clickbait-mitigation-eval
Clicks can be Cheating: Counterfactual Recommendation for Mitigating Clickbait Issue — Wenjie Wang et al. (2020) (arXiv:2009.09945, 2020)
What this evaluates
This evaluation probes a recommender system's ability to mitigate clickbait by measuring performance exclusively on user interactions that result in positive post-click feedback (likes), rather than raw click-through rates.
Datasets
- Unspecified in provided section — total ?; splits: test (-1)
Metrics
post-click satisfaction (likes)(primary) — range: [0, 1]- Recommendation performance is computed exclusively on the subset of test interactions where the user provided positive post-click feedback (likes). Interactions lacking post-click feedback are excluded from evaluation.
Input / output format
Input: User features $u$ and item features $i=(e,t)$, where $e$ denotes exposure features (e.g., title, cover) and $t$ denotes content features.
Output: A predicted preference score $Y_{u,i} = s_{\bar{\theta}}(u,i)$ used to rank items.
Scoring recipe
# 1. Filter test interactions to keep only those with positive post-click feedback (likes)
liked_interactions = [(u, i) for (u, i, y) in test_data if y == 'like']
# 2. Exclude interactions lacking post-click feedback
# 3. Compute standard recommendation performance metric (e.g., AUC/NDCG) on the filtered subset
metric_value = compute_recommender_metric(model, liked_interactions)
Common pitfalls
- Conventional recommender evaluations treat all clicks as positive signals; this protocol explicitly excludes clicks without post-click feedback to isolate clickbait effects.
- Evaluating on raw click-through rate (CTR) will overestimate performance on clickbait items; this protocol requires post-click satisfaction signals.
Evidence (verbatim from paper)
Distinct from the conventional recommender evaluation that treats all clicks in the testing period as positive samples*(Wei et al., 2019); He and McAuley, 2016), we evaluate recommendation performance only over clicks that end with positive post-click feedback (i.e., likes)(Wen et al., 2020)*. We do not use the clicks that lack post-click feedback due to the unawareness of user satisfaction.
Citation
@misc{wang2020clickbait,
title={Clicks can be Cheating: Counterfactual Recommendation for Mitigating Clickbait Issue},
author={Wenjie Wang et al. (2020)},
year={2020},
note={arXiv:2009.09945}
}
- arXiv: 2009.09945