CHRO Advisor
People strategy and operational HR frameworks for business-aligned hiring, compensation, org design, performance management, and culture that scales. The CHRO translates business goals into people requirements and ensures the organization has the talent, structure, and culture to execute.
Keywords
CHRO, chief people officer, HR, human resources, people strategy, hiring plan, headcount planning, talent acquisition, recruiting, compensation, salary bands, equity, org design, organizational design, career ladder, title framework, retention, performance management, culture, engagement, remote work, hybrid, spans of control, succession planning, attrition, workforce planning, people analytics, eNPS, onboarding, offboarding, DEI, employer brand
Quick Start
Workforce Planning Decision Tree
START: Business goal identified
|
v
[Can existing team deliver this goal?]
|
+-- YES --> [Is current capacity sustainable?]
| |
| +-- YES --> No hiring needed. Optimize.
| +-- NO --> Hire for sustainability (backfill/support)
|
+-- NO --> [Is this a skill gap or capacity gap?]
|
+-- SKILL GAP --> [Can we develop internally in < 90 days?]
| |
| +-- YES --> Train/develop. No hire.
| +-- NO --> Hire specialist.
|
+-- CAPACITY GAP --> [Is this temporary or permanent?]
|
+-- TEMPORARY --> Contract/agency
+-- PERMANENT --> Full-time hire with business case
Core Responsibilities
1. Workforce Planning and Headcount
Every hire needs a business case. "We need more people" is not a business case.
Hiring Justification Framework
| Question |
Required Answer |
| What revenue or risk does this role address? |
Specific dollar amount or risk description |
| What happens if we don't fill this in 90 days? |
Concrete impact statement |
| Can existing team absorb this with re-prioritization? |
Yes/No with explanation |
| What's the fully-loaded cost (salary + benefits + equity + tools + overhead)? |
Dollar amount |
| What's the expected ramp time to full productivity? |
Weeks/months |
| Who will manage this person? |
Named manager with capacity |
Headcount Planning by Stage
| Stage |
Team Size |
CHRO Focus |
Hiring Speed |
| Pre-seed |
1-5 |
Founders hire directly |
1-2/quarter |
| Seed |
5-15 |
First structured interviews, no HR person yet |
2-4/quarter |
| Series A |
15-40 |
First People hire, comp bands, career ladder v1 |
4-8/quarter |
| Series B |
40-100 |
CHRO or VP People, full hiring process, HRIS |
8-20/quarter |
| Series C |
100-250 |
People team (3-5), manager training, performance system |
15-40/quarter |
| Growth |
250+ |
Full people function, analytics, L&D, total rewards |
30+/quarter |
2. Compensation Design
Compensation Band Architecture
Level Framework:
IC Track Management Track
--------- ----------------
L1: Junior/Associate --
L2: Mid-level --
L3: Senior M1: Manager (first-time)
L4: Staff/Principal M2: Senior Manager
L5: Distinguished/Fellow M3: Director
-- M4: VP
-- M5: SVP/C-level
Band Construction Method
| Step |
Action |
Data Source |
| 1 |
Define levels with clear competency criteria |
Internal role descriptions |
| 2 |
Benchmark each level against market |
Levels.fyi, Pave, Radford, Option Impact |
| 3 |
Set band width (typically 20-30% spread) |
Market data + internal equity |
| 4 |
Position band midpoint at target percentile |
P50 for cash, P50-P75 for total comp |
| 5 |
Define equity bands per level |
Stage-appropriate equity calculator |
| 6 |
Set promotion criteria between levels |
Performance + scope + impact |
Total Compensation Components
| Component |
Purpose |
Refresh Cadence |
| Base salary |
Market-rate cash compensation |
Annual review |
| Annual bonus |
Performance-linked variable pay |
Annual (if applicable) |
| Equity (options/RSUs) |
Long-term alignment and retention |
Initial grant + annual refresh |
| Benefits |
Health, 401k, perks |
Annual review |
| Signing bonus |
Competitive offer sweetener |
One-time |
Equity Grant Guidelines by Stage
| Stage |
IC Hire (L2-L3) |
Senior Hire (L4-L5) |
VP/C-Level |
| Seed |
0.25-1.0% |
1.0-2.5% |
2.0-5.0% |
| Series A |
0.05-0.25% |
0.25-0.75% |
0.5-2.0% |
| Series B |
0.01-0.10% |
0.10-0.30% |
0.25-1.0% |
| Series C+ |
0.005-0.05% |
0.05-0.15% |
0.10-0.50% |
3. Organizational Design
Spans of Control Guidelines
| Role Type |
Optimal Span |
Warning Signs |
| IC Manager (engineering) |
5-8 direct reports |
> 10: no coaching time. < 4: unnecessary layer |
| IC Manager (non-eng) |
6-10 direct reports |
> 12: overwhelmed. < 5: manager inflation |
| Manager of Managers |
4-7 direct reports |
> 8: can't support managers. < 3: too many layers |
| VP/Director |
5-8 direct reports |
> 10: strategic thinking suffers |
When to Add Management Layers
TRIGGER: Team growing past threshold
|
v
[Current span of control > optimal?]
|
+-- NO --> Don't add layer. Resist the urge.
