Pack Availability Guard
Before telling the user to run a skill from another project-local pack, check .agents/project.json.enabled_packs. If the target pack is not enabled, recommend /pack install <pack> instead of the target skill. Global skills are always valid. Skills from this same pack are valid because the current skill is already running from that pack.
Journey Map — Orchestrator
This is an orchestrator skill using the parent router delegation pattern. It detects context, recommends applicable journey-mapping frameworks, and synthesizes their outputs. Individual frameworks live as child skills under frameworks/.
Report-First Approval Gate
Default to report-only: present findings, evidence coverage, assumptions, recommended artifact path, and proposed file changes in a pre-approval alignment page plus a concise conversation summary for user approval before creating or updating canonical research, spec, or task files.
Do not write or overwrite synthesized deliverables until the user explicitly approves, unless the user invoked an explicit write/update/fix mode or clearly asked to write files upfront. Raw evidence capture may be persisted before analysis when reproducibility requires it; report those raw paths separately and still gate synthesized research/report writes.
When stopping for approval, build and attempt to open the alignment preview page first, then ask the user to review it and approve, question, or request adjustments. Do not include Recommended next skill, Recommended next command, or downstream routing language. The approval request itself is the next action. Only emit next-skill routing after the approved artifact has been written or updated.
Prerequisites
- Hard:
research/icp.md (or research/{slug}/icp.md in product-path mode) must exist — run /icp first.
- Soft: Read these if they exist:
research/competitive-analysis.md — competitor landscape
research/customer-feedback.md — real customer language
- Specs, README/CLAUDE, and relevant source files for product context
Operational Modes
Mode A: Framework Selection (default first invocation)
Activated by: /journey-map or /journey-map [focus area] (no special flags).
Mode B: Synthesis
Activated by: /journey-map --synthesize
Mode C: Product-Exists Shortcut
Activated by: /journey-map product
Process
0. Product-Path Scope Resolution
Resolve research scope by product path before using code or app structure as a hint:
- If
$ARGUMENTS names a non-archived research/{slug}/ directory or a product-path ID whose scope_path points there, use that path. Treat {slug} as the product/app name, not the ICP, audience, or segment label.
- If
$ARGUMENTS names only research/_archive/{slug}/ or a manifest entry with status: archived or legacy status: abandoned, stop and warn that the path is archived; do not write or update scoped outputs there.
- Read
research/.progress.yaml when present. Normalize legacy active_path to active_paths on read and write back active_paths on manifest updates. Treat legacy abandoned as archived; exclude archived, abandoned, deferred, revisit_candidate, promoted, and any scope_path under research/_archive/ from active target selection.
- If active product paths exist in the manifest, use those paths. If multiple active paths exist, ask which one to target unless this skill explicitly supports cross-path output.
- If no active manifest target exists, list non-archived product directories under
research/, excluding research/_archive/ and dot directories. Auto-select only when exactly one exists; ask when multiple exist.
- If no product directories exist, use flat
research/ single-product mode.
- Detect monorepo/app/package structure only as a secondary hint. Suggest creating a missing
research/{slug}/ product path when code clearly exposes an app, but do not require code or monorepo detection before using research/{slug}/.
When product path {slug} is active, read and write research under research/{slug}/, specs under specs/{slug}/, and treat top-level research/*.md files as flat-mode documents or cross-path summaries.
0b. Product-path manifest: Read research/.progress.yaml when present. Normalize active_path (singular legacy) to active_paths (plural list) when reading; treat legacy abandoned as archived and exclude archived/deferred/revisit/promoted paths plus research/_archive/ scopes from active target selection. Scope the journey map to the active product path by default. When journey mapping reveals lifecycle stages or user flows that only apply to a deferred product path, add a ## Product Path Implications section noting the finding and recommending /product-line fork if it implies a new product surface.
