Marketing Strategy & PMM
Product marketing patterns for positioning, GTM strategy, and competitive intelligence.
Table of Contents
Clarify First
Before building the PMM artifact, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:
Stop rule: ask only the 2-3 that most change the output. If the user says "just draft it," proceed and list your assumptions at the top of the artifact.
ICP Definition Workflow
Define ideal customer profile for targeting:
- Analyze existing customers (top 20% by LTV)
- Identify common firmographics (size, industry, revenue)
- Map technographics (tools, maturity, integrations)
- Document psychographics (pain level, motivation, risk tolerance)
- Define 3-5 buyer personas (economic, technical, user)
- Validate against sales cycle and churn data
- Score prospects A/B/C/D based on ICP fit
- Validation: A-fit customers have lowest churn and fastest close
Firmographics Template
| Dimension |
Target Range |
Rationale |
| Employees |
50-5000 |
Series A sweet spot |
| Revenue |
$5M-$500M |
Budget available |
| Industry |
SaaS, Tech, Services |
Product fit |
| Geography |
US, UK, DACH |
Market priority |
| Funding |
Seed to Growth |
Willing to adopt |
Buyer Personas
Economic Buyer (signs contract):
- Title: VP, Director, Head of [Department]
- Goals: ROI, team productivity, cost reduction
- Messaging: Business outcomes, ROI, case studies
Technical Buyer (evaluates product):
- Title: Engineer, Architect, Tech Lead
- Goals: Technical fit, easy integration
- Messaging: Architecture, security, documentation
User/Champion (advocates internally):
- Title: Manager, Team Lead, Power User
- Goals: Makes job easier, quick wins
- Messaging: UX, ease of use, time savings
ICP Validation Checklist
Positioning Development
Develop positioning using April Dunford methodology:
- List competitive alternatives (direct, adjacent, status quo)
- Isolate unique attributes (features only you have)
- Map attributes to customer value (why it matters)
- Define best-fit customers (who cares most)
- Choose market category (head-to-head, niche, new category)
- Layer on relevant trends (timing justification)
- Test with 10+ customer interviews
- Validation: 7+ customers describe value unprompted
Positioning Statement Template
FOR [target customer]
WHO [statement of need]
THE [product] IS A [category]
THAT [key benefit]
UNLIKE [competitive alternative]
OUR PRODUCT [primary differentiation]
Value Proposition Formula
Template: [Product] helps [Target Customer] [Achieve Goal] by [Unique Approach]
Example: "Acme helps mid-market SaaS teams ship 2x faster by automating project workflows with AI"
Messaging Hierarchy
| Level |
Content |
Example |
| Headline |
5-7 words |
"Ship faster with AI automation" |
| Subhead |
1 sentence |
"Automate workflows so teams focus on what matters" |
| Benefits |
3-4 bullets |
Speed, quality, collaboration, cost |
| Features |
Supporting evidence |
AI automation → 10 hrs/week saved |
| Proof |
Social proof |
Customer logos, stats, case studies |
Competitive Intelligence
Build competitive knowledge base:
- Identify tier 1 (direct), tier 2 (adjacent), tier 3 (status quo)
- Sign up for competitor products (hands-on evaluation)
- Monitor competitor websites, pricing, messaging
- Analyze sales call recordings for competitor mentions
- Read G2/Capterra reviews (pros and cons)
- Track competitor job postings (roadmap signals)
- Update battlecards monthly
- Validation: Sales team uses battlecards in 80%+ competitive deals
Competitive Tier Structure
| Tier |
Definition |
Examples |
| 1 |
Direct competitor, same category |
[Competitor A, B] |
| 2 |
Adjacent solution, overlapping use case |
[Alt Solution C, D] |
| 3 |
Status quo (what they do today) |
Spreadsheets, manual, in-house |
Battlecard Template
COMPETITOR: [Name]
OVERVIEW: Founded [year], Funding [stage], Size [employees]
POSITIONING:
- They say: "[Their claim]"
- Reality: [Your assessment]
STRENGTHS:
1. [What they do well]
2. [What they do well]
WEAKNESSES:
1. [Where they fall short]
2. [Where they fall short]
OUR ADVANTAGES:
1. [Your advantage + evidence]
2. [Your advantage + evidence]
WHEN WE WIN:
- [Scenario where you win]
WHEN WE LOSE:
- [Scenario where they win]
TALK TRACK:
Objection: "[Common objection]"
