thedixitjain

@thedixitjain source repo

10k skills
0 followers
2 repo stars
2 weeks ago last updated

▌
Jeem Identification · thedixitjain
Use when the identification argument is the bottleneck for a Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) manuscript — an environmental-policy causal design, a climate/weather IV, or a revealed- or stated-preference valuation. Stress-tests the data-to-welfare mapping before exhibits are finalized; it does not invent evidence or citations.

2 repo stars
▌
Jeem Tables Figures · thedixitjain
Use when the exhibits of a Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) manuscript — regression tables, event-study plots, maps, WTP/demand-curve figures — do not yet show the environmental signal cleanly. Designs publication-grade exhibits in JEEM/Elsevier house style; it does not run the analysis (jeem-robustness) or write the prose (jeem-writing-style).

2 repo stars
▌
Jel Editor Strategy · thedixitjain
Use when working with the editor and referees of a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey — scope negotiation, what survey referees evaluate, and revision expectations. Plans the interaction; it does not run the submission preflight (jel-submission) or draft the response letter (jel-revision).

2 repo stars
▌
Jel Topic Selection · thedixitjain
Use when judging whether a literature is a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL)-scale survey topic — mature, important, and genuinely in need of synthesis — rather than a narrow review. Decides fit and frames the survey's animating question; it does not gather or synthesize the literature (that is jel-literature-synthesis).

2 repo stars
▌
Jep Editor Strategy · thedixitjain
Use when working with the Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP) editorial team — the managing-editor-led model and the symposium structure — on scope, length, framing, and the invited/commissioned process. Handles editor interaction strategy; defer the final submission preflight to jep-submission and post-decision edits to jep-revision.

2 repo stars
▌
Jep Topic Selection · thedixitjain
Use when deciding whether a topic is right for the Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP) — broadly interesting, timely, and synthesizable for non-specialists — rather than a narrow research contribution. Judges venue fit; it does not draft the article or the proposal.

2 repo stars
▌
Jet Topic Selection · thedixitjain
Use when testing whether a project clears the Journal of Economic Theory (JET) scope gate — a rigorous, original theoretical contribution in a core theory area, with empirical/computational work only when firmly grounded in theory.

2 repo stars
▌
Jfe Topic Selection · thedixitjain
Use when scoping or framing a topic for a Journal of Financial Economics (JFE) manuscript and you need to test fit and contribution before investing in data work. Pressure-tests the question and contribution; it does not write the literature review or design the empirics.

2 repo stars
▌
Jfqa Review Process · thedixitjain
Use when explaining how the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA) review process works — double-anonymous peer review, the seven-Managing-Editor structure, the $350 fee with $275 refund if not sent to a reviewer, and the under-9-percent acceptance reality. Use to set expectations for what happens after you submit and how decisions are made.

2 repo stars
▌
Jfr Fit Positioning · thedixitjain
Use to judge whether a manuscript fits 《金融研究》 (Journal of Financial Research) and to settle the line — macro-finance vs micro corporate-finance — re-routing to industrial-economics or accounting journals when the paper is not really a finance-mechanism paper.

2 repo stars
▌
Jfr Topic Selection · thedixitjain
Use to sharpen the research question and contribution for a 《金融研究》 (Journal of Financial Research) manuscript — turning a finance data finding into a question with a clear financial-mechanism contribution and concrete relevance to China's financial system.

2 repo stars
▌
Jhe Topic Selection · thedixitjain
Use when deciding whether a question is a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) paper at all — is it a genuine health-economics contribution, not a public-finance or labor paper with health as a thin application. Frames the question and audience; it does not run the analysis or invent citations.

2 repo stars
▌
Jhr Topic Selection · thedixitjain
Use when checking whether a research question fits the Journal of Human Resources (JHR) — empirical microeconomics with a policy-relevant, causal emphasis — and to filter out off-scope "HR management" framings before paying the nonrefundable fee. A fit gate, not an idea generator.

2 repo stars
▌
Jie Topic Selection · thedixitjain
Use when checking whether a paper fits the Journal of International Economics (JIE) scope and clears its originality gate — trade patterns and commercial policy, exchange rates, open-economy macro, international finance, sovereign debt, factor mobility, spatial economics, and whether the motivation or modelling structure is original. Tests fit; it does not pick your topic for you.