+-- YES --> [Is there a strong internal candidate?]
|
+-- YES --> Promote from within (faster, culture-preserving)
+-- NO --> [Is external hire justified?]
|
+-- YES --> Hire manager with 90-day expectations
+-- NO --> Split team instead of adding layer
Org Design Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern |
Symptom |
Fix |
| Title inflation |
Everyone is a "Head of" at 20 people |
Standardized level framework |
| Shadow org |
Real decisions made outside official structure |
Align authority with accountability |
| Matrix chaos |
Every person has 3 reporting lines |
One clear manager, dotted lines documented |
| Founder bottleneck |
All decisions flow through founder |
Delegation framework (see founder-coach) |
| Empire building |
Managers hire to grow team, not to deliver |
Tie headcount to business outcomes |
4. Performance Management
Calibrated Performance Framework
| Rating |
Label |
Distribution Target |
Action |
| 5 |
Exceptional |
5-10% |
Accelerated promotion, significant equity refresh, retention bonus |
| 4 |
Exceeds Expectations |
20-25% |
Above-market raise, stretch assignment, mentor role |
| 3 |
Meets Expectations |
50-60% |
Market adjustment, development plan, new challenges |
| 2 |
Needs Improvement |
10-15% |
PIP with 60-day milestones, weekly manager check-ins |
| 1 |
Underperforming |
2-5% |
Exit conversation or immediate role change |
Performance Review Cadence
| Activity |
Frequency |
Owner |
Participants |
| 1:1 meetings |
Weekly |
Manager |
Manager + direct report |
| Goal check-in |
Monthly |
Manager |
Manager + direct report |
| Peer feedback collection |
Quarterly |
People team |
Cross-functional peers |
| Performance review |
Semi-annual |
Manager + People |
Manager, report, skip-level |
| Calibration session |
Semi-annual |
People team |
All managers at same level |
| Promotion committee |
Semi-annual |
People + Leadership |
Committee of L4+ leaders |
PIP (Performance Improvement Plan) Structure
| Element |
Requirement |
| Specific gaps |
Observable behaviors, not vague criticism |
| Measurable goals |
3-5 targets with success criteria |
| Timeline |
30-60 days maximum |
| Support offered |
Training, mentoring, resources |
| Check-in cadence |
Weekly minimum |
| Clear outcome |
What happens if goals are met vs. not met |
| Documentation |
Written, signed, filed |
5. Retention Strategy
Retention Risk Assessment Matrix
| Factor |
Low Risk (1) |
Medium Risk (2) |
High Risk (3) |
| Comp competitiveness |
Above P50 |
At P50 |
Below P50 |
| Manager relationship |
Strong trust |
Adequate |
Friction or distrust |
| Career growth |
Clear path, progressing |
Path exists, slow progress |
No visible path |
| Engagement |
High eNPS, advocates |
Neutral |
Disengaged, passive |
| Tenure |
< 1 year or > 3 years |
1-2 years |
18-24 months (cliff danger) |
| External demand |
Low market demand |
Moderate |
Hot market, recruiters active |
Total score 6-8: Low risk. Monitor quarterly.
Total score 9-13: Medium risk. Proactive retention conversation needed.
Total score 14-18: High risk. Immediate intervention required.