Response: "[Your response]"
Win/Loss Analysis
Track monthly:
- Win rate by competitor
- Top win reasons (product fit, ease of use, price)
- Top loss reasons (missing feature, price, relationship)
- Action items for product, sales, marketing
Product Launch Planning
Plan launches by tier:
| Tier |
Scope |
Prep Time |
Budget |
| 1 |
New product, major feature |
6-8 weeks |
$50-100k |
| 2 |
Significant feature, integration |
3-4 weeks |
$10-25k |
| 3 |
Small improvement |
1 week |
<$5k |
Tier 1 Launch Workflow
Execute major product launch:
- Kickoff meeting with Product, Marketing, Sales, CS
- Define goals (pipeline $, MQLs, press coverage)
- Develop positioning and messaging
- Create sales enablement (deck, demo, battlecard)
- Build campaign assets (landing page, emails, ads)
- Train sales and CS teams
- Execute launch day (press, email, ads, outbound)
- Monitor and optimize for 30 days
- Validation: Pipeline on track to goal by week 2
Launch Day Checklist
Launch Metrics
| Metric |
Leading (Daily) |
Lagging (Weekly) |
| Traffic |
Landing page visitors |
- |
| Engagement |
Demo requests, signups |
Feature adoption % |
| Pipeline |
MQLs generated |
SQLs, pipeline $ |
| Revenue |
- |
Deals closed, revenue |
Sales Enablement
Equip sales team with PMM assets:
- Create sales deck (15-20 slides, visual-first)
- Build one-pagers (product, competitive, case study)
- Develop demo script (30-45 min with discovery)
- Write email templates (outreach, follow-up, closing)
- Create ROI calculator (input costs, output savings)
- Conduct monthly enablement calls
- Deliver quarterly training (positioning, competitive)
- Validation: Sales uses assets in 80%+ of opportunities
Sales Deck Structure
| Slide |
Content |
| 1-2 |
Title, agenda |
| 3-4 |
Company intro, problem statement |
| 5-7 |
Solution, key benefits, demo |
| 8-10 |
Differentiation, case study, pricing |
| 11-12 |
Implementation, support, next steps |
Demo Flow
1. Intro (2 min): Who we are, agenda
2. Discovery (5 min): Their needs, pain points
3. Demo (20 min): Product focused on their use case
4. Q&A (10 min): Objection handling
5. Next steps (3 min): Trial, POC, proposal
Sales-Marketing Handoff
| Handoff |
Frequency |
Content |
| Weekly sync |
30 min |
Win/loss, competitive, new assets |
| Monthly enablement |
60 min |
Product updates, training |
| Quarterly review |
Half-day |
Results, strategy, planning |
International Expansion
Enter new markets systematically:
- Validate market demand (inbound leads, TAM analysis)
- Localize website, pricing, legal
- Establish sales coverage (hire or agency)
- Adapt messaging for cultural fit
- Build local partnerships and references
- Launch localized campaigns
- Monitor CAC and conversion by market
- Validation: 3+ paying customers from market in first 90 days
Market Priority (Series A)
| Market |
Timeline |
Budget % |
Target ARR |
| US |
Months 1-6 |
50% |
$1M |
| UK |
Months 4-9 |
20% |
$500k |
| DACH |
Months 7-12 |
15% |
$300k |
| France |
Months 10-15 |
10% |
$200k |
| Canada |
Months 7-12 |
5% |
$100k |
Localization Checklist
Reference Documentation
Positioning Frameworks
references/positioning-frameworks.md contains:
- April Dunford 5-step positioning process
- Geoffrey Moore positioning statement template
- Positioning validation interview protocol
- Competitive positioning map construction
Launch Checklists
references/launch-checklists.md contains:
- Tier 1/2/3 launch checklists
- Week-by-week launch timeline
- Launch day runbook
- Post-launch metrics dashboard
International GTM
references/international-gtm.md contains:
- US, UK, DACH, France, Canada playbooks
- Market-specific channel mix and messaging
- Localization requirements per market
- Entry timeline and budget allocation
Messaging Templates
references/messaging-templates.md contains:
- Value proposition formulas
- Persona-specific messaging
- Competitive response scripts
- Objection handling templates
- Channel-specific copy (landing pages, emails, ads)
PMM KPIs
| Metric |
Target |
Measurement |
| Product adoption |
>40% in 90 days |
Feature usage after launch |
| Win rate |
>30% competitive |
Deals won vs. competitors |
| Sales velocity |
-20% YoY |
Days from SQL to close |
| Deal size |
+25% YoY |
Average contract value |
| Launch pipeline |
3:1 ROMI |