2 repo stars
▌
Jle Topic Selection · thedixitjain
Use when deciding whether a law-and-economics project belongs at The Journal of Law and Economics (JLE) rather than the Journal of Legal Studies, JLEO, or the American Law and Economics Review, and what its central legal/regulatory question should be. Sets venue fit and question scope; it does not design the identification (see jle-identification).

2 repo stars
▌
Jleo Identification · thedixitjain
Use when the identification argument is the bottleneck for an empirical Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (JLEO) manuscript — institutional/organizational causal designs (reforms, institutional variation, court/committee/case assignment, governance-form choice). Stress-tests the design to JLEO's institutional bar; it does not build the theory model (jleo-theory-model).

2 repo stars
▌
Jleo Tables Figures · thedixitjain
Use when designing tables and figures for a Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (JLEO) manuscript — making exhibits carry the institutional/organizational comparison cleanly for an OUP economics audience. Improves the exhibits; it does not run the analysis (jleo-robustness) or write the prose (jleo-writing-style).

2 repo stars
▌
Jmcb Identification · thedixitjain
Use when the identification argument is the bottleneck for a Journal of Money, Credit and Banking (JMCB) manuscript — macro shock identification (SVAR, narrative, sign/high-frequency monetary surprises), parameter identification in a monetary/banking model, or a micro-banking causal design. Stress-tests the data-to-object mapping to the JMCB bar before exhibits are finalized.

2 repo stars
▌
Jmcb Tables Figures · thedixitjain
Use when exhibits — IRF plots, coefficient/event-study figures, balance-sheet and regression tables — are the bottleneck for a Journal of Money, Credit and Banking (JMCB) manuscript. Makes each exhibit answer the question on its own; it does not re-run the analysis or write the prose.

2 repo stars
▌
Jme Topic Selection · thedixitjain
Use when assessing whether a research question fits the Journal of Monetary Economics (JME) — monetary theory and policy, central banking, business cycles, growth, financial intermediation, fiscal interactions, and expectations — before investing in a model or estimation. Checks scope fit and the policy/conceptual payoff bar.

2 repo stars
▌
Jmf Research Design · thedixitjain
Use when defending the research design of a Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) manuscript — longitudinal and life-course designs, dyadic and family-level analysis, family-demographic methods, experiments, and qualitative/multi-method designs. JMF judges each tradition on its own terms and is alert to selection. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.

2 repo stars
▌
Jmf Topic Selection · thedixitjain
Use when deciding whether a project fits the Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) and whether it should be a full article or a brief report. JMF is the interdisciplinary flagship of family science, so the test is a genuine contribution to understanding families and close relationships, not a generic social-science finding. Helps frame the question; it does not collect data.

2 repo stars
▌
Jmis Review Process · thedixitjain
Use when calibrating expectations for the Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS) editorial process — the EIC-led, email-intake, double-anonymized review by Associate Editors and expert referees, likely decision types, and timing. Sets expectations and revision posture; it does not draft the response letter (jmis-rebuttal).

2 repo stars
▌
Jmis Tables Figures · thedixitjain
Use when the exhibits are the bottleneck for a Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS) manuscript — regression/SEM tables, platform/value figures, measurement-model exhibits, or artifact-evaluation charts that must carry the argument inside the 50-page budget. Finalizes exhibits and labeling; it does not run the analysis (jmis-data-analysis) or polish prose (jmis-writing-style).

2 repo stars
▌
Jmr Topic Selection · thedixitjain
Use when testing whether a marketing question is a fit for the Journal of Marketing Research (JMR) — a methods-/modeling-forward AMA flagship — rather than the managerial Journal of Marketing, the analytical Marketing Science, or the consumer-theory JCR. Locks a question that can clear both JMR's rigor bar and its substantive-contribution bar.

2 repo stars
▌
Jms Topic Selection · thedixitjain
Use when scoping or stress-testing whether a research question fits the Journal of Management Studies (JMS) — a phenomenon-grounded management-theory question, quantitative or qualitative. Decides fit and framing direction; it does not build the theory (jms-theory-development) or position the literature (jms-literature-positioning).

