Finance & Business

johnalbertini14-glitch Skill

Teaches participants (AI agents or humans) how to define, update, and operate within delegation constraints — budget caps, risk tolerance, value weights, red lines, and expiry.

johnalbertini14-glitch Bundle

Set up and maintain a structured OpenClaw workspace with project boundaries, role-based file taxonomy, and memory budgets. Use when: (1) bootstrapping a new workspace, (2) migrating from a flat docs/ structure, (3) adding a new project, (4) unsure where to write something, (5) running workspace maintenance, (6) auditing workspace health. Provides the directory layout, ROLE front-matter spec, MEMORY.md budget rules, and maintenance procedures.

johnalbertini14-glitch Bundle

한국 비즈니스 서류(세금계산서, 계약서, 통장사본, 견적서, 거래명세서, 사업자등록증, 사업비 요청 공문, 지원금 신청서, 검수조서, 이체확인증, 결과보고서) 검토 및 검증. Use when reviewing Korean business documents for format compliance, required fields, value accuracy, and cross-document consistency. Triggers on: 서류 검토, 문서 확인, 세금계산서 검증, 계약서 리뷰, 견적서 확인, 통장사본 검증, 거래명세서 확인, 사업자등록증 확인, 검수조서 검토, 이체확인증 검증, 결과보고서 검토, document review, invoice check.