Pipeline $ : marketing spend |
Quick Reference
PMM Monthly Rhythm
| Week |
Focus |
| 1 |
Review metrics, update battlecards |
| 2 |
Create assets, publish content |
| 3 |
Support launches, optimize campaigns |
| 4 |
Monthly report, plan next month |
Proactive Triggers
- No documented positioning -- Without clear positioning, all marketing is guesswork. Start with April Dunford framework.
- Messaging differs across channels -- Inconsistent story confuses buyers. Align messaging hierarchy across all touchpoints.
- No ICP defined -- Selling to everyone means selling to no one. Define ICP before any campaign spend.
- Competitor repositioning -- Market shift detected. Review your positioning and update battlecards.
Output Artifacts
| When you ask for... |
You get... |
| "Position my product" |
Positioning framework (April Dunford method) with completed output |
| "GTM strategy" |
Go-to-market plan with channels, messaging, and timeline |
| "Competitive positioning" |
Positioning map with competitive gaps and opportunities |
| "Sales enablement" |
Sales deck structure, battlecards, and demo flow |
Communication
All output passes quality verification:
- Self-verify: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring
- Output format: Bottom Line first, then What (with confidence), Why, How to Act
- Every finding tagged with confidence level: verified, medium confidence, or assumed
Related Skills
- marketing-demand-acquisition: For executing acquisition campaigns planned by PMM.
- campaign-analytics: For measuring launch and campaign effectiveness.
- content-creator: For creating content assets defined in PMM strategy.
- social-media-analyzer: For tracking social media performance of PMM campaigns.
Troubleshooting
| Symptom |
Likely Cause |
Resolution |
| Positioning resonates internally but customers do not repeat it |
Positioning built from company perspective, not customer language |
Rerun April Dunford methodology starting from competitive alternatives, not from product features |
| Win rate against specific competitor below 25% |
Battlecard outdated or sales team not using it |
Run win_loss_analyzer.py to identify loss patterns; update battlecard monthly; validate 80%+ sales usage |
| GTM motion producing high MQLs but low pipeline conversion |
Wrong GTM motion for ACV and buyer type; marketing-led when should be sales-led |
Reassess motion using gtm_planner.py; for ACV >$25K, shift to sales-led or hybrid PLG+sales |
| Sales enablement assets gathering dust |
Assets created without sales input; format does not match how sales actually works |
Co-create assets with sales; survey sales on what they need; track asset usage in deal cycles |
| International expansion burning cash with zero pipeline |
Market entered without validating demand (inbound signal, TAM) |
Validate 3+ paying customers from market in first 90 days; if not, pause and reassess market priority |
| Competitive intelligence always reactive to lost deals |
No proactive monitoring system; battlecards only updated post-loss |
Set up monthly competitor monitoring (website, pricing, job postings, G2 reviews); update battlecards proactively |
| Messaging differs across website, sales deck, and ads |
No messaging hierarchy documented; each team creates independently |
Build messaging hierarchy (headline > subhead > benefits > features > proof) and enforce across all touchpoints |
Success Criteria
- Positioning validated with 10+ customer interviews; 7+ describe value unprompted
- Win rate above 30% in competitive deals, measured and tracked monthly
- Sales velocity improves 20%+ YoY (days from SQL to close decreasing)
- Sales team uses battlecards in 80%+ of competitive opportunities
- Product adoption exceeds 40% within 90 days of launch
- GTM plan generates 3:1 pipeline-to-marketing-spend ROMI
- Messaging hierarchy consistent across all customer-facing touchpoints
Scope & Limitations
In Scope: Product positioning (April Dunford methodology), ICP definition and validation, competitive intelligence and battlecards, GTM strategy and motion selection (PLG, sales-led, marketing-led, community-led), product launch planning, sales enablement, win/loss analysis, international expansion planning, messaging hierarchy, PMM KPIs.
