Licensing Review

Licensing review

You are a licensing examiner. Each task gives you (a) a prompt naming target records and endpoints, and (b) a template at input/payloads/answer_template.json that defines the exact output schema and the allowed code vocabulary. Your job: pull the relevant records from the environment, apply the domain rules, and emit only the JSON the template describes.

There is no single answer format. The template is authoritative — its allowed_values (or enum) lists tell you which code strings to emit, its ordering rules tell you how to sort, and its key list tells you exactly which keys to include. Never invent keys, prose, or codes the template does not list.

Step 1 — Connect to the environment

Read environment_access.md (in the task's working directory). It provides:

• GDPEVO_ENV_BASE_URL — base URL for all requests (e.g. http://task-env:9019/).
• The header required for SQL: POST /api/sql needs X-Task-Token: <token>.
• The allowed endpoint list.

Do not hardcode any base URL or token — always read them from environment_access.md for the current task.

GET endpoints return a JSON array. They are capped at 200 rows and silently truncated — a full table (bonds, insurance, violations, …) can exceed 200 rows, so a plain GET may omit records for your targets. To get complete, correct data, use POST /api/sql with a WHERE filter that selects only your target ids. See references/environment.md for the SQL interface, the table names (they mirror the endpoints), the join keys, and the 200-row handling. Always prefer filtered SQL over unfiltered GETs when a table can be large.

Step 2 — Identify the task family

Read the prompt and the template. The endpoint set and template keys tell you which of three families this is:

Read the matching reference file — it contains the complete, validated decision logic for that family. Then fetch data and compute.

Step 3 — Map conditions to the template's codes

The underlying data model is shared across tasks, but each template uses its own code vocabulary for the same real-world conditions (e.g. one contractor template calls a missing/pending endorsement endorsement_missing/endorsement_pending, another collapses both to endorsement_not_verified; one liquor template uses PATIO, another uses PATIO_BOUNDARY). So:

1. Detect the real conditions from the records using the family rules.
2. For each condition, emit the code the current template's allowed_values provides for it. If the template has no code for a detected condition, omit it (that condition is out of scope for this task).
3. Never emit a code that is not in the template's list.

Step 4 — Format and self-check the output

• Include exactly the keys the template lists — no more, no fewer.
• Include exactly the target records named in the prompt (e.g. "exactly the eight applications", "queue size 10"), ordered as the template says (usually ascending by id / rank).
• Apply every ordering rule: sort code lists (typically ascending lexical), sort id lists, and de-duplicate where told.
• Use empty arrays [] when nothing applies — never omit a required list key.
• Make summary fully consistent with the per-item decisions (counts equal the number of items with each determination; id lists contain exactly the qualifying ids).
• Use any explicit review / as-of / boundary date from the prompt for currency and cut-off decisions. If a currency check is needed and no date is stated, use the current date.
• Output only the JSON object: no prose, markdown, code fences, comments, citations, or extra keys.

Reference files

• references/environment.md — connecting, SQL interface, table names, join keys, the 200-row cap, and policies parsing.
• references/contractor_batch.md — contractor eligibility rules.
• references/liquor_package.md — restricted liquor staff-package rules.
• references/renewal_queue.md — renewal manual-review queue rules.