Prompt Engineer Toolkit — Production Prompt Engineering
The complete lifecycle for production prompts: design patterns that work, testing frameworks that catch regressions, versioning systems that track changes, and evaluation rubrics that replace subjective "looks good" with measurable quality. This treats prompts as production code with the same rigor — not clever tricks.
Tags: prompt engineering, chain-of-thought, few-shot, evaluation, testing, prompt versioning
Core Capabilities
- Prompt patterns — 6-layer system-prompt architecture, chain-of-thought (standard, scratchpad, self-consistency), few-shot design + dynamic selection, JSON/section output structuring, decomposition pipelines, calibration (temperature + confidence levels).
- Testing framework — test-case structure, suite composition (40/30/15/15), a 5-dimension automated scoring rubric with a weighted formula, and a regression-testing protocol.
- Versioning — version-control layout, changelog format with rationale/baselines/rollback, and a prompt-diff risk checklist.
- Failure-mode catalog — instruction override, format drift, sycophancy, verbosity, hallucination, anchoring, lost-in-the-middle, each with fixes.
- Lifecycle workflows — design a prompt, debug a degraded prompt, migrate a prompt to a new model.
When to Use
- Designing production prompts or building a prompt library.
- Running A/B tests or regression tests on prompt variants.
- Versioning prompts and gating changes on test scores.
- Debugging a degraded prompt or migrating prompts across models.
Clarify First
Before designing or testing the prompt, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:
Stop rule: ask only the 2-3 that most change the output. If the user says "just draft it," proceed and list your assumptions at the top of the artifact.
Tools
| Tool |
Purpose |
Command |
eval_scorer.py |
Score evaluation results from JSON test cases (exact/contains/regex) |
python scripts/eval_scorer.py suite.json --fail-under 0.80 --json |
prompt_analyzer.py |
Analyze prompt files for clarity, instruction density, few-shot coverage, tokens |
python scripts/prompt_analyzer.py my_prompt.txt --json |
prompt_diff.py |
Compare two prompt versions for structural changes, instruction deltas, risk |
python scripts/prompt_diff.py v2.txt v3.txt --show-diff --json |
References
Load the reference that matches the task — keep this file lean and pull detail on demand:
- references/prompt-patterns-catalog.md — complete catalog of prompting techniques with examples: system-prompt architecture, chain-of-thought, few-shot, output structuring, decomposition, and calibration. Read when designing or structuring a prompt.
- references/testing-and-versioning.md — test-case design, suite composition, the evaluation rubric and scoring formula, the regression protocol, version-control strategy, changelog format, and diff analysis. Read when building a test suite or managing versions.
- references/failure-modes-and-workflows.md — common failure modes, the three lifecycle workflows, a quick-view integration table, the troubleshooting matrix, and success criteria. Read when debugging a prompt or running a workflow.
Scope & Limitations
This skill covers:
- Designing, structuring, and layering system prompts for production AI applications
- Building and running test suites, evaluation rubrics, and regression tests for prompt quality
- Versioning prompts with changelogs, baselines, and rollback plans
- Calibration techniques including temperature tuning, confidence levels, and few-shot selection
This skill does NOT cover:
- Fine-tuning or training models -- see
engineering/model-training-pipeline for training workflows
- Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipeline design -- see
engineering/context-engine for context retrieval architecture
- Agent orchestration and multi-step tool use -- see
engineering/agent-designer for agent system design
- LLM infrastructure, hosting, or cost optimization -- see
engineering/llm-gateway-design for inference infrastructure patterns
Integration Points
| Skill |
Integration |
Data Flow |
| agent-designer |
Agent system prompts are the highest-stakes prompts; use this toolkit to test and version them |
Agent specs → prompt layers → tested system prompts |
| self-improving-agent |
Prompt degradation signals feed into self-improvement loops for automatic correction |
Test suite results → regression alerts → prompt iteration |
| context-engine |
Retrieved context quality directly impacts prompt effectiveness; coordinate retrieval tuning with prompt testing |
Retrieved chunks → prompt context layer → evaluation scores |
| ab-test-setup |
A/B test prompt variants in production with statistical rigor before full rollout |
Prompt candidates → traffic split → scoring comparison → winner promotion |
| llm-gateway-design |
Gateway handles prompt routing, versioning, and model fallback at the infrastructure layer |
Versioned prompts → gateway config → model routing → response logging |
| code-review-automation |
Code review prompts are high-frequency production prompts that benefit from this toolkit's testing framework |
Review criteria → prompt design → test suite → deployed reviewer prompt |
1---
2name: prompt-engineer-toolkit
3description: >
4 Prompt engineering frameworks for building, testing, versioning, and evaluating prompts:
5 chain-of-thought, few-shot, regression testing, and rubrics. Use when designing production
6 prompts, running A/B tests, or building prompt libraries.
7license: MIT + Commons Clause
8metadata:
9 version: 1.1.0
10 author: borghei
11 category: engineering
12 domain: ai-engineering
13 tier: POWERFUL
14 updated: 2026-06-17
15 frameworks: prompt-patterns, evaluation-rubrics, regression-testing, version-control
16---
17
18# Prompt Engineer Toolkit — Production Prompt Engineering
19
20The complete lifecycle for production prompts: design patterns that work, testing frameworks that catch regressions, versioning systems that track changes, and evaluation rubrics that replace subjective "looks good" with measurable quality. This treats prompts as production code with the same rigor — not clever tricks.