Out of Scope: Brand identity and visual design (see brand-guidelines skill), demand generation execution (see marketing-demand-acquisition skill), content creation (see content-creator skill), pricing strategy optimization, sales process design.
Limitations: Positioning frameworks require real customer input to be effective — internally generated positioning is unreliable. Win/loss analysis requires honest deal outcome data from sales; incomplete data produces misleading patterns. GTM motion recommendations are based on ACV and buyer type heuristics; edge cases may require hybrid approaches. International expansion timelines assume US-first model and may not apply to non-US companies.
Scripts
| Script |
Purpose |
Usage |
scripts/gtm_planner.py |
Generate GTM plans with motion selection, channel strategy, and timeline |
python scripts/gtm_planner.py config.json --demo |
scripts/win_loss_analyzer.py |
Analyze deal outcomes by competitor, segment, and reason |
python scripts/win_loss_analyzer.py deals.json --demo |
scripts/battlecard_generator.py |
Generate competitive battlecards with feature comparison and objection handling |
python scripts/battlecard_generator.py competitor.json --demo |
1---2name: marketing-strategy-pmm3description: Product marketing skill for positioning, GTM strategy, competitive intelligence, and product launches. Covers April Dunford positioning, ICP definition, competitive battlecards, launch playbooks, and international market entry.4license: MIT + Commons Clause5---6# Marketing Strategy & PMM
7
8Product marketing patterns for positioning, GTM strategy, and competitive intelligence.
9
10---
11
12## Table of Contents
13
14- [ICP Definition Workflow](#icp-definition-workflow)
15- [Positioning Development](#positioning-development)
16- [Competitive Intelligence](#competitive-intelligence)
17- [Product Launch Planning](#product-launch-planning)
18- [Sales Enablement](#sales-enablement)
19- [International Expansion](#international-expansion)
20- [Reference Documentation](#reference-documentation)
21
22---
23
24## Clarify First
25
26Before building the PMM artifact, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:
27
28- [ ] **Deliverable type** — positioning statement, GTM plan, battlecard, or sales enablement (determines which workflow runs)
29- [ ] **Target customer / ICP** — best-fit segment, ideally top 20% by LTV (drives the FOR clause and targeting)
30- [ ] **Competitive alternatives** — direct, adjacent, and status-quo options (drives the UNLIKE clause and battlecards)
31- [ ] **Unique differentiation** — what only you do and why it matters (drives the positioning differentiator and value prop)
32
33Stop rule: ask only the 2-3 that most change the output. If the user says "just draft it," proceed and list your assumptions at the top of the artifact.
