Positioning statement:
For [target] who [need], [product] is a [category] that [benefit].
Unlike [alternative], our product [differentiator].
Value-based pricing: Price at 10-20% of quantified value delivered
Opportunity score: /100 across Market Fit, Technical Fit, GTM Fit, Personal Fit, Economics
Quick Reference
| Framework |
Purpose |
When to Use |
| ICP Development |
Define ideal customer |
Before any outreach |
| Positioning |
Differentiate in market |
Product launch, pivot |
| Messaging Hierarchy |
Consistent communication |
Sales enablement |
| Competitive Intel |
Understand landscape |
Deal strategy, positioning |
| Value-Based Pricing |
Price by value delivered |
Setting initial prices |
| Tier Structure |
Package offering |
Feature gating decisions |
| Opportunity Scoring |
Evaluate fit |
New client/project decisions |
Part 1: Go-To-Market Strategy
ICP Development Framework
Build your ICP across three dimensions, then score each prospect:
Dimension 1 -- Firmographics (who they are):
- Company size: employee count range, revenue range
- Industry: primary verticals, secondary, and explicitly excluded
- Geography: target regions, excluded regions
- Company type: startup, growth-stage, enterprise, SMB
- Funding stage: bootstrapped, seed, Series A-D, public/PE-backed
Dimension 2 -- Technographics (what they use):
- Required stack: must-have tech, nice-to-have, incompatible
- Tech maturity: early adopter, early majority, late majority, laggard
- Current solutions: CRM, ERP, industry-specific tools
- Integration requirements: what your product must connect to
- Pain indicators: manual processes, disconnected systems, spreadsheet workarounds
Dimension 3 -- Psychographics (how they buy):
- Awareness stage: unaware, problem-aware, solution-aware, product-aware
- Buying committee: economic buyer, technical buyer, user buyer, champion, blocker
- Decision criteria: primary (speed, cost, features) and secondary
- Risk tolerance: budget concerns, implementation risk, change management, vendor stability
ICP Scoring Rubric:
| Score |
Label |
Action |
| 80-100 |
Ideal |
Prioritize -- full outreach cadence, executive sponsorship |
| 60-79 |
Good |
Pursue -- standard cadence, qualify thoroughly |
| 40-59 |
Marginal |
Conditional -- only if specific signal changes (budget, timing) |
| <40 |
Pass |
Decline -- opportunity cost too high |
Behavioral Signals to Watch:
- High intent: searched for competitor alternatives, visited pricing page 3+ times, downloaded buyer's guide
- Medium intent: attended webinar, engaged with case study, connected on LinkedIn
- Low intent: blog subscriber, social follower, newsletter open
ICP Validation Checklist:
- TAM/SAM/SOM calculated with minimum 1,000 companies in ICP
- Historical win rate against ICP >30%
- ICP customers have lowest churn and highest NPS
- Sales team, CS, and product all agree on the profile
See reference/gtm.md for full YAML ICP worksheet templates and an example ICP (MEP contractors).
Positioning (April Dunford Framework)
The 5 Components of Positioning:
- Competitive alternatives -- What would customers use if you didn't exist? (Not just direct competitors -- include spreadsheets, manual processes, hiring, doing nothing)
- Unique attributes -- What do you have that alternatives don't? (Features, architecture, team expertise, data, integrations)
- Value -- What does the unique attribute enable for customers? (Time saved, revenue gained, risk reduced, cost avoided)
- Target customer -- Who cares most about that value? (The segment where your strengths matter most)
- Market category -- What market do you position in? (Existing category, subcategory, or create new category)
Positioning Statement Template:
For [target customer segment] who [key need/pain],
[product name] is a [market category]
that [primary value proposition].
Unlike [competitive alternative],
our product [key differentiator tied to unique attribute].
Messaging Hierarchy (3 levels, max 3 differentiators each):
| Level |
Audience |
Message Type |
| Strategic |
C-suite, board |
Business outcomes, ROI, risk reduction |
| Solution |
Directors, VPs |
Capability, integration, workflow improvement |
| Persona |
End users, admins |
Features, UX, daily workflow benefits |
Competitive Battle Card Essentials:
For each top-3 competitor, document:
- Overview: founded, HQ, funding, target market, pricing model
- Strengths (acknowledge honestly -- credibility requires it)
- Weaknesses mapped to your advantages
- Common objections with value-based responses
- Win strategy: lead differentiator, proof point, reference story
- Questions to ask the prospect that expose competitor weaknesses
See reference/gtm.md for battle card template, positioning examples, and competitive positioning framework.
