Marketing Strategy & PMM
Product marketing patterns for positioning, GTM strategy, and competitive intelligence.
Table of Contents
Clarify First
Before building the PMM artifact, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:
Stop rule: ask only the 2-3 that most change the output. If the user says "just draft it," proceed and list your assumptions at the top of the artifact.
ICP Definition Workflow
Define ideal customer profile for targeting:
- Analyze existing customers (top 20% by LTV)
- Identify common firmographics (size, industry, revenue)
- Map technographics (tools, maturity, integrations)
- Document psychographics (pain level, motivation, risk tolerance)
- Define 3-5 buyer personas (economic, technical, user)
- Validate against sales cycle and churn data
- Score prospects A/B/C/D based on ICP fit
- Validation: A-fit customers have lowest churn and fastest close
Firmographics Template
| Dimension |
Target Range |
Rationale |
| Employees |
50-5000 |
Series A sweet spot |
| Revenue |
$5M-$500M |
Budget available |
| Industry |
SaaS, Tech, Services |
Product fit |
| Geography |
US, UK, DACH |
Market priority |
| Funding |
Seed to Growth |
Willing to adopt |
Buyer Personas
Economic Buyer (signs contract):
- Title: VP, Director, Head of [Department]
- Goals: ROI, team productivity, cost reduction
- Messaging: Business outcomes, ROI, case studies
Technical Buyer (evaluates product):
- Title: Engineer, Architect, Tech Lead
- Goals: Technical fit, easy integration
- Messaging: Architecture, security, documentation
User/Champion (advocates internally):
- Title: Manager, Team Lead, Power User
- Goals: Makes job easier, quick wins
- Messaging: UX, ease of use, time savings
ICP Validation Checklist
Positioning Development
Develop positioning using April Dunford methodology:
- List competitive alternatives (direct, adjacent, status quo)
- Isolate unique attributes (features only you have)
- Map attributes to customer value (why it matters)
- Define best-fit customers (who cares most)
- Choose market category (head-to-head, niche, new category)
- Layer on relevant trends (timing justification)
- Test with 10+ customer interviews
- Validation: 7+ customers describe value unprompted
Positioning Statement Template
FOR [target customer]
WHO [statement of need]
THE [product] IS A [category]
THAT [key benefit]
UNLIKE [competitive alternative]
OUR PRODUCT [primary differentiation]
Value Proposition Formula
Template: [Product] helps [Target Customer] [Achieve Goal] by [Unique Approach]
Example: "Acme helps mid-market SaaS teams ship 2x faster by automating project workflows with AI"
Messaging Hierarchy
| Level |
Content |
Example |
| Headline |
5-7 words |
"Ship faster with AI automation" |
| Subhead |
1 sentence |
"Automate workflows so teams focus on what matters" |
| Benefits |
3-4 bullets |
Speed, quality, collaboration, cost |
| Features |
Supporting evidence |
AI automation → 10 hrs/week saved |
| Proof |
Social proof |
Customer logos, stats, case studies |
Competitive Intelligence
Build competitive knowledge base:
- Identify tier 1 (direct), tier 2 (adjacent), tier 3 (status quo)
- Sign up for competitor products (hands-on evaluation)
- Monitor competitor websites, pricing, messaging
- Analyze sales call recordings for competitor mentions
- Read G2/Capterra reviews (pros and cons)
- Track competitor job postings (roadmap signals)
- Update battlecards monthly
- Validation: Sales team uses battlecards in 80%+ competitive deals
Competitive Tier Structure
| Tier |
Definition |
Examples |
| 1 |
Direct competitor, same category |
[Competitor A, B] |
| 2 |
Adjacent solution, overlapping use case |
[Alt Solution C, D] |
| 3 |
Status quo (what they do today) |
Spreadsheets, manual, in-house |
Battlecard Template
COMPETITOR: [Name]
OVERVIEW: Founded [year], Funding [stage], Size [employees]
POSITIONING:
- They say: "[Their claim]"
- Reality: [Your assessment]
STRENGTHS:
1. [What they do well]
2. [What they do well]
WEAKNESSES:
1. [Where they fall short]
2. [Where they fall short]
OUR ADVANTAGES:
1. [Your advantage + evidence]
2. [Your advantage + evidence]
WHEN WE WIN:
- [Scenario where you win]
WHEN WE LOSE:
- [Scenario where they win]
TALK TRACK:
Objection: "[Common objection]"
