runs a bounded spec-build-review development loop with explicit scope, stop conditions, and human approval gates for risky or ambiguous work.

Runs a bounded spec-build-review development loop with explicit scope, stop conditions, and human approval gates for risky or ambiguous work.

Runs a bounded spec-build-review development loop with explicit scope, stop conditions, and human approval gates for risky or ambiguous work.

`analysis-agent`/`task-agent`/`review-agent`: use for structure, workspace or package bootstrap, config, scripts, or quality gates; skip without an initialization decision.

Quality Gates

Use `analysis-agent` to map acceptance to validation, `task-agent` to add or run bounded tests, and `review-agent` to assess proof coverage. Skip work with no material change or already-fresh complete validation.

Creates a GitHub pull request with an auto-generated summary, running mandatory pre-commit and code-quality review gates, plus optional deep-review subagents, and posts findings into the PR body.

Iterate on a pull request until actionable CI checks pass and high/medium review feedback is addressed, stopping at human approval, draft, or merge gates.

Decide whether an article deserves publication through hard checks and skeptical comparison.

Use this skill for SEO checks in CI, metadata, canonicals, links, robots, sitemap, noindex regressions. Trigger when the task involves seo work related to SEO CI Quality Gate, implementation, audits, debugging, strategy, or validation.

Gatekeeping Git/PR by classifying change essence and recommending granularity, naming, and strategy. Use when PR preparation or commit strategy is needed.

Benchmark-relative quality gate. Scores the draft against the research dossier's beat spec (depth, consensus coverage, evidence) plus AI-tell and voice signals, runs an adversarial read armed with the SERP benchmark, and emits the verdict that gates the pipeline.

Fact-forcing gate that blocks Edit/Write/Bash (including MultiEdit) and demands concrete investigation (importers, data schemas, user instruction) before allowing the action. Measurably improves output quality by +2.25 points vs ungated agents.

Runs a structured code review as a pre-commit or pre-ship gate, supporting multiple review engines and scope governance.

Fact-forcing gate that blocks Edit/Write/Bash (including MultiEdit) and demands concrete investigation (importers, data schemas, user instruction) before allowing the action. Measurably improves output quality by +2.25 points vs ungated agents.

Read-only audit of CI gate logic — silent bypass, ratchet gaming, conflicting conditions, required checks that are not, and accreted duplicate gates. Use when "can CI be bypassed", "why did a regression pass CI", "we have too many overlapping checks". Cost/speed → audit-cicd. Consolidation → housekeep-gates.

Guardian of V.A.I.R.E. quality standards (Value/Agency/Identity/Resilience/Echo). Handles pre-release evaluation, scorecard assessment, and pass/fail determination. Use when UX quality gates are needed. Does not write code.

Manage Gate entities — validation checkpoints that WorkItems, scopes, or policy applications must pass (code review, security scan, tests). Use when defining or updating a checkpoint for v2 workflow surfaces — code review, tests green, security scan, stakeholder approval.

Use `analysis-agent` to analyze permissions, secrets, sensitive data, trust boundaries, and injection; `task-agent` to implement controls; and `review-agent` to assess evidence. Skip self-review and no-trust-impact work.

Run the Legal Builder Hub security-review gate on a candidate legal skill — inspect its manifest and body for unsafe behavior before any install is allowed.

Review a ticket or PR through focused specialist lenses: scope, architecture, security, tests, AC coverage, and PR metadata.

Blocks Claude from finishing a session until deterministic quality checks pass: learning library freshness, disk space, and rationalization pattern detection.