2 repo stars
▌
Jmsc Model Building · thedixitjain
Use when building the formal model for a 《管理科学学报》 (Journal of Management Sciences in China) manuscript — making decision variables, parameters, constraints, objective function, and assumptions all explicit, and justifying each assumption against the modeling goal. Use after jmsc-problem-formulation and before jmsc-proofs.

2 repo stars
▌
Jmsc Notation Style · thedixitjain
Use when unifying notation and tightening mathematical exposition for a 《管理科学学报》 (Journal of Management Sciences in China) manuscript — one symbol one meaning, explicit assumptions, rigorous statements in the body, and full proofs moved to the appendix to keep the body readable. Use as a late-stage statute pass before submission.

2 repo stars
▌
Joap Review Process · thedixitjain
Use when you need to understand how the Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) evaluates a manuscript — masked (anonymized) peer review, the action-editor model, the dual gate of theoretical contribution and measurement/design rigor, and common desk-reject patterns. Use when stress-testing a paper before submission or interpreting a decision letter. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

2 repo stars
▌
Joap Tables Figures · thedixitjain
Use when building tables and figures for a Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) manuscript in APA 7th-edition style — correlation/descriptives tables, CFA/SEM path diagrams, multilevel (HLM) result tables, and meta-analytic forest/funnel plots. Exhibits must carry effect sizes, CIs, and reliabilities and be self-contained. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis.

2 repo stars
▌
Joc Research Design · thedixitjain
Use when defending the research design of a Journal of Communication (JoC) manuscript — experimental and survey design, content analysis with intercoder reliability, computational/text-as-data validation, or qualitative/critical inquiry. JoC judges each tradition on its own terms. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.

2 repo stars
▌
Joc Theory Building · thedixitjain
Use when building the theoretical argument of a Journal of Communication (JoC) manuscript into a field-level contribution — whether the work is mechanistic-empirical, computational, interpretive, or critical. JoC rewards a clear, portable communication-theory argument over a bare finding. Structures the argument; it does not run analyses.

2 repo stars
▌
Joc Topic Selection · thedixitjain
Use when deciding whether a communication project fits the Journal of Communication (JoC) and which format (original article vs. JoC Forum) to target. JoC is the field's generalist flagship, so the test is general significance across communication research, not platform novelty alone. Helps frame the question; it does not collect data.

2 repo stars
▌
Joe Topic Selection · thedixitjain
Use when deciding whether a project is a genuine methodological contribution for the Journal of Econometrics (JoE) versus a purely applied result better placed elsewhere. Pressure-tests the idea against JoE's theory-plus-applied-methods scope before months are spent.

2 repo stars
▌
Jole Review Process · thedixitjain
Use to understand how the Journal of Labor Economics (JOLE) actually reviews a paper — single-blind refereeing, the non-refundable submission fee, Editorial Manager, the SOLE society tie, and what labor referees expect. Explains the process; it does not draft the manuscript.

2 repo stars
▌
Jole Tables Figures · thedixitjain
Use when designing tables and figures for a Journal of Labor Economics (JOLE) manuscript under the journal's word economy — each full-page table or figure counts as 500 words toward the ~20,000-word limit. Makes exhibits earn their space; it does not run the analysis.

2 repo stars
▌
Jom Topic Selection · thedixitjain
Use when shaping or screening a research question for the Journal of Operations Management (JOM) — testing whether operations is genuinely at the heart of the question, whether the work can be empirical, and which of JOM's 12 Departments should route it (vs. analytical OM venues like M&SOM / Management Science / Operations Research).

2 repo stars
▌
Jonc Review Process · thedixitjain
在需要理解《通信学报》(Journal on Communications, JOC) 的审稿流程、预测各环节结果与识别作者可用杠杆时调用。对本刊初审（编辑审查规范/对口性/知网查重）→ 外审（约 2~3 名专家评审通信学科贡献）→ 终审（由编委会负责给出最终结果）三审制建模，说明约 1~3 个月的审稿周期、修回（大修/小修）与退稿的常见判定，指导作者在每个环节采取的应对策略（对口性论证、实证补强、修回闭环、按月刊排期跟进），帮助把稿件顺利推进本刊三审制，适用于通信/网络/信息安全/信号处理方向的中文长文投稿。

2 repo stars
▌
Jop Research Design · thedixitjain
Use when defending the research design of a The Journal of Politics (JOP) manuscript — causal identification for quantitative work, experimental and survey-experimental design, formal-empirical linkage, or case selection and process tracing for qualitative work. JOP is methodologically diverse and makes acceptance contingent on replicability, so design with reproducibility in mind. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.