Response: "[Your response]"
Win/Loss Analysis
Track monthly:
- Win rate by competitor
- Top win reasons (product fit, ease of use, price)
- Top loss reasons (missing feature, price, relationship)
- Action items for product, sales, marketing
Product Launch Planning
Plan launches by tier:
| Tier |
Scope |
Prep Time |
Budget |
| 1 |
New product, major feature |
6-8 weeks |
$50-100k |
| 2 |
Significant feature, integration |
3-4 weeks |
$10-25k |
| 3 |
Small improvement |
1 week |
<$5k |
Tier 1 Launch Workflow
Execute major product launch:
- Kickoff meeting with Product, Marketing, Sales, CS
- Define goals (pipeline $, MQLs, press coverage)
- Develop positioning and messaging
- Create sales enablement (deck, demo, battlecard)
- Build campaign assets (landing page, emails, ads)
- Train sales and CS teams
- Execute launch day (press, email, ads, outbound)
- Monitor and optimize for 30 days
- Validation: Pipeline on track to goal by week 2
Launch Day Checklist
Launch Metrics
| Metric |
Leading (Daily) |
Lagging (Weekly) |
| Traffic |
Landing page visitors |
- |
| Engagement |
Demo requests, signups |
Feature adoption % |
| Pipeline |
MQLs generated |
SQLs, pipeline $ |
| Revenue |
- |
Deals closed, revenue |
Sales Enablement
Equip sales team with PMM assets:
- Create sales deck (15-20 slides, visual-first)
- Build one-pagers (product, competitive, case study)
- Develop demo script (30-45 min with discovery)
- Write email templates (outreach, follow-up, closing)
- Create ROI calculator (input costs, output savings)
- Conduct monthly enablement calls
- Deliver quarterly training (positioning, competitive)
- Validation: Sales uses assets in 80%+ of opportunities
Sales Deck Structure
| Slide |
Content |
| 1-2 |
Title, agenda |
| 3-4 |
Company intro, problem statement |
| 5-7 |
Solution, key benefits, demo |
| 8-10 |
Differentiation, case study, pricing |
| 11-12 |
Implementation, support, next steps |
Demo Flow
1. Intro (2 min): Who we are, agenda
2. Discovery (5 min): Their needs, pain points
3. Demo (20 min): Product focused on their use case
4. Q&A (10 min): Objection handling
5. Next steps (3 min): Trial, POC, proposal
Sales-Marketing Handoff
| Handoff |
Frequency |
Content |
| Weekly sync |
30 min |
Win/loss, competitive, new assets |
| Monthly enablement |
60 min |
Product updates, training |
| Quarterly review |
Half-day |
Results, strategy, planning |
International Expansion
Enter new markets systematically:
- Validate market demand (inbound leads, TAM analysis)
- Localize website, pricing, legal
- Establish sales coverage (hire or agency)
- Adapt messaging for cultural fit
- Build local partnerships and references
- Launch localized campaigns
- Monitor CAC and conversion by market
- Validation: 3+ paying customers from market in first 90 days
Market Priority (Series A)
| Market |
Timeline |
Budget % |
Target ARR |
| US |
Months 1-6 |
50% |
$1M |
| UK |
Months 4-9 |
20% |
$500k |
| DACH |
Months 7-12 |
15% |
$300k |
| France |
Months 10-15 |
10% |
$200k |
| Canada |
Months 7-12 |
5% |
$100k |
Localization Checklist
Reference Documentation
Positioning Frameworks
references/positioning-frameworks.md contains:
- April Dunford 5-step positioning process
- Geoffrey Moore positioning statement template
- Positioning validation interview protocol
- Competitive positioning map construction
Launch Checklists
references/launch-checklists.md contains:
- Tier 1/2/3 launch checklists
- Week-by-week launch timeline
- Launch day runbook
- Post-launch metrics dashboard
International GTM
references/international-gtm.md contains:
- US, UK, DACH, France, Canada playbooks
- Market-specific channel mix and messaging
- Localization requirements per market
- Entry timeline and budget allocation
Messaging Templates
references/messaging-templates.md contains:
- Value proposition formulas
- Persona-specific messaging
- Competitive response scripts
- Objection handling templates
- Channel-specific copy (landing pages, emails, ads)
PMM KPIs
| Metric |
Target |
Measurement |
| Product adoption |
>40% in 90 days |
Feature usage after launch |
| Win rate |
>30% competitive |
Deals won vs. competitors |
| Sales velocity |
-20% YoY |
Days from SQL to close |
| Deal size |
+25% YoY |
Average contract value |
| Launch pipeline |
3:1 ROMI |
