Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
When it applies
A state-changing action authenticated purely by an ambiently-sent credential (cookie) with no unpredictable token the attacker's site can't know/replay.
Why it works
Browsers attach cookies to cross-site requests automatically. If the server accepts the action
on cookie alone, an attacker page can submit it on the victim's behalf. Anti-CSRF tokens /
SameSite cookies break this by requiring something cross-site JS can't supply.
Method
- Find a candidate: a sensitive action (change email/password, transfer, role) that changes state.
- Check the defenses: is there a CSRF token? Is it validated (remove it / reuse another
user's / swap value)? Is the cookie
SameSite=Lax/Strict? Is it a simple request (no preflight)? - Build the PoC: auto-submitting HTML form (or
fetchfor simple requests) that fires the action; host it and load it as the victim. - Bypass weak tokens: token not tied to session, predictable, accepted when blank, only checked if present, or leaked via GET/referer.
- JSON endpoints: try
Content-Type: text/plain/form-encoding to avoid preflight; if the API accepts it, CSRF applies.
Gotchas
SameSite=Lax(now default in Chrome) blocks most cross-site POST CSRF — look forNone, GET-based actions, or method override.- Token present ≠ safe — always test that it's actually validated and bound to the session.
- Login CSRF and CSRF chained with self-XSS are often the real impact.
Verify success
Loading your PoC while authenticated as the victim performs the action (email changed, etc.) with no interaction beyond visiting the page.
References
PortSwigger CSRF labs; OWASP CSRF Prevention Cheat Sheet.