2 repo stars
▌
Jop Theory Building · thedixitjain
Use when turning a The Journal of Politics (JOP) idea into a theoretically innovative argument — formal/game-theoretic, empirical, or normative. JOP explicitly prizes theoretical innovation across all subfields and counts pages, so the argument must be sharp, general, and economical. Builds the argument; it does not run analyses.

2 repo stars
▌
Jop Topic Selection · thedixitjain
Use when deciding whether a political-science project fits The Journal of Politics (JOP) and which category to target. JOP is a general-interest journal across all subfields that prizes theoretical innovation and methodological diversity, and it counts pages (Research Article <= 35, Short Article <= 10), not words. Helps frame the question and pick the category; it does not collect data.

2 repo stars
▌
Jos Author Response · thedixitjain
当你收到《软件学报》(Journal of Software, JOS) 的外审意见、需要撰写修回说明（答复审稿人）并修改稿件时使用。覆盖逐条回应的结构、"必须改/可讨论/礼貌不改"的分级策略、修回说明与稿件修改处的对应标注、补做实验的取舍、多轮修回之间的一致性维护、以及与责任编委和主编终审衔接的中文表达分寸，帮助你把《软件学报》(Journal of Software) 的"修改后再审"稳妥地做成录用，而不是在下一轮被退稿。

2 repo stars
▌
Jos Reproducibility · thedixitjain
当你要为投向《软件学报》(Journal of Software, JOS) 的软件学科稿件建立可复现性与实验可重复保障时使用。覆盖数据/代码可用性声明、环境与依赖固定、随机性与种子控制、挖掘与大模型实验的出处锁定与输出缓存、可复现材料的目录组织与 README，以及"可根据要求提供"这类弱表述的规避，帮助你让《软件学报》(Journal of Software) 审稿人相信你的实验结果可被他人重复得到。

2 repo stars
▌
Jos Topic Selection · thedixitjain
当你要判断一个研究项目是否契合《软件学报》(Journal of Software, JOS)、还是更适合投向《计算机学报》《计算机研究与发展》《自动化学报》《电子学报》《计算机科学》或英文会议/期刊时使用。本技能给出软件学科定位判据、与兄弟刊的区分测试、栏目（研究论文/综述/专刊）选择、以及"模型可替换"与"改标题"两个改投信号，帮助你在动笔前把选题对准《软件学报》(Journal of Software) 的软件工程与系统软件侧重，并决定是否走 CCF ChinaSoft 联动的专刊通道。

2 repo stars
▌
Jpam Review Process · thedixitjain
Use when anticipating how a Journal of Policy Analysis and Management (JPAM) manuscript will be evaluated — desk screening, double-blind peer review, the article types and which are not peer-reviewed, decision categories, and what JPAM referees reward and punish. Sets expectations; it does not write the paper or the rebuttal.

2 repo stars
▌
Jpam Tables Figures · thedixitjain
Use when building tables and figures for a Journal of Policy Analysis and Management (JPAM) manuscript — self-contained, decision-legible exhibits that show the policy effect, its uncertainty, the design's validity, and cost-benefit / distributional results. Designs exhibits; it does not run the estimation.

2 repo stars
▌
Jpart Data Analysis · thedixitjain
Use when executing and reporting the analysis for a Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (JPART) manuscript so it survives expert, double-blind review and the journal's mandatory data-and-code release. Covers honest uncertainty, robustness, and the PA-specific traps (common-method bias, selection). Guides analysis norms; it does not fabricate results.

2 repo stars
▌
Jpe Topic Selection · thedixitjain
Use when scoping or framing a research question for a Journal of Political Economy (JPE) manuscript and you need to test whether it is "JPE-shaped" — i.e., a mechanism-driven economic question, not an atheoretical correlation. Diagnoses fit and frames the contribution; it does not design the empirics.

2 repo stars
▌
Jpsp Review Process · thedixitjain
Use to understand how a Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (JPSP) manuscript is judged — per-section editors, masked review, the theoretical-innovation gate, central vs. peripheral limitations, and decision categories. Sets expectations; it does not predict any specific editor's or reviewer's verdict.

