Production and Operations Management Workflow (pom-workflow)
Overview
This is the router. It does not replace any specialized skill; it tells you which pom- skill to use right now* for your POM manuscript.
Default assumption: unless told otherwise, the target is Production and Operations Management (POM) — the flagship journal of the Production and Operations Management Society (POMS), published by SAGE since January 2024 (previously Wiley-Blackwell), ISSN 1059-1478, twelve issues per year, founded and edited by Kalyan Singhal (University of Baltimore). POM accepts the full breadth of operations management — analytical/mathematical modeling, empirical OM, behavioral/experimental OM, and operations data science — and routes every paper to one of many named Departments (Behavioral Operations, Supply Chain Management, Healthcare Operations, Sustainable Operations, Operations Management Data Analytics, plus interface departments). The non-negotiable bar: the work must be of significant interest to practicing operations managers and make a substantial contribution to knowledge and practice, executed rigorously by whatever method fits.
Editors (verified 2026-06-22 via POMS / SAGE): Kalyan Singhal is founder & Editor-in-Chief and Subodha Kumar is Co-Editor-in-Chief; the department roster and Department Editors rotate. Verify the live masthead and departments at poms.org/journal. POM is hybrid open access on SAGE; the optional Sage Choice/open-access APC and any data-deposit mandate are 待核实 — see resources/official-source-map.md.
When to trigger
- "What should I do next?" with a half-built POM manuscript
- You have a model or dataset but no clear managerial insight
- You are unsure which Department your paper belongs to
- You received a POM decision letter and need to switch into response mode
- You keep bouncing between model, analysis, and writing without a plan
Routing table
| Current symptom |
Next skill |
| Idea is vague; unclear if it is OM and POM-fit; no target Department |
pom-topic-selection |
| Model/hypotheses lack a clear mechanism, assumptions, or propositions |
pom-theory-development |
| Front end reads as gap-spotting; wrong department's literature engaged |
pom-literature-positioning |
| Method may not match the question (model vs data vs experiment) |
pom-methods |
| Have proofs/data; unsure about numerics, identification, robustness |
pom-data-analysis |
| Results exist but the "so what for the operations manager" is thin |
pom-contribution-framing |
| Exhibits cluttered, not self-explanatory, or off house style |
pom-tables-figures |
| Prose buries the argument; over the 32-page cap |
pom-writing-style |
| Ready to submit; need the ScholarOne + department preflight |
pom-submission |
| Want to understand POM department review before/after submit |
pom-review-process |
| Received an R&R; need to plan and draft the response |
pom-rebuttal |
Default order
pom-topic-selection — lock an OM question, POM fit, and target Department
pom-theory-development — build the model/mechanism; derive propositions or hypotheses
pom-literature-positioning — engage the right department's prior OM work
pom-methods — match method (optimization/stochastic/game-theory/empirical/behavioral/ML)
pom-data-analysis — execute proofs and numerics, or identification, estimation, robustness
pom-contribution-framing — turn results into a managerial-and-knowledge contribution
pom-tables-figures — finalize exhibits (result tables, comparative-statics plots, schematics)
pom-writing-style — full-manuscript polish; enforce 32-page cap and e-companion split
pom-submission — ScholarOne preflight (department routing, double-blind, same-data disclosure)
pom-review-process — set expectations; understand the no-resubmission rule
pom-rebuttal — after an R&R, revise then draft the point-by-point response
pom-tables-figures and pom-writing-style are late-stage polish. Do not invoke them while the model, identification, or managerial insight is still unsettled.
Decision shortcuts
- "I have an elegant model but no managerial takeaway" →
pom-topic-selection then pom-contribution-framing
- "Which department do I submit to?" →
pom-topic-selection
- "My intro says 'no one has modeled X'" (gap-spotting) →
pom-literature-positioning
- "Reviewer says insight is not relevant to practice" →
pom-contribution-framing
- "I am 6 pages over the 32-page cap" →
pom-writing-style (move proofs to the e-companion)
- "I was rejected — can I resubmit to another department?" →
pom-review-process (almost never)
Routing snapshot template
Fill this snapshot at every planning checkpoint; it makes the current stage, the department route, and the hard constraints visible before you invoke the next skill.