Pipeline $ : marketing spend |
Quick Reference
PMM Monthly Rhythm
| Week |
Focus |
| 1 |
Review metrics, update battlecards |
| 2 |
Create assets, publish content |
| 3 |
Support launches, optimize campaigns |
| 4 |
Monthly report, plan next month |
Proactive Triggers
- No documented positioning -- Without clear positioning, all marketing is guesswork. Start with April Dunford framework.
- Messaging differs across channels -- Inconsistent story confuses buyers. Align messaging hierarchy across all touchpoints.
- No ICP defined -- Selling to everyone means selling to no one. Define ICP before any campaign spend.
- Competitor repositioning -- Market shift detected. Review your positioning and update battlecards.
Output Artifacts
| When you ask for... |
You get... |
| "Position my product" |
Positioning framework (April Dunford method) with completed output |
| "GTM strategy" |
Go-to-market plan with channels, messaging, and timeline |
| "Competitive positioning" |
Positioning map with competitive gaps and opportunities |
| "Sales enablement" |
Sales deck structure, battlecards, and demo flow |
Communication
All output passes quality verification:
- Self-verify: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring
- Output format: Bottom Line first, then What (with confidence), Why, How to Act
- Every finding tagged with confidence level: verified, medium confidence, or assumed
Related Skills
- marketing-demand-acquisition: For executing acquisition campaigns planned by PMM.
- campaign-analytics: For measuring launch and campaign effectiveness.
- content-creator: For creating content assets defined in PMM strategy.
- social-media-analyzer: For tracking social media performance of PMM campaigns.
Troubleshooting
| Symptom |
Likely Cause |
Resolution |
| Positioning resonates internally but customers do not repeat it |
Positioning built from company perspective, not customer language |
Rerun April Dunford methodology starting from competitive alternatives, not from product features |
| Win rate against specific competitor below 25% |
Battlecard outdated or sales team not using it |
Run win_loss_analyzer.py to identify loss patterns; update battlecard monthly; validate 80%+ sales usage |
| GTM motion producing high MQLs but low pipeline conversion |
Wrong GTM motion for ACV and buyer type; marketing-led when should be sales-led |
Reassess motion using gtm_planner.py; for ACV >$25K, shift to sales-led or hybrid PLG+sales |
| Sales enablement assets gathering dust |
Assets created without sales input; format does not match how sales actually works |
Co-create assets with sales; survey sales on what they need; track asset usage in deal cycles |
| International expansion burning cash with zero pipeline |
Market entered without validating demand (inbound signal, TAM) |
Validate 3+ paying customers from market in first 90 days; if not, pause and reassess market priority |
| Competitive intelligence always reactive to lost deals |
No proactive monitoring system; battlecards only updated post-loss |
Set up monthly competitor monitoring (website, pricing, job postings, G2 reviews); update battlecards proactively |
| Messaging differs across website, sales deck, and ads |
No messaging hierarchy documented; each team creates independently |
Build messaging hierarchy (headline > subhead > benefits > features > proof) and enforce across all touchpoints |
Success Criteria
- Positioning validated with 10+ customer interviews; 7+ describe value unprompted
- Win rate above 30% in competitive deals, measured and tracked monthly
- Sales velocity improves 20%+ YoY (days from SQL to close decreasing)
- Sales team uses battlecards in 80%+ of competitive opportunities
- Product adoption exceeds 40% within 90 days of launch
- GTM plan generates 3:1 pipeline-to-marketing-spend ROMI
- Messaging hierarchy consistent across all customer-facing touchpoints
Scope & Limitations
In Scope: Product positioning (April Dunford methodology), ICP definition and validation, competitive intelligence and battlecards, GTM strategy and motion selection (PLG, sales-led, marketing-led, community-led), product launch planning, sales enablement, win/loss analysis, international expansion planning, messaging hierarchy, PMM KPIs.