34
35## ICP Definition Workflow
36
37Define ideal customer profile for targeting:
38
391. Analyze existing customers (top 20% by LTV)
402. Identify common firmographics (size, industry, revenue)
413. Map technographics (tools, maturity, integrations)
424. Document psychographics (pain level, motivation, risk tolerance)
435. Define 3-5 buyer personas (economic, technical, user)
446. Validate against sales cycle and churn data
457. Score prospects A/B/C/D based on ICP fit
468. **Validation:** A-fit customers have lowest churn and fastest close
47
48### Firmographics Template
49
50| Dimension | Target Range | Rationale |
51|-----------|--------------|-----------|
52| Employees | 50-5000 | Series A sweet spot |
53| Revenue | $5M-$500M | Budget available |
54| Industry | SaaS, Tech, Services | Product fit |
55| Geography | US, UK, DACH | Market priority |
56| Funding | Seed to Growth | Willing to adopt |
57
58### Buyer Personas
59
60**Economic Buyer** (signs contract):
61- Title: VP, Director, Head of [Department]
62- Goals: ROI, team productivity, cost reduction
63- Messaging: Business outcomes, ROI, case studies
64
65**Technical Buyer** (evaluates product):
66- Title: Engineer, Architect, Tech Lead
67- Goals: Technical fit, easy integration
68- Messaging: Architecture, security, documentation
69
70**User/Champion** (advocates internally):
71- Title: Manager, Team Lead, Power User
72- Goals: Makes job easier, quick wins
73- Messaging: UX, ease of use, time savings
74
75### ICP Validation Checklist
76
77- [ ] 5+ paying customers match this profile
78- [ ] Fastest sales cycles (< median)
79- [ ] Highest LTV (> median)
80- [ ] Lowest churn (< 5% annual)
81- [ ] Strong product engagement
82- [ ] Willing to do case studies
83
84---
85
86## Positioning Development
87
88Develop positioning using April Dunford methodology:
89
901. List competitive alternatives (direct, adjacent, status quo)
912. Isolate unique attributes (features only you have)
923. Map attributes to customer value (why it matters)
934. Define best-fit customers (who cares most)
945. Choose market category (head-to-head, niche, new category)
956. Layer on relevant trends (timing justification)
967. Test with 10+ customer interviews
978. **Validation:** 7+ customers describe value unprompted
98
99### Positioning Statement Template
100
101```
102FOR [target customer]
103WHO [statement of need]
104THE [product] IS A [category]
105THAT [key benefit]
106UNLIKE [competitive alternative]
107OUR PRODUCT [primary differentiation]
108```
109
110### Value Proposition Formula
111
112Template: `[Product] helps [Target Customer] [Achieve Goal] by [Unique Approach]`
113
114Example: "Acme helps mid-market SaaS teams ship 2x faster by automating project workflows with AI"
115
116### Messaging Hierarchy
117
118| Level | Content | Example |
119|-------|---------|---------|
120| Headline | 5-7 words | "Ship faster with AI automation" |
121| Subhead | 1 sentence | "Automate workflows so teams focus on what matters" |
122| Benefits | 3-4 bullets | Speed, quality, collaboration, cost |
123| Features | Supporting evidence | AI automation → 10 hrs/week saved |
124| Proof | Social proof | Customer logos, stats, case studies |
125
126---
127
128## Competitive Intelligence
129
130Build competitive knowledge base:
131
1321. Identify tier 1 (direct), tier 2 (adjacent), tier 3 (status quo)
1332. Sign up for competitor products (hands-on evaluation)
1343. Monitor competitor websites, pricing, messaging
1354. Analyze sales call recordings for competitor mentions
1365. Read G2/Capterra reviews (pros and cons)
1376. Track competitor job postings (roadmap signals)
1387. Update battlecards monthly
1398. **Validation:** Sales team uses battlecards in 80%+ competitive deals
140
141### Competitive Tier Structure
142
143| Tier | Definition | Examples |
144|------|------------|----------|
145| 1 | Direct competitor, same category | [Competitor A, B] |
146| 2 | Adjacent solution, overlapping use case | [Alt Solution C, D] |
147| 3 | Status quo (what they do today) | Spreadsheets, manual, in-house |