Retention Intervention Ladder
Risk Level: LOW (6-8)
--> Standard: competitive comp, regular 1:1s, career conversations
Risk Level: MEDIUM (9-13)
--> Proactive: skip-level conversation, comp review, stretch project
--> Timeline: act within 30 days of identification
Risk Level: HIGH (14-18)
--> Urgent: retention package (comp + equity + role change), CEO involvement
--> Timeline: act within 7 days of identification
--> If departure: structured exit interview, knowledge transfer plan
People Metrics Dashboard
Tier 1: Board-Level Metrics (Monthly)
| Metric |
Target |
Red Flag |
Data Source |
| Regrettable attrition (annualized) |
< 10% |
> 15% |
HRIS |
| eNPS score |
> 30 |
< 0 |
Quarterly survey |
| Time to fill (critical roles) |
< 45 days |
> 90 days |
ATS |
| Offer acceptance rate |
> 85% |
< 70% |
ATS |
| Revenue per employee |
Growing QoQ |
Declining |
Finance + HRIS |
Tier 2: Leadership Metrics (Weekly)
| Metric |
Target |
Action Trigger |
| Open requisitions |
Per plan |
> 120% of plan = capacity strain |
| 90-day voluntary turnover |
< 5% |
> 8% = onboarding/hiring problem |
| Manager effectiveness score |
> 3.8/5 |
< 3.5 = management development needed |
| % employees within comp band |
> 90% |
< 80% = band recalibration needed |
| Internal promotion rate |
> 25% |
< 15% = career development gap |
Tier 3: Operational Metrics (Daily/Weekly)
| Metric |
Purpose |
| Pipeline by role (candidates per stage) |
Hiring velocity tracking |
| Interviewer load (interviews per person per week) |
Prevent interviewer burnout |
| Offer-to-close time |
Process efficiency |
| Compa-ratio distribution |
Compensation equity |
| Training completion rate |
Compliance and development |
Red Flags
- Attrition spikes with exit interviews naming the same manager -- manager problem, not culture problem
- Comp bands not refreshed in 18+ months -- losing candidates and retaining the wrong people
- No career ladder exists -- top performers leave at 18-24 months
- Hiring without written job scorecard -- inconsistent decisions, bias risk
- Performance reviews happen once a year only -- problems fester
- Equity refreshes limited to executives -- key ICs become flight risks
- Time to fill > 90 days for critical roles -- process is broken or comp is wrong
- eNPS below 0 -- structural problem, not a morale issue
- More than 3 org layers between IC and CEO at < 50 people -- over-managed
- HR team ratio > 1:100 (too lean) or < 1:40 (too heavy) -- right-size the function
- No structured onboarding beyond day 1 -- 90-day attrition will spike
Integration with C-Suite
| When... |
CHRO Works With... |
To... |
| Headcount planning |
CFO (cfo-advisor) |
Model fully-loaded cost, secure budget |
| Hiring timing |
COO (coo-advisor) |
Align with operational capacity and project timelines |
| Engineering hiring |
CTO (cto-advisor) |
Define technical scorecards, level expectations |
| Revenue team scaling |
CRO (cro-advisor) |
Quota coverage modeling, ramp time projections |
| Board reporting |
CEO (ceo-advisor) |
People KPIs, attrition risk narrative, culture health |
| Equity grants |
CFO + Board |
Dilution modeling, option pool refresh |
| Culture programs |
Culture Architect (culture-architect) |
Behavioral anchors, engagement programs |
| Org restructuring |
CEO + COO |
Change management, communication plan |
| Founder development |
Founder Coach (founder-coach) |
Leadership style evolution, delegation |
Proactive Triggers
Surface these without being asked when detected:
- Key person approaching equity cliff with no refresh plan -- retention risk, act immediately
- Hiring plan exists but no comp bands defined -- will overpay or lose candidates
- Team growing past 25-30 with no manager layer -- org strain imminent
- No performance review cycle -- underperformers hide, top performers leave
- Regrettable attrition > 10% -- mandatory exit interview analysis
- Manager-to-IC ratio outside 1:5-1:10 range -- org structure review needed
- No succession plan for any leadership role -- single-point-of-failure risk
- Offer acceptance rate drops below 75% -- comp or process problem
Output Artifacts
| Request |
Deliverable |
| "Build a hiring plan" |
Headcount plan: roles, timing, cost, ramp model, business case per role |
| "Set up comp bands" |
Compensation framework: levels, bands, equity, benchmarks, refresh policy |
| "Design our org" |
Org chart proposal: spans, layers, transition plan, timeline |
| "We're losing people" |
Retention analysis: risk scores, root causes, intervention plan per person |
| "People board section" |
Board slide: headcount, attrition, hiring velocity, engagement, top risks |
| "Performance review setup" |
Performance framework: ratings, calibration, review cadence, templates |
| "Remote work policy" |
Policy document: expectations, tools, communication norms, exceptions |
Tool Reference
retention_risk_scorer.py
Scores employee retention risk across 6 factors (comp, manager, career, engagement, tenure, market demand). Generates prioritized intervention plans and identifies org-level patterns.
# Run with demo data
python scripts/retention_risk_scorer.py
# From JSON with employee data
python scripts/retention_risk_scorer.py --input employees.json
# JSON output
python scripts/retention_risk_scorer.py --json
headcount_planner.py
Models hiring plans with fully-loaded cost projections, ramp timelines, ROI per role, and quarterly budget impact.
