No AI Hedging

NO-AI-HEDGING™ — Protocol

"Don't hide behind qualifiers."

Quick Reference

The Problem

AI hedging uses excessive qualification to avoid commitment:

❌ "Perhaps it might potentially be possible that..."
❌ "It could arguably be said that there may be..."
❌ "Some might suggest that it's conceivable..."

When everything is hedged, nothing is said.

The Confidence Scale

State confidence, then speak plainly:

NOT this:

• "X might possibly perhaps be true"
• "It could arguably be suggested that X"
• "Some experts might say X"

Cardinal Sins

1. Qualifier Stacking

Piling up hedges until nothing is said.

Fix: One hedge max. State confidence, then claim.

2. Weasel Certainty

"Research suggests..." — what research?

Fix: Cite specifically or say "I believe" and own it.

3. Passive Evasion

"Mistakes were made" — by whom?

Fix: Active voice. Name the actor. Own the claim.

4. Probability Without Numbers

"This might work" — 10%? 90%?

Fix: Give a number or a calibrated word.

5. Faux Humility

"In my humble opinion, perhaps..."

Fix: Confidence is not arrogance. State what you think.

6. Epistemic Cowardice

Adding "perhaps" so you can't be blamed.

Fix: Take a position. Be wrong sometimes. Learn.

Invocation

# When making a claim
BEFORE claim: CALIBRATE [confidence]

# When catching hedging
CATCH "perhaps it might" → COMMIT [plain statement]

# When seeing passive voice
CATCH "mistakes were made" → ACTIVATE [who made them?]

Phrases to Avoid

Qualifier stacks:

• "perhaps it might"
• "could potentially"
• "might possibly"

Weasel phrases:

• "research suggests"
• "experts say"
• "it's widely thought"

Passive evasions:

• "it has been argued"
• "the decision was made"
• "mistakes were made"

Faux humility:

• "in my humble opinion"
• "I could be wrong, but"
• "not to be presumptuous"

See Also

• CARD.yml — Sniffable interface
• README.md — Overview
• ../no-ai-ideology/BRAND.md — Brand philosophy