Market Brand

Brand Voice Analysis and Guidelines Generation

Skill Purpose

Analyze a brand's voice, tone, and messaging across all available channels and generate a comprehensive brand voice guidelines document. This skill examines how a brand communicates, identifies patterns and inconsistencies, and produces actionable guidelines that any writer or marketer can follow to maintain brand consistency.

When to Use

• User wants to understand or document a brand's voice
• User needs brand voice guidelines for a team, freelancers, or agency
• User wants to ensure consistency across marketing channels
• User is rebranding or refining their brand identity
• User wants to compare their brand voice to competitors
• Triggered by /market brand <url> or /market brand

Dynamic Workflow orchestration

Brand voice analysis is multi-angle by nature: the truth lives in many separate pieces of copy, and each voice dimension is its own lens. Run it as a fan-out, not a linear read.

1. Plan (you, the orchestrator). Resolve the brand URL and enumerate the source surfaces to fetch (the Step 1 list). This is an unknown-size discovery: keep pulling pages/profiles loop-until-dry — stop when new sources stop revealing new voice signals (diminishing evidence), capped by the Step 1 tiers (primary → secondary → tertiary).
2. Fan out parallel sub-agents — natural units of THIS skill:
   • Source harvesters (one per surface group: site copy, blog, social, email, ads/microcopy) — extract verbatim quotes only, no interpretation. File-disjoint, so parallel-safe.
   • Dimension scorers (one each: Formal↔Casual, Serious↔Playful, Technical↔Simple, Reserved↔Bold) — each scores 1-10 from the harvested quotes with ≥3 cited examples.
   • Archetype mapper, vocabulary miner, competitor-voice comparator (reuses /market competitors output if present), consistency auditor — one agent each.
3. Adversarially verify (≥3 skeptic graders, 2-of-3 consensus). Before accepting any score or archetype call, dispatch skeptic graders that try to falsify it: "Does the cited quote actually prove a 7/10 casual, or is it 4/10?" "Is the 'Innovator' archetype contradicted by the hedged claims on the pricing page?" A dimension score or archetype ships only on 2-of-3 agreement; on a split, re-harvest more quotes and re-grade. Reject any claim whose cited evidence a grader can overturn.
4. Synthesize yourself. You — not a sub-agent — write the final BRAND-VOICE.md, reconciling the verified dimension scores, archetype, vocabulary, competitor delta, and consistency map into one coherent voice portrait. Never paste a sub-agent's section as the verdict.

Scope discipline: fan out only over surfaces that belong to THIS brand. Competitor copy is fetched solely for the comparison matrix, never blended into the brand's own voice scoring.

Output contract & VERIFY

Produces: a single BRAND-VOICE.md (schema under "Output Format") containing — voice summary, 4 dimension scores with visual map, primary/secondary archetype, tone-by-context table, vocabulary lists + signature phrases, Voice IS/IS-NOT chart, Do's/Don'ts, messaging hierarchy (tagline → boilerplate → story), 5-8 copy samples, competitor comparison, consistency audit with score, and prioritized recommendations.

VERIFY before declaring done (R-RUBRIC):

• Every one of the 4 dimension scores cites ≥3 verbatim quotes from harvested sources.
• Each cited quote is real (traceable to a fetched URL/source) — no invented copy.
• Archetype call passed 2-of-3 adversarial consensus.
• All template placeholders ([X/10], [quote], [type]) are filled — zero brackets remain.
• The 5-8 copy samples are written in the derived voice and cover ≥5 distinct contexts.
• A new copywriter could write on-brand from this doc alone (usability check).

If any box fails, the deliverable is incomplete — re-harvest/re-grade the failing section, never ship a guessed value (L0 no-regression, L1 evidence-is-truth).