1. Mode Detection
Detect pre-product mode (default) or product-exists mode:
Pre-product mode activates when:
- No production codebase with live users detected, AND
- No
research/customer-feedback.md with post-launch customer evidence, AND
$ARGUMENTS does not contain "product"
Available frameworks in pre-product mode:
jtbd-timeline (default) — Moesta/Switch timeline with push/pull/anxiety/habit forces
experience-map (default) — Adaptive Path emotional arc with doing/thinking/feeling
customer-journey-canvas (optional) — Stickdorn stage×touchpoints×actions canvas
service-blueprint (optional) — Shostack front-stage/backstage/support lines
user-story-map (optional) — Jeff Patton activity→task→story hierarchy
Product-exists mode activates when:
- Production code or deployment exists, OR
research/customer-feedback.md exists with real customer data, OR
$ARGUMENTS contains "product"
Available frameworks in product-exists mode:
service-blueprint (default) — operational gaps visible with a running product
user-story-map (default) — release slicing grounded in real usage
customer-journey-canvas (optional) — full-stage touchpoint audit
experience-map (optional) — emotional arc refresh with real feedback
jtbd-timeline (optional) — switching timeline with post-launch evidence
2. Load Context
- Read
research/icp.md — ICP segments, pain points, value props, trigger events
- Read
research/competitive-analysis.md if it exists — competitor landscape
- Read
research/customer-feedback.md if it exists — real customer language
- Read CLAUDE.md, README for product context
- Read any existing
research/journey-map-*.md intermediate artifacts (from prior runs)
3. Mode A — Framework Selection
Build an alignment page with:
- Mode explanation: which mode was detected and why (evidence for detection)
- Available evidence summary: what research exists and what's missing
- Multi-select framework section: checkboxes for each available framework with:
- Framework name and one-line description
- Why it's recommended or optional for this context
- Pre-checked defaults based on detected mode (see mode detection above)
- Execution plan explanation: selected frameworks will be written to
tasks/todo.md for sequential /exec execution
- Approval gate: framework selection confirmation
After user approval via compiled YAML (which includes selected_frameworks list):
Write selected frameworks as sequential steps in tasks/todo.md:
## Journey Map Framework Execution
- [ ] Run `/journey-map/frameworks/jtbd-timeline` — JTBD switching timeline
- [ ] Run `/journey-map/frameworks/experience-map` — Adaptive Path experience map
- [ ] Synthesize: `/journey-map --synthesize` — Combine framework outputs into research/journey-map.md
Only include frameworks the user selected. Always append the synthesis step last.
Stop after writing tasks/todo.md. The user runs /exec to execute each framework sequentially.
4. Mode B — Synthesis (/journey-map --synthesize)
Read all intermediate framework outputs:
research/journey-map-jtbd-timeline.md
research/journey-map-experience-map.md
research/journey-map-customer-journey-canvas.md
research/journey-map-service-blueprint.md
research/journey-map-user-story-map.md
At least one must exist. If none exist, tell user to run framework selection first.
Synthesize into unified research/journey-map.md:
Synthesis includes:
- Unified customer lifecycle: trigger, discovery, evaluation, onboarding, aha moment, conversion, transaction, retention, expansion, advocacy, churn, recovery
- User journey map per key persona with core use cases, entry points, task steps, decision points, happy path, failure modes
- Critical moments: the 3-5 moments where the product wins or loses the user/customer
- Evidence matrix: each claim mapped to which framework(s) support it
- Confidence levels per claim (strong/moderate/hypothesized)
- Stage detail index: links to deeper stage docs when they exist
- Journey gaps: stages needing deeper analysis
- Mode header:
> Mode: Pre-Product (hypothesized) or > Mode: Product-Exists (grounded)
Build alignment page for synthesis approval with:
- Full proposed
research/journey-map.md content
- Evidence matrix combining all framework sources
- Confidence/assumption register
- Critical-moment evidence matrix
- Proposed file changes gate
- Approval gate
After approval: write research/journey-map.md, then emit next-step routing.
5. Mode C — Product-Exists Shortcut
Skip multi-select. Build an alignment page for the shortcut execution plan with:
- Shortcut explanation: product-exists shortcut selected and why
service-blueprint + user-story-map are the queued defaults
- Evidence readiness: available product/customer evidence and any caveats
- Proposed execution plan: the exact
tasks/todo.md framework queue shown below
- Approval gate: require final compiled YAML approval before writing
tasks/todo.md
Do not write tasks/todo.md before alignment approval. The next action is review of the HTML alignment page.