POM MANUSCRIPT ROUTING SNAPSHOT — fill in before invoking the next pom-* skill
==============================================================================
Working title ...........: <concise, descriptive, <= 25 words>
Method track ............: [ ] analytical/mathematical model [ ] empirical OM
[ ] behavioral/experimental [ ] operations data science
Target Department .......: <e.g., Supply Chain Management / Behavioral Operations /
Healthcare Operations / Sustainable Operations /
Operations Management Data Analytics / interface dept.>
(verify live roster at poms.org/journal before submitting)
Operations decision .....: <who decides what, under which constraints>
Managerial lever ........: <what a practicing operations manager does differently>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STAGE GATES — mark exactly one CURRENT; earlier gates must be DONE
1. [ ] Question, POM fit, department locked .......... pom-topic-selection
2. [ ] Mechanism / propositions or hypotheses built ... pom-theory-development
3. [ ] Department's prior OM literature engaged ....... pom-literature-positioning
4. [ ] Method matched to the question ................. pom-methods
5. [ ] Proofs/numerics or identification/robustness ... pom-data-analysis
6. [ ] Knowledge + practice contribution framed ....... pom-contribution-framing
7. [ ] Exhibits finalized ............................. pom-tables-figures
8. [ ] Prose polished; page cap enforced .............. pom-writing-style
9. [ ] ScholarOne preflight cleared ................... pom-submission
10. [ ] Decision letter interpreted .................... pom-review-process
11. [ ] R&R response drafted after revising ............ pom-rebuttal
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HARD CONSTRAINTS — all must hold before gate 9
[ ] Main document within 32 pages incl. abstract, exhibits, appendices, refs
[ ] Overflow (proofs, derivations, extended robustness) -> e-companion file
[ ] Double-blind: identity scrubbed from files, metadata, self-citations
[ ] Same-data / related prior work listed for the cover-letter disclosure
[ ] Not a barred resubmission (no prior POM rejection without invitation)
Portal: ScholarOne — mc.manuscriptcentral.com/poms
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRACTICE GATE — POM's non-negotiable bar
Significant interest to practicing operations managers ....: yes / not yet
Substantial contribution to knowledge AND practice ........: yes / not yet
If either reads "not yet", route to pom-contribution-framing before polish.
Difference vs. M&SOM / Management Science / JOM stacks
- POM: POMS/SAGE flagship; department-routed; rigor and practicing-manager relevance weighted together; 32-page cap with an unlimited online e-companion.
- M&SOM / Management Science (INFORMS): different limits and norms; not department-letter-routed the same way.
- JOM / IJOPM: often more empirical/process-oriented; different publishers and formats.
Anti-patterns
- Do not submit without choosing a Department — misrouting wastes a cycle.
- Do not let
pom-tables-figures beautify exhibits before the model is settled.
- Do not treat polish as a substitute for managerial relevance — POM's practice gate cannot be styled away.
- Do not plan a resubmission of a rejected paper to another department; it is barred unless explicitly invited.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills → Production-and-Operations-Management-Skills/skills/pom-workflow/SKILL.md
1---2name: pom-workflow3description: Use when deciding which pom-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Production and Operations Management (POM) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills, and it identifies your method track (analytical / empirical / behavioral / data-science).4---5
6
7# Production and Operations Management Workflow (pom-workflow)
8
9## Overview
10
11This is the router. It does not replace any specialized skill; it tells you **which pom-* skill to use right now** for your POM manuscript.