johnalbertini14-glitch Bundle

Complete construction estimating and cost management system. Use when preparing project estimates, bid proposals, cost breakdowns, value engineering, change order management, or construction budget tracking. Covers residential, commercial, and infrastructure projects. Trigger on 'estimate', 'construction cost', 'bid', 'takeoff', 'cost breakdown', 'change order', 'value engineering', 'construction budget', 'unit pricing', 'RSMeans'.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when designing or auditing the evaluation of an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) systems paper — matching evidence to the claim with real testbeds, fair baselines, end-to-end plus microbenchmark results, tail-latency and variance reporting, workload realism, and honest cost accounting.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when auditing an ECAI submission for readiness — the abstract-then-full-paper two-deadline flow, the tight 7-page body budget, double-blind anonymity, the correct template/publisher regime (ecai.cls/FAIA for a standalone ECAI vs ijcai.sty/IJCAI proceedings for the joint IJCAI-ECAI 2026), the per-author submission cap, the ethics statement, and desk-reject triage before the AoE cutoff.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when preparing the camera-ready of an accepted ACM/IEEE HRI paper — de-anonymizing systematically, completing ACM+IEEE dual-publication metadata (CCS concepts, ORCID, rights/eRights form), delivering every rebuttal promise within the 8-page budget, finalizing the video and de-anonymized archive, and passing production checks.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when preparing an accepted KDD paper for ACM proceedings, covering the 12-page proceedings budget with 9 content pages, the extra content page over the submission, the 3-page cap on references plus appendix, ACM e-rights and TAPS source processing, ACM Open APC status, de-anonymization, and Digital Library metadata for SIGKDD.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when auditing an ACM PODC submission for HotCRP readiness, covering the two-step abstract-registration then full-paper deadline, the ACM Master template with the 10-page-merits budget and unbounded full version, lightweight double-blind anonymization, the regular-paper-vs-Brief-Announcement choice, and desk-risk triage before the AoE cutoff.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when auditing a PVLDB submission before a monthly deadline, covering the mandatory abstract on the 25th, the CMT window, the 1st-of-month 5:00 PM Pacific cutoff, category and page-budget choice, single-blind cover-page requirements, the per-month and per-year author caps, and desk-reject hazards specific to VLDB.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when auditing a WSDM submission before the August deadlines - EasyChair setup, the abstract-then-paper week, the appendix-inclusive page budget, the required ethical-considerations section, anonymization that survives Associate-Chair metadata visibility, and desk-reject exposure at a no-rebuttal venue.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when deciding what belongs in the 10-page ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) paper body versus the artifact and supplementary material, splitting content by decision-criticality so nothing that decides acceptance lives outside the reviewed pages under the 10+2 budget.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when drafting or revising an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) systems paper — writing a self-standing two-page extended abstract for the round-one gate, structuring the implementation-and-measurement narrative, reporting costs beside gains, and holding the two-column 12-page budget.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when revising a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) paper for a precise verification contribution on the first page, an explicit soundness/completeness statement, theorem-and-proof discipline in the LNCS page budget, fair benchmark claims, honest scope and limits, and double-blind wording for the anonymized categories.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when deciding what belongs in an ESEC/FSE paper body versus its anonymized artifact and appendices, covering the ACM-template page budget, the rule that decision-critical evidence stays inside the reviewed pages, double-anonymous supplementary material, and how to split an empirical-SE paper between body and package.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when drafting or revising the prose of an ACM IMC measurement paper, covering the first-page measurement finding, making vantage points and methodology auditable, longitudinal framing for a moving Internet, arguing limitations rather than reciting them, writing the Ethics section early, and acmart page-budget discipline.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when deciding what belongs in an IEEE VIS paper body versus its supplemental materials, covering the VGTC/TVCG 9+2 page budget, the supplemental video that VIS reviewers routinely watch, the one-week supplemental deadline extension, double-blind supplemental anonymization, and how to split a visualization paper between the reviewed pages and the archive.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when revising an IEEE VIS paper for a task-grounded visualization contribution on the first page, a design rationale that ties each visual encoding and interaction to a task, evaluation matched to the contribution type, honest limitations, and disciplined use of the VGTC/TVCG 9+2 page budget for a paper that will be read as an IEEE TVCG journal article.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when preparing an accepted ECCV paper for Springer LNCS publication — the enlarged final page budget, Springer author kit and licensing, the June 30 AoE camera-ready cutoff in 2026, registration as a publication condition, ECVA open-access mirroring about four weeks before the conference, and arXiv synchronization.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when auditing an ICALP (EATCS) Track A or Track B submission for HotCRP readiness, covering the correct-track submission server, abstract registration before the full-paper deadline, the 15-page extended-abstract page budget with a clearly labelled appendix / full version, lightweight double-blind anonymity, the no-simultaneous-submission rule, and the single annual February AoE cutoff.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when writing or revising a CVPR paper's prose and figures, covering the 8-page budget where figures and tables count against the limit, the page-1 teaser figure convention, benchmark-table craft, claim calibration for a skeptical vision audience, and taking responsibility for tool-assisted text under CVPR's rules.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when organizing an EACL paper's body, mandatory Limitations section, appendices, and anonymized supplementary archive so that no decision-critical content hides where ACL Rolling Review reviewers are not obliged to read, and so the content-page budget carries the whole argument on its own.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when deciding what belongs in an EDBT paper body versus its artifact and appendices, covering the per-shape page budget with unlimited references, the rule that decision-critical evidence stays inside the reviewed pages, and how to split a database-systems paper between body and reproducible package.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when revising an EDBT paper for a data-management contribution on the first page, a reproducibly described mechanism, an evaluation that survives a database-systems reviewer, honest scope, and disciplined use of the per-shape page budget (Regular / Experiments-&-Analysis / Vision) in the OpenProceedings template.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when deciding what belongs in a USENIX FAST paper body versus its artifact and appendices, covering the USENIX two-column page budget (references excluded), the rule that decision-critical storage evidence stays inside the reviewed pages, double-blind supplementary material, and how to split a storage paper between body and package.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when revising a USENIX FAST paper for a storage contribution on the first page, a design/mechanism narrative a storage reviewer can follow, an evaluation framed as the storage cost it changes (write amplification, tail latency, endurance, crash consistency), double-blind wording, and disciplined use of the USENIX two-column page budget.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when revising an IPSN-lineage paper for a real sensing problem on the first page, a load-bearing information-processing or platform contribution, ground-truth methodology, energy/latency/accuracy budgets, honest deployment reporting, double-blind wording, and disciplined use of the ≤12-page ACM two-column budget.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when deciding what accompanies an ISCA submission beyond the 11 reviewed pages — what must live inside the page budget because reviewers see nothing else, how to use fully anonymized artifact links under the double-blind rules, staging material for the revision window, and planning post-acceptance release.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when designing or auditing ISSTA experiments, covering real subject programs and benchmarks like Defects4J, fair tool-baseline configuration, bug-finding and coverage metrics, non-parametric comparison with effect sizes, equal-budget protocols, repeated runs, and matching evidence to the claim being made.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when designing or auditing the experimental program of a NAACL submission — matching evidence to language-coverage claims, keeping cross-lingual comparisons budget-fair, testing on natively authored rather than translated data where the claim requires it, and reporting variance that survives reviewer probing.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when deciding what belongs in an ACM PODS paper body versus its at-submission appendix, covering the acmsmall 15-page budget, the rule that PODS forbids online/external appendices so all proofs ship with the submission, the body/appendix split for a theory paper, and double-anonymous supplementary hygiene.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when revising a PVLDB paper's prose, covering the page-one contract for systems readers, scoping performance claims to measured regimes, stating design trade-offs instead of hiding them, terminology and notation discipline across a 12-page budget, and the tone VLDB's builder-reviewers reward.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when revising a WACV paper's prose and first page, covering how to write for the chosen Applications or Algorithms track, leading with the real-world constraint or the method, self-contained figure captions inside the 8-page-including-figures budget, scoped claims, and a first page that pre-empts the Revise-and-Resubmit question.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when deciding what goes where in a WSDM submission whose appendices count inside the page cap - triage between the 9-page body, the uncounted references and ethics section, and the cited external repository; compