Youtube Format Research

Pack Availability Guard

Before telling the user to run a skill from another project-local pack, check .agents/project.json.enabled_packs. If the target pack is not enabled, recommend $pack install <pack> instead of the target skill. Global skills are always valid. Skills from this same pack are valid because the current skill is already running from that pack.

YouTube Format Research

Invoke as $youtube-format-research.

Report-First Approval Gate

Default to report-only: present findings, evidence coverage, assumptions, recommended artifact path, and proposed file changes in a pre-approval alignment page plus a concise conversation summary for user approval before creating or updating canonical research, spec, or task files.

Do not write or overwrite synthesized deliverables until the user explicitly approves, unless the user invoked an explicit write/update/fix mode or clearly asked to write files upfront. Raw evidence capture may be persisted before analysis when reproducibility requires it; report those raw paths separately and still gate synthesized research/report writes.

When stopping for approval, build and attempt to open the alignment preview page first, then ask the user to review it and approve, question, or request adjustments. Do not include Recommended next skill, Recommended next command, or downstream routing language. The approval request itself is the next action. Only emit next-skill routing after the approved artifact has been written or updated.

Analyze how a reference YouTube video is constructed so its format, design language, pacing, and production grammar can be adapted. This is the production-pattern lane; use $youtube-vid-research for general comprehension, $youtube-competitive-research for performance lessons, and $video-build when an approved script is ready for Remotion implementation.

Inputs

• Required: one YouTube video URL or video ID.
• Optional --target remotion|script|style-guide: default remotion.
• Optional --compare <video URL or ID...>: additional references to distinguish repeatable format rules from one-off choices.

Workflow

1. Resolve all video targets into video IDs from watch URLs, Shorts URLs, youtu.be URLs, embed URLs, or raw 11-character IDs.

2. Require yt-dlp for public metadata:

   command -v yt-dlp
   

3. Select a transcript Python interpreter. Prefer a workspace-local .venv; create it if missing. Install youtube-transcript-api into .venv only when the import check fails and network access is available.

4. Persist raw evidence under research/youtube/data/<video-id>/:

   • metadata-YYYY-MM-DD.json: raw yt-dlp --dump-json "VIDEO_URL" output.
   • transcript/<video-id>.json: raw transcript JSON when available.
   • transcript/transcript-summary.json: transcript text or failure reason.

5. Inspect available metadata, transcript, chapters, thumbnail URLs, description, and any user-provided screenshots or notes. If visual details cannot be verified from available evidence, mark them as gaps instead of guessing.

6. Analyze:

   • Scene grammar: opener, recurring segments, transitions, title cards, examples, proof moments, CTA, outro.
   • Timing and pacing: section durations, speaking density, cut rhythm, beats, visual resets, and retention support.
   • Visual system: typography, color, layout, framing, captions, lower thirds, callouts, charts, browser frames, code blocks, or product shots.
   • Motion language: camera moves, zooms, wipes, kinetic text, object movement, reveal timing, and transition rules.
   • Audio language: music bed, silence, sound effects, emphasis beats, voiceover style, and mix notes when evidence supports them.
   • Production assets: required footage, screenshots, diagrams, logos, fonts, icons, stock, B-roll, music, SFX, and licensing checks.

7. Translate the reference into reusable format rules without copying copyrighted assets or pretending the exact source project is available.

Output

Write:

research/youtube/format-research-<video-id>-YYYY-MM-DD.md

Use this structure:

# YouTube Format Research - [Title]

> Video: [URL]
> Target: remotion / script / style-guide
> Date captured: YYYY-MM-DD
> Evidence: [raw paths used]

## Evidence Coverage

| Evidence | Status | Path or gap |
|---|---|---|
| Public metadata | Available / Missing | ... |
| Transcript | Available / Missing | ... |
| Chapters | Available / Missing | ... |
| Visual references | Available / Missing | ... |
| Audio references | Available / Missing | ... |

## Format Summary

[The repeatable format in one concise brief.]