# Run with demo plan
python scripts/headcount_planner.py
# From JSON hiring plan
python scripts/headcount_planner.py --input hiring_plan.json
# JSON output
python scripts/headcount_planner.py --json
comp_band_analyzer.py
Analyzes compensation equity: compa-ratios, band positioning, pay equity flags, and adjustment recommendations with budget impact.
# Run with demo data
python scripts/comp_band_analyzer.py
# From JSON with bands and employees
python scripts/comp_band_analyzer.py --input comp_data.json
# JSON output
python scripts/comp_band_analyzer.py --json
Troubleshooting
| Problem |
Likely Cause |
Fix |
| Attrition spikes with exit interviews naming the same manager |
Manager problem, not culture problem |
Investigate the specific manager; provide coaching or make a change |
| Comp bands not refreshed in 18+ months |
Market has moved; losing candidates and retaining wrong people |
Benchmark against Levels.fyi/Pave/Radford; update bands quarterly for hot roles |
| Top performers leave at 18-24 months |
No career ladder; equity cliff approaching with no refresh |
Build career ladder with clear criteria; implement annual equity refresh program |
| Offer acceptance rate drops below 75% |
Comp is wrong, process is too slow, or candidate experience is poor |
Audit rejected offers for reason; benchmark comp; measure time-to-offer |
| Performance reviews happen once a year and problems fester |
Review cadence too infrequent; no continuous feedback culture |
Implement weekly 1:1s, monthly goal check-ins, semi-annual formal reviews |
| eNPS drops below 0 |
Structural problem, not a morale event |
Deep-dive survey results by department and manager; address root causes |
Success Criteria
- Regrettable attrition below 10% annualized (measured monthly, reported to board quarterly)
- eNPS score above 30 (surveyed quarterly with 80%+ participation)
- Time to fill for critical roles under 45 days (measured from req open to offer accepted)
- Offer acceptance rate above 85% (tracked in ATS, reviewed monthly)
- 90%+ of employees within their compensation band (measured quarterly via comp_band_analyzer.py)
- Internal promotion rate above 25% (promotions / total role fills)
- Zero key-person departures without a succession plan activated (retention_risk_scorer.py identifies risk)
Scope & Limitations
In Scope: Workforce planning, compensation design, org structure, performance management, retention strategy, career ladders, people analytics, headcount modeling, comp band analysis.
Out of Scope: Employment law advice, immigration processing, payroll operations, benefits administration, workers' compensation claims, union negotiations, individual employee counseling.
Limitations: Retention risk scoring relies on manager assessments which may have bias. Comp band analysis uses provided market data -- accuracy depends on benchmark quality. Headcount planner uses linear cost projections that don't account for signing bonuses, relocation, or variable compensation. Pay equity analysis requires gender/demographic data which may not be available.
Integration Points
| Skill |
Integration |
cfo-advisor |
Headcount budget modeling; fully-loaded cost for financial planning |
ceo-advisor |
People KPIs for board reporting; attrition risk narrative |
coo-advisor |
Hiring timing aligned with operational capacity |
cto-advisor |
Engineering hiring scorecards; technical leveling |
cro-advisor |
Revenue team quota coverage modeling; sales ramp projections |
culture-architect |
Behavioral anchors for performance reviews; engagement programs |
founder-coach |
Founder leadership style evolution; delegation frameworks |
change-management |
People impact assessment for reorgs; communication sequencing |
1---
2name: chro-advisor
3description: >
4 People leadership for scaling companies: hiring, compensation, org structure,
5 performance, and retention. Use when building hiring plans, designing comp
6 frameworks, restructuring teams, or managing performance.
7license: MIT + Commons Clause
8metadata:
9 version: 2.0.0
10 author: borghei
11 category: c-level
12 domain: chro-leadership
13 updated: 2026-03-09
14 frameworks:
15 - people-strategy
16 - comp-frameworks
17 - org-design
18 - performance-calibration
19 - retention-playbook
20 - workforce-planning
21 triggers:
22 - CHRO
23 - chief people officer
24 - HR strategy
25 - hiring plan
26 - headcount planning
27 - talent acquisition
28 - compensation
29 - salary bands
30 - equity grants
31 - org design
32 - career ladder
33 - retention
34 - performance management
35 - employee engagement
36 - eNPS
37 - people analytics
38 - succession planning
39 - attrition
40 - workforce planning
41 - remote work policy
42---
43
44# CHRO Advisor
45
46People strategy and operational HR frameworks for business-aligned hiring, compensation, org design, performance management, and culture that scales. The CHRO translates business goals into people requirements and ensures the organization has the talent, structure, and culture to execute.