Out of Scope: Brand identity and visual design (see brand-guidelines skill), demand generation execution (see marketing-demand-acquisition skill), content creation (see content-creator skill), pricing strategy optimization, sales process design.
Limitations: Positioning frameworks require real customer input to be effective — internally generated positioning is unreliable. Win/loss analysis requires honest deal outcome data from sales; incomplete data produces misleading patterns. GTM motion recommendations are based on ACV and buyer type heuristics; edge cases may require hybrid approaches. International expansion timelines assume US-first model and may not apply to non-US companies.
Scripts
| Script |
Purpose |
Usage |
scripts/gtm_planner.py |
Generate GTM plans with motion selection, channel strategy, and timeline |
python scripts/gtm_planner.py config.json --demo |
scripts/win_loss_analyzer.py |
Analyze deal outcomes by competitor, segment, and reason |
python scripts/win_loss_analyzer.py deals.json --demo |
scripts/battlecard_generator.py |
Generate competitive battlecards with feature comparison and objection handling |
python scripts/battlecard_generator.py competitor.json --demo |
1---
2name: marketing-strategy-pmm
3description: >
4 Product marketing skill for positioning, GTM strategy, competitive
5 intelligence, and product launches. Covers April Dunford positioning, ICP
6 definition, competitive battlecards, launch playbooks, and international
7 market entry.
8license: MIT + Commons Clause
9metadata:
10 version: 1.0.0
11 author: borghei
12 category: marketing
13 domain: product-marketing
14 updated: 2026-03-31
15 tags: [product-marketing, positioning, gtm, competitive-intel, launches]
16---
17
18# Marketing Strategy & PMM
19
20Product marketing patterns for positioning, GTM strategy, and competitive intelligence.
21
22---
23
24## Table of Contents
25
26- [ICP Definition Workflow](#icp-definition-workflow)
27- [Positioning Development](#positioning-development)
28- [Competitive Intelligence](#competitive-intelligence)
29- [Product Launch Planning](#product-launch-planning)
30- [Sales Enablement](#sales-enablement)
31- [International Expansion](#international-expansion)
32- [Reference Documentation](#reference-documentation)
33
34---
35
36## Clarify First
37
38Before building the PMM artifact, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:
39
40- [ ] **Deliverable type** — positioning statement, GTM plan, battlecard, or sales enablement (determines which workflow runs)
41- [ ] **Target customer / ICP** — best-fit segment, ideally top 20% by LTV (drives the FOR clause and targeting)
42- [ ] **Competitive alternatives** — direct, adjacent, and status-quo options (drives the UNLIKE clause and battlecards)
43- [ ] **Unique differentiation** — what only you do and why it matters (drives the positioning differentiator and value prop)
44
45Stop rule: ask only the 2-3 that most change the output. If the user says "just draft it," proceed and list your assumptions at the top of the artifact.