GTM Motion and Launch
GTM Motion Selection:
| Motion |
ACV |
Sales Cycle |
Team Needed |
CAC |
| Product-Led Growth (PLG) |
<$5K |
Days |
Growth/product |
Low |
| Sales-Assisted |
$5-50K |
Weeks |
SDR + AE |
Medium |
| Enterprise |
$50K+ |
Months |
AE + SE + CSM |
High |
| Partner/Channel |
Variable |
Variable |
Partner Manager |
Variable |
Channel Mix: 60-70% primary motion, 20-30% secondary, 10% experimental.
Launch Checklist Milestones:
- T-30 (Pre-launch): ICP validated, positioning finalized, messaging hierarchy complete, battle cards created, pricing approved, sales team trained, demo environment stable
- T-0 (Launch): Website updated, outbound sequences activated, press release distributed, social campaign live, partner notifications sent
- T+30 (Post-launch): Win/loss analysis started, messaging refined from feedback, pipeline reviewed, competitive response documented, metrics dashboard active
See reference/gtm.md for full launch checklists, channel strategy details, and complexity-to-resource matching.
Part 2: Pricing Strategy
Value-Based Pricing Method
Step 1 -- Quantify customer value:
Total Value = Time Savings + Revenue Impact + Cost Avoidance
Time Savings: Hours saved/month x Hourly rate x 12
Revenue Impact: Additional revenue enabled per year
Cost Avoidance: Costs eliminated or reduced per year
Step 2 -- Set price at 10-20% of quantified value:
- 10% = conservative (easy sell, high perceived value)
- 15% = balanced (standard B2B SaaS)
- 20% = aggressive (strong differentiation required)
Step 3 -- Validate against willingness-to-pay:
- Van Westendorp price sensitivity: ask "too cheap / cheap / expensive / too expensive"
- Competitive benchmarking: where do alternatives price?
- Customer interviews: "Would you pay $X for Y outcome?"
Pricing Models
| Model |
Best For |
Pros |
Cons |
| Flat rate |
Simple products |
Easy to understand |
Doesn't scale with value |
| Per seat |
Team tools |
Predictable, scales with org |
Discourages adoption |
| Usage-based |
APIs, infra |
Aligns cost with value |
Unpredictable revenue |
| Tiered (Good/Better/Best) |
Feature differentiation |
Anchoring, clear upgrade path |
Complex to design |
| Hybrid (seat + usage) |
Enterprise SaaS |
Predictable base + upside |
Complex billing |
Tier Design (Good/Better/Best)
Tier structure principles:
- 3-4 tiers optimal (more creates decision paralysis)
- Middle tier should be your target -- it gets the "Most Popular" badge
- Top tier makes middle tier look reasonable (price anchoring)
- Free tier only if PLG motion (land, qualify, viral growth)
Feature Gating Rules:
| Gate By |
Examples |
When to Use |
| Scale |
Users, API calls, storage, projects |
Usage naturally grows with value |
| Sophistication |
Advanced analytics, AI features, workflows |
Features require maturity to use |
| Control |
SSO, SAML, audit logs, custom roles |
Enterprise compliance needs |
| Support |
SLA, dedicated CSM, phone support |
Willingness to pay for service |
Never gate: Security features, data export, basic integrations. Gating these breeds resentment and churn.
Discounting Strategy
| Type |
Trigger |
Range |
Use When |
| Volume |
Commitment to scale |
10-30% |
Large seat count, multi-year |
| Term |
Annual commitment |
15-25% |
Monthly-to-annual conversion |
| Competitive |
Switching from competitor |
20-40% |
Match remaining contract value |
| Strategic |
Reference customer, logo value |
Up to 50% |
Brand-name + case study commitment |
Protect your pricing -- never discount when:
- Customer hasn't articulated the value they'll receive
- No competitive pressure exists
- You're early in negotiation (discount later, not first)
- Customer is purely price-shopping (they'll churn anyway)
Alternatives to discounting: Extended payment terms, additional training/onboarding, extended trial period, success-milestone feature unlocks, multi-year lock-in at current rate.