12
13Default assumption: unless told otherwise, the target is **Production and Operations Management (POM)** — the flagship journal of the Production and Operations Management Society (POMS), published by SAGE since January 2024 (previously Wiley-Blackwell), ISSN 1059-1478, twelve issues per year, founded and edited by Kalyan Singhal (University of Baltimore). POM accepts the **full breadth of operations management** — analytical/mathematical modeling, empirical OM, behavioral/experimental OM, and operations data science — and routes every paper to one of many named **Departments** (Behavioral Operations, Supply Chain Management, Healthcare Operations, Sustainable Operations, Operations Management Data Analytics, plus interface departments). The non-negotiable bar: the work must be of **significant interest to practicing operations managers** *and* make a **substantial contribution to knowledge and practice**, executed rigorously by whatever method fits.
14
15> Editors (verified 2026-06-22 via POMS / SAGE): **Kalyan Singhal** is founder & Editor-in-Chief and **Subodha Kumar** is Co-Editor-in-Chief; the department roster and Department Editors rotate. Verify the live masthead and departments at poms.org/journal. POM is hybrid open access on SAGE; the optional Sage Choice/open-access APC and any data-deposit mandate are **待核实** — see `resources/official-source-map.md`.
16
17## When to trigger
18
19- "What should I do next?" with a half-built POM manuscript
20- You have a model or dataset but no clear managerial insight
21- You are unsure which Department your paper belongs to
22- You received a POM decision letter and need to switch into response mode
23- You keep bouncing between model, analysis, and writing without a plan
24
25## Routing table
26
27| Current symptom | Next skill |
28|------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
29| Idea is vague; unclear if it is OM and POM-fit; no target Department | `pom-topic-selection` |
30| Model/hypotheses lack a clear mechanism, assumptions, or propositions | `pom-theory-development` |
31| Front end reads as gap-spotting; wrong department's literature engaged | `pom-literature-positioning`|
32| Method may not match the question (model vs data vs experiment) | `pom-methods` |
33| Have proofs/data; unsure about numerics, identification, robustness | `pom-data-analysis` |
34| Results exist but the "so what for the operations manager" is thin | `pom-contribution-framing` |
35| Exhibits cluttered, not self-explanatory, or off house style | `pom-tables-figures` |
36| Prose buries the argument; over the 32-page cap | `pom-writing-style` |
37| Ready to submit; need the ScholarOne + department preflight | `pom-submission` |
38| Want to understand POM department review before/after submit | `pom-review-process` |
39| Received an R&R; need to plan and draft the response | `pom-rebuttal` |
40
41## Default order
42
431. `pom-topic-selection` — lock an OM question, POM fit, and target Department
442. `pom-theory-development` — build the model/mechanism; derive propositions or hypotheses
453. `pom-literature-positioning` — engage the right department's prior OM work
464. `pom-methods` — match method (optimization/stochastic/game-theory/empirical/behavioral/ML)
475. `pom-data-analysis` — execute proofs and numerics, or identification, estimation, robustness
486. `pom-contribution-framing` — turn results into a managerial-and-knowledge contribution
497. `pom-tables-figures` — finalize exhibits (result tables, comparative-statics plots, schematics)
508. `pom-writing-style` — full-manuscript polish; enforce 32-page cap and e-companion split
519. `pom-submission` — ScholarOne preflight (department routing, double-blind, same-data disclosure)
5210. `pom-review-process` — set expectations; understand the no-resubmission rule
5311. `pom-rebuttal` — after an R&R, revise then draft the point-by-point response
54
55> `pom-tables-figures` and `pom-writing-style` are **late-stage polish**. Do not invoke them while the model, identification, or managerial insight is still unsettled.
