Game Implementation Plan
Turn the approved build brief into an execution plan.
Use ../../shared/templates/task-plan.md.
Outputs
Follow the gsp-orchestrator output strategy:
- inline (default): present implementation plan in conversation.
- minimal or full: write
docs/game-studio/plan.md.
Spec-driven compatibility
When gsp-spec-driven-planning is active:
- write the implementation plan to
changes/<change-id>/tasks.md - keep each task traceable to the requirement or design area it implements
Key rule
Do not use one default task size for all situations. Use the chosen development mode.
Planning bias
- In yolo-super, larger end-to-end tasks are allowed and often preferred.
- In guided-build, keep the plan comprehensible but still fast.
- In refactor-open, plan migrations and replacements explicitly.
- In surgical-live, keep tasks tight and rollbackable.
Execution bias
Unless the user explicitly wants a cheap or minimal pass, assume the plan should support:
- a builder stage
- a reviewer stage
- a verifier stage
For benchmark, showcase, or polished-prototype work, plan with this loop in mind instead of assuming one pass from build to done.
Important
Do not produce fake progress tasks like “set up scaffolding” unless that scaffold immediately enables real implementation. Prefer tasks that end in a stronger running build.