Key SaaS Pricing Metrics
| Metric |
Target |
Formula |
| LTV |
>3x CAC |
ARPU / monthly churn rate |
| CAC Payback |
<12 months |
CAC / ARPU |
| NRR |
>100% |
(Start MRR + expansion - contraction - churn) / Start MRR |
| Gross Margin |
>70% |
(Revenue - COGS) / Revenue |
See reference/pricing.md for per-model deep dives, price increase playbook, services pricing, productized service model, and revenue model templates.
Part 3: Opportunity Evaluation
Quick Score (/100)
| Dimension |
Points |
What to Assess |
| Market Fit |
25 |
Problem clarity (10), market size (8), timing (7) |
| Technical Fit |
20 |
Can I build it (10), infrastructure fit (5), maintenance burden (5) |
| GTM Fit |
20 |
Sales complexity (8), channel access (7), competition (5) |
| Personal Fit |
20 |
Interest/energy (8), growth potential (7), lifestyle fit (5) |
| Economics |
15 |
Revenue potential (8), time to revenue (4), risk/reward (3) |
Score Interpretation and Action
| Score |
Action |
Next Step |
| 80-100 |
STRONG PURSUE |
Prioritize immediately, allocate resources |
| 60-79 |
EXPLORE |
Worth a time-boxed deep dive (1-2 weeks) |
| 40-59 |
CONDITIONAL |
Park it -- revisit only if a specific factor changes |
| 0-39 |
PASS |
Decline -- opportunity cost too high |
Red Flags (Automatic Deductions)
Any of these should subtract 10-20 points from your score:
- Unclear payment terms: "We'll figure out compensation later"
- Expanding scope pre-start: Requirements growing before contract signed
- Pressure to decide fast: "We need an answer by Friday" on a major commitment
- Misaligned incentives: Their success doesn't require your success
- Economics don't work even optimistically: If best-case math doesn't pencil, walk away
- Single-threaded champion: Only one person wants this; no organizational buy-in
- No budget allocated: Interested but no approved spend
GTM Complexity Levels
| Level |
Buyer |
ACV |
Cycle |
Decision Style |
| PLG |
Individual user |
<$2K |
Days |
User = buyer, self-serve |
| Low-Touch |
Manager |
$2-15K |
1-4 weeks |
Light demo, quick approval |
| Mid-Market |
Director/VP |
$15-100K |
1-3 months |
Committee, multiple stakeholders |
| Enterprise |
C-suite |
$100K-1M |
6-18 months |
RFP, security review, legal |
| Complex |
Board-level |
$1M+ |
12-36 months |
Transformation project |
Match complexity to your resources:
- Solo / side project: target Level 1-2 max
- Small team: target Level 2-3
- Funded startup: target Level 2-4
- Enterprise sales org: target Level 3-5
5-Minute Viability Test
Before deep-diving any opportunity, answer four questions:
- How much will one customer pay? $____/month
- How many customers can I realistically get in 6 months? ____
- What does it cost to serve one customer? $____/month
- How many hours/week will this take? ____
Quick math:
- Monthly revenue at 6 months: #2 x #1
- Monthly costs: #2 x #3
- Monthly margin: Revenue - Costs
- Effective hourly rate: Margin / (hours x 4.33)
- If hourly rate < $100 --> needs rethinking
Build vs Partner vs Buy Decision
| Signal |
Build |
Partner |
Buy |
| Core differentiator |
Yes |
|
|
| Commodity capability |
|
|
Yes |
| Complementary strength |
|
Yes |
|
| Time-critical |
|
|
Yes |
| Learning value high |
Yes |
|
|
| Maintenance burden high |
|
Yes |
Yes |
| No good alternative exists |
Yes |
|
|
See reference/opportunity.md for detailed scoring rubrics per dimension, full scorecard YAML templates, unit economics worksheets, cost structure analysis, break-even calculations, and build-vs-partner decision trees.
