Results for “scientific-method”

Audit websites and landing pages for conversion issues and design evidence-based A/B tests using a scientific, customer-centric methodology.

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality by assessing experimental design, identifying biases and confounders, and applying evidence grading frameworks like GRADE and Cochrane Risk of Bias.

Search scientific papers and retrieve structured experimental data extracted from full-text studies via the BGPT MCP server, returning 25+ fields per paper including methods, results, sample sizes, quality scores, and conclusions.

Generate novel research ideas through structured, conversational brainstorming that explores interdisciplinary connections, challenges assumptions, and identifies research gaps.

Write scientific manuscripts in full paragraphs using IMRAD structure, with citations (APA/AMA/Vancouver), figures/tables, and reporting guidelines (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA) for research papers and journal submissions.

Core skill for the deep research and writing tool. Write scientific manuscripts in full paragraphs (never bullet points). Use two-stage process: (1) create section outlines with key points using research-lookup, (2) convert to flowing prose. IMRAD structure, citations (APA/AMA/Vancouver), figures/tables, reporting guidelines (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA), for research papers and journal submissions.

Challenge system assumptions against accumulated evidence. Triages observations and tensions, detects patterns, generates proposals. The scientific method applied to knowledge systems. Triggers on "/rethink", "review observations", "challenge assumptions", "what have I learned".

Build visually engaging scientific slide decks for conferences, seminars, defenses, and research talks with structured planning, design templates, and automated image generation.

Philosophy of science methodology examining how research programs evolve through proofs and refutations

Econometrics skill for Synthetic Control Method (SCM). Activates when the user asks about "synthetic control", "SCM", "placebo test", "synthetic DID", "合成控制", "安慰剂检验", "合成反事实", "合成DID".

Experimental methodology and statistical rigor specialist. Use when the user asks to talk to Breach, requests the methodologist, or needs experiment design review, ablation planning, and reproducibility protocols.

Provides the shared STORM methodology, artifact layout, stage-gating contract, citation hygiene, and retrieval fallback. Use when executing any /storm:* skill (generate, research, outline, write, polish). Internal knowledge; never user-invocable.

Systematic research methodology for formulating problems, building evidence-based arguments, and communicating findings in academic contexts. For scholarly writing, thesis development, and knowledge contribution. NOT for creative writing, journalistic reporting, or business analytics.

Orchestrate parallel scientist agents for comprehensive analysis with AUTO mode

Build slide decks and presentations for research talks. Use this for making PowerPoint slides, conference presentations, seminar talks, research presentations, thesis defense slides, or any scientific talk. Provides slide structure, design templates, timing guidance, and visual validation. Works with PowerPoint and LaTeX Beamer.

Stress-test ideas, plans, and decisions using structured critical reasoning across five modes: Socratic questioning, dialectic, pre-mortem, red teaming, and evidence audit.

Runs Stanford's STORM pipeline to produce Wikipedia-quality research articles with citations, using Claude models and a search engine API.

Select evidence-based study strategies matched to material type, learning goal, and student habits. Use when advising students on revision techniques, homework, or independent study approaches.

Plan and synthesize product/user research with method rigor: select the right method for the goal, compute defensible sample sizes with confidence labels, and cluster coded observations into insights while flagging single-source anecdotes.

Uses two independent review agents to verify output quality, requiring both to pass before shipping.

Enforces a disciplined, evidence-based debugging protocol. Use when the user reports a bug, an unexpected behavior, a broken test, or asks "why is X not working?". Prevents premature fixes and treats symptoms. Blocks code changes until a root cause is confirmed.

Create publication-quality scientific diagrams using Nano Banana Pro AI with smart iterative refinement. Uses Gemini 3 Pro for quality review. Only regenerates if quality is below threshold for your document type. Specialized in neural network architectures, system diagrams, flowcharts, biological pathways, and complex scientific visualizations.

NIH grant research skill for clinical researchers. Grill-me intake (research idea + career stage + preliminary data + environment + submission posture + known institute targets) locks down the funding strategy before any search runs. Runs a 5-facet Consensus positioning analysis (with draft Significance/Innovation language), maps the research to the right NIH institutes and study sections via RePORTER, finds NOSIs and funded overlap, and produces an editable Word document (.docx) with budget/scope-aware mechanism recommendations, submission timelines, and a mandatory program officer recommendation. Use when the user asks about research funding or makes any grant-related request (e.g., 'grants for [topic]', 'find grants for my research idea', 'what grants match my research', 'help me find NIH funding', 'grant opportunities for my research'). NIH-only scope — non-NIH funders (PCORI, DOD CDMRP, VA, foundations) are out of scope and flagged at intake.

Applies quantitative and qualitative analysis techniques, interprets experimental data, validates procedures, and selects appropriate methods with uncertainty quantification.

Accelerate LLM inference using speculative decoding, Medusa multiple heads, and lookahead decoding techniques for 1.5-3.6× speedup without quality loss.

4-phase systematic debugging methodology with root cause analysis and evidence-based verification. Use when debugging complex issues.

Provides nine skills for Nature-journal-family academic publishing, covering figure creation, prose polishing, manuscript writing, citation formatting, data availability statements, paper reading, reviewer responses, paper-to-PPT conversion, and academic search via an MCP server.

Conduct technical research on technologies and architecture. Use when the user says they would like to do or produce a technical research report

Search Google Scholar and PubMed for papers, extract accurate metadata, validate citations, and generate properly formatted BibTeX entries.

Create publication-ready scientific figures with multi-panel layouts, significance annotations, error bars, colorblind-safe palettes, and journal-specific formatting using matplotlib, seaborn, and plotly.