46
47## ICP Definition Workflow
48
49Define ideal customer profile for targeting:
50
511. Analyze existing customers (top 20% by LTV)
522. Identify common firmographics (size, industry, revenue)
533. Map technographics (tools, maturity, integrations)
544. Document psychographics (pain level, motivation, risk tolerance)
555. Define 3-5 buyer personas (economic, technical, user)
566. Validate against sales cycle and churn data
577. Score prospects A/B/C/D based on ICP fit
588. **Validation:** A-fit customers have lowest churn and fastest close
59
60### Firmographics Template
61
62| Dimension | Target Range | Rationale |
63|-----------|--------------|-----------|
64| Employees | 50-5000 | Series A sweet spot |
65| Revenue | $5M-$500M | Budget available |
66| Industry | SaaS, Tech, Services | Product fit |
67| Geography | US, UK, DACH | Market priority |
68| Funding | Seed to Growth | Willing to adopt |
69
70### Buyer Personas
71
72**Economic Buyer** (signs contract):
73- Title: VP, Director, Head of [Department]
74- Goals: ROI, team productivity, cost reduction
75- Messaging: Business outcomes, ROI, case studies
76
77**Technical Buyer** (evaluates product):
78- Title: Engineer, Architect, Tech Lead
79- Goals: Technical fit, easy integration
80- Messaging: Architecture, security, documentation
81
82**User/Champion** (advocates internally):
83- Title: Manager, Team Lead, Power User
84- Goals: Makes job easier, quick wins
85- Messaging: UX, ease of use, time savings
86
87### ICP Validation Checklist
88
89- [ ] 5+ paying customers match this profile
90- [ ] Fastest sales cycles (< median)
91- [ ] Highest LTV (> median)
92- [ ] Lowest churn (< 5% annual)
93- [ ] Strong product engagement
94- [ ] Willing to do case studies
95
96---
97
98## Positioning Development
99
100Develop positioning using April Dunford methodology:
101
1021. List competitive alternatives (direct, adjacent, status quo)
1032. Isolate unique attributes (features only you have)
1043. Map attributes to customer value (why it matters)
1054. Define best-fit customers (who cares most)
1065. Choose market category (head-to-head, niche, new category)
1076. Layer on relevant trends (timing justification)
1087. Test with 10+ customer interviews
1098. **Validation:** 7+ customers describe value unprompted
110
111### Positioning Statement Template
112
113```
114FOR [target customer]
115WHO [statement of need]
116THE [product] IS A [category]
117THAT [key benefit]
118UNLIKE [competitive alternative]
119OUR PRODUCT [primary differentiation]
120```
121
122### Value Proposition Formula
123
124Template: `[Product] helps [Target Customer] [Achieve Goal] by [Unique Approach]`
125
126Example: "Acme helps mid-market SaaS teams ship 2x faster by automating project workflows with AI"
127
128### Messaging Hierarchy
129
130| Level | Content | Example |
131|-------|---------|---------|
132| Headline | 5-7 words | "Ship faster with AI automation" |
133| Subhead | 1 sentence | "Automate workflows so teams focus on what matters" |
134| Benefits | 3-4 bullets | Speed, quality, collaboration, cost |
135| Features | Supporting evidence | AI automation → 10 hrs/week saved |
136| Proof | Social proof | Customer logos, stats, case studies |
137
138---
139
140## Competitive Intelligence
141
142Build competitive knowledge base:
143
1441. Identify tier 1 (direct), tier 2 (adjacent), tier 3 (status quo)
1452. Sign up for competitor products (hands-on evaluation)
1463. Monitor competitor websites, pricing, messaging
1474. Analyze sales call recordings for competitor mentions
1485. Read G2/Capterra reviews (pros and cons)
1496. Track competitor job postings (roadmap signals)
1507. Update battlecards monthly
1518. **Validation:** Sales team uses battlecards in 80%+ competitive deals
152
153### Competitive Tier Structure
154
155| Tier | Definition | Examples |
156|------|------------|----------|
157| 1 | Direct competitor, same category | [Competitor A, B] |
158| 2 | Adjacent solution, overlapping use case | [Alt Solution C, D] |
159| 3 | Status quo (what they do today) | Spreadsheets, manual, in-house |