2 repo stars
▌
Jpsp Tables Figures · thedixitjain
Use when building tables and figures for a Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (JPSP) manuscript in APA 7th edition style — embedded in the text, self-contained, and covering a multi-study package including the internal meta-analysis forest plot. Guides exhibit design; it does not generate data.

2 repo stars
▌
Jqte Tables Figures · thedixitjain
Use when finalizing tables and figures for a 《数量经济技术经济研究》 (JQTE) manuscript — making sure measurement / forecast / decomposition results carry quantitative interpretation (magnitudes, units, shares, rankings, trends) rather than only significance stars, and that every table/figure states its source and method. Use after estimates and sensitivity are settled.

2 repo stars
▌
Jru Topic Selection · thedixitjain
Use when deciding whether a question belongs in the Journal of Risk and Uncertainty (JRU) and how to frame it as a risk/uncertainty primitive. Tests scope fit and sibling boundaries; it does not invent evidence or citations.

2 repo stars
▌
Jue Topic Selection · thedixitjain
Use when deciding whether a question is a genuinely spatial, urban-economics contribution that fits the Journal of Urban Economics (JUE) rather than a sibling venue. Locks the spatial question and outlet fit before positioning; it does not write the literature review or design the identification.

2 repo stars
▌
Kdd Reproducibility · thedixitjain
Use when hardening the reproducibility story of a KDD paper, where reproducibility is an explicit decision factor for area chairs. Covers claim-to-evidence tiers for mining pipelines, seeds and splits on large graphs and streams, baseline-tuning disclosure, compute reporting, and honest limits for ADS deployment results.

2 repo stars
▌
Micro Supplementary · thedixitjain
Use when deciding where a MICRO paper's supporting material lives, because MICRO allows no appendix at all — triaging content into the 11 reviewed pages, the unlimited references, an anonymized artifact repository, or the post-acceptance two-page artifact appendix, and cutting what fits nowhere.

2 repo stars
▌
Mind Review Process · thedixitjain
Use to understand how Mind evaluates a submission — triple-anonymous peer review, quality as the sole criterion, the role of expert referees, and what it means for a journal that receives over 800 submissions a year. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

2 repo stars
▌
Mlsys Supplementary · thedixitjain
Use when deciding what goes into an MLSys appendix versus the 10-page body, exploiting the venue's unlimited separately-uploaded appendix that reviewers are not required to read, organizing configs, traces, extended results, and anonymized code pointers, and keeping supplementary material blinded for the research track.

2 repo stars
▌
Nature Cell Biology · thedixitjain
Use when targeting Nature Cell Biology or deciding whether a cell-biology manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

2 repo stars
▌
Nature Microbiology · thedixitjain
Use when targeting Nature Microbiology (Nat Microbiol) or deciding whether a microbiology or microbial-ecology manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

2 repo stars
▌
Nature Neuroscience · thedixitjain
Use when targeting Nature Neuroscience (Nat Neurosci) or deciding whether a neuroscience manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

2 repo stars
▌
Nejm Figures Tables · thedixitjain
Use to build NEJM clinical display items correctly — Table 1 baseline characteristics by group (with standardized differences, not P values), Kaplan-Meier curves with numbers-at-risk, forest plots for subgroups and meta-analyses, and the CONSORT participant flow diagram.

2 repo stars
▌
Oopsla Camera Ready · thedixitjain
Use when converting an accepted OOPSLA paper into its PACMPL journal article — final acmsmall formatting within the 25-page revision cap, de-anonymization and Data-Availability Statement updates, ACM open-access and rights steps, hitting the OOPSLA1 (April) or OOPSLA2 (October) issue, and planning the SPLASH talk.

2 repo stars
▌
Operations Research · thedixitjain
Use when targeting Operations Research (OR) or deciding whether an optimization / stochastic-models / queueing / applied-mathematical-modeling manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

2 repo stars
▌
Ors Topic Selection · thedixitjain
Use when deciding whether a problem is a fit for Operations Research (OR) and which of its editorial areas it belongs to — testing for a genuine OR/MS methodological contribution and picking the correct area before formulating. Scopes and routes the problem; it does not build the model (ors-theory-development) or position it in the literature (ors-literature-positioning).

