cbrock84 Service level management
A service level is a promise with a number attached. The number is the easy part; choosing what to measure is where these go wrong.
Measure what the customer feels
The characteristic failure is a service meeting every target while customers are angry. It happens when the measure is chosen for availability of data rather than relevance:
- Uptime that excludes degraded operation. Technically up and unusably slow is down.
- Response time instead of resolution time. An instant acknowledgment that resolves nothing measures the autoresponder.
- Averages instead of percentiles. A mean hides the tail, and the tail is who complains. Commit at p95 or p99, not the mean.
- Measurement from inside your own perimeter, which excludes the part of the path the customer actually traverses.
Set targets you would fund
A target is a spending decision. Each added nine costs disproportionately more than the last, so the question is never "what would be good?" but "what is the gap worth to the customer, and does it exceed what closing it costs?"
Set the internal objective tighter than the external commitment. The gap between them is your warning margin; without it, the first thing you learn about a breach is the breach.
Write them so both sides can tell
An unmeasurable clause is a future dispute. Every service level needs: what is measured, where it is measured from, how it is calculated, what is excluded, over what window, and what happens when it is missed.
Exclusions are the substance — planned maintenance, force majeure, customer-caused failures,
dependencies outside your control. Vague exclusions get read narrowly when it matters. For anything
with contractual teeth, legal-risk:contract-review owns the remedy language; this skill owns
whether the number is achievable.
When you breach
Say so before the customer does. A breach reported by the provider with a cause and a fix costs far less trust than one the customer discovers and raises.
Then separate the incident from the pattern. One breach is an incident, handled by
customer-experience:escalation-management. Repeated breaches of the same target mean the target was
never fundable — renegotiate it honestly rather than continuing to miss it.
Never
- Commit to a level you have not measured yourself achieving for a sustained period.
- Report availability on a mean when the customer experiences the tail.
- Agree an SLA whose exclusions are undefined.
- Let a target stand that you have missed repeatedly without either funding it or renegotiating it.