160
161### Battlecard Template
162
163```
164COMPETITOR: [Name]
165OVERVIEW: Founded [year], Funding [stage], Size [employees]
166
167POSITIONING:
168- They say: "[Their claim]"
169- Reality: [Your assessment]
170
171STRENGTHS:
1721. [What they do well]
1732. [What they do well]
174
175WEAKNESSES:
1761. [Where they fall short]
1772. [Where they fall short]
178
179OUR ADVANTAGES:
1801. [Your advantage + evidence]
1812. [Your advantage + evidence]
182
183WHEN WE WIN:
184- [Scenario where you win]
185
186WHEN WE LOSE:
187- [Scenario where they win]
188
189TALK TRACK:
190Objection: "[Common objection]"
191Response: "[Your response]"
192```
193
194### Win/Loss Analysis
195
196Track monthly:
197- Win rate by competitor
198- Top win reasons (product fit, ease of use, price)
199- Top loss reasons (missing feature, price, relationship)
200- Action items for product, sales, marketing
201
202---
203
204## Product Launch Planning
205
206Plan launches by tier:
207
208| Tier | Scope | Prep Time | Budget |
209|------|-------|-----------|--------|
210| 1 | New product, major feature | 6-8 weeks | $50-100k |
211| 2 | Significant feature, integration | 3-4 weeks | $10-25k |
212| 3 | Small improvement | 1 week | <$5k |
213
214### Tier 1 Launch Workflow
215
216Execute major product launch:
217
2181. Kickoff meeting with Product, Marketing, Sales, CS
2192. Define goals (pipeline $, MQLs, press coverage)
2203. Develop positioning and messaging
2214. Create sales enablement (deck, demo, battlecard)
2225. Build campaign assets (landing page, emails, ads)
2236. Train sales and CS teams
2247. Execute launch day (press, email, ads, outbound)
2258. Monitor and optimize for 30 days
2269. **Validation:** Pipeline on track to goal by week 2
227
228### Launch Day Checklist
229
230- [ ] Press release distributed
231- [ ] Email announcement sent
232- [ ] Social media posts live
233- [ ] Paid ads at full budget
234- [ ] Sales outbound blitz launched
235- [ ] In-app notification active
236- [ ] Metrics monitored every 2 hours
237
238### Launch Metrics
239
240| Metric | Leading (Daily) | Lagging (Weekly) |
241|--------|-----------------|------------------|
242| Traffic | Landing page visitors | - |
243| Engagement | Demo requests, signups | Feature adoption % |
244| Pipeline | MQLs generated | SQLs, pipeline $ |
245| Revenue | - | Deals closed, revenue |
246
247---
248
249## Sales Enablement
250
251Equip sales team with PMM assets:
252
2531. Create sales deck (15-20 slides, visual-first)
2542. Build one-pagers (product, competitive, case study)
2553. Develop demo script (30-45 min with discovery)
2564. Write email templates (outreach, follow-up, closing)
2575. Create ROI calculator (input costs, output savings)
2586. Conduct monthly enablement calls
2597. Deliver quarterly training (positioning, competitive)
2608. **Validation:** Sales uses assets in 80%+ of opportunities
261
262### Sales Deck Structure
263
264| Slide | Content |
265|-------|---------|
266| 1-2 | Title, agenda |
267| 3-4 | Company intro, problem statement |
268| 5-7 | Solution, key benefits, demo |
269| 8-10 | Differentiation, case study, pricing |
270| 11-12 | Implementation, support, next steps |
271
272### Demo Flow
273
274```
2751. Intro (2 min): Who we are, agenda
2762. Discovery (5 min): Their needs, pain points
2773. Demo (20 min): Product focused on their use case
2784. Q&A (10 min): Objection handling
2795. Next steps (3 min): Trial, POC, proposal
280```
281
282### Sales-Marketing Handoff
283
284| Handoff | Frequency | Content |
285|---------|-----------|---------|
286| Weekly sync | 30 min | Win/loss, competitive, new assets |
287| Monthly enablement | 60 min | Product updates, training |
288| Quarterly review | Half-day | Results, strategy, planning |
289
290---
291
292## International Expansion
293
294Enter new markets systematically:
295
2961. Validate market demand (inbound leads, TAM analysis)
2972. Localize website, pricing, legal
2983. Establish sales coverage (hire or agency)
2994. Adapt messaging for cultural fit