After user approval via final compiled YAML, write this execution plan to tasks/todo.md:
## Journey Map Framework Execution
- [ ] Run `/journey-map/frameworks/service-blueprint` — Shostack service blueprint
- [ ] Run `/journey-map/frameworks/user-story-map` — Jeff Patton user story map
- [ ] Synthesize: `/journey-map --synthesize` — Write research/journey-map.md
Stop — user runs /exec.
6. Next Steps (after synthesis only)
Priority-ordered decision tree — recommend the first match:
- Blocking optional research trigger — the overview exposed a stage, fit, measurement, or product-loop risk that must be resolved before positioning or UX choices harden → use the Optional Research Trigger Map below. Cite the exact journey evidence, why it blocks the next AFPS step, and which existing framework skill owns it.
- Positioning missing (
research/positioning.md does not exist) → check .agents/project.json.enabled_packs for business-discovery — if business-discovery is not enabled, recommend /pack install business-discovery first; if business-discovery is enabled, recommend /positioning — Positioning needs ICP, competitive analysis, and journey evidence, so it is the natural next step.
- Positioning done, UX variations missing → check
.agents/project.json.enabled_packs for product-design — if product-design is not enabled, recommend /pack install product-design first; if product-design is enabled, recommend /ux-variations — Explore experience directions before production specification.
- Never recommend
/spec-interview from this skill — it is many steps downstream in the AFPS chain.
Optional Research Trigger Map
These detours are conditional framework owners, not required AFPS chain links. Use them only when the journey evidence shows that the answer will change positioning, product-loop direction, or UX/prototype choices. When the trigger is absent, continue to /positioning or /ux-variations using the decision tree above.
| Journey signal |
Existing owner |
Trigger threshold |
| Signup, setup, activation, first-success, or time-to-value path is unclear |
/onboarding-map |
The journey cannot identify the first success path, onboarding drop-offs, or activation criteria well enough to shape UX. |
| Evaluation, trial, pricing decision, objections, or buyer roles are unresolved |
/conversion-map |
Conversion decision logic affects the primary screen flow, offer, or proof sequence. |
| Purchase, checkout, payment, fulfillment, refund, dispute, or trust state is material |
/transaction-map |
Transaction mechanics create product risk before UX/prototype choices. |
| Repeat-use job, return trigger, churn risk, recovery path, or retention signal is unclear |
/retention-map |
The product needs a natural return model before designing engagement, lifecycle messages, or saved state. |
| Stage instrumentation, leading indicators, or lifecycle handoff metrics are unclear |
/lifecycle-metrics |
The journey has stage risks but needs measurement before growth or implementation planning. Prefer this over /hook-model for enterprise, infrastructure, transactional, or naturally infrequent products. |
| Product value depends on repeat use, habit formation, engagement loops, retention triggers, saved state, social rewards, or investment compounding |
Check .agents/project.json.enabled_packs for business-growth — if missing, recommend /pack install business-growth; if enabled, recommend /hook-model |
Use only for consumer, prosumer, PLG, marketplace, community, or B2B-with-consumer-component products where habit-loop design should shape UX before /ux-variations. Do not force this on B2B/enterprise, infrastructure, transactional, or naturally infrequent products; route those to /lifecycle-metrics or, when business-growth is enabled and a broader success framework is needed, /metrics. |
| Expansion, upgrade, seat growth, referral, advocacy, or land-and-expand path is material |
/expansion-map |
Expansion mechanics change lifecycle sequencing, account roles, or product surface priorities. |
| Jobs, pains, gains, aha moment, or solution fit are weak, disputed, or need explicit scoring |
Check .agents/project.json.enabled_packs for business-discovery — if missing, recommend /pack install business-discovery; if enabled, recommend /value-prop-canvas |
Use the existing Strategyzer-style framework only when fit risk would make positioning or UX premature. |
| Revenue, channel, cost, defensibility, or unfair-advantage assumptions are material risks |
Check .agents/project.json.enabled_packs for business-discovery — if missing, recommend /pack install business-discovery; if enabled, recommend /lean-canvas |
Use the existing Ash Maurya Lean Canvas framework when the journey exposes business-model risk before UX/prototype decisions. |
| Pricing gates, packaging, free-to-paid timing, or willingness-to-pay moments are central to the journey |
Check .agents/project.json.enabled_packs for business-growth — if missing, recommend /pack install business-growth; if enabled, recommend /monetization |
Use when pricing architecture must be grounded before conversion, transaction, or prototype choices. |
| Acquisition source, launch channel, messaging route, or early traction mechanism is a journey blocker |
Check .agents/project.json.enabled_packs for business-growth — if missing, recommend /pack install business-growth; if enabled, recommend /gtm |
Use after enough ICP/competitive/journey evidence exists and the channel path changes product or UX priorities. |
/growth-model is an existing Reforge-style framework owner for compounding acquisition, retention, and monetization loops, but do not route to it directly from journey-map unless metrics/GTM prerequisites are already satisfied. In most AFPS cases, /hook-model, /metrics, /monetization, or /gtm is the earlier business-growth detour.