How to Execute

Step 1: Gather Source Material

To analyze a brand's voice, examine content from multiple sources. Prioritize in this order:

Primary Sources (must analyze):

1. Homepage -- The most curated representation of the brand
2. About page -- How the brand describes itself
3. Product/service pages -- How they present their offerings

Secondary Sources (analyze if available): 4. Blog posts (at least 3-5 recent posts) 5. Social media profiles (bio, recent posts, engagement style) 6. Email newsletters (welcome email, recent sends) 7. Customer-facing copy (error messages, onboarding flows, help docs)

Tertiary Sources: 8. Job postings -- Reveals internal culture and values 9. Press releases -- Formal communication style 10. Ad copy -- Paid messaging approach 11. Video scripts or podcast transcripts -- Spoken brand voice

Use browser tools or the analyze_page.py script to access web content. For social media, check the website for social links and analyze the linked profiles.

Step 2: Voice Dimension Analysis

Map the brand's voice along four primary dimensions. Each dimension is a spectrum, not a binary.

Dimension 1: Formal <-----> Casual

Where does the brand fall on the formality spectrum?

Score: 1 (extremely formal) to 10 (extremely casual)

Evidence required: Quote 3-5 specific examples from the source material that support your rating.

Dimension 2: Serious <-----> Playful

How much levity does the brand inject into its communication?

Score: 1 (extremely serious) to 10 (extremely playful)

Dimension 3: Technical <-----> Simple

How much domain expertise does the brand assume in its audience?

Score: 1 (extremely technical) to 10 (extremely simple)

Dimension 4: Reserved <-----> Bold

How much personality and confidence does the brand project?

Score: 1 (extremely reserved) to 10 (extremely bold)

Step 3: Tone Spectrum Mapping

Beyond the four dimensions, map how the brand's tone shifts across different contexts:

Step 4: Brand Personality Framework

Map the brand to one of five core personality archetypes (brands may blend 1-2):

The 5 Archetypes

1. The Authority

• Characteristics: Expert, trustworthy, data-driven, established
• Voice: Confident but not arrogant, educational, precise
• Industries: Finance, healthcare, B2B enterprise, legal, consulting
• Example brands: McKinsey, IBM, Mayo Clinic
• Key phrases: "Research shows...", "Our experts...", "Industry-leading..."

2. The Innovator

• Characteristics: Forward-thinking, disruptive, visionary, tech-savvy
• Voice: Exciting, future-focused, sometimes provocative
• Industries: Tech, SaaS, startups, renewable energy
• Example brands: Tesla, Stripe, Notion
• Key phrases: "Reimagine...", "The future of...", "We're building..."

3. The Friend

• Characteristics: Warm, approachable, helpful, relatable
• Voice: Conversational, empathetic, inclusive, encouraging
• Industries: Consumer products, education, community platforms
• Example brands: Mailchimp, Slack, Duolingo
• Key phrases: "We get it...", "You've got this...", "Here to help..."

4. The Rebel

• Characteristics: Bold, challenging conventions, irreverent, passionate
• Voice: Direct, opinionated, sometimes confrontational, memorable
• Industries: Lifestyle, fitness, creative industries, direct-to-consumer
• Example brands: Nike, Oatly, Cards Against Humanity
• Key phrases: "Stop settling for...", "The truth is...", "We're done with..."

5. The Guide

• Characteristics: Wise, patient, methodical, trustworthy
• Voice: Clear, instructional, supportive, knowledgeable
• Industries: Education, professional development, tools, platforms
• Example brands: HubSpot, Khan Academy, Ahrefs
• Key phrases: "Here's how to...", "Step by step...", "The complete guide to..."

Assessment:

• Primary archetype: [which one and why]
• Secondary archetype: [if applicable]
• Archetype fit: [Strong/Moderate/Weak -- how well does the brand embody this archetype?]