3005. Build local partnerships and references
3016. Launch localized campaigns
3027. Monitor CAC and conversion by market
3038. **Validation:** 3+ paying customers from market in first 90 days
304
305### Market Priority (Series A)
306
307| Market | Timeline | Budget % | Target ARR |
308|--------|----------|----------|------------|
309| US | Months 1-6 | 50% | $1M |
310| UK | Months 4-9 | 20% | $500k |
311| DACH | Months 7-12 | 15% | $300k |
312| France | Months 10-15 | 10% | $200k |
313| Canada | Months 7-12 | 5% | $100k |
314
315### Localization Checklist
316
317- [ ] Website translation (professional, not machine)
318- [ ] Currency and pricing localized
319- [ ] Local phone number and address
320- [ ] Legal compliance (GDPR, PIPEDA)
321- [ ] Local payment methods
322- [ ] Sales coverage during local hours
323- [ ] Local case studies and references
324
325---
326
327## Reference Documentation
328
329### Positioning Frameworks
330
331`references/positioning-frameworks.md` contains:
332
333- April Dunford 5-step positioning process
334- Geoffrey Moore positioning statement template
335- Positioning validation interview protocol
336- Competitive positioning map construction
337
338### Launch Checklists
339
340`references/launch-checklists.md` contains:
341
342- Tier 1/2/3 launch checklists
343- Week-by-week launch timeline
344- Launch day runbook
345- Post-launch metrics dashboard
346
347### International GTM
348
349`references/international-gtm.md` contains:
350
351- US, UK, DACH, France, Canada playbooks
352- Market-specific channel mix and messaging
353- Localization requirements per market
354- Entry timeline and budget allocation
355
356### Messaging Templates
357
358`references/messaging-templates.md` contains:
359
360- Value proposition formulas
361- Persona-specific messaging
362- Competitive response scripts
363- Objection handling templates
364- Channel-specific copy (landing pages, emails, ads)
365
366---
367
368## PMM KPIs
369
370| Metric | Target | Measurement |
371|--------|--------|-------------|
372| Product adoption | >40% in 90 days | Feature usage after launch |
373| Win rate | >30% competitive | Deals won vs. competitors |
374| Sales velocity | -20% YoY | Days from SQL to close |
375| Deal size | +25% YoY | Average contract value |
376| Launch pipeline | 3:1 ROMI | Pipeline $ : marketing spend |
377
378---
379
380## Quick Reference
381
382### PMM Monthly Rhythm
383
384| Week | Focus |
385|------|-------|
386| 1 | Review metrics, update battlecards |
387| 2 | Create assets, publish content |
388| 3 | Support launches, optimize campaigns |
389| 4 | Monthly report, plan next month |
390
391## Proactive Triggers
392
393- **No documented positioning** -- Without clear positioning, all marketing is guesswork. Start with April Dunford framework.
394- **Messaging differs across channels** -- Inconsistent story confuses buyers. Align messaging hierarchy across all touchpoints.
395- **No ICP defined** -- Selling to everyone means selling to no one. Define ICP before any campaign spend.
396- **Competitor repositioning** -- Market shift detected. Review your positioning and update battlecards.
397
398## Output Artifacts
399
400| When you ask for... | You get... |
401|---------------------|------------|
402| "Position my product" | Positioning framework (April Dunford method) with completed output |
403| "GTM strategy" | Go-to-market plan with channels, messaging, and timeline |
404| "Competitive positioning" | Positioning map with competitive gaps and opportunities |
405| "Sales enablement" | Sales deck structure, battlecards, and demo flow |
406
407## Communication
408
409All output passes quality verification:
410- Self-verify: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring
411- Output format: Bottom Line first, then What (with confidence), Why, How to Act
412- Every finding tagged with confidence level: verified, medium confidence, or assumed
413
414## Related Skills
415
416- **marketing-demand-acquisition**: For executing acquisition campaigns planned by PMM.