2 repo stars
▌
Podc Review Process · thedixitjain
Use when reasoning about how an ACM PODC submission is evaluated — covering lightweight double-blind review, a program committee that reads proofs, the accept/reject decision with no journal-style revision round, the Brief Announcements track's lighter bar, and how PODC's process differs from DISC, SPAA, and the sequential-theory venues STOC/FOCS/SODA.

2 repo stars
▌
Poq Topic Selection · thedixitjain
Use when deciding whether a project fits Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ) and which submission type to target. POQ is the leading journal of public opinion and survey methodology, so the test is a contribution to opinion/communication theory, to current public opinion, or to survey validity — not a generic social-science finding. Helps frame the question; it does not collect data.

2 repo stars
▌
Ppopp Supplementary · thedixitjain
Use when deciding what belongs in a PPoPP paper's 10 reviewed pages versus the artifact or appendix, splitting content by decision-criticality so proofs, full core sweeps, and correctness arguments that determine acceptance stay legible in the body, while bulk data and extended runs move out.

2 repo stars
▌
Psci Review Process · thedixitjain
Use when you need to understand how Psychological Science evaluates a manuscript — anonymized peer review, editorial weighting of robustness, transparency, and preregistration quality, desk-reject and decline-without-review patterns, and the Registered Reports route. Use when stress-testing a paper before submission or interpreting a decision letter. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

2 repo stars
▌
Psci Tables Figures · thedixitjain
Use when building tables and figures for a Psychological Science manuscript. The journal uses APA 7th-edition style and asks that tables and figures be embedded within the main text near where they are discussed, and exhibits should show effect sizes and uncertainty. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis.

2 repo stars
▌
Qje Topic Selection · thedixitjain
Use when scoping or pressure-testing a research question for a Quarterly Journal of Economics (QJE) submission — checks fit, the "big idea" bar, and breadth of the takeaway for QJE's general-interest readership. Diagnoses scope fit; it does not design the empirics.

2 repo stars
▌
Recsys Camera Ready · thedixitjain
Use when preparing an accepted ACM RecSys paper for camera-ready, covering ACM two-column de-anonymization and reflow, the ACM Digital Library rights/copyright form, metadata and DOI, integrating rebuttal-promised fixes without overreach, releasing the previously-anonymous code/data repository publicly, and registration and presentation obligations.

2 repo stars
▌
Recsys Related Work · thedixitjain
Use when positioning an ACM RecSys submission against recommender-systems literature and its neighbors (SIGIR, KDD, WSDM, TheWebConf, UAI), including the reproducibility-critique line, arXiv and prior versions, concurrent work, ACM Digital Library archival status, and the citation coverage RecSys reviewers expect across recommendation subfields.

2 repo stars
▌
Red Topic Selection · thedixitjain
Use when testing whether a research question fits the Review of Economic Dynamics (RED) — a journal whose scope is defined by method and lens (dynamic, quantitative economics) rather than subfield. Helps decide if the paper studies a genuinely dynamic mechanism through a dynamic model, and whether it belongs at RED versus a generalist or a specialist outlet.

2 repo stars
▌
Research Ops Skills · thedixitjain
Use when planning, funding, scoping, or synthesizing enterprise research across workstreams — clinical study design, R&D program finance, market sizing/surveys, or product/user research. Triggers on "design this clinical study", "what sample size", "R&D budget", "burn rate", "capitalize or expense", "TAM SAM SOM", "market sizing", "survey design", "segment the market", "plan user interviews", "usability test", "synthesize research insights". Forks context to route to one of four Research-Operations sub-skills (clinical-research, research-finance, market-research, product-research) and returns a digest. Distinct from ra-qm-team (regulatory submission), finance (corporate close/valuation), research/grants (funding discovery), product-team (persona/journey/live experiments), and marketing-skill (campaign analytics).

2 repo stars
▌
Revedres Submission · thedixitjain bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript via Manuscript Central — masking, APA 7, the 150-word abstract, file set, and reporting-standard attachments. Checks readiness to submit; it does not negotiate scope (revedres-editor-strategy) or handle the decision letter (revedres-revision).