Reference Files
reference/gtm.md - ICP YAML templates, behavioral signals, validation checklist, channel strategy, launch playbooks, battle card template, positioning examples
reference/pricing.md - Model deep dives, tier design, price increase playbook, services pricing, discount framework, SaaS metrics dashboard
reference/opportunity.md - Full scoring rubrics (5 sections), scorecard YAML, unit economics, cost analysis, break-even formulas, build/partner/buy decision trees
Emit Outcome Sidecar
As the final step, write to ~/.claude/skill-analytics/last-outcome-gtm-pricing.json:
{"ts":"[UTC ISO8601]","skill":"gtm-pricing","version":"1.0.0","variant":"default",
"status":"[success|partial|error]","runtime_ms":[estimated ms from start],
"metrics":{"pricing_models_evaluated":[n],"tiers_designed":[n],"gtm_channels_mapped":[n]},
"error":null,"session_id":"[YYYY-MM-DD]"}
Use status "partial" if some stages failed but results were produced. Use "error" only if no output was generated.
1---2name: gtm-pricing3description: B2B go-to-market strategy, pricing models, ICP development, positioning, and competitive intelligence. Use when planning GTM strategy, setting pricing, defining ICP, or evaluating opportunities.4---5
6<objective>
7Comprehensive B2B go-to-market framework covering ICP development (firmographics, technographics, psychographics), positioning (April Dunford canvas), pricing strategy (value-based, tiered, feature gating), and opportunity evaluation (scoring, red flags, complexity levels).
8</objective>
9
10<quick_start>
11**ICP scoring:** 80+ = Ideal | 60-79 = Good | 40-59 = Marginal | <40 = Pass
12
13**Positioning statement:**
14```
15For [target] who [need], [product] is a [category] that [benefit].
16Unlike [alternative], our product [differentiator].
17```
18
19**Value-based pricing:** Price at 10-20% of quantified value delivered
20
21**Opportunity score:** /100 across Market Fit, Technical Fit, GTM Fit, Personal Fit, Economics
22</quick_start>
23
24<success_criteria>
25GTM strategy is successful when:
26- ICP documented with scoring criteria (firmographics, technographics, psychographics)
27- Positioning statement follows April Dunford framework
28- Pricing anchored to quantified value (not cost-plus)
29- Tier structure follows Good/Better/Best with clear feature gates
30- Opportunity scoring identifies red flags and good signals
31- Battle cards created for top 3 competitors
32- Launch checklist completed (pre-launch, launch, post-launch)
33</success_criteria>
34
35<core_content>
36Comprehensive guide for B2B go-to-market strategy, pricing, and opportunity evaluation.
37
38## Quick Reference
39
40| Framework | Purpose | When to Use |
41|-----------|---------|-------------|
42| ICP Development | Define ideal customer | Before any outreach |
43| Positioning | Differentiate in market | Product launch, pivot |
44| Messaging Hierarchy | Consistent communication | Sales enablement |
45| Competitive Intel | Understand landscape | Deal strategy, positioning |
46| Value-Based Pricing | Price by value delivered | Setting initial prices |
47| Tier Structure | Package offering | Feature gating decisions |
48| Opportunity Scoring | Evaluate fit | New client/project decisions |
49
50---
51
52## Part 1: Go-To-Market Strategy
53
54### ICP Development Framework
55
56Build your ICP across three dimensions, then score each prospect:
57
58**Dimension 1 -- Firmographics (who they are):**
59- Company size: employee count range, revenue range
60- Industry: primary verticals, secondary, and explicitly excluded
61- Geography: target regions, excluded regions
62- Company type: startup, growth-stage, enterprise, SMB
63- Funding stage: bootstrapped, seed, Series A-D, public/PE-backed
64
65**Dimension 2 -- Technographics (what they use):**
66- Required stack: must-have tech, nice-to-have, incompatible
67- Tech maturity: early adopter, early majority, late majority, laggard
68- Current solutions: CRM, ERP, industry-specific tools
69- Integration requirements: what your product must connect to
70- Pain indicators: manual processes, disconnected systems, spreadsheet workarounds
71
72**Dimension 3 -- Psychographics (how they buy):**
73- Awareness stage: unaware, problem-aware, solution-aware, product-aware
74- Buying committee: economic buyer, technical buyer, user buyer, champion, blocker
75- Decision criteria: primary (speed, cost, features) and secondary
76- Risk tolerance: budget concerns, implementation risk, change management, vendor stability
77
78**ICP Scoring Rubric:**
79
80| Score | Label | Action |
81|-------|-------|--------|
82| 80-100 | Ideal | Prioritize -- full outreach cadence, executive sponsorship |
83| 60-79 | Good | Pursue -- standard cadence, qualify thoroughly |
84| 40-59 | Marginal | Conditional -- only if specific signal changes (budget, timing) |
85| <40 | Pass | Decline -- opportunity cost too high |
86
87**Behavioral Signals to Watch:**
88- High intent: searched for competitor alternatives, visited pricing page 3+ times, downloaded buyer's guide
89- Medium intent: attended webinar, engaged with case study, connected on LinkedIn
90- Low intent: blog subscriber, social follower, newsletter open
91
92**ICP Validation Checklist:**
931. TAM/SAM/SOM calculated with minimum 1,000 companies in ICP
942. Historical win rate against ICP >30%
953. ICP customers have lowest churn and highest NPS
964. Sales team, CS, and product all agree on the profile
97
98See `reference/gtm.md` for full YAML ICP worksheet templates and an example ICP (MEP contractors).