417- **campaign-analytics**: For measuring launch and campaign effectiveness.
418- **content-creator**: For creating content assets defined in PMM strategy.
419- **social-media-analyzer**: For tracking social media performance of PMM campaigns.
420
421---
422
423## Troubleshooting
424
425| Symptom | Likely Cause | Resolution |
426|---------|-------------|------------|
427| Positioning resonates internally but customers do not repeat it | Positioning built from company perspective, not customer language | Rerun April Dunford methodology starting from competitive alternatives, not from product features |
428| Win rate against specific competitor below 25% | Battlecard outdated or sales team not using it | Run win_loss_analyzer.py to identify loss patterns; update battlecard monthly; validate 80%+ sales usage |
429| GTM motion producing high MQLs but low pipeline conversion | Wrong GTM motion for ACV and buyer type; marketing-led when should be sales-led | Reassess motion using gtm_planner.py; for ACV >$25K, shift to sales-led or hybrid PLG+sales |
430| Sales enablement assets gathering dust | Assets created without sales input; format does not match how sales actually works | Co-create assets with sales; survey sales on what they need; track asset usage in deal cycles |
431| International expansion burning cash with zero pipeline | Market entered without validating demand (inbound signal, TAM) | Validate 3+ paying customers from market in first 90 days; if not, pause and reassess market priority |
432| Competitive intelligence always reactive to lost deals | No proactive monitoring system; battlecards only updated post-loss | Set up monthly competitor monitoring (website, pricing, job postings, G2 reviews); update battlecards proactively |
433| Messaging differs across website, sales deck, and ads | No messaging hierarchy documented; each team creates independently | Build messaging hierarchy (headline > subhead > benefits > features > proof) and enforce across all touchpoints |
434
435---
436
437## Success Criteria
438
439- Positioning validated with 10+ customer interviews; 7+ describe value unprompted
440- Win rate above 30% in competitive deals, measured and tracked monthly
441- Sales velocity improves 20%+ YoY (days from SQL to close decreasing)
442- Sales team uses battlecards in 80%+ of competitive opportunities
443- Product adoption exceeds 40% within 90 days of launch
444- GTM plan generates 3:1 pipeline-to-marketing-spend ROMI
445- Messaging hierarchy consistent across all customer-facing touchpoints
446
447---
448
449## Scope & Limitations
450
451**In Scope:** Product positioning (April Dunford methodology), ICP definition and validation, competitive intelligence and battlecards, GTM strategy and motion selection (PLG, sales-led, marketing-led, community-led), product launch planning, sales enablement, win/loss analysis, international expansion planning, messaging hierarchy, PMM KPIs.
452
453**Out of Scope:** Brand identity and visual design (see brand-guidelines skill), demand generation execution (see marketing-demand-acquisition skill), content creation (see content-creator skill), pricing strategy optimization, sales process design.
454
455**Limitations:** Positioning frameworks require real customer input to be effective — internally generated positioning is unreliable. Win/loss analysis requires honest deal outcome data from sales; incomplete data produces misleading patterns. GTM motion recommendations are based on ACV and buyer type heuristics; edge cases may require hybrid approaches. International expansion timelines assume US-first model and may not apply to non-US companies.
456
457---
458
459## Scripts
460
461| Script | Purpose | Usage |
462|--------|---------|-------|
463| `scripts/gtm_planner.py` | Generate GTM plans with motion selection, channel strategy, and timeline | `python scripts/gtm_planner.py config.json --demo` |
464| `scripts/win_loss_analyzer.py` | Analyze deal outcomes by competitor, segment, and reason | `python scripts/win_loss_analyzer.py deals.json --demo` |
465| `scripts/battlecard_generator.py` | Generate competitive battlecards with feature comparison and objection handling | `python scripts/battlecard_generator.py competitor.json --demo` |