Output
Mode A output: tasks/todo.md update
Framework execution steps (see section 3 above).
Mode B output: research/journey-map.md (or research/{slug}/journey-map.md)
# Journey Map
> Based on: [list of framework outputs used]
> Date: [current date]
> Mode: Pre-Product (hypothesized) | Product-Exists (grounded)
> Frameworks applied: [list]
## Summary
## User Journeys
## Customer Lifecycle
## Critical Moments
## Evidence Matrix
| Claim | Supporting Framework(s) | Evidence | Confidence |
|-------|------------------------|----------|------------|
| [claim] | JTBD Timeline / Experience Map / Service Blueprint / User Story Map / Customer Journey Canvas | [source] | Strong / Moderate / Hypothesized |
## Stage Detail Index
## Journey Gaps
## Next Steps
Alignment Page
When this skill produces durable deliverables (research, specs, plans, reports, prototypes, or any document output), build a full-depth HTML alignment page following ALIGNMENT-PAGE.md in this skill's directory. Output: alignment/journey-map-{topic}.html.
Journey research translation. Render the lifecycle overview as approval-ready research, not a chat-only summary. The alignment page must include the proposed research/journey-map.md content, proposed file changes, evidence coverage by journey stage, assumptions/confidence register, critical-moment evidence matrix, and approval gates before canonical research files are created or updated.
Before approval, the next action is review of alignment/journey-map-{topic}.html and compiled YAML answers from that page. Do not treat a plain-text lifecycle summary as a substitute for the HTML alignment preview.
Constraints
- Parent does not execute frameworks. It selects and queues them.
/exec handles execution.
- Synthesis requires at least one framework output. Do not synthesize from zero evidence.
- Mode detection is evidence-based. Do not override mode detection without user confirmation.
- Ground every important step in ICP, research, specs, feedback, or codebase evidence.
- Do not prescribe UI or architecture.
- Present findings before writing.
- Follow the archive-first replacement policy for canonical research/spec documents.
- Do not overwrite existing
research/journey-map.md without asking the user first.
Default Shipping Contract
Follow the shared shipping contract convention in CLAUDE.md.
1---2name: journey-map-203description: Orchestrator — detect pre-product vs product-exists mode, recommend journey-mapping frameworks, synthesize outputs into unified lifecycle overview4---5
6## Pack Availability Guard
7
8Before telling the user to run a skill from another project-local pack, check `.agents/project.json.enabled_packs`. If the target pack is not enabled, recommend `/pack install <pack>` instead of the target skill. Global skills are always valid. Skills from this same pack are valid because the current skill is already running from that pack.
9
10# Journey Map — Orchestrator
11
12This is an **orchestrator skill** using the parent router delegation pattern. It detects context, recommends applicable journey-mapping frameworks, and synthesizes their outputs. Individual frameworks live as child skills under `frameworks/`.
13
14## Report-First Approval Gate
15
16Default to report-only: present findings, evidence coverage, assumptions, recommended artifact path, and proposed file changes in a pre-approval alignment page plus a concise conversation summary for user approval before creating or updating canonical research, spec, or task files.