21
22**Tags:** prompt engineering, chain-of-thought, few-shot, evaluation, testing, prompt versioning
23
24## Core Capabilities
25
26- **Prompt patterns** — 6-layer system-prompt architecture, chain-of-thought (standard, scratchpad, self-consistency), few-shot design + dynamic selection, JSON/section output structuring, decomposition pipelines, calibration (temperature + confidence levels).
27- **Testing framework** — test-case structure, suite composition (40/30/15/15), a 5-dimension automated scoring rubric with a weighted formula, and a regression-testing protocol.
28- **Versioning** — version-control layout, changelog format with rationale/baselines/rollback, and a prompt-diff risk checklist.
29- **Failure-mode catalog** — instruction override, format drift, sycophancy, verbosity, hallucination, anchoring, lost-in-the-middle, each with fixes.
30- **Lifecycle workflows** — design a prompt, debug a degraded prompt, migrate a prompt to a new model.
31
32## When to Use
33
34- Designing production prompts or building a prompt library.
35- Running A/B tests or regression tests on prompt variants.
36- Versioning prompts and gating changes on test scores.
37- Debugging a degraded prompt or migrating prompts across models.
38
39## Clarify First
40
41Before designing or testing the prompt, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:
42
43- [ ] **Task & definition of "good"** — what the prompt must produce and how success is judged (drives the 5-dimension evaluation rubric)
44- [ ] **Target model** — calibration (temperature, few-shot count) and migration paths differ by model
45- [ ] **Lifecycle stage** — design new / debug a degraded prompt / migrate to a new model (selects the workflow)
46
47Stop rule: ask only the 2-3 that most change the output. If the user says "just draft it," proceed and list your assumptions at the top of the artifact.
48
49## Tools
50
51| Tool | Purpose | Command |
52|------|---------|---------|
53| `eval_scorer.py` | Score evaluation results from JSON test cases (exact/contains/regex) | `python scripts/eval_scorer.py suite.json --fail-under 0.80 --json` |
54| `prompt_analyzer.py` | Analyze prompt files for clarity, instruction density, few-shot coverage, tokens | `python scripts/prompt_analyzer.py my_prompt.txt --json` |
55| `prompt_diff.py` | Compare two prompt versions for structural changes, instruction deltas, risk | `python scripts/prompt_diff.py v2.txt v3.txt --show-diff --json` |
56
57## References
58
59Load the reference that matches the task — keep this file lean and pull detail on demand:
60
61- **[references/prompt-patterns-catalog.md](references/prompt-patterns-catalog.md)** — complete catalog of prompting techniques with examples: system-prompt architecture, chain-of-thought, few-shot, output structuring, decomposition, and calibration. Read when designing or structuring a prompt.
62- **[references/testing-and-versioning.md](references/testing-and-versioning.md)** — test-case design, suite composition, the evaluation rubric and scoring formula, the regression protocol, version-control strategy, changelog format, and diff analysis. Read when building a test suite or managing versions.
63- **[references/failure-modes-and-workflows.md](references/failure-modes-and-workflows.md)** — common failure modes, the three lifecycle workflows, a quick-view integration table, the troubleshooting matrix, and success criteria. Read when debugging a prompt or running a workflow.
64
65## Scope & Limitations
66
67**This skill covers:**
68- Designing, structuring, and layering system prompts for production AI applications
69- Building and running test suites, evaluation rubrics, and regression tests for prompt quality
70- Versioning prompts with changelogs, baselines, and rollback plans
71- Calibration techniques including temperature tuning, confidence levels, and few-shot selection
72
73**This skill does NOT cover:**
74- Fine-tuning or training models -- see `engineering/model-training-pipeline` for training workflows
75- Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipeline design -- see `engineering/context-engine` for context retrieval architecture
76- Agent orchestration and multi-step tool use -- see `engineering/agent-designer` for agent system design
77- LLM infrastructure, hosting, or cost optimization -- see `engineering/llm-gateway-design` for inference infrastructure patterns
78
79## Integration Points
80
81| Skill | Integration | Data Flow |
82|-------|-------------|-----------|
83| **agent-designer** | Agent system prompts are the highest-stakes prompts; use this toolkit to test and version them | Agent specs → prompt layers → tested system prompts |
84| **self-improving-agent** | Prompt degradation signals feed into self-improvement loops for automatic correction | Test suite results → regression alerts → prompt iteration |
85| **context-engine** | Retrieved context quality directly impacts prompt effectiveness; coordinate retrieval tuning with prompt testing | Retrieved chunks → prompt context layer → evaluation scores |
86| **ab-test-setup** | A/B test prompt variants in production with statistical rigor before full rollout | Prompt candidates → traffic split → scoring comparison → winner promotion |
87| **llm-gateway-design** | Gateway handles prompt routing, versioning, and model fallback at the infrastructure layer | Versioned prompts → gateway config → model routing → response logging |
88| **code-review-automation** | Code review prompts are high-frequency production prompts that benefit from this toolkit's testing framework | Review criteria → prompt design → test suite → deployed reviewer prompt |