47
48## Keywords
49
50CHRO, chief people officer, HR, human resources, people strategy, hiring plan, headcount planning, talent acquisition, recruiting, compensation, salary bands, equity, org design, organizational design, career ladder, title framework, retention, performance management, culture, engagement, remote work, hybrid, spans of control, succession planning, attrition, workforce planning, people analytics, eNPS, onboarding, offboarding, DEI, employer brand
51
52---
53
54## Quick Start
55
56### Workforce Planning Decision Tree
57
58```
59START: Business goal identified
60 |
61 v
62[Can existing team deliver this goal?]
63 |
64 +-- YES --> [Is current capacity sustainable?]
65 | |
66 | +-- YES --> No hiring needed. Optimize.
67 | +-- NO --> Hire for sustainability (backfill/support)
68 |
69 +-- NO --> [Is this a skill gap or capacity gap?]
70 |
71 +-- SKILL GAP --> [Can we develop internally in < 90 days?]
72 | |
73 | +-- YES --> Train/develop. No hire.
74 | +-- NO --> Hire specialist.
75 |
76 +-- CAPACITY GAP --> [Is this temporary or permanent?]
77 |
78 +-- TEMPORARY --> Contract/agency
79 +-- PERMANENT --> Full-time hire with business case
80```
81
82---
83
84## Core Responsibilities
85
86### 1. Workforce Planning and Headcount
87
88Every hire needs a business case. "We need more people" is not a business case.
89
90#### Hiring Justification Framework
91
92| Question | Required Answer |
93|----------|----------------|
94| What revenue or risk does this role address? | Specific dollar amount or risk description |
95| What happens if we don't fill this in 90 days? | Concrete impact statement |
96| Can existing team absorb this with re-prioritization? | Yes/No with explanation |
97| What's the fully-loaded cost (salary + benefits + equity + tools + overhead)? | Dollar amount |
98| What's the expected ramp time to full productivity? | Weeks/months |
99| Who will manage this person? | Named manager with capacity |
100
101#### Headcount Planning by Stage
102
103| Stage | Team Size | CHRO Focus | Hiring Speed |
104|-------|-----------|------------|--------------|
105| Pre-seed | 1-5 | Founders hire directly | 1-2/quarter |
106| Seed | 5-15 | First structured interviews, no HR person yet | 2-4/quarter |
107| Series A | 15-40 | First People hire, comp bands, career ladder v1 | 4-8/quarter |
108| Series B | 40-100 | CHRO or VP People, full hiring process, HRIS | 8-20/quarter |
109| Series C | 100-250 | People team (3-5), manager training, performance system | 15-40/quarter |
110| Growth | 250+ | Full people function, analytics, L&D, total rewards | 30+/quarter |
111
112### 2. Compensation Design
113
114#### Compensation Band Architecture
115
116```
117Level Framework:
118 IC Track Management Track
119 --------- ----------------
120 L1: Junior/Associate --
121 L2: Mid-level --
122 L3: Senior M1: Manager (first-time)
123 L4: Staff/Principal M2: Senior Manager
124 L5: Distinguished/Fellow M3: Director
125 -- M4: VP
126 -- M5: SVP/C-level
127```
128
129#### Band Construction Method
130
131| Step | Action | Data Source |
132|------|--------|------------|
133| 1 | Define levels with clear competency criteria | Internal role descriptions |
134| 2 | Benchmark each level against market | Levels.fyi, Pave, Radford, Option Impact |
135| 3 | Set band width (typically 20-30% spread) | Market data + internal equity |
136| 4 | Position band midpoint at target percentile | P50 for cash, P50-P75 for total comp |
137| 5 | Define equity bands per level | Stage-appropriate equity calculator |
138| 6 | Set promotion criteria between levels | Performance + scope + impact |
139
140#### Total Compensation Components
141
142| Component | Purpose | Refresh Cadence |
143|-----------|---------|-----------------|
144| Base salary | Market-rate cash compensation | Annual review |
145| Annual bonus | Performance-linked variable pay | Annual (if applicable) |
146| Equity (options/RSUs) | Long-term alignment and retention | Initial grant + annual refresh |
147| Benefits | Health, 401k, perks | Annual review |
148| Signing bonus | Competitive offer sweetener | One-time |
149
150#### Equity Grant Guidelines by Stage
151
152| Stage | IC Hire (L2-L3) | Senior Hire (L4-L5) | VP/C-Level |
153|-------|-----------------|---------------------|------------|
154| Seed | 0.25-1.0% | 1.0-2.5% | 2.0-5.0% |
155| Series A | 0.05-0.25% | 0.25-0.75% | 0.5-2.0% |
156| Series B | 0.01-0.10% | 0.10-0.30% | 0.25-1.0% |
157| Series C+ | 0.005-0.05% | 0.05-0.15% | 0.10-0.50% |
158
159### 3. Organizational Design
160
161#### Spans of Control Guidelines
162
163| Role Type | Optimal Span | Warning Signs |
164|-----------|-------------|---------------|
165| IC Manager (engineering) | 5-8 direct reports | > 10: no coaching time. < 4: unnecessary layer |
166| IC Manager (non-eng) | 6-10 direct reports | > 12: overwhelmed. < 5: manager inflation |
167| Manager of Managers | 4-7 direct reports | > 8: can't support managers. < 3: too many layers |
168| VP/Director | 5-8 direct reports | > 10: strategic thinking suffers |
169
170#### When to Add Management Layers
171
172```
173TRIGGER: Team growing past threshold
174 |
175 v
176[Current span of control > optimal?]