17
18Do not write or overwrite synthesized deliverables until the user explicitly approves, unless the user invoked an explicit write/update/fix mode or clearly asked to write files upfront. Raw evidence capture may be persisted before analysis when reproducibility requires it; report those raw paths separately and still gate synthesized research/report writes.
19
20When stopping for approval, build and attempt to open the alignment preview page first, then ask the user to review it and approve, question, or request adjustments. Do not include `Recommended next skill`, `Recommended next command`, or downstream routing language. The approval request itself is the next action. Only emit next-skill routing after the approved artifact has been written or updated.
21
22## Prerequisites
23
24- **Hard**: `research/icp.md` (or `research/{slug}/icp.md` in product-path mode) must exist — run `/icp` first.
25- **Soft**: Read these if they exist:
26 - `research/competitive-analysis.md` — competitor landscape
27 - `research/customer-feedback.md` — real customer language
28 - Specs, README/CLAUDE, and relevant source files for product context
29
30## Operational Modes
31
32### Mode A: Framework Selection (default first invocation)
33
34Activated by: `/journey-map` or `/journey-map [focus area]` (no special flags).
35
36### Mode B: Synthesis
37
38Activated by: `/journey-map --synthesize`
39
40### Mode C: Product-Exists Shortcut
41
42Activated by: `/journey-map product`
43
44---
45
46## Process
47
48### 0. Product-Path Scope Resolution
49
50Resolve research scope by product path before using code or app structure as a hint:
51
521. If `$ARGUMENTS` names a non-archived `research/{slug}/` directory or a product-path ID whose `scope_path` points there, use that path. Treat `{slug}` as the product/app name, not the ICP, audience, or segment label.
532. If `$ARGUMENTS` names only `research/_archive/{slug}/` or a manifest entry with `status: archived` or legacy `status: abandoned`, stop and warn that the path is archived; do not write or update scoped outputs there.
543. Read `research/.progress.yaml` when present. Normalize legacy `active_path` to `active_paths` on read and write back `active_paths` on manifest updates. Treat legacy `abandoned` as `archived`; exclude `archived`, `abandoned`, `deferred`, `revisit_candidate`, `promoted`, and any `scope_path` under `research/_archive/` from active target selection.
554. If active product paths exist in the manifest, use those paths. If multiple active paths exist, ask which one to target unless this skill explicitly supports cross-path output.
565. If no active manifest target exists, list non-archived product directories under `research/`, excluding `research/_archive/` and dot directories. Auto-select only when exactly one exists; ask when multiple exist.
576. If no product directories exist, use flat `research/` single-product mode.
587. Detect monorepo/app/package structure only as a secondary hint. Suggest creating a missing `research/{slug}/` product path when code clearly exposes an app, but do not require code or monorepo detection before using `research/{slug}/`.
59
60When product path `{slug}` is active, read and write research under `research/{slug}/`, specs under `specs/{slug}/`, and treat top-level `research/*.md` files as flat-mode documents or cross-path summaries.
61
620b. **Product-path manifest**: Read `research/.progress.yaml` when present. Normalize `active_path` (singular legacy) to `active_paths` (plural list) when reading; treat legacy `abandoned` as `archived` and exclude archived/deferred/revisit/promoted paths plus `research/_archive/` scopes from active target selection. Scope the journey map to the active product path by default. When journey mapping reveals lifecycle stages or user flows that only apply to a deferred product path, add a `## Product Path Implications` section noting the finding and recommending `/product-line fork` if it implies a new product surface.