Step 5: Vocabulary Analysis

Identify patterns in the brand's word choices:

Words They Use Frequently

Analyze all source material and identify the 15-20 most characteristic words or phrases. Organize by category:

Action words: (verbs they favor)

• e.g., "build", "scale", "transform", "streamline"

Descriptive words: (adjectives they use)

• e.g., "powerful", "simple", "enterprise-grade", "effortless"

Value words: (words that reflect their values)

• e.g., "transparent", "sustainable", "inclusive", "innovative"

Industry-specific terms:

• e.g., "workflow", "pipeline", "conversion", "engagement"

Words They Avoid

Identify words that are notably absent or that would feel out of character:

• Words that are too casual for the brand (if formal)
• Words that are too technical for the brand (if simple)
• Competitor terminology they deliberately avoid
• Industry cliches they seem to sidestep

Signature Phrases

Does the brand have any recurring phrases, taglines, or linguistic patterns?

• Tagline: [if they have one]
• Recurring phrases: [patterns you notice]
• Linguistic patterns: [e.g., always starts sentences with verbs, uses dashes frequently, favors short paragraphs]

Step 6: Competitor Voice Comparison

Compare the brand's voice to 2-3 key competitors:

Voice Comparison Matrix:

Differentiation Assessment:

• How distinct is the brand's voice from competitors?
• Where do voices overlap? (potential differentiation opportunity)
• What voice territory is unoccupied in the competitive landscape?
• Specific recommendations for vocal differentiation

Step 7: Consistency Audit

Assess voice consistency across all analyzed channels:

Common Consistency Issues:

• Different writers creating noticeably different tones
• Social media voice drastically different from website
• Formal website copy but casual email newsletters
• Blog content written in a completely different voice than product pages
• Error messages or microcopy that feels off-brand
• Old pages that haven't been updated to match current brand voice

Overall Consistency Score: X/10

Step 8: Brand Messaging Hierarchy

Document the brand's messaging from most distilled to most expanded:

Level 1: Tagline (under 10 words)

The most compressed form of the brand message.

• Current: "[existing tagline or suggested one]"
• Assessment: Does it capture the core value proposition?

Level 2: Value Propositions (1 sentence each)

3-5 core value propositions that support the brand promise.

1. "[Value prop 1]"
2. "[Value prop 2]"
3. "[Value prop 3]"

Level 3: Elevator Pitch (30 seconds / 75 words)

A conversational explanation of what the brand does and why it matters. "[Draft elevator pitch based on analyzed content]"

Level 4: Boilerplate (100-150 words)

The standard "about us" paragraph used in press releases, email signatures, and speaker bios. "[Draft boilerplate based on analyzed content]"

Level 5: Full Brand Story (300-500 words)

The complete narrative of who the brand is, what they stand for, and why they exist.

• Current status: [Exists/Partial/Missing]
• Recommendations for improvement

Step 9: Generate Brand Voice Documentation

Create the comprehensive Do's and Don'ts guide:

Voice Chart

OUR VOICE IS:                    OUR VOICE IS NOT:
--------------------------------------------------
[Characteristic 1]              [Anti-characteristic 1]
e.g., "Confident"               e.g., "Arrogant"

[Characteristic 2]              [Anti-characteristic 2]
e.g., "Helpful"                 e.g., "Condescending"

[Characteristic 3]              [Anti-characteristic 3]
e.g., "Clear"                   e.g., "Dumbed down"

[Characteristic 4]              [Anti-characteristic 4]
e.g., "Bold"                    e.g., "Aggressive"

Writing Do's and Don'ts

DO:

• [Specific writing instruction based on analysis]
• [Example: "Use contractions to sound natural (we're, you'll, it's)"]
• [Example: "Lead with the benefit, not the feature"]
• [Example: "Use active voice in all headlines and CTAs"]
• [Example: "Address the reader directly with 'you' and 'your'"]

DON'T:

• [Specific anti-patterns based on analysis]
• [Example: "Don't use jargon without explaining it"]
• [Example: "Don't use passive voice in calls-to-action"]
• [Example: "Don't use exclamation marks more than once per paragraph"]
• [Example: "Don't start sentences with 'We' -- focus on the customer"]

Step 10: Copy Samples in Identified Voice

Provide 5-8 sample copy pieces written in the identified brand voice so the team has concrete examples to reference:

1. Homepage Headline: "[Sample headline in the brand voice]"

2. Product Description Paragraph: "[Sample product description in the brand voice]"

3. Blog Post Opening: "[Sample blog intro in the brand voice]"

4. Social Media Post: "[Sample social post in the brand voice]"

5. Email Subject Line: "[Sample subject line in the brand voice]"

6. CTA Button Text: "[Sample CTA text in the brand voice]"

7. Error Message: "[Sample error message in the brand voice]"

8. Customer Thank You Message: "[Sample thank you message in the brand voice]"

Output Format

Generate a file called BRAND-VOICE.md with:

# Brand Voice Guidelines
## [Brand Name]
### Analysis Date: [Date]

---

## Voice Summary
[2-3 sentence summary of the brand voice, personality, and key characteristics]

---

## Voice Dimensions

### Formal <-----> Casual: [X/10]
[Evidence and explanation]

### Serious <-----> Playful: [X/10]
[Evidence and explanation]

### Technical <-----> Simple: [X/10]
[Evidence and explanation]

### Reserved <-----> Bold: [X/10]
[Evidence and explanation]

### Visual Voice Map

Formal Casual |----[X]----------------------------------| Serious Playful |--------[X]------------------------------| Technical Simple |------------------[X]--------------------| Reserved Bold |------------[X]--------------------------|

---

## Brand Personality
- Primary Archetype: [Archetype]
- Secondary Archetype: [Archetype]
- [Explanation and evidence]

---

## Tone by Context
| Context | Tone | Example |
|---|---|---|
| [context] | [tone] | "[example]" |

---

## Vocabulary

### Words We Use
[Organized word lists]

### Words We Avoid
[Words that don't fit the brand]

### Signature Phrases
[Recurring patterns and phrases]

---

## Voice Chart
| Our Voice IS | Our Voice IS NOT |
|---|---|
| [trait] | [anti-trait] |

---

## Writing Guidelines

### Do's
- [specific guidelines]

### Don'ts
- [specific anti-patterns]

---

## Brand Messaging Hierarchy

### Tagline
[tagline]

### Value Propositions
1. [value prop]

### Elevator Pitch
[pitch]

### Boilerplate
[boilerplate]

---

## Copy Samples
[8 examples of copy in the brand voice]

---

## Competitor Voice Comparison
[Comparison matrix and differentiation analysis]

---

## Consistency Audit
[Channel-by-channel assessment]
- Overall Consistency Score: [X/10]

---

## Recommendations
### Immediate Actions
1. [recommendation]

### Voice Evolution Opportunities
1. [recommendation]

### Consistency Improvements
1. [recommendation]

Key Principles

• Brand voice analysis requires reading like a detective. Every word choice, punctuation decision, and sentence structure reveals something about how the brand wants to be perceived.
• Always provide EVIDENCE for every assessment. Don't just say "the brand is casual" -- quote specific examples that prove it.
• The brand voice guide should be usable by someone who has never worked with the brand before. A new copywriter should be able to read this document and write on-brand content.
• Copy samples are the most valuable part of the deliverable. People learn voice by example, not by description. Make the samples diverse (headlines, body copy, social, email, error messages) so writers have references for every context.
• Voice and tone are different. Voice is the consistent personality. Tone shifts based on context (a customer complaint response is different from a product launch announcement, but both should be in the same voice).
• If the brand's voice is inconsistent across channels, frame it as an opportunity to strengthen their brand, not as a failure. Consistency issues are common and fixable.
• If the user has run /market competitors previously, use that data for the competitor voice comparison section.
• The voice dimensions should be plotted visually (text-based spectrum) so stakeholders can quickly understand the positioning at a glance.

Constraints

MUST DO

• Verify all claims with data or sources
• Include actionable recommendations, not just observations
• Consider the target audience and business context
• Provide specific examples, not generic advice

MUST NOT DO

• Make claims without supporting evidence
• Ignore the user's specific business context
• Provide generic one-size-fits-all recommendations
• Skip competitive or market context when relevant