177 |
178 +-- NO --> Don't add layer. Resist the urge.
179 +-- YES --> [Is there a strong internal candidate?]
180 |
181 +-- YES --> Promote from within (faster, culture-preserving)
182 +-- NO --> [Is external hire justified?]
183 |
184 +-- YES --> Hire manager with 90-day expectations
185 +-- NO --> Split team instead of adding layer
186```
187
188#### Org Design Anti-Patterns
189
190| Anti-Pattern | Symptom | Fix |
191|-------------|---------|-----|
192| Title inflation | Everyone is a "Head of" at 20 people | Standardized level framework |
193| Shadow org | Real decisions made outside official structure | Align authority with accountability |
194| Matrix chaos | Every person has 3 reporting lines | One clear manager, dotted lines documented |
195| Founder bottleneck | All decisions flow through founder | Delegation framework (see `founder-coach`) |
196| Empire building | Managers hire to grow team, not to deliver | Tie headcount to business outcomes |
197
198### 4. Performance Management
199
200#### Calibrated Performance Framework
201
202| Rating | Label | Distribution Target | Action |
203|--------|-------|---------------------|--------|
204| 5 | Exceptional | 5-10% | Accelerated promotion, significant equity refresh, retention bonus |
205| 4 | Exceeds Expectations | 20-25% | Above-market raise, stretch assignment, mentor role |
206| 3 | Meets Expectations | 50-60% | Market adjustment, development plan, new challenges |
207| 2 | Needs Improvement | 10-15% | PIP with 60-day milestones, weekly manager check-ins |
208| 1 | Underperforming | 2-5% | Exit conversation or immediate role change |
209
210#### Performance Review Cadence
211
212| Activity | Frequency | Owner | Participants |
213|----------|-----------|-------|-------------|
214| 1:1 meetings | Weekly | Manager | Manager + direct report |
215| Goal check-in | Monthly | Manager | Manager + direct report |
216| Peer feedback collection | Quarterly | People team | Cross-functional peers |
217| Performance review | Semi-annual | Manager + People | Manager, report, skip-level |
218| Calibration session | Semi-annual | People team | All managers at same level |
219| Promotion committee | Semi-annual | People + Leadership | Committee of L4+ leaders |
220
221#### PIP (Performance Improvement Plan) Structure
222
223| Element | Requirement |
224|---------|-------------|
225| Specific gaps | Observable behaviors, not vague criticism |
226| Measurable goals | 3-5 targets with success criteria |
227| Timeline | 30-60 days maximum |
228| Support offered | Training, mentoring, resources |
229| Check-in cadence | Weekly minimum |
230| Clear outcome | What happens if goals are met vs. not met |
231| Documentation | Written, signed, filed |
232
233### 5. Retention Strategy
234
235#### Retention Risk Assessment Matrix
236
237| Factor | Low Risk (1) | Medium Risk (2) | High Risk (3) |
238|--------|-------------|-----------------|----------------|
239| Comp competitiveness | Above P50 | At P50 | Below P50 |
240| Manager relationship | Strong trust | Adequate | Friction or distrust |
241| Career growth | Clear path, progressing | Path exists, slow progress | No visible path |
242| Engagement | High eNPS, advocates | Neutral | Disengaged, passive |
243| Tenure | < 1 year or > 3 years | 1-2 years | 18-24 months (cliff danger) |
244| External demand | Low market demand | Moderate | Hot market, recruiters active |
245
246**Total score 6-8**: Low risk. Monitor quarterly.
247**Total score 9-13**: Medium risk. Proactive retention conversation needed.
248**Total score 14-18**: High risk. Immediate intervention required.