63
64### 1. Mode Detection
65
66Detect **pre-product mode** (default) or **product-exists mode**:
67
68**Pre-product mode** activates when:
69- No production codebase with live users detected, AND
70- No `research/customer-feedback.md` with post-launch customer evidence, AND
71- `$ARGUMENTS` does not contain "product"
72
73Available frameworks in pre-product mode:
74- `jtbd-timeline` (default) — Moesta/Switch timeline with push/pull/anxiety/habit forces
75- `experience-map` (default) — Adaptive Path emotional arc with doing/thinking/feeling
76- `customer-journey-canvas` (optional) — Stickdorn stage×touchpoints×actions canvas
77- `service-blueprint` (optional) — Shostack front-stage/backstage/support lines
78- `user-story-map` (optional) — Jeff Patton activity→task→story hierarchy
79
80**Product-exists mode** activates when:
81- Production code or deployment exists, OR
82- `research/customer-feedback.md` exists with real customer data, OR
83- `$ARGUMENTS` contains "product"
84
85Available frameworks in product-exists mode:
86- `service-blueprint` (default) — operational gaps visible with a running product
87- `user-story-map` (default) — release slicing grounded in real usage
88- `customer-journey-canvas` (optional) — full-stage touchpoint audit
89- `experience-map` (optional) — emotional arc refresh with real feedback
90- `jtbd-timeline` (optional) — switching timeline with post-launch evidence
91
92### 2. Load Context
93
94- Read `research/icp.md` — ICP segments, pain points, value props, trigger events
95- Read `research/competitive-analysis.md` if it exists — competitor landscape
96- Read `research/customer-feedback.md` if it exists — real customer language
97- Read CLAUDE.md, README for product context
98- Read any existing `research/journey-map-*.md` intermediate artifacts (from prior runs)
99
100### 3. Mode A — Framework Selection
101
102Build an alignment page with:
103
1041. **Mode explanation**: which mode was detected and why (evidence for detection)
1052. **Available evidence summary**: what research exists and what's missing
1063. **Multi-select framework section**: checkboxes for each available framework with:
107 - Framework name and one-line description
108 - Why it's recommended or optional for this context
109 - Pre-checked defaults based on detected mode (see mode detection above)
1104. **Execution plan explanation**: selected frameworks will be written to `tasks/todo.md` for sequential `/exec` execution
1115. **Approval gate**: framework selection confirmation
112
113After user approval via compiled YAML (which includes `selected_frameworks` list):
114
115Write selected frameworks as sequential steps in `tasks/todo.md`:
116
117```markdown
118## Journey Map Framework Execution
119
120- [ ] Run `/journey-map/frameworks/jtbd-timeline` — JTBD switching timeline
121- [ ] Run `/journey-map/frameworks/experience-map` — Adaptive Path experience map
122- [ ] Synthesize: `/journey-map --synthesize` — Combine framework outputs into research/journey-map.md
123```
124
125Only include frameworks the user selected. Always append the synthesis step last.
126
127Stop after writing `tasks/todo.md`. The user runs `/exec` to execute each framework sequentially.
128
129### 4. Mode B — Synthesis (`/journey-map --synthesize`)
130
131Read all intermediate framework outputs:
132- `research/journey-map-jtbd-timeline.md`
133- `research/journey-map-experience-map.md`
134- `research/journey-map-customer-journey-canvas.md`
135- `research/journey-map-service-blueprint.md`
136- `research/journey-map-user-story-map.md`
137
138At least one must exist. If none exist, tell user to run framework selection first.
139
140Synthesize into unified `research/journey-map.md`:
141
142**Synthesis includes:**
143- Unified customer lifecycle: trigger, discovery, evaluation, onboarding, aha moment, conversion, transaction, retention, expansion, advocacy, churn, recovery
144- User journey map per key persona with core use cases, entry points, task steps, decision points, happy path, failure modes
145- Critical moments: the 3-5 moments where the product wins or loses the user/customer
146- Evidence matrix: each claim mapped to which framework(s) support it
147- Confidence levels per claim (strong/moderate/hypothesized)
148- Stage detail index: links to deeper stage docs when they exist
149- Journey gaps: stages needing deeper analysis
150- Mode header: `> Mode: Pre-Product (hypothesized)` or `> Mode: Product-Exists (grounded)`
151
152Build alignment page for synthesis approval with:
153- Full proposed `research/journey-map.md` content
154- Evidence matrix combining all framework sources
155- Confidence/assumption register
156- Critical-moment evidence matrix
157- Proposed file changes gate
158- Approval gate
159
160After approval: write `research/journey-map.md`, then emit next-step routing.
