Results for “review-management”

Provides HR business partner guidance for organizational planning, hiring, performance management, talent reviews, and employee relations, with templates for role design, interview rubrics, onboarding plans, and communication.

Provides a comprehensive security checklist and code patterns for authentication, input validation, secrets management, SQL injection prevention, XSS, CSRF, rate limiting, and sensitive data exposure.

Delegate coding tasks to the OpenCode CLI, including one-shot runs, interactive sessions, and PR reviews.

Documents AI-built apps with architecture, permissions, secrets, and test coverage maps to make them reviewable before shipping.

Automates GitHub Actions, Issues, and PR management for CI/CD, project tracking, and code review workflows.

Splits oversized pull requests into sequential, reviewable chunks under 300 lines using stacked PRs or feature branch chains, with dependency tracking and review budget management.

Conduct systematic reviews of privileged accounts to validate access rights, identify excessive permissions, and enforce least privilege across PAM infrastructure.

Conduct systematic access reviews and certifications to ensure users have appropriate access rights aligned with their roles, covering review campaign design, reviewer selection, risk-based prioritization, and remediation tracking for compliance with SOX, HIPAA, and PCI DSS.

Reviews unverified wiki pages flagged as explored: false, presenting them for human confirmation, editing, skipping, or deletion, and updating their status accordingly.

Use this when reviewing or designing how secrets, API keys, service credentials, signing keys, tokens, and environment-specific credentials are stored, loaded, rotated, and kept out of untrusted runtimes.

Guides the periodic DPIA review lifecycle including trigger identification for regulatory changes, new data categories, technology changes, and breach incidents. Covers version control, stakeholder sign-off procedures, and DPIA register management per Art. 35(11). Keywords: DPIA review, PIA update, review cadence, version control, Art. 35(11), periodic review, trigger events, stakeholder sign-off.

Guides designing or reviewing Lightning Web Components for keyboard access, semantic labeling, and focus management, prioritizing base components over custom ARIA.

Eng manager-mode plan review. (gstack)

Manage, inventory, standardize, migrate, and test reusable Codex skills for the MetaSkill repository. Use when Codex needs to inspect local skills, convert a personal workflow into a public skill candidate, normalize skill folder shape, plan skill promotion, or decide whether a skill belongs in skill-management, publication-review, or skill-examples.

Reviews and tailors Product Manager resumes against 10 best practices including the XYZ+S formula, keyword optimization, and job-specific customization.

通用跨模型审查：Review LLM 对任意研究制品进行独立评审，输出结构化评分、wiki 实体映射与改进建议

Write, review, or improve SwiftUI code following best practices for state management, view composition, performance, macOS-specific APIs, and iOS 26+ Liquid Glass adoption. Use when building new SwiftUI features, refactoring existing views, reviewing code quality, or adopting modern SwiftUI patterns.

针对 Modular RAG MCP Server 项目的老师式复习 Agent。按章节带领用户系统复习项目知识点，每道题互动问答、给出参考答案，复习结束后记录掌握进度，每次开始时回顾上次进度并建议继续或复习。Use when user says '复习项目', '帮我复习', '带我复习', '开始复习', '项目复习', 'review project', 'study review', '学习复习', '复盘', or wants to systematically review and study the project.

Transforms uploaded course materials into exam-oriented study notes, practice questions, and scoring-focused explanations.

Analyze the available skill set and recommend candidate groups that could be consolidated into sub-skill bundles. Read-only — proposes a plan, does not move files.

针对 Modular RAG MCP Server 项目的老师式复习 Agent。按章节带领用户系统复习项目知识点，每道题互动问答、给出参考答案，复习结束后记录掌握进度，每次开始时回顾上次进度并建议继续或复习。Use when user says '复习项目', '帮我复习', '带我复习', '开始复习', '项目复习', 'review project', 'study review', '学习复习', '复盘', or wants to systematically review and study the project.

Eng manager-mode plan review. Lock in the execution plan — architecture, data flow, diagrams, edge cases, test coverage, performance. Walks through issues interactively with opinionated recommendations. Use when asked to "review the architecture", "engineering review", or "lock in the plan". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan or design doc and is about to start coding — to catch architecture issues before implementation. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "tech review", "technical review", "plan engineering review".

Routes quality reviews to specialized critic agents based on file type or flags, covering peer review, code review, and manuscript polish.

Routes ambiguous review or planning to one leaf workflow. Do not use for a clear code, security, UI, architecture, or migration review.

The art of reviewing code that improves both the codebase and the developer - sharing knowledge, maintaining standards, and building cultureUse when "code review, PR review, pull request, merge request, review comments, LGTM, review feedback, approve PR, request changes, review checklist, code quality, review standards, code-review, pull-request, PR, quality, standards, feedback, collaboration, mentoring" mentioned.

Converts a markdown code review or PR writeup with diff blocks and severity-tagged callouts into a single-file two-column HTML review with jump navigation and a named reviewer footer.

Classifies code review findings to choose the smallest correct response, preventing one-patch-per-comment churn.

Forge reviews its own skill updates, review history, and research outputs before publishing them.

Review pull requests against repository standards using automated validation and manual content review.

Use when a skill needs the user to interactively review code changes in revdiff mid-workflow — working changes, staged changes, or a specific commit — then read their annotations back. Takes a review mode.