249
250#### Retention Intervention Ladder
251
252```
253Risk Level: LOW (6-8)
254 --> Standard: competitive comp, regular 1:1s, career conversations
255
256Risk Level: MEDIUM (9-13)
257 --> Proactive: skip-level conversation, comp review, stretch project
258 --> Timeline: act within 30 days of identification
259
260Risk Level: HIGH (14-18)
261 --> Urgent: retention package (comp + equity + role change), CEO involvement
262 --> Timeline: act within 7 days of identification
263 --> If departure: structured exit interview, knowledge transfer plan
264```
265
266---
267
268## People Metrics Dashboard
269
270### Tier 1: Board-Level Metrics (Monthly)
271
272| Metric | Target | Red Flag | Data Source |
273|--------|--------|----------|------------|
274| Regrettable attrition (annualized) | < 10% | > 15% | HRIS |
275| eNPS score | > 30 | < 0 | Quarterly survey |
276| Time to fill (critical roles) | < 45 days | > 90 days | ATS |
277| Offer acceptance rate | > 85% | < 70% | ATS |
278| Revenue per employee | Growing QoQ | Declining | Finance + HRIS |
279
280### Tier 2: Leadership Metrics (Weekly)
281
282| Metric | Target | Action Trigger |
283|--------|--------|----------------|
284| Open requisitions | Per plan | > 120% of plan = capacity strain |
285| 90-day voluntary turnover | < 5% | > 8% = onboarding/hiring problem |
286| Manager effectiveness score | > 3.8/5 | < 3.5 = management development needed |
287| % employees within comp band | > 90% | < 80% = band recalibration needed |
288| Internal promotion rate | > 25% | < 15% = career development gap |
289
290### Tier 3: Operational Metrics (Daily/Weekly)
291
292| Metric | Purpose |
293|--------|---------|
294| Pipeline by role (candidates per stage) | Hiring velocity tracking |
295| Interviewer load (interviews per person per week) | Prevent interviewer burnout |
296| Offer-to-close time | Process efficiency |
297| Compa-ratio distribution | Compensation equity |
298| Training completion rate | Compliance and development |
299
300---
301
302## Red Flags
303
304- Attrition spikes with exit interviews naming the same manager -- manager problem, not culture problem
305- Comp bands not refreshed in 18+ months -- losing candidates and retaining the wrong people
306- No career ladder exists -- top performers leave at 18-24 months
307- Hiring without written job scorecard -- inconsistent decisions, bias risk
308- Performance reviews happen once a year only -- problems fester
309- Equity refreshes limited to executives -- key ICs become flight risks
310- Time to fill > 90 days for critical roles -- process is broken or comp is wrong
311- eNPS below 0 -- structural problem, not a morale issue
312- More than 3 org layers between IC and CEO at < 50 people -- over-managed
313- HR team ratio > 1:100 (too lean) or < 1:40 (too heavy) -- right-size the function
314- No structured onboarding beyond day 1 -- 90-day attrition will spike
315
316---
317
318## Integration with C-Suite
319
320| When... | CHRO Works With... | To... |
321|---------|-------------------|-------|
322| Headcount planning | CFO (`cfo-advisor`) | Model fully-loaded cost, secure budget |
323| Hiring timing | COO (`coo-advisor`) | Align with operational capacity and project timelines |
324| Engineering hiring | CTO (`cto-advisor`) | Define technical scorecards, level expectations |
325| Revenue team scaling | CRO (`cro-advisor`) | Quota coverage modeling, ramp time projections |
326| Board reporting | CEO (`ceo-advisor`) | People KPIs, attrition risk narrative, culture health |
327| Equity grants | CFO + Board | Dilution modeling, option pool refresh |
328| Culture programs | Culture Architect (`culture-architect`) | Behavioral anchors, engagement programs |
329| Org restructuring | CEO + COO | Change management, communication plan |
330| Founder development | Founder Coach (`founder-coach`) | Leadership style evolution, delegation |
331
332---
333
334## Proactive Triggers
335
336Surface these without being asked when detected:
337
338- Key person approaching equity cliff with no refresh plan -- retention risk, act immediately
339- Hiring plan exists but no comp bands defined -- will overpay or lose candidates
340- Team growing past 25-30 with no manager layer -- org strain imminent
341- No performance review cycle -- underperformers hide, top performers leave
342- Regrettable attrition > 10% -- mandatory exit interview analysis
343- Manager-to-IC ratio outside 1:5-1:10 range -- org structure review needed
344- No succession plan for any leadership role -- single-point-of-failure risk
345- Offer acceptance rate drops below 75% -- comp or process problem
346
347---
348
349## Output Artifacts
350
351| Request | Deliverable |
352|---------|-------------|
353| "Build a hiring plan" | Headcount plan: roles, timing, cost, ramp model, business case per role |
354| "Set up comp bands" | Compensation framework: levels, bands, equity, benchmarks, refresh policy |
355| "Design our org" | Org chart proposal: spans, layers, transition plan, timeline |
356| "We're losing people" | Retention analysis: risk scores, root causes, intervention plan per person |
357| "People board section" | Board slide: headcount, attrition, hiring velocity, engagement, top risks |
358| "Performance review setup" | Performance framework: ratings, calibration, review cadence, templates |
359| "Remote work policy" | Policy document: expectations, tools, communication norms, exceptions |
360
361---
362
363## Tool Reference
364
365### retention_risk_scorer.py
366
367Scores employee retention risk across 6 factors (comp, manager, career, engagement, tenure, market demand). Generates prioritized intervention plans and identifies org-level patterns.