148
149### Battlecard Template
150
151```
152COMPETITOR: [Name]
153OVERVIEW: Founded [year], Funding [stage], Size [employees]
154
155POSITIONING:
156- They say: "[Their claim]"
157- Reality: [Your assessment]
158
159STRENGTHS:
1601. [What they do well]
1612. [What they do well]
162
163WEAKNESSES:
1641. [Where they fall short]
1652. [Where they fall short]
166
167OUR ADVANTAGES:
1681. [Your advantage + evidence]
1692. [Your advantage + evidence]
170
171WHEN WE WIN:
172- [Scenario where you win]
173
174WHEN WE LOSE:
175- [Scenario where they win]
176
177TALK TRACK:
178Objection: "[Common objection]"
179Response: "[Your response]"
180```
181
182### Win/Loss Analysis
183
184Track monthly:
185- Win rate by competitor
186- Top win reasons (product fit, ease of use, price)
187- Top loss reasons (missing feature, price, relationship)
188- Action items for product, sales, marketing
189
190---
191
192## Product Launch Planning
193
194Plan launches by tier:
195
196| Tier | Scope | Prep Time | Budget |
197|------|-------|-----------|--------|
198| 1 | New product, major feature | 6-8 weeks | $50-100k |
199| 2 | Significant feature, integration | 3-4 weeks | $10-25k |
200| 3 | Small improvement | 1 week | <$5k |
201
202### Tier 1 Launch Workflow
203
204Execute major product launch:
205
2061. Kickoff meeting with Product, Marketing, Sales, CS
2072. Define goals (pipeline $, MQLs, press coverage)
2083. Develop positioning and messaging
2094. Create sales enablement (deck, demo, battlecard)
2105. Build campaign assets (landing page, emails, ads)
2116. Train sales and CS teams
2127. Execute launch day (press, email, ads, outbound)
2138. Monitor and optimize for 30 days
2149. **Validation:** Pipeline on track to goal by week 2
215
216### Launch Day Checklist
217
218- [ ] Press release distributed
219- [ ] Email announcement sent
220- [ ] Social media posts live
221- [ ] Paid ads at full budget
222- [ ] Sales outbound blitz launched
223- [ ] In-app notification active
224- [ ] Metrics monitored every 2 hours
225
226### Launch Metrics
227
228| Metric | Leading (Daily) | Lagging (Weekly) |
229|--------|-----------------|------------------|
230| Traffic | Landing page visitors | - |
231| Engagement | Demo requests, signups | Feature adoption % |
232| Pipeline | MQLs generated | SQLs, pipeline $ |
233| Revenue | - | Deals closed, revenue |
234
235---
236
237## Sales Enablement
238
239Equip sales team with PMM assets:
240
2411. Create sales deck (15-20 slides, visual-first)
2422. Build one-pagers (product, competitive, case study)
2433. Develop demo script (30-45 min with discovery)
2444. Write email templates (outreach, follow-up, closing)
2455. Create ROI calculator (input costs, output savings)
2466. Conduct monthly enablement calls
2477. Deliver quarterly training (positioning, competitive)
2488. **Validation:** Sales uses assets in 80%+ of opportunities
249
250### Sales Deck Structure
251
252| Slide | Content |
253|-------|---------|
254| 1-2 | Title, agenda |
255| 3-4 | Company intro, problem statement |
256| 5-7 | Solution, key benefits, demo |
257| 8-10 | Differentiation, case study, pricing |
258| 11-12 | Implementation, support, next steps |
259
260### Demo Flow
261
262```
2631. Intro (2 min): Who we are, agenda
2642. Discovery (5 min): Their needs, pain points
2653. Demo (20 min): Product focused on their use case
2664. Q&A (10 min): Objection handling
2675. Next steps (3 min): Trial, POC, proposal
268```
269
270### Sales-Marketing Handoff
271
272| Handoff | Frequency | Content |
273|---------|-----------|---------|
274| Weekly sync | 30 min | Win/loss, competitive, new assets |
275| Monthly enablement | 60 min | Product updates, training |
276| Quarterly review | Half-day | Results, strategy, planning |
277
278---
279
280## International Expansion
281
282Enter new markets systematically:
283
2841. Validate market demand (inbound leads, TAM analysis)
2852. Localize website, pricing, legal
2863. Establish sales coverage (hire or agency)
2874. Adapt messaging for cultural fit