99
100---
101
102### Positioning (April Dunford Framework)
103
104**The 5 Components of Positioning:**
105
1061. **Competitive alternatives** -- What would customers use if you didn't exist? (Not just direct competitors -- include spreadsheets, manual processes, hiring, doing nothing)
1072. **Unique attributes** -- What do you have that alternatives don't? (Features, architecture, team expertise, data, integrations)
1083. **Value** -- What does the unique attribute enable for customers? (Time saved, revenue gained, risk reduced, cost avoided)
1094. **Target customer** -- Who cares most about that value? (The segment where your strengths matter most)
1105. **Market category** -- What market do you position in? (Existing category, subcategory, or create new category)
111
112**Positioning Statement Template:**
113```
114For [target customer segment] who [key need/pain],
115[product name] is a [market category]
116that [primary value proposition].
117Unlike [competitive alternative],
118our product [key differentiator tied to unique attribute].
119```
120
121**Messaging Hierarchy (3 levels, max 3 differentiators each):**
122
123| Level | Audience | Message Type |
124|-------|----------|-------------|
125| Strategic | C-suite, board | Business outcomes, ROI, risk reduction |
126| Solution | Directors, VPs | Capability, integration, workflow improvement |
127| Persona | End users, admins | Features, UX, daily workflow benefits |
128
129**Competitive Battle Card Essentials:**
130For each top-3 competitor, document:
131- Overview: founded, HQ, funding, target market, pricing model
132- Strengths (acknowledge honestly -- credibility requires it)
133- Weaknesses mapped to your advantages
134- Common objections with value-based responses
135- Win strategy: lead differentiator, proof point, reference story
136- Questions to ask the prospect that expose competitor weaknesses
137
138See `reference/gtm.md` for battle card template, positioning examples, and competitive positioning framework.
139
140---
141
142### GTM Motion and Launch
143
144**GTM Motion Selection:**
145
146| Motion | ACV | Sales Cycle | Team Needed | CAC |
147|--------|-----|-------------|-------------|-----|
148| Product-Led Growth (PLG) | <$5K | Days | Growth/product | Low |
149| Sales-Assisted | $5-50K | Weeks | SDR + AE | Medium |
150| Enterprise | $50K+ | Months | AE + SE + CSM | High |
151| Partner/Channel | Variable | Variable | Partner Manager | Variable |
152
153**Channel Mix:** 60-70% primary motion, 20-30% secondary, 10% experimental.
154
155**Launch Checklist Milestones:**
156- **T-30 (Pre-launch):** ICP validated, positioning finalized, messaging hierarchy complete, battle cards created, pricing approved, sales team trained, demo environment stable
157- **T-0 (Launch):** Website updated, outbound sequences activated, press release distributed, social campaign live, partner notifications sent
158- **T+30 (Post-launch):** Win/loss analysis started, messaging refined from feedback, pipeline reviewed, competitive response documented, metrics dashboard active
159
160See `reference/gtm.md` for full launch checklists, channel strategy details, and complexity-to-resource matching.