56
57## Decision shortcuts
58
59- "I have an elegant model but no managerial takeaway" → `pom-topic-selection` then `pom-contribution-framing`
60- "Which department do I submit to?" → `pom-topic-selection`
61- "My intro says 'no one has modeled X'" (gap-spotting) → `pom-literature-positioning`
62- "Reviewer says insight is not relevant to practice" → `pom-contribution-framing`
63- "I am 6 pages over the 32-page cap" → `pom-writing-style` (move proofs to the e-companion)
64- "I was rejected — can I resubmit to another department?" → `pom-review-process` (almost never)
65
66## Routing snapshot template
67
68Fill this snapshot at every planning checkpoint; it makes the current stage, the department route, and the hard constraints visible before you invoke the next skill.
69
70```text
71POM MANUSCRIPT ROUTING SNAPSHOT — fill in before invoking the next pom-* skill
72==============================================================================
73Working title ...........: <concise, descriptive, <= 25 words>
74Method track ............: [ ] analytical/mathematical model [ ] empirical OM
75 [ ] behavioral/experimental [ ] operations data science
76Target Department .......: <e.g., Supply Chain Management / Behavioral Operations /
77 Healthcare Operations / Sustainable Operations /
78 Operations Management Data Analytics / interface dept.>
79 (verify live roster at poms.org/journal before submitting)
80Operations decision .....: <who decides what, under which constraints>
81Managerial lever ........: <what a practicing operations manager does differently>
82------------------------------------------------------------------------------
83STAGE GATES — mark exactly one CURRENT; earlier gates must be DONE
84 1. [ ] Question, POM fit, department locked .......... pom-topic-selection
85 2. [ ] Mechanism / propositions or hypotheses built ... pom-theory-development
86 3. [ ] Department's prior OM literature engaged ....... pom-literature-positioning
87 4. [ ] Method matched to the question ................. pom-methods
88 5. [ ] Proofs/numerics or identification/robustness ... pom-data-analysis
89 6. [ ] Knowledge + practice contribution framed ....... pom-contribution-framing
90 7. [ ] Exhibits finalized ............................. pom-tables-figures
91 8. [ ] Prose polished; page cap enforced .............. pom-writing-style
92 9. [ ] ScholarOne preflight cleared ................... pom-submission
93 10. [ ] Decision letter interpreted .................... pom-review-process
94 11. [ ] R&R response drafted after revising ............ pom-rebuttal
95------------------------------------------------------------------------------
96HARD CONSTRAINTS — all must hold before gate 9
97 [ ] Main document within 32 pages incl. abstract, exhibits, appendices, refs
98 [ ] Overflow (proofs, derivations, extended robustness) -> e-companion file
99 [ ] Double-blind: identity scrubbed from files, metadata, self-citations
100 [ ] Same-data / related prior work listed for the cover-letter disclosure
101 [ ] Not a barred resubmission (no prior POM rejection without invitation)
102 Portal: ScholarOne — mc.manuscriptcentral.com/poms
103------------------------------------------------------------------------------
104PRACTICE GATE — POM's non-negotiable bar
105 Significant interest to practicing operations managers ....: yes / not yet
106 Substantial contribution to knowledge AND practice ........: yes / not yet
107 If either reads "not yet", route to pom-contribution-framing before polish.
108```
109
110## Difference vs. M&SOM / Management Science / JOM stacks
111
112- **POM**: POMS/SAGE flagship; department-routed; rigor *and* practicing-manager relevance weighted together; 32-page cap with an unlimited online e-companion.
113- **M&SOM / Management Science** (INFORMS): different limits and norms; not department-letter-routed the same way.
114- **JOM / IJOPM**: often more empirical/process-oriented; different publishers and formats.
115
116## Anti-patterns
117
118- **Do not** submit without choosing a Department — misrouting wastes a cycle.
119- **Do not** let `pom-tables-figures` beautify exhibits before the model is settled.
120- **Do not** treat polish as a substitute for managerial relevance — POM's practice gate cannot be styled away.
121- **Do not** plan a resubmission of a rejected paper to another department; it is barred unless explicitly invited.
122
123---
124
125**Source:** [`brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills`](https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) → `Production-and-Operations-Management-Skills/skills/pom-workflow/SKILL.md`