Porter's Five Forces
Michael Porter's framework for analyzing the structural attractiveness
of an industry. Reveals where profit pools form, why some markets are
chronically unprofitable, and where strategic positioning has leverage.
When to use this skill
- Market entry decision (which industry to play in)
- Diagnosing chronic margin pressure (why are we squeezed?)
- Strategic positioning (where to invest, where to defend)
- Competitive response planning
- M&A target evaluation (industry attractiveness)
- Pre-fundraise industry framing
The 5 forces
- Threat of new entrants — how easily can newcomers join?
- Bargaining power of suppliers — how concentrated/critical are inputs?
- Bargaining power of buyers — how concentrated/price-sensitive are customers?
- Threat of substitute products — what alternatives could replace the category?
- Competitive rivalry — how intense is competition between existing players?
Plus (Porter's later addition):
6. Complementors (the "sixth force") — do partners increase total industry value?
Scoring rubric
Each force is rated low / medium / high based on specific factors:
1. Threat of new entrants — high when:
- Low capital requirements
- No regulatory barriers
- No proprietary tech / patents
- Low switching costs
- No economies of scale
- No brand loyalty
- Access to distribution is easy
- Network effects absent
2. Supplier power — high when:
- Few suppliers / concentrated supply base
- Suppliers are critical / cannot be substituted
- Switching cost is high
- Suppliers can forward-integrate
- Industry is not a large customer for supplier
3. Buyer power — high when:
- Few buyers / concentrated demand
- Buyers purchase in large volumes
- Product is undifferentiated
- Switching cost is low
- Buyers can backward-integrate
- Buyers have full information
- Buyers face thin margins (price pressure)
4. Threat of substitutes — high when:
- Many substitutes exist
- Substitutes have favorable price-performance
- Switching cost to substitute is low
- Buyer propensity to substitute is high
- Substitute industry is growing fast
5. Competitive rivalry — high when:
- Many similar-sized competitors
- Low growth industry (zero-sum)
- High fixed costs (drive volume)
- Low differentiation
- High exit barriers
- Strategic stakes high
Clarify First
Before scoring the forces, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:
Stop rule: ask only the 2-3 that most change the output. If the user says "just draft it," proceed and list your assumptions at the top of the artifact.
Workflow
Step 1 — Define the industry
Industry definition is the most-frequent source of error.
- "Software" is too broad
- "B2B SaaS" is too broad
- "Mid-market HR analytics SaaS" is workable
- "Enterprise revenue intelligence tools (Gong, Outreach, Salesloft-tier)" is precise
Step 2 — Score each force
Use the rubric. Each force gets low / medium / high + evidence.
Step 3 — Identify the dominant force(s)
Usually 1-2 forces dominate. They drive the industry's profit pool.
Step 4 — Translate to strategy
Each force suggests strategic moves:
| Force |
High = unfavorable |
Strategy implications |
| New entrants |
Easy entry |
Build barriers (brand, scale, network, switching cost) |
| Supplier power |
Concentrated |
Diversify, integrate backward, build alternative supply |
| Buyer power |
Concentrated |
Diversify customer base, differentiate, integrate forward |
| Substitutes |
Strong substitutes |
Differentiate, raise switching cost, defend value prop |
| Rivalry |
Intense |
Differentiate, niche down, exit, consolidate |
Step 5 — Run five_forces_scorer.py
Audit for: missing evidence, generic factors, missed sub-factors, no
strategy implications drawn.
python3 project-management/strategy-frameworks/porters-five-forces/scripts/five_forces_scorer.py \
--input forces.json --format markdown
Common engagements
"Should we enter market X?"
- Define X precisely.
- Score each force.
- Identify dominant force.
- Assess: can we differentiate against the dominant force?
- If yes, structure entry to counter that force; if no, don't enter.
"Why are our margins under pressure?"
- Score industry today vs 3-5 years ago.
- Identify the force(s) that shifted (usually buyer power or rivalry).
- Identify which factor specifically caused the shift.