161
162---
163
164## Part 2: Pricing Strategy
165
166### Value-Based Pricing Method
167
168**Step 1 -- Quantify customer value:**
169```
170Total Value = Time Savings + Revenue Impact + Cost Avoidance
171
172Time Savings: Hours saved/month x Hourly rate x 12
173Revenue Impact: Additional revenue enabled per year
174Cost Avoidance: Costs eliminated or reduced per year
175```
176
177**Step 2 -- Set price at 10-20% of quantified value:**
178- 10% = conservative (easy sell, high perceived value)
179- 15% = balanced (standard B2B SaaS)
180- 20% = aggressive (strong differentiation required)
181
182**Step 3 -- Validate against willingness-to-pay:**
183- Van Westendorp price sensitivity: ask "too cheap / cheap / expensive / too expensive"
184- Competitive benchmarking: where do alternatives price?
185- Customer interviews: "Would you pay $X for Y outcome?"
186
187### Pricing Models
188
189| Model | Best For | Pros | Cons |
190|-------|----------|------|------|
191| Flat rate | Simple products | Easy to understand | Doesn't scale with value |
192| Per seat | Team tools | Predictable, scales with org | Discourages adoption |
193| Usage-based | APIs, infra | Aligns cost with value | Unpredictable revenue |
194| Tiered (Good/Better/Best) | Feature differentiation | Anchoring, clear upgrade path | Complex to design |
195| Hybrid (seat + usage) | Enterprise SaaS | Predictable base + upside | Complex billing |
196
197### Tier Design (Good/Better/Best)
198
199**Tier structure principles:**
200- 3-4 tiers optimal (more creates decision paralysis)
201- Middle tier should be your target -- it gets the "Most Popular" badge
202- Top tier makes middle tier look reasonable (price anchoring)
203- Free tier only if PLG motion (land, qualify, viral growth)
204
205**Feature Gating Rules:**
206
207| Gate By | Examples | When to Use |
208|---------|----------|-------------|
209| Scale | Users, API calls, storage, projects | Usage naturally grows with value |
210| Sophistication | Advanced analytics, AI features, workflows | Features require maturity to use |
211| Control | SSO, SAML, audit logs, custom roles | Enterprise compliance needs |
212| Support | SLA, dedicated CSM, phone support | Willingness to pay for service |
213
214**Never gate:** Security features, data export, basic integrations. Gating these breeds resentment and churn.
215
216### Discounting Strategy
217
218| Type | Trigger | Range | Use When |
219|------|---------|-------|----------|
220| Volume | Commitment to scale | 10-30% | Large seat count, multi-year |
221| Term | Annual commitment | 15-25% | Monthly-to-annual conversion |
222| Competitive | Switching from competitor | 20-40% | Match remaining contract value |
223| Strategic | Reference customer, logo value | Up to 50% | Brand-name + case study commitment |
224
225**Protect your pricing -- never discount when:**
226- Customer hasn't articulated the value they'll receive
227- No competitive pressure exists
228- You're early in negotiation (discount later, not first)
229- Customer is purely price-shopping (they'll churn anyway)
230
231**Alternatives to discounting:** Extended payment terms, additional training/onboarding, extended trial period, success-milestone feature unlocks, multi-year lock-in at current rate.
232
233### Key SaaS Pricing Metrics
234
235| Metric | Target | Formula |
236|--------|--------|---------|
237| LTV | >3x CAC | ARPU / monthly churn rate |
238| CAC Payback | <12 months | CAC / ARPU |
239| NRR | >100% | (Start MRR + expansion - contraction - churn) / Start MRR |
240| Gross Margin | >70% | (Revenue - COGS) / Revenue |
241
242See `reference/pricing.md` for per-model deep dives, price increase playbook, services pricing, productized service model, and revenue model templates.