161
162### 5. Mode C — Product-Exists Shortcut
163
164Skip multi-select. Build an alignment page for the shortcut execution plan with:
165
1661. **Shortcut explanation**: product-exists shortcut selected and why `service-blueprint` + `user-story-map` are the queued defaults
1672. **Evidence readiness**: available product/customer evidence and any caveats
1683. **Proposed execution plan**: the exact `tasks/todo.md` framework queue shown below
1694. **Approval gate**: require final compiled YAML approval before writing `tasks/todo.md`
170
171Do not write `tasks/todo.md` before alignment approval. The next action is review of the HTML alignment page.
172
173After user approval via final compiled YAML, write this execution plan to `tasks/todo.md`:
174
175```markdown
176## Journey Map Framework Execution
177
178- [ ] Run `/journey-map/frameworks/service-blueprint` — Shostack service blueprint
179- [ ] Run `/journey-map/frameworks/user-story-map` — Jeff Patton user story map
180- [ ] Synthesize: `/journey-map --synthesize` — Write research/journey-map.md
181```
182
183Stop — user runs `/exec`.
184
185### 6. Next Steps (after synthesis only)
186
187Priority-ordered decision tree — recommend the **first** match:
188
1891. **Blocking optional research trigger** — the overview exposed a stage, fit, measurement, or product-loop risk that must be resolved before positioning or UX choices harden → use the Optional Research Trigger Map below. Cite the exact journey evidence, why it blocks the next AFPS step, and which existing framework skill owns it.
1902. **Positioning missing** (`research/positioning.md` does not exist) → check `.agents/project.json.enabled_packs` for `business-discovery` — if `business-discovery` is not enabled, recommend `/pack install business-discovery` first; if `business-discovery` is enabled, recommend `/positioning` — Positioning needs ICP, competitive analysis, and journey evidence, so it is the natural next step.
1913. **Positioning done, UX variations missing** → check `.agents/project.json.enabled_packs` for `product-design` — if `product-design` is not enabled, recommend `/pack install product-design` first; if `product-design` is enabled, recommend `/ux-variations` — Explore experience directions before production specification.
1924. **Never** recommend `/spec-interview` from this skill — it is many steps downstream in the AFPS chain.
193
194## Optional Research Trigger Map
195
196These detours are conditional framework owners, not required AFPS chain links. Use them only when the journey evidence shows that the answer will change positioning, product-loop direction, or UX/prototype choices. When the trigger is absent, continue to `/positioning` or `/ux-variations` using the decision tree above.
197
198| Journey signal | Existing owner | Trigger threshold |
199| --- | --- | --- |
200| Signup, setup, activation, first-success, or time-to-value path is unclear | `/onboarding-map` | The journey cannot identify the first success path, onboarding drop-offs, or activation criteria well enough to shape UX. |
201| Evaluation, trial, pricing decision, objections, or buyer roles are unresolved | `/conversion-map` | Conversion decision logic affects the primary screen flow, offer, or proof sequence. |
202| Purchase, checkout, payment, fulfillment, refund, dispute, or trust state is material | `/transaction-map` | Transaction mechanics create product risk before UX/prototype choices. |
203| Repeat-use job, return trigger, churn risk, recovery path, or retention signal is unclear | `/retention-map` | The product needs a natural return model before designing engagement, lifecycle messages, or saved state. |
204| Stage instrumentation, leading indicators, or lifecycle handoff metrics are unclear | `/lifecycle-metrics` | The journey has stage risks but needs measurement before growth or implementation planning. Prefer this over `/hook-model` for enterprise, infrastructure, transactional, or naturally infrequent products. |
205| Product value depends on repeat use, habit formation, engagement loops, retention triggers, saved state, social rewards, or investment compounding | Check `.agents/project.json.enabled_packs` for `business-growth` — if missing, recommend `/pack install business-growth`; if enabled, recommend `/hook-model` | Use only for consumer, prosumer, PLG, marketplace, community, or B2B-with-consumer-component products where habit-loop design should shape UX before `/ux-variations`. Do not force this on B2B/enterprise, infrastructure, transactional, or naturally infrequent products; route those to `/lifecycle-metrics` or, when `business-growth` is enabled and a broader success framework is needed, `/metrics`. |
