Marketing Research

Marketing Research

Research marketing opportunities by analyzing trend signals, platform sentiment, and audience language. Identifies timing windows and produces actor-specific recommendations — no vague "keep monitoring" output.

Trigger: /marketing-research or /marketing-research [topic]

Complementary to /project-research (concept validation) — this skill actively searches for marketing opportunities, timing windows, and messaging entry points.

PHASE 0: Scope Definition

Existing report check:

Search for .project/thinking/*-marketing-research.md. If found, ask via AskUserQuestion:

header: "Existing report"
question: "A marketing research report already exists for this topic. What do you want to do?"
options:
  - label: "Load and continue (Recommended)", description: "Use existing report as basis for marketing-content"
  - label: "Research again", description: "Overwrite the existing report with new research"
multiSelect: false

On "Load and continue": show the SCOPE ANCHORS from the existing report and close PHASE 0. Go directly to PHASE 3 (Recommendations) or suggest next steps.

If $1 provided → use as starting point.

If no argument:

Ask via AskUserQuestion:

header: "Topic"
question: "What do you want to research for marketing?"
options:
  - label: "Product or feature launch", description: "Timing, messaging, audience for a launch"
  - label: "Content strategy", description: "Which topics, formats, platforms are relevant now"
  - label: "Competitive positioning", description: "How competitors position themselves and where the gap is"
  - label: "Campaign timing", description: "When a theme or topic has momentum"
multiSelect: false

Then ask for free-text input: product/concept + target audience + optional time window.

Scope extraction (two-step):

Extract 5-10 structured research angles from the free-text input. Categorize them:

• Audience: who are they, what do they say, what language do they use?
• Trending topics: what has momentum in this domain right now?
• Competitors: how do they position themselves, what is their messaging?
• Channels: where is the audience active?
• Timing signals: when is the conversation most active?

Present as a mandatory output block — this is the contract between PHASE 0 and the rest of the skill, and the input for /marketing-content:

SCOPE ANCHORS

Topic: {topic in one sentence}
Audience: {who + 2-3 characteristics}
Trending topics: [{topic 1}, {topic 2}, ...]
Competitors: [{name 1}, {name 2}]
Active channels: [{platform 1}, {platform 2}]
Timing window: {active now / seasonal: {when} / open}
Research type: {launch / content / positioning / campaign timing}

Confirm via AskUserQuestion (Yes / Adjust).

PHASE 1: Multi-Source Research

Run WebSearch queries in parallel, derived from the scope angles. Cover at minimum:

• Trend signals per platform (Twitter/X, Reddit, LinkedIn, HN, news sources)
• Competitor messaging and positioning
• Audience language and pain points (forums, reviews, comments)

Present findings per source with platform label:

PLATFORM — {platform name}

Query: "{search query}"

Findings:
- {key finding 1}
- {key finding 2}

Sources: {URLs}

PHASE 2: Signal Analysis

Analyze the collected data on three axes:

Platform temperature differences:

Temperature difference = actively interpret: "trending on X but not on LinkedIn" is a signal, not a gap.

Trajectory per topic — label each relevant topic:

• acute_rise: appears and rises quickly → time-sensitive window
• plateau: high but stable → mainstream, commodity risk
• zombie: lingers without growth → exhausted momentum
• comeback: was gone, returns → new trigger, investigate cause

Sentiment conflict:

Look for where consensus breaks — not "positive or negative?" but "where does sentiment fracture?" That breaking point is the most relevant moment for campaign timing.

Present:

SIGNAL ANALYSIS

Platform temperatures:
- {platform}: {trajectory label} — {character of the conversation}
- {platform}: {trajectory label} — {character of the conversation}

Temperature difference: {interpretation of the difference between platforms}

Weak signals: {what is in niche sources but not in mainstream?}

Sentiment conflict: {where does consensus fracture? what is the actual conflict?}

PHASE 3: Actor-Specific Recommendations

Ask via AskUserQuestion which actor type is relevant:

header: "Actor type"
question: "Who are the recommendations for?"
options:
  - label: "Brand / company (Recommended)", description: "Marketing team, content strategy, campaigns"
  - label: "Solo creator / personal brand", description: "Content creator, thought leader, freelancer"
  - label: "Agency / consultant", description: "Advice for clients, positioning"
multiSelect: false

Generate a concrete recommendation per relevant scope angle:

• Action: what specifically to do (not "consider X" but "publish Y on Z")
• Timing window: when — based on trajectory label
• Reasoning: which signal justifies this
• Platform: where to activate

No "keep monitoring" advice allowed. Every recommendation ends with a concrete action or decision. If the moment is not yet right: say that explicitly with the condition under which it becomes right.

Present as table:

RECOMMENDATIONS — {actor type}

| # | Action | Timing | Platform | Reasoning |
|---|--------|--------|----------|-----------|
| 1 | {concrete action} | {now / in N weeks / wait for X} | {platform} | {signal} |
| 2 | ... | ... | ... | ... |

PHASE 4: Report + Save

Generate a markdown report:

# Marketing Research: {topic}

## Summary

{2-3 sentences: what is the core opportunity and the core risk?}

## Signal Analysis

### Platform Temperatures

{temperature differences + trajectories}

### Sentiment Conflict

{where does consensus fracture?}

### Weak Signals

{what mainstream doesn't cover}

## Audience Language

{exact words, frames, and pain points the audience uses}

## Competitive Positioning

{how do competitors position themselves and where is the gap?}

## Recommendations

| #   | Action | Timing | Platform | Reasoning |
| --- | ------ | ------ | -------- | --------- |

{table from PHASE 3}

## Sources

- [{source title}]({url})

Save to .project/thinking/{topic}-marketing-research.md.

Show next steps:

Next steps:
- /marketing-content  — write text variants based on these signals
- /marketing-screenshots — marketing screenshots for launch
- /project-plan       — feature backlog based on market insights

Guidelines

Formatting:

• NEVER blockquote syntax (>) — unreadable background in dark terminals
• NEVER backticks for emphasis on regular words — use bold
• Backticks only for code, file paths, and command references

Language: Follow the Language Policy in CLAUDE.md.