Brainstorm
Invoke as $brainstorm.
Evaluate the current codebase and generate actionable suggestions that the user can take into $feature-interview for human/agent alignment, planning-destination triage, and follow-up specification or roadmap work.
Workflow
0. App Scope Resolution (Monorepo Support)
Before checking prerequisites, determine the app scope:
- If
$ARGUMENTS specifies an app name matching a subdirectory of research/, use it.
- If
research/ contains subdirectories (excluding files), list them and ask the user which app to target. If the session is already in Plan mode and there are 2-3 concrete choices, prefer request_user_input; otherwise ask in plain text. If only one subdirectory exists, use it automatically.
- If no subdirectories exist, proceed with flat structure (single-product mode).
When app scope {app} is active:
- Read/write research from
research/{app}/ instead of research/
- Read/write specs from
specs/{app}/ instead of specs/
- Also read
research/icp.md (cross-app overview) for broader context
Read CLAUDE.md, README, package config, and key source files to understand the project.
Check tasks/roadmap.md, tasks/todo.md, tasks/manual-todo.md, tasks/record-todo.md, tasks/recurring-todo.md (when they exist), and specs from specs/ (or spec.md) if they exist — avoid suggesting things already planned or deferred as advisory records. Read research/competitive-analysis.md (or research/{app}/competitive-analysis.md) if it exists — competitor gaps, market white space, and positioning weaknesses are high-signal inputs for ideation. Read research/customer-feedback.md (or research/{app}/customer-feedback.md) if it exists — "Wrong" and "New" findings are highest-signal ideation input. Read research/metrics.md (or research/{app}/metrics.md) if it exists — instrumentation gaps can generate ideas.
Analyse the codebase across these dimensions:
Strategic / Product
- New features that would make the project significantly more useful or valuable
- New workflows or end-to-end automation the project could enable
- Product line expansion — adjacent use cases, new audiences, or complementary products the core could serve
- Integration opportunities with external tools, platforms, or APIs that multiply value
Improvement
- Missing capabilities the architecture is set up for
- Pain points, rough edges, or manual steps that could be automated
- Performance bottlenecks or low-hanging optimisations
- Developer experience friction
Hygiene
- Technical debt where code has outgrown its design
- Testing gaps in critical paths
- Security hardening opportunities
Market Fit (only when research/icp.md (or research/{app}/icp.md), research/mvp-gap.md (or research/{app}/mvp-gap.md), or research/competitive-analysis.md (or research/{app}/competitive-analysis.md) exist)
- ICP alignment — features addressing ICP pain points that are missing or incomplete
- Journey gaps — steps where the product loses the user or customer
- Unaddressed MVP gaps from
research/mvp-gap.md (or research/{app}/mvp-gap.md) not yet in roadmap
- Competitive white space — features or capabilities no competitor offers well, from
research/competitive-analysis.md (or research/{app}/competitive-analysis.md) market gaps
- Competitor leapfrog — specific competitor weaknesses to exploit, or table-stakes features competitors have that you lack
- Positioning plays — ideas that sharpen differentiation against the competitive landscape
If the user provides a focus area, scope the analysis there. Otherwise cover all dimensions.
Output
Append the suggestions to tasks/ideas.md (do not overwrite existing content). Also display them to the user. When app scope is active, prefix each suggestion with the app name.
Group suggestions by effort level (hours / days / weeks). Each suggestion should include:
- A specific, actionable title
- A one-line description with the concrete codebase signal that motivates it
- A
$feature-interview <topic> prompt the user can copy-paste
Constraints
- Be specific and actionable — no vague aspirations.
- Limit to 3–5 suggestions per effort level.
- Do not suggest changes that conflict with CLAUDE.md conventions.
- Do not repeat work already in
tasks/roadmap.md, tasks/todo.md, tasks/manual-todo.md, tasks/record-todo.md, tasks/recurring-todo.md, or specs/ (or specs/{app}/).
Alignment Page
When this skill produces durable deliverables (research, specs, plans, reports, prototypes, or any document output), build a full-depth HTML alignment page following ALIGNMENT-PAGE.md in this skill's directory. Output: alignment/brainstorm-{topic}.html.
Default Shipping Contract
Follow the shared shipping contract convention in CLAUDE.md.
1---2name: brainstorm-33description: Evaluate the codebase and suggest ideas to explore with $feature-interview4---5
6# Brainstorm
7
8Invoke as `$brainstorm`.
9
10Evaluate the current codebase and generate actionable suggestions that the user can take into `$feature-interview` for human/agent alignment, planning-destination triage, and follow-up specification or roadmap work.