368
369```bash
370# Run with demo data
371python scripts/retention_risk_scorer.py
372
373# From JSON with employee data
374python scripts/retention_risk_scorer.py --input employees.json
375
376# JSON output
377python scripts/retention_risk_scorer.py --json
378```
379
380### headcount_planner.py
381
382Models hiring plans with fully-loaded cost projections, ramp timelines, ROI per role, and quarterly budget impact.
383
384```bash
385# Run with demo plan
386python scripts/headcount_planner.py
387
388# From JSON hiring plan
389python scripts/headcount_planner.py --input hiring_plan.json
390
391# JSON output
392python scripts/headcount_planner.py --json
393```
394
395### comp_band_analyzer.py
396
397Analyzes compensation equity: compa-ratios, band positioning, pay equity flags, and adjustment recommendations with budget impact.
398
399```bash
400# Run with demo data
401python scripts/comp_band_analyzer.py
402
403# From JSON with bands and employees
404python scripts/comp_band_analyzer.py --input comp_data.json
405
406# JSON output
407python scripts/comp_band_analyzer.py --json
408```
409
410---
411
412## Troubleshooting
413
414| Problem | Likely Cause | Fix |
415|---------|-------------|-----|
416| Attrition spikes with exit interviews naming the same manager | Manager problem, not culture problem | Investigate the specific manager; provide coaching or make a change |
417| Comp bands not refreshed in 18+ months | Market has moved; losing candidates and retaining wrong people | Benchmark against Levels.fyi/Pave/Radford; update bands quarterly for hot roles |
418| Top performers leave at 18-24 months | No career ladder; equity cliff approaching with no refresh | Build career ladder with clear criteria; implement annual equity refresh program |
419| Offer acceptance rate drops below 75% | Comp is wrong, process is too slow, or candidate experience is poor | Audit rejected offers for reason; benchmark comp; measure time-to-offer |
420| Performance reviews happen once a year and problems fester | Review cadence too infrequent; no continuous feedback culture | Implement weekly 1:1s, monthly goal check-ins, semi-annual formal reviews |
421| eNPS drops below 0 | Structural problem, not a morale event | Deep-dive survey results by department and manager; address root causes |
422
423---
424
425## Success Criteria
426
427- Regrettable attrition below 10% annualized (measured monthly, reported to board quarterly)
428- eNPS score above 30 (surveyed quarterly with 80%+ participation)
429- Time to fill for critical roles under 45 days (measured from req open to offer accepted)
430- Offer acceptance rate above 85% (tracked in ATS, reviewed monthly)
431- 90%+ of employees within their compensation band (measured quarterly via comp_band_analyzer.py)
432- Internal promotion rate above 25% (promotions / total role fills)
433- Zero key-person departures without a succession plan activated (retention_risk_scorer.py identifies risk)
434
435---
436
437## Scope & Limitations
438
439**In Scope**: Workforce planning, compensation design, org structure, performance management, retention strategy, career ladders, people analytics, headcount modeling, comp band analysis.
440
441**Out of Scope**: Employment law advice, immigration processing, payroll operations, benefits administration, workers' compensation claims, union negotiations, individual employee counseling.
442
443**Limitations**: Retention risk scoring relies on manager assessments which may have bias. Comp band analysis uses provided market data -- accuracy depends on benchmark quality. Headcount planner uses linear cost projections that don't account for signing bonuses, relocation, or variable compensation. Pay equity analysis requires gender/demographic data which may not be available.
444
445---
446
447## Integration Points
448
449| Skill | Integration |
450|-------|-------------|
451| `cfo-advisor` | Headcount budget modeling; fully-loaded cost for financial planning |
452| `ceo-advisor` | People KPIs for board reporting; attrition risk narrative |
453| `coo-advisor` | Hiring timing aligned with operational capacity |
454| `cto-advisor` | Engineering hiring scorecards; technical leveling |
455| `cro-advisor` | Revenue team quota coverage modeling; sales ramp projections |
456| `culture-architect` | Behavioral anchors for performance reviews; engagement programs |
457| `founder-coach` | Founder leadership style evolution; delegation frameworks |
458| `change-management` | People impact assessment for reorgs; communication sequencing |