Uxcel-Lab Design Review (UX Orchestrator) Skill
How this skill behaves (read first)
This is the front door for holistic UX review. It is the executable form of
docs/orchestration-policy.md — it decides which audit lenses run, which are offered, and
which are suppressed, then returns one prioritized report instead of a pile of separate
audits.
Its whole job is to avoid two opposite failures: doing a flat "looks good" review with no framework, and firing every audit in the repo regardless of relevance (the bandwagon).
When NOT to use this skill: if the user named a specific lens ("run the accessibility audit", "check this for dark patterns"), skip this orchestrator and invoke that one skill directly. Explicit scope overrides orchestration.
Step 0 — Establish the context profile (once)
Infer these from what the user gave you; ask only the one that's unknown and changes what runs. Persist for the session — don't re-ask.
- Design system in play? Infer yes if they provided tokens, a styleguide, a component library, a Figma library, themed component code, or said "our design system / our brand guidelines." Otherwise ask once: "Are you working from an established design system, or designing from scratch?" — this is the single biggest driver of what gets skipped.
- Platform — mobile or web (decides whether mobile-responsiveness is relevant).
- Primary task — what the user actually came to do (used to resolve conflicts later).
State the assumptions you're proceeding with in one line.
Step 1 — Determine the traits of the work
Look at the artifact and note which are true:
- Interactive UI? (almost always yes)
- Contains user-facing copy?
- Involves conversion / pricing / sign-up friction / opt-ins / cancellation?
- Multi-screen or structures content?
- Targets mobile?
Step 2 — Auto-run the always-relevant lenses (Tier A)
Run these whenever their trait is present. They don't depend on the visual system and almost always earn their keep:
ux-heuristics-audit— any interactive UI. Usability behavior, feedback, error recovery.ux-microcopy-audit— any user-facing copy. Clarity, tone, error/empty/CTA wording.ux-dark-patterns-audit— any conversion/pricing/opt-in/cancellation surface.
These run unprompted. The design-system profile does not suppress them.
Each lens is named by its installable skill
name. Invoke a lens only if that skill is installed; if one isn't, list it under "available but not run" in the report and don't block — this orchestrator degrades to whichever lenses are present.
Step 3 — Offer the context-dependent lenses (Tier B)
These are relevant but should be offered, not fired — and several are suppressed when a design system is in play. Apply the suppression matrix from the policy:
| Lens | Offer when | If design system in play |
|---|---|---|
ux-accessibility-audit |
any UI | Narrow to usage — custom color combos, focus order, alt text, labels; don't re-audit the token palette |
ux-aesthetics-audit |
any visual UI | Suppress — visual harmony is already defined |
ux-information-architecture-audit |
multi-screen / structured content | Unaffected — offer |
ux-mobile-responsiveness-audit |
platform = mobile | Unaffected — offer |
ux-color (as lens) |
palette is being defined/changed | Suppress — tokens own color |
ux-typography (as lens) |
type is being defined/changed | Suppress — tokens own type |
ux-layout-spacing-grids (as lens) |
spacing/grid is being defined/changed | Suppress — the scale owns spacing |
Say the suppression out loud, briefly: "Your design system owns color, type, and spacing, so I'm skipping those and checking how the system is applied (accessibility-in-use, IA, copy)."
Then offer the rest: "Want me to also run accessibility-in-use and an IA pass?" If the user opts in, run them; otherwise leave them listed as available.
Step 4 — Merge into one prioritized report
De-duplicate findings across lenses (if heuristics and accessibility both flag the same unlabeled control, report it once, tagged with both). Resolve any cross-lens conflicts toward the primary task from Step 0. Output a single severity-ordered list:
## Design Review — [target]
Context: [platform · design system: yes/no · primary task]
Lenses run: [heuristics, microcopy, …] Lenses available but not run: [aesthetics, …]
### Critical
- [Issue] — what's wrong → fix. (heuristic / a11y / dark-pattern / …)
### Major
- …
### Minor
- …
### Working well ✓
- …
**Top 3 priorities:** the highest-impact fixes across all lenses.
Offered, not run: accessibility-in-use, IA — say the word and I'll add them.
Common do/don't patterns
| ❌ Don't | ✅ Do |
|---|---|
| Fire all seven UX audits because the work "is a UI" | Auto-run Tier A; offer Tier B; suppress what the design system owns |
| Re-audit color/type/spacing when the user has a design system | Skip them out loud; check application instead |
| Return one report per audit | Merge into a single prioritized, de-duplicated list |
| Run this orchestrator when the user asked for one named lens | Defer to that lens directly (explicit scope wins) |
| Silently skip accessibility because there's a design system | Narrow it to usage checks — never drop it entirely |
Relationship to the policy
This skill is docs/orchestration-policy.md in executable form. If the two ever diverge,
the policy governs; update this skill to match it.
Source lessons (Uxcel)
This is an orchestrator — its substance lives in the lenses it routes to. See the source
lessons in each: ux-heuristics-audit, ux-microcopy-audit, ux-dark-patterns-audit,
ux-accessibility-audit, ux-aesthetics-audit, ux-information-architecture-audit,
ux-mobile-responsiveness-audit.