Nemoclaw Maintainer Find Review Pr

Find PR to Review

Search for open PRs labeled security + priority: high, associate each with its linked issue, detect duplicates (multiple PRs targeting the same issue), and present a clean summary so you can decide what to review or close.

Prerequisites

• gh (GitHub CLI) must be installed and authenticated.
• You must be in a GitHub repository (or the user must specify OWNER/REPO).

Step 1: Fetch candidate PRs

List all open PRs that carry both the security and priority: high labels:

gh pr list --label security --label "priority: high" --state open --limit 50 --json number,title,author,headRefName,labels,body,createdAt

If the result is empty, report that there are no matching PRs and stop.

Step 2: Extract linked issues

For each PR, parse the body for linked issue references. Look for these patterns (case-insensitive):

• Fixes #NNN, Closes #NNN, Resolves #NNN
• Related Issue / Linked Issue section containing #NNN
• Issue number in the PR title, e.g. (#NNN) suffix
• Branch name containing an issue number, e.g. fix/something-NNN

Build a mapping: PR# → [issue numbers].

If a PR has no detectable linked issue, mark it as (no linked issue).

Step 3: Detect duplicates

Group PRs by linked issue number. Any issue with two or more open PRs is a duplicate group.

For each duplicate group, fetch a brief summary of each competing PR to help the user decide which to keep:

gh pr view <number> --json number,title,author,createdAt,additions,deletions,reviewDecision,statusCheckRollup --jq '{number,title,author: .author.login,created: .createdAt,additions,deletions,review: .reviewDecision,checks: [.statusCheckRollup[]?.conclusion] | unique}'

Step 4: Check for superseded PRs

Also flag PRs whose body contains phrases like:

• follow-up to #NNN / supersedes #NNN / replaces #NNN / folds in #NNN

where #NNN is another open PR number in the candidate list. These indicate one PR has absorbed another.

Step 5: Present results

Duplicates / Superseded

If duplicates or superseded PRs exist, present them first in a table:

### Duplicate PRs (same issue)

| Issue | PR | Author | Title | +/- | Status |
|-------|-----|--------|-------|-----|--------|
| #804  | #1121 | user1 | ...  | +50/-10 | Checks passing |
| #804  | #1300 | user2 | ...  | +80/-20 | Checks failing |

**Recommendation:** #1121 is smaller and passing checks — consider closing #1300.

For superseded PRs:

### Superseded PRs

- #1416 supersedes/folds in #1392 (shell-quote sandboxName)
  → Consider closing #1392 if #1416 covers its scope.

Clean candidates

Present non-duplicate PRs in a table:

### Review candidates (no duplicates)

| PR | Issue | Title | Author | Age |
|----|-------|-------|--------|-----|
| #1476 | #577 | disable remote uninstall fallback | user1 | 2d |
| #1121 | #804 | Landlock read-only /sandbox | user2 | 6d |

Summary line

End with a one-line recommendation of which PR to review first, preferring:

1. Older PRs (waiting longest)
2. PRs with passing checks
3. PRs with smaller diff size (easier to review)

Notes

• Do NOT automatically close any PRs. Only present findings and recommendations.
• If the user specifies additional filters (e.g., a specific scope label like OpenShell), apply them.
• If the user asks for a different priority label, adjust accordingly.