206| Expansion, upgrade, seat growth, referral, advocacy, or land-and-expand path is material | `/expansion-map` | Expansion mechanics change lifecycle sequencing, account roles, or product surface priorities. |
207| Jobs, pains, gains, aha moment, or solution fit are weak, disputed, or need explicit scoring | Check `.agents/project.json.enabled_packs` for `business-discovery` — if missing, recommend `/pack install business-discovery`; if enabled, recommend `/value-prop-canvas` | Use the existing Strategyzer-style framework only when fit risk would make positioning or UX premature. |
208| Revenue, channel, cost, defensibility, or unfair-advantage assumptions are material risks | Check `.agents/project.json.enabled_packs` for `business-discovery` — if missing, recommend `/pack install business-discovery`; if enabled, recommend `/lean-canvas` | Use the existing Ash Maurya Lean Canvas framework when the journey exposes business-model risk before UX/prototype decisions. |
209| Pricing gates, packaging, free-to-paid timing, or willingness-to-pay moments are central to the journey | Check `.agents/project.json.enabled_packs` for `business-growth` — if missing, recommend `/pack install business-growth`; if enabled, recommend `/monetization` | Use when pricing architecture must be grounded before conversion, transaction, or prototype choices. |
210| Acquisition source, launch channel, messaging route, or early traction mechanism is a journey blocker | Check `.agents/project.json.enabled_packs` for `business-growth` — if missing, recommend `/pack install business-growth`; if enabled, recommend `/gtm` | Use after enough ICP/competitive/journey evidence exists and the channel path changes product or UX priorities. |
211
212`/growth-model` is an existing Reforge-style framework owner for compounding acquisition, retention, and monetization loops, but do not route to it directly from `journey-map` unless metrics/GTM prerequisites are already satisfied. In most AFPS cases, `/hook-model`, `/metrics`, `/monetization`, or `/gtm` is the earlier business-growth detour.
213
214## Output
215
216### Mode A output: `tasks/todo.md` update
217
218Framework execution steps (see section 3 above).
219
220### Mode B output: `research/journey-map.md` (or `research/{slug}/journey-map.md`)
221
222```markdown
223# Journey Map
224
225> Based on: [list of framework outputs used]
226> Date: [current date]
227> Mode: Pre-Product (hypothesized) | Product-Exists (grounded)
228> Frameworks applied: [list]
229
230## Summary
231
232## User Journeys
233
234## Customer Lifecycle
235
236## Critical Moments
237
238## Evidence Matrix
239
240| Claim | Supporting Framework(s) | Evidence | Confidence |
241|-------|------------------------|----------|------------|
242| [claim] | JTBD Timeline / Experience Map / Service Blueprint / User Story Map / Customer Journey Canvas | [source] | Strong / Moderate / Hypothesized |
243
244## Stage Detail Index
245
246## Journey Gaps
247
248## Next Steps
249```
250
251## Alignment Page
252
253When this skill produces durable deliverables (research, specs, plans, reports, prototypes, or any document output), build a full-depth HTML alignment page following `ALIGNMENT-PAGE.md` in this skill's directory. Output: `alignment/journey-map-{topic}.html`.
254
255**Journey research translation.** Render the lifecycle overview as approval-ready research, not a chat-only summary. The alignment page must include the proposed `research/journey-map.md` content, proposed file changes, evidence coverage by journey stage, assumptions/confidence register, critical-moment evidence matrix, and approval gates before canonical research files are created or updated.
256
257Before approval, the next action is review of `alignment/journey-map-{topic}.html` and compiled YAML answers from that page. Do not treat a plain-text lifecycle summary as a substitute for the HTML alignment preview.
258
259## Constraints
260
261- **Parent does not execute frameworks.** It selects and queues them. `/exec` handles execution.
262- **Synthesis requires at least one framework output.** Do not synthesize from zero evidence.
263- **Mode detection is evidence-based.** Do not override mode detection without user confirmation.
264- Ground every important step in ICP, research, specs, feedback, or codebase evidence.
265- Do not prescribe UI or architecture.
266- Present findings before writing.
267- Follow the archive-first replacement policy for canonical research/spec documents.
268- Do not overwrite existing `research/journey-map.md` without asking the user first.
269
270## Default Shipping Contract
271
272Follow the shared shipping contract convention in CLAUDE.md.