## Scene And Timing Map

| Segment | Approx time | Purpose | Visual treatment | Audio / motion notes |
|---|---:|---|---|---|
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |

## Visual And Motion System

- **Typography**: ...
- **Color and layout**: ...
- **Captions / callouts**: ...
- **Transitions**: ...
- **Recurring components**: ...

## Production Grammar

[Rules for pacing, proof, examples, visual resets, CTA placement, and when to change scenes.]

## Remotion Handoff

| Component / asset | Role | Inputs | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| ... | ... | ... | ... |

## Adaptation Guidance

[What to copy as a pattern, what to avoid copying directly, and what to change for the user's brand or series.]

## Evidence Gaps And Human Checks

[Missing screenshots, unavailable fonts, uncertain audio details, licensing checks, or manual review needs.]

Constraints

• Do not copy or embed copyrighted assets, music, fonts, footage, or thumbnails unless the user confirms licensing.
• Do not invent visual details that are not evident from metadata, transcript, screenshots, or user-provided notes.
• Distinguish repeatable format rules from one-off creative choices.
• Keep Remotion handoff at the component/spec level; actual scaffold and render planning belongs to $video-build.
• Do not bypass login walls, bot protections, access controls, or private YouTube Studio data.
• Archive existing canonical artifacts before replacing them under docs/history/archive/YYYY-MM-DD/HHMMSS/<original-relative-path>.

Approved Artifact Handoff

After an approved synthesized write, explicit write/update mode, or any direct artifact mutation:

• List every created or updated synthesized artifact path in the final response.
• State the verification performed, such as readback, schema/check command, or why no executable verification applies for a Markdown-only strategy artifact.
• Check and report the relevant git status for intended artifacts when the project is a git repository. If intended artifacts are modified or untracked, make the next action shipping, committing, or an explicit dirty-artifact handoff before recommending downstream strategy work.
• Do not imply the research workflow is complete while approved artifacts remain untracked or uncommitted unless the user explicitly asked not to ship.
• If stopping for approval before writing, the approval request remains the next action; do not include downstream routing.

Intent-Aware Routing

Before applying the default ## Next-Skill Routing sequence, classify the user's immediate intent and route to the missing action that best serves that intent:

• Strategy refresh: recommend the missing or stale positioning, programming, portfolio, metrics, or product-media artifact.
• Recording prep: recommend the missing series spec, script, build proof, walkthrough guide, or validation artifact needed before recording.
• Upload prep: recommend packaging, title/thumbnail, description, chapters, or final metadata work before broader strategy work.
• Performance review: recommend metrics, cadence, portfolio, peer benchmark, or owner-analytics export work before new content planning.
• Owner analytics or private/manual platform evidence: route to an explicit manual/guide handoff instead of inventing unavailable metrics.
• Dirty intended artifacts: route to shipping/commit/handoff first, not another creator strategy skill.

Use the default next-skill sequence only when no stronger user intent, missing artifact, manual blocker, or dirty-artifact handoff applies.

Alignment Page

When this skill produces durable deliverables (research, specs, plans, reports, prototypes, or any document output), build a full-depth HTML alignment page at alignment/youtube-format-research-{topic}.html. Use a normalized topic slug derived from the app, feature, research subject, report subject, or output filename.

Full content requirement. The alignment page must contain the complete content of every proposed markdown deliverable -- every section, every finding, every detail, every list item. It is a thorough interactive review document, not a summary. Render the full deliverable content in clean, readable HTML with appropriate hierarchy, styling, and navigation. If the skill writes multiple scoped deliverables in one run, build one alignment page that contains all deliverables with anchor-linked navigation. Durable tracker artifacts, such as research/assumption-tracker.md, remain canonical markdown outputs but must also be fully rendered into the alignment page before approval.

Dark-mode styling. Use a dark color scheme by default. Base CSS variables: --bg: #0d1117; --surface: #161b22; --border: #30363d; --text: #c9d1d9; --text-muted: #8b949e; --accent: #58a6ff; --green: #3fb950; --red: #f85149; --orange: #d29922; --purple: #bc8cff;. Apply background: var(--bg); color: var(--text); on body. Use --surface for cards, nav, and table headers. Use --border for all borders. Use --purple for question blocks and gate headings. Use --accent for links and section headings. Keep headings color: #fff or var(--accent) for hierarchy. Question block backgrounds should use #1c2333.

