AlphaGBM Compare
Side-by-side comparison of 2-5 stocks or options across every AlphaGBM dimension, so you can pick the best opportunity.
What This Skill Does
| Dimension |
What Gets Compared |
| GBM Five Pillars |
Momentum, Value, Quality, Volatility, Sentiment scores for each ticker |
| Options Metrics |
IV rank, IV percentile, VRP, skew, term structure for each ticker |
| Technicals |
RSI, MACD, moving averages, support/resistance levels |
| Valuations |
P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, PEG ratio — who is cheaper? |
| Category Winner |
Best ticker in each dimension highlighted |
| Overall Recommendation |
Weighted composite ranking across all dimensions |
How to Use
Input: 2-5 ticker symbols with a comparison query.
Output:
- Comparison table with all dimensions side by side
- Winner highlighted per category (green badge)
- Overall recommendation with composite score
- Key differentiators: what makes the winner stand out
- Trade idea: if you had to pick one, which and why
Example Queries:
compare AAPL vs MSFT — Head-to-head across all dimensionsNVDA or AMD — Which semiconductor name is the better trade?which is cheaper TSLA or META options — Options cost comparisontech stock comparison AAPL MSFT GOOGL AMZN META — Full sector comparisoncompare options AAPL vs MSFT 30d ATM — Specific options contract comparison
Mock Data
Mock data files are located in mock-data/compare/ and include:
aapl-vs-msft.json — Full comparison output for AAPL vs MSFTtech-five-way.json — Five-way comparison of mega-cap techoptions-cost-compare.json — Options-specific metrics comparison
API Endpoint
GET /api/analytics/compare
Query parameters:
symbols (string, required) — Comma-separated tickers (2-5), e.g., "AAPL,MSFT,GOOGL"dimensions (string, default "all") — Comma-separated: "pillars", "options", "technicals", "valuations"options_expiry (string) — Target expiry for options comparison (e.g., "30d", "60d")
Response fields: tickers[], comparison_table, category_winners, overall_ranking[], recommendation
Related Skills
Powered by AlphaGBM — Real-data options & research intelligence. 10K+ users.
1---2name: alphagbm-compare3description: Compares 2-5 stocks or options across GBM Five Pillars scores, options metrics, technicals, and valuations, highlighting winners per category and providing an overall recommendation.4---56# AlphaGBM Compare78Side-by-side comparison of 2-5 stocks or options across every AlphaGBM dimension, so you can pick the best opportunity.910## What This Skill Does1112| Dimension | What Gets Compared |13|-----------|--------------------|14| GBM Five Pillars | Momentum, Value, Quality, Volatility, Sentiment scores for each ticker |15| Options Metrics | IV rank, IV percentile, VRP, skew, term structure for each ticker |16| Technicals | RSI, MACD, moving averages, support/resistance levels |17| Valuations | P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, PEG ratio — who is cheaper? |18| Category Winner | Best ticker in each dimension highlighted |19| Overall Recommendation | Weighted composite ranking across all dimensions |2021## How to Use2223**Input:** 2-5 ticker symbols with a comparison query.2425**Output:**26- Comparison table with all dimensions side by side27- Winner highlighted per category (green badge)28- Overall recommendation with composite score29- Key differentiators: what makes the winner stand out30- Trade idea: if you had to pick one, which and why3132**Example Queries:**33- `compare AAPL vs MSFT` — Head-to-head across all dimensions34- `NVDA or AMD` — Which semiconductor name is the better trade?35- `which is cheaper TSLA or META options` — Options cost comparison36- `tech stock comparison AAPL MSFT GOOGL AMZN META` — Full sector comparison37- `compare options AAPL vs MSFT 30d ATM` — Specific options contract comparison3839## Mock Data4041Mock data files are located in `mock-data/compare/` and include:42- `aapl-vs-msft.json` — Full comparison output for AAPL vs MSFT43- `tech-five-way.json` — Five-way comparison of mega-cap tech44- `options-cost-compare.json` — Options-specific metrics comparison4546## API Endpoint4748```49GET /api/analytics/compare50```5152Query parameters:53- `symbols` (string, required) — Comma-separated tickers (2-5), e.g., "AAPL,MSFT,GOOGL"54- `dimensions` (string, default "all") — Comma-separated: "pillars", "options", "technicals", "valuations"55- `options_expiry` (string) — Target expiry for options comparison (e.g., "30d", "60d")5657Response fields: `tickers[]`, `comparison_table`, `category_winners`, `overall_ranking[]`, `recommendation`5859## Related Skills6061| Skill | Relevance |62|-------|-----------|63| [alphagbm-stock-analysis](../alphagbm-stock-analysis/) | Detailed single-stock analysis for deeper dives after comparison |64| [alphagbm-options-score](../alphagbm-options-score/) | The options score that feeds into the comparison |65| [alphagbm-iv-rank](../alphagbm-iv-rank/) | IV rank data used in the options metrics comparison |6667---6869*Powered by [AlphaGBM](https://alphagbm.com) — Real-data options & research intelligence. 10K+ users.*
AlphaGBM