2 repo stars
▌
Rje Topic Selection · thedixitjain
Use to test whether a research question fits The RAND Journal of Economics (RJE) — the flagship industrial-organization journal with a deliberately narrow applied-microeconomics scope (regulated industries, antitrust/competition, market structure, firm strategy, the economics of organizations). Screens fit before you invest in a full draft.

2 repo stars
▌
Rt Execution Bridge · thedixitjain
Use when an empirical analysis should be RUN and audited, not just advised — DiD, IV, RDD, synthetic control, DML, multiple-testing, sensitivity. Maps the design to the concrete StatsPAI / Stata MCP tools in this environment and reports the fitted, audited number. Defers result placement and house style to the target journal's pack.

2 repo stars
▌
Sensys Camera Ready · thedixitjain
Use when preparing an accepted SenSys camera-ready — de-anonymizing the double-column ACM final, completing ACM rights and metadata, restoring acknowledgments, landing the awarded ACM artifact badges onto the paper, releasing traces and firmware within their constraints, and planning the in-person talk and demo for the merged audience.

2 repo stars
▌
Sensys Related Work · thedixitjain
Use when positioning a SenSys paper against the sensing, embedded, IoT, and on-device-AI literature — sweeping the right venue lanes after the SenSys/IPSN/IoTDI merger, proving each citation's venue via dblp/ACM DL against the MobiCom/NSDI/IPSN traps, distinguishing your mechanism from the nearest prior system, and self-citing blind-safely.

2 repo stars
▌
Sigmod Camera Ready · thedixitjain
Use when converting an accepted SIGMOD research paper into its PACMMOD journal version, covering the port from the ACM submission template to PACMMOD format, de-anonymization, per-round issue placement, ACM DL metadata, conference presentation logistics, and the post-acceptance artifact and ARI handoff.

2 repo stars
▌
Smj Topic Selection · thedixitjain
Use when scoping or pressure-testing whether a research question is a genuine *strategy* question fit for the Strategic Management Journal (SMJ). Decides fit and sharpens the question; it does not build the theory or run analysis.

2 repo stars
▌
Smr Topic Selection · thedixitjain
Use when deciding whether a project clears the Sociological Methods & Research (SMR) bar — a genuine methodological contribution (develop, evaluate, or critically assess a method), not an application dressed as method. Screens fit and scope; does not derive properties or design simulations.

2 repo stars
▌
Spq Research Design · thedixitjain
Use when defending the research design of a Social Psychology Quarterly (SPQ) manuscript — laboratory and survey experiments (group processes, status), survey and secondary-data analysis (social structure and personality), or observation/ethnography and interviews (symbolic interaction). SPQ judges each tradition on its own terms but always asks how the design captures the link between structure and the individual. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.

2 repo stars
▌
Ssi Reproducibility · thedixitjain
当需要为投往《中国科学：信息科学》(Scientia Sinica Informationis, SSI) 的稿件保证实验可重复、结果可复现，并撰写数据/代码可用性叙述时调用。覆盖实验环境与来源固定（数据集版本、工具链、随机种子、硬件平台）、仿真与实测/硅后结果的区分、统计报告与随机性控制、跨子学科（计算机/控制/通信/微电子）的可复现要点，以及诚实的可用性声明。作为国家级大信息学科综合旗舰，本刊强调科学价值与可信证据，与英文姊妹刊 Science China Information Sciences 的开放科学精神一致。

2 repo stars
▌
Stoc Review Process · thedixitjain
Use when reasoning about how a STOC (ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing) submission is evaluated — the SIGACT program-committee model with external subreviewers, HotCRP mechanics, double-blind conflicts, the November-to-February decision arc, and what best-paper designation and rejection each actually mean.

2 repo stars
▌
The Lancet Oncology · thedixitjain
Use when targeting The Lancet Oncology or deciding whether a clinical oncology manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

2 repo stars
▌
Uai Reproducibility · thedixitjain
Use when hardening reproducibility evidence for a UAI paper, including seeds, sampler convergence diagnostics, ELBO and calibration traces, dataset and hyperparameter disclosure, compute reporting, and honest code-availability statements, since UAI strongly encourages released code and data and reviews whether claims are convincingly backed.

2 repo stars
▌
Vis Reproducibility · thedixitjain
Use when strengthening IEEE VIS reproducibility and open-practices evidence, covering the open-materials statement, anonymized-but-runnable code and stimuli, preregistration of perceptual and user studies, provenance for datasets and rendering pipelines, claim-to-figure mapping, honest degrees of reproducibility, and consistency between what the TVCG paper says and what the supplemental archive contains.