2885. Build local partnerships and references
2896. Launch localized campaigns
2907. Monitor CAC and conversion by market
2918. **Validation:** 3+ paying customers from market in first 90 days
292
293### Market Priority (Series A)
294
295| Market | Timeline | Budget % | Target ARR |
296|--------|----------|----------|------------|
297| US | Months 1-6 | 50% | $1M |
298| UK | Months 4-9 | 20% | $500k |
299| DACH | Months 7-12 | 15% | $300k |
300| France | Months 10-15 | 10% | $200k |
301| Canada | Months 7-12 | 5% | $100k |
302
303### Localization Checklist
304
305- [ ] Website translation (professional, not machine)
306- [ ] Currency and pricing localized
307- [ ] Local phone number and address
308- [ ] Legal compliance (GDPR, PIPEDA)
309- [ ] Local payment methods
310- [ ] Sales coverage during local hours
311- [ ] Local case studies and references
312
313---
314
315## Reference Documentation
316
317### Positioning Frameworks
318
319`references/positioning-frameworks.md` contains:
320
321- April Dunford 5-step positioning process
322- Geoffrey Moore positioning statement template
323- Positioning validation interview protocol
324- Competitive positioning map construction
325
326### Launch Checklists
327
328`references/launch-checklists.md` contains:
329
330- Tier 1/2/3 launch checklists
331- Week-by-week launch timeline
332- Launch day runbook
333- Post-launch metrics dashboard
334
335### International GTM
336
337`references/international-gtm.md` contains:
338
339- US, UK, DACH, France, Canada playbooks
340- Market-specific channel mix and messaging
341- Localization requirements per market
342- Entry timeline and budget allocation
343
344### Messaging Templates
345
346`references/messaging-templates.md` contains:
347
348- Value proposition formulas
349- Persona-specific messaging
350- Competitive response scripts
351- Objection handling templates
352- Channel-specific copy (landing pages, emails, ads)
353
354---
355
356## PMM KPIs
357
358| Metric | Target | Measurement |
359|--------|--------|-------------|
360| Product adoption | >40% in 90 days | Feature usage after launch |
361| Win rate | >30% competitive | Deals won vs. competitors |
362| Sales velocity | -20% YoY | Days from SQL to close |
363| Deal size | +25% YoY | Average contract value |
364| Launch pipeline | 3:1 ROMI | Pipeline $ : marketing spend |
365
366---
367
368## Quick Reference
369
370### PMM Monthly Rhythm
371
372| Week | Focus |
373|------|-------|
374| 1 | Review metrics, update battlecards |
375| 2 | Create assets, publish content |
376| 3 | Support launches, optimize campaigns |
377| 4 | Monthly report, plan next month |
378
379## Proactive Triggers
380
381- **No documented positioning** -- Without clear positioning, all marketing is guesswork. Start with April Dunford framework.
382- **Messaging differs across channels** -- Inconsistent story confuses buyers. Align messaging hierarchy across all touchpoints.
383- **No ICP defined** -- Selling to everyone means selling to no one. Define ICP before any campaign spend.
384- **Competitor repositioning** -- Market shift detected. Review your positioning and update battlecards.
385
386## Output Artifacts
387
388| When you ask for... | You get... |
389|---------------------|------------|
390| "Position my product" | Positioning framework (April Dunford method) with completed output |
391| "GTM strategy" | Go-to-market plan with channels, messaging, and timeline |
392| "Competitive positioning" | Positioning map with competitive gaps and opportunities |
393| "Sales enablement" | Sales deck structure, battlecards, and demo flow |
394
395## Communication
396
397All output passes quality verification:
398- Self-verify: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring
399- Output format: Bottom Line first, then What (with confidence), Why, How to Act
400- Every finding tagged with confidence level: verified, medium confidence, or assumed
401
402## Related Skills
403
404- **marketing-demand-acquisition**: For executing acquisition campaigns planned by PMM.