11
12## Workflow
13
14### 0. App Scope Resolution (Monorepo Support)
15
16Before checking prerequisites, determine the app scope:
17
181. If `$ARGUMENTS` specifies an app name matching a subdirectory of `research/`, use it.
192. If `research/` contains subdirectories (excluding files), list them and ask the user which app to target. If the session is already in Plan mode and there are 2-3 concrete choices, prefer `request_user_input`; otherwise ask in plain text. If only one subdirectory exists, use it automatically.
203. If no subdirectories exist, proceed with flat structure (single-product mode).
21
22When app scope `{app}` is active:
23- Read/write research from `research/{app}/` instead of `research/`
24- Read/write specs from `specs/{app}/` instead of `specs/`
25- Also read `research/icp.md` (cross-app overview) for broader context
26
271. Read CLAUDE.md, README, package config, and key source files to understand the project.
282. Check `tasks/roadmap.md`, `tasks/todo.md`, `tasks/manual-todo.md`, `tasks/record-todo.md`, `tasks/recurring-todo.md` (when they exist), and specs from `specs/` (or `spec.md`) if they exist — avoid suggesting things already planned or deferred as advisory records. Read `research/competitive-analysis.md` (or `research/{app}/competitive-analysis.md`) if it exists — competitor gaps, market white space, and positioning weaknesses are high-signal inputs for ideation. Read `research/customer-feedback.md` (or `research/{app}/customer-feedback.md`) if it exists — "Wrong" and "New" findings are highest-signal ideation input. Read `research/metrics.md` (or `research/{app}/metrics.md`) if it exists — instrumentation gaps can generate ideas.
293. Analyse the codebase across these dimensions:
30
31 **Strategic / Product**
32 - New features that would make the project significantly more useful or valuable
33 - New workflows or end-to-end automation the project could enable
34 - Product line expansion — adjacent use cases, new audiences, or complementary products the core could serve
35 - Integration opportunities with external tools, platforms, or APIs that multiply value
36
37 **Improvement**
38 - Missing capabilities the architecture is set up for
39 - Pain points, rough edges, or manual steps that could be automated
40 - Performance bottlenecks or low-hanging optimisations
41 - Developer experience friction
42
43 **Hygiene**
44 - Technical debt where code has outgrown its design
45 - Testing gaps in critical paths
46 - Security hardening opportunities
47
48 **Market Fit** (only when `research/icp.md` (or `research/{app}/icp.md`), `research/mvp-gap.md` (or `research/{app}/mvp-gap.md`), or `research/competitive-analysis.md` (or `research/{app}/competitive-analysis.md`) exist)
49 - ICP alignment — features addressing ICP pain points that are missing or incomplete
50 - Journey gaps — steps where the product loses the user or customer
51 - Unaddressed MVP gaps from `research/mvp-gap.md` (or `research/{app}/mvp-gap.md`) not yet in roadmap
52 - Competitive white space — features or capabilities no competitor offers well, from `research/competitive-analysis.md` (or `research/{app}/competitive-analysis.md`) market gaps
53 - Competitor leapfrog — specific competitor weaknesses to exploit, or table-stakes features competitors have that you lack
54 - Positioning plays — ideas that sharpen differentiation against the competitive landscape
554. If the user provides a focus area, scope the analysis there. Otherwise cover all dimensions.
56
57## Output
58
59Append the suggestions to `tasks/ideas.md` (do not overwrite existing content). Also display them to the user. When app scope is active, prefix each suggestion with the app name.
60
61Group suggestions by effort level (hours / days / weeks). Each suggestion should include:
62- A specific, actionable title
63- A one-line description with the concrete codebase signal that motivates it
64- A `$feature-interview <topic>` prompt the user can copy-paste
65
66## Constraints
67
68- Be specific and actionable — no vague aspirations.
69- Limit to 3–5 suggestions per effort level.
70- Do not suggest changes that conflict with CLAUDE.md conventions.
71- Do not repeat work already in `tasks/roadmap.md`, `tasks/todo.md`, `tasks/manual-todo.md`, `tasks/record-todo.md`, `tasks/recurring-todo.md`, or `specs/` (or `specs/{app}/`).
72
73## Alignment Page
74
75When this skill produces durable deliverables (research, specs, plans, reports, prototypes, or any document output), build a full-depth HTML alignment page following `ALIGNMENT-PAGE.md` in this skill's directory. Output: `alignment/brainstorm-{topic}.html`.
76
77## Default Shipping Contract
78
79Follow the shared shipping contract convention in CLAUDE.md.