2 repo stars
▌
Vis Topic Selection · thedixitjain
Use when deciding whether a project belongs at IEEE VIS or should be routed to EuroVis, PacificVis, CHI, a graphics venue, or the IEEE TVCG journal track, and when choosing among the six VIS areas (Theoretical & Empirical, Applications, Systems & Rendering, Representations & Interaction, Data Transformations, Analytics & Decisions) by contribution type and evidence maturity.

2 repo stars
▌
Wacv Review Process · thedixitjain
Use when reasoning about how WACV decides a paper, covering the two-round model, the Round 1 Accept / Revise-and-Resubmit / Reject recommendations, the optional Round 1 rebuttal, the no-rebuttal Round 2, area-chair consolidation, double-blind confidentiality, and where author leverage actually exists across the two rounds.

2 repo stars
▌
Webconf Experiments · thedixitjain
Use when designing or auditing the empirical section of a Web Conference (WWW) paper — matching evidence to the claim's scale, choosing datasets with provenance and freshness, blocking temporal and popularity leakage, running honest baselines from the sibling circuit, and deciding when live-platform or user-study evidence is required.

2 repo stars
▌
Ylj Topic Selection · thedixitjain
Use when deciding whether a legal-scholarship idea is a fit for The Yale Law Journal (YLJ) and which track it belongs in. It tests generalist significance, timeliness, and novelty potential; it does not draft the thesis or run the formal preemption search.

2 repo stars
▌
Arecon Submission · thedixitjain bundle
Use when running the final delivery preflight for a commissioned Annual Review of Economics (ARE) review via the Annual Reviews production system — disclosure statements, reference/format compliance, figure permissions, and the transparency/reproducibility of any meta-analysis the review itself contains. Final checks; it does not draft content.

2 repo stars
▌
Asplos Submission · thedixitjain
Use when running the final pre-upload audit of an ASPLOS submission — the 11-page limit covering figures/tables/footnotes with references excluded, the mandatory template, the no-"et al." full-name citation rule, hyperlinked DOIs, double-blind hygiene, GenAI disclosure, appendix self-containment, and HotCRP completion before the AoE deadline.

2 repo stars
▌
Bugs Are Annoying · thedixitjain
Adversarial code auditor that hunts down bugs, logic errors, and security flaws. Use for deep correctness passes, not style reviews.

2 repo stars
▌
Ccs Supplementary · thedixitjain
Use when preparing ACM CCS appendices and supplementary material, including the ethics considerations appendix, protocol transcripts, formal proofs, measurement tables, and anonymized supporting material under the 12-page body limit, anonymity, and reviewer-discretion constraints for a security paper.

2 repo stars
▌
Crossframe Public · thedixitjain bundle
Use when CrossFrame Suite routes explicit Chinese analysis of public issues, platform governance, policy, institutional responsibility, appeals, or compliance evidence.

2 repo stars
▌
Ecopol Robustness · thedixitjain
Use when an Economic Policy (EP) manuscript's results may be specification-, sample-, or inference-fragile, especially ahead of the two-discussant panel. Organizes robustness by the threat a discussant will raise; it does not invent evidence or citations.

2 repo stars
▌
Gdpr Dsgvo Expert · thedixitjain bundle
GDPR and German DSGVO compliance automation. Scans codebases for privacy risks, generates DPIA documentation, tracks data subject rights requests with Art. 12(3) one-month deadlines. Use when running GDPR compliance assessments, privacy audits, data protection planning, DPIA generation, or data subject rights (DSAR) management (e.g., 'check this service for GDPR risks', 'track an access request deadline'). Final compliance determinations route to the DPO or legal counsel.

2 repo stars
▌
Icassp Submission · thedixitjain
Use when auditing an ICASSP submission before the CMS portal deadline — the IEEE 4+1 page format, the single-blind rule that the author list must appear, EDICS subject selection, the Compliance-with-Ethical-Standards statement, PDF eXpress validation, the 9-papers-per-author cap, dual-submission policy, and desk-reject triggers.

2 repo stars

10,417 published skills · page 65 of 105