- Address: product differentiation, switching cost, customer concentration, etc.
"Audit our strategic position"
- Score industry forces.
- For each high force, identify how we currently counter it.
- Identify weak counters; recommend reinforcement.
Anti-patterns to avoid
- Industry defined too broadly. Yields generic analysis.
- Industry defined too narrowly. Misses substitute threats.
- Each force = "medium". No analysis happened.
- No evidence cited. Just opinion.
- No strategy implications. Just a score; not actionable.
- Static analysis. Industries evolve; refresh every 12-18 months.
- Mixing internal capabilities with industry analysis. Five Forces is industry-level; capabilities are firm-level (see SWOT).
References
references/five-forces-deep.md — each force, factors, examples
references/five-forces-and-strategy.md — translating to strategic moves
Related skills
project-management/strategy-frameworks/swot-analysis — firm-level positioning
project-management/strategy-frameworks/ansoff-matrix — growth options
project-management/strategy-frameworks/business-model-canvas — operational view
marketing/competitive-teardown — competitor-specific analysis
c-level-advisor/ceo-advisor — strategic context
1---
2name: porters-five-forces
3description: >
4 Porter's Five Forces — analyze the competitive intensity and
5 attractiveness of an industry. Use when evaluating a new market entry,
6 diagnosing margin pressure, designing a defensive strategy, or auditing
7 industry-level positioning.
8license: MIT + Commons Clause
9metadata:
10 version: 1.0.0
11 author: borghei
12 category: project-management
13 domain: strategy-frameworks
14 updated: 2026-05-27
15 python-tools: five_forces_scorer.py
16 tech-stack: porters-five-forces, industry-analysis, competitive-strategy
17---
18
19# Porter's Five Forces
20
21Michael Porter's framework for analyzing the structural attractiveness
22of an industry. Reveals where profit pools form, why some markets are
23chronically unprofitable, and where strategic positioning has leverage.
24
25## When to use this skill
26
27- **Market entry** decision (which industry to play in)
28- Diagnosing **chronic margin pressure** (why are we squeezed?)
29- **Strategic positioning** (where to invest, where to defend)
30- **Competitive response** planning
31- **M&A target evaluation** (industry attractiveness)
32- **Pre-fundraise** industry framing
33
34## The 5 forces
35
361. **Threat of new entrants** — how easily can newcomers join?
372. **Bargaining power of suppliers** — how concentrated/critical are inputs?
383. **Bargaining power of buyers** — how concentrated/price-sensitive are customers?
394. **Threat of substitute products** — what alternatives could replace the category?
405. **Competitive rivalry** — how intense is competition between existing players?
41
42Plus (Porter's later addition):
436. **Complementors** (the "sixth force") — do partners increase total industry value?
44
45## Scoring rubric
46
47Each force is rated **low / medium / high** based on specific factors:
48
49### 1. Threat of new entrants — high when:
50- Low capital requirements
51- No regulatory barriers
52- No proprietary tech / patents
53- Low switching costs
54- No economies of scale
55- No brand loyalty
56- Access to distribution is easy
57- Network effects absent
58
59### 2. Supplier power — high when:
60- Few suppliers / concentrated supply base
61- Suppliers are critical / cannot be substituted
62- Switching cost is high
63- Suppliers can forward-integrate
64- Industry is not a large customer for supplier
65
66### 3. Buyer power — high when:
67- Few buyers / concentrated demand
68- Buyers purchase in large volumes
69- Product is undifferentiated
70- Switching cost is low
71- Buyers can backward-integrate
72- Buyers have full information
73- Buyers face thin margins (price pressure)
74
75### 4. Threat of substitutes — high when:
76- Many substitutes exist
77- Substitutes have favorable price-performance
78- Switching cost to substitute is low
79- Buyer propensity to substitute is high
80- Substitute industry is growing fast
81
82### 5. Competitive rivalry — high when:
83- Many similar-sized competitors
84- Low growth industry (zero-sum)
85- High fixed costs (drive volume)
86- Low differentiation
87- High exit barriers
88- Strategic stakes high
89
90## Clarify First
91
92Before scoring the forces, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:
93
94- [ ] **Precise industry definition** — narrow enough to be specific, broad enough to catch substitutes (too broad/narrow is the #1 error and sets the entire analysis scope)
95- [ ] **Evidence per force** — the data/facts behind each low/medium/high rating (a score without evidence is just opinion)
96- [ ] **Purpose** — market entry / margin-pressure diagnosis / positioning audit (frames which dominant force matters and the strategy translation; margin diagnosis also needs a then-vs-now comparison)
97
98Stop rule: ask only the 2-3 that most change the output. If the user says "just draft it," proceed and list your assumptions at the top of the artifact.