405- **campaign-analytics**: For measuring launch and campaign effectiveness.
406- **content-creator**: For creating content assets defined in PMM strategy.
407- **social-media-analyzer**: For tracking social media performance of PMM campaigns.
408
409---
410
411## Troubleshooting
412
413| Symptom | Likely Cause | Resolution |
414|---------|-------------|------------|
415| Positioning resonates internally but customers do not repeat it | Positioning built from company perspective, not customer language | Rerun April Dunford methodology starting from competitive alternatives, not from product features |
416| Win rate against specific competitor below 25% | Battlecard outdated or sales team not using it | Run win_loss_analyzer.py to identify loss patterns; update battlecard monthly; validate 80%+ sales usage |
417| GTM motion producing high MQLs but low pipeline conversion | Wrong GTM motion for ACV and buyer type; marketing-led when should be sales-led | Reassess motion using gtm_planner.py; for ACV >$25K, shift to sales-led or hybrid PLG+sales |
418| Sales enablement assets gathering dust | Assets created without sales input; format does not match how sales actually works | Co-create assets with sales; survey sales on what they need; track asset usage in deal cycles |
419| International expansion burning cash with zero pipeline | Market entered without validating demand (inbound signal, TAM) | Validate 3+ paying customers from market in first 90 days; if not, pause and reassess market priority |
420| Competitive intelligence always reactive to lost deals | No proactive monitoring system; battlecards only updated post-loss | Set up monthly competitor monitoring (website, pricing, job postings, G2 reviews); update battlecards proactively |
421| Messaging differs across website, sales deck, and ads | No messaging hierarchy documented; each team creates independently | Build messaging hierarchy (headline > subhead > benefits > features > proof) and enforce across all touchpoints |
422
423---
424
425## Success Criteria
426
427- Positioning validated with 10+ customer interviews; 7+ describe value unprompted
428- Win rate above 30% in competitive deals, measured and tracked monthly
429- Sales velocity improves 20%+ YoY (days from SQL to close decreasing)
430- Sales team uses battlecards in 80%+ of competitive opportunities
431- Product adoption exceeds 40% within 90 days of launch
432- GTM plan generates 3:1 pipeline-to-marketing-spend ROMI
433- Messaging hierarchy consistent across all customer-facing touchpoints
434
435---
436
437## Scope & Limitations
438
439**In Scope:** Product positioning (April Dunford methodology), ICP definition and validation, competitive intelligence and battlecards, GTM strategy and motion selection (PLG, sales-led, marketing-led, community-led), product launch planning, sales enablement, win/loss analysis, international expansion planning, messaging hierarchy, PMM KPIs.
440
441**Out of Scope:** Brand identity and visual design (see brand-guidelines skill), demand generation execution (see marketing-demand-acquisition skill), content creation (see content-creator skill), pricing strategy optimization, sales process design.
442
443**Limitations:** Positioning frameworks require real customer input to be effective — internally generated positioning is unreliable. Win/loss analysis requires honest deal outcome data from sales; incomplete data produces misleading patterns. GTM motion recommendations are based on ACV and buyer type heuristics; edge cases may require hybrid approaches. International expansion timelines assume US-first model and may not apply to non-US companies.
444
445---
446
447## Scripts
448
449| Script | Purpose | Usage |
450|--------|---------|-------|
451| `scripts/gtm_planner.py` | Generate GTM plans with motion selection, channel strategy, and timeline | `python scripts/gtm_planner.py config.json --demo` |
452| `scripts/win_loss_analyzer.py` | Analyze deal outcomes by competitor, segment, and reason | `python scripts/win_loss_analyzer.py deals.json --demo` |
453| `scripts/battlecard_generator.py` | Generate competitive battlecards with feature comparison and objection handling | `python scripts/battlecard_generator.py competitor.json --demo` |