Alignment gates. Treat gates as explicit review sections inside the HTML page. A gate blocks finalization until its required inline questions are answered and compiled into YAML. Include every gate that applies to the skill output, and include these gate types whenever relevant: evidence coverage, assumptions/confidence, scope/non-goals, candidate/verdict decisions, artifact destination, proposed file changes, coverage checkpoint, and post-approval route.

Report-only research gates. For report-only or pre-approval research skills, the alignment page must explicitly contain evidence coverage, assumptions/confidence, recommended path, proposed file changes, and approval gates before any canonical research, spec, or task file is created or updated.

Required inline questions. Each gate must contain at least one required inline question placed directly under the content it governs, inside a visually distinct question block. Each question must use radio-button inputs and include two standing options after the skill-generated choices: "Other / None of the above" backed by a multi-line text box for free-form input, and "Need clarification" backed by an optional notes box where the user can explain what is unclear. When any radio option other than "Other" or "Need clarification" is selected, show an optional "Additional notes" text box beneath it so the user can qualify their choice. Generate questions based on what genuinely needs user input -- do not add filler questions. Do not create a separate bottom "Decisions & Clarifications" section.

Gate YAML contract. At the bottom of the page, include a "Compile Answers" button that aggregates answers from all inline gate questions throughout the page, including free-text notes. The button remains disabled until every required question has a selection, shows a count of remaining unanswered questions, and scrolls to the first unanswered question if clicked early. When every question is answered, generate a structured YAML block with one item per gate answer using this stable shape: section, gate_type, status (answered, other, or needs-clarification), answer, optional notes, and optional target_artifact or target_path when the gate controls file output. After successful compilation, automatically attempt to copy the YAML to the clipboard with the Clipboard API, display copy status, and display the YAML in a read-only textarea with an explicit "Copy YAML" button. The copy button must retry clipboard copy when supported and fall back to selecting the textarea contents when clipboard access is unavailable or blocked.

Pre-approval stop. Before user approval, the next action is review of the HTML alignment page, not downstream routing. Ask the user to review the page and provide the compiled YAML answers. Do not include Recommended next skill, Recommended next command, or downstream routing language until after compiled YAML has been provided and the approved artifacts have been written or updated.

Diff highlighting on updates. When the agent updates an existing alignment page after receiving compiled answers, highlight what changed since the previous version. The agent chooses inline annotation or side-by-side layout per situation.

Archiving. Before replacing an existing alignment page, archive it to docs/history/archive/YYYY-MM-DD/HHMMSS/alignment/youtube-format-research-{topic}.html.

Browser open. Attempt to open the resulting HTML page in the browser and report whether the open succeeded or was blocked. A blocked browser-open attempt does not make the skill fail when the files were written correctly.

Next-Skill Routing

After writing the artifact, recommend the next contextual Remotion or creator-media skill in the final response as Recommended next skill: <command>.

Default recommendation: $video-build when the user has an approved script and wants a Remotion implementation next; $video-script when the format needs to be adapted into a new script first; $series-spec when the output should become a reusable show format.

If the default successor already exists and is current, recommend the first missing or stale downstream Remotion or creator-media artifact in this order:

$youtube-channel-audit -> $youtube-video-audit -> $youtube-vid-research -> $youtube-format-research -> $youtube-competitive-research -> $youtube-title-thumbnail-audit -> $youtube-description-optimizer -> $youtube-portfolio -> $youtube-peer-benchmark -> $youtube-search-positioning -> $youtube-cadence-diagnosis -> $creator-positioning -> $content-programming -> $series-spec -> $product-led-media-map -> $video-script -> $video-build -> $creator-metrics-review

If the sequence is ambiguous, recommend $series-spec for reusable formats or $video-script for one-off production and explain the missing artifact.