99
100## Workflow
101
102### Step 1 — Define the industry
103Industry definition is the most-frequent source of error.
104- "Software" is too broad
105- "B2B SaaS" is too broad
106- "Mid-market HR analytics SaaS" is workable
107- "Enterprise revenue intelligence tools (Gong, Outreach, Salesloft-tier)" is precise
108
109### Step 2 — Score each force
110Use the rubric. Each force gets low / medium / high + evidence.
111
112### Step 3 — Identify the dominant force(s)
113Usually 1-2 forces dominate. They drive the industry's profit pool.
114
115### Step 4 — Translate to strategy
116Each force suggests strategic moves:
117
118| Force | High = unfavorable | Strategy implications |
119|-------|---------------------|------------------------|
120| New entrants | Easy entry | Build barriers (brand, scale, network, switching cost) |
121| Supplier power | Concentrated | Diversify, integrate backward, build alternative supply |
122| Buyer power | Concentrated | Diversify customer base, differentiate, integrate forward |
123| Substitutes | Strong substitutes | Differentiate, raise switching cost, defend value prop |
124| Rivalry | Intense | Differentiate, niche down, exit, consolidate |
125
126### Step 5 — Run `five_forces_scorer.py`
127Audit for: missing evidence, generic factors, missed sub-factors, no
128strategy implications drawn.
129
130```bash
131python3 project-management/strategy-frameworks/porters-five-forces/scripts/five_forces_scorer.py \
132 --input forces.json --format markdown
133```
134
135## Common engagements
136
137### "Should we enter market X?"
1381. Define X precisely.
1392. Score each force.
1403. Identify dominant force.
1414. Assess: can we differentiate against the dominant force?
1425. If yes, structure entry to counter that force; if no, don't enter.
143
144### "Why are our margins under pressure?"
1451. Score industry today vs 3-5 years ago.
1462. Identify the force(s) that shifted (usually buyer power or rivalry).
1473. Identify which factor specifically caused the shift.
1484. Address: product differentiation, switching cost, customer concentration, etc.
149
150### "Audit our strategic position"
1511. Score industry forces.
1522. For each high force, identify how we currently counter it.
1533. Identify weak counters; recommend reinforcement.
154
155## Anti-patterns to avoid
156
157- **Industry defined too broadly.** Yields generic analysis.
158- **Industry defined too narrowly.** Misses substitute threats.
159- **Each force = "medium".** No analysis happened.
160- **No evidence cited.** Just opinion.
161- **No strategy implications.** Just a score; not actionable.
162- **Static analysis.** Industries evolve; refresh every 12-18 months.
163- **Mixing internal capabilities with industry analysis.** Five Forces is industry-level; capabilities are firm-level (see SWOT).
164
165## References
166
167- `references/five-forces-deep.md` — each force, factors, examples
168- `references/five-forces-and-strategy.md` — translating to strategic moves
169
170## Related skills
171
172- `project-management/strategy-frameworks/swot-analysis` — firm-level positioning
173- `project-management/strategy-frameworks/ansoff-matrix` — growth options
174- `project-management/strategy-frameworks/business-model-canvas` — operational view
175- `marketing/competitive-teardown` — competitor-specific analysis
176- `c-level-advisor/ceo-advisor` — strategic context