243
244---
245
246## Part 3: Opportunity Evaluation
247
248### Quick Score (/100)
249
250| Dimension | Points | What to Assess |
251|-----------|--------|----------------|
252| Market Fit | 25 | Problem clarity (10), market size (8), timing (7) |
253| Technical Fit | 20 | Can I build it (10), infrastructure fit (5), maintenance burden (5) |
254| GTM Fit | 20 | Sales complexity (8), channel access (7), competition (5) |
255| Personal Fit | 20 | Interest/energy (8), growth potential (7), lifestyle fit (5) |
256| Economics | 15 | Revenue potential (8), time to revenue (4), risk/reward (3) |
257
258### Score Interpretation and Action
259
260| Score | Action | Next Step |
261|-------|--------|-----------|
262| 80-100 | **STRONG PURSUE** | Prioritize immediately, allocate resources |
263| 60-79 | **EXPLORE** | Worth a time-boxed deep dive (1-2 weeks) |
264| 40-59 | **CONDITIONAL** | Park it -- revisit only if a specific factor changes |
265| 0-39 | **PASS** | Decline -- opportunity cost too high |
266
267### Red Flags (Automatic Deductions)
268
269Any of these should subtract 10-20 points from your score:
270
271- **Unclear payment terms:** "We'll figure out compensation later"
272- **Expanding scope pre-start:** Requirements growing before contract signed
273- **Pressure to decide fast:** "We need an answer by Friday" on a major commitment
274- **Misaligned incentives:** Their success doesn't require your success
275- **Economics don't work even optimistically:** If best-case math doesn't pencil, walk away
276- **Single-threaded champion:** Only one person wants this; no organizational buy-in
277- **No budget allocated:** Interested but no approved spend
278
279### GTM Complexity Levels
280
281| Level | Buyer | ACV | Cycle | Decision Style |
282|-------|-------|-----|-------|----------------|
283| PLG | Individual user | <$2K | Days | User = buyer, self-serve |
284| Low-Touch | Manager | $2-15K | 1-4 weeks | Light demo, quick approval |
285| Mid-Market | Director/VP | $15-100K | 1-3 months | Committee, multiple stakeholders |
286| Enterprise | C-suite | $100K-1M | 6-18 months | RFP, security review, legal |
287| Complex | Board-level | $1M+ | 12-36 months | Transformation project |
288
289**Match complexity to your resources:**
290- Solo / side project: target Level 1-2 max
291- Small team: target Level 2-3
292- Funded startup: target Level 2-4
293- Enterprise sales org: target Level 3-5
294
295### 5-Minute Viability Test
296
297Before deep-diving any opportunity, answer four questions:
298
2991. How much will one customer pay? $____/month
3002. How many customers can I realistically get in 6 months? ____
3013. What does it cost to serve one customer? $____/month
3024. How many hours/week will this take? ____
303
304**Quick math:**
305- Monthly revenue at 6 months: #2 x #1
306- Monthly costs: #2 x #3
307- Monthly margin: Revenue - Costs
308- Effective hourly rate: Margin / (hours x 4.33)
309- If hourly rate < $100 --> needs rethinking
310
311### Build vs Partner vs Buy Decision
312
313| Signal | Build | Partner | Buy |
314|--------|-------|---------|-----|
315| Core differentiator | Yes | | |
316| Commodity capability | | | Yes |
317| Complementary strength | | Yes | |
318| Time-critical | | | Yes |
319| Learning value high | Yes | | |
320| Maintenance burden high | | Yes | Yes |
321| No good alternative exists | Yes | | |
322
323See `reference/opportunity.md` for detailed scoring rubrics per dimension, full scorecard YAML templates, unit economics worksheets, cost structure analysis, break-even calculations, and build-vs-partner decision trees.
324
325---
326
327## Reference Files
328
329- `reference/gtm.md` - ICP YAML templates, behavioral signals, validation checklist, channel strategy, launch playbooks, battle card template, positioning examples
330- `reference/pricing.md` - Model deep dives, tier design, price increase playbook, services pricing, discount framework, SaaS metrics dashboard
331- `reference/opportunity.md` - Full scoring rubrics (5 sections), scorecard YAML, unit economics, cost analysis, break-even formulas, build/partner/buy decision trees
332</core_content>
333
334## Emit Outcome Sidecar
335
336As the final step, write to `~/.claude/skill-analytics/last-outcome-gtm-pricing.json`:
337```json
338{"ts":"[UTC ISO8601]","skill":"gtm-pricing","version":"1.0.0","variant":"default",
339 "status":"[success|partial|error]","runtime_ms":[estimated ms from start],
340 "metrics":{"pricing_models_evaluated":[n],"tiers_designed":[n],"gtm_channels_mapped":[n]},
341 "error":null,"session_id":"[YYYY-MM-DD]"}
342```
343Use status "partial" if some stages failed but results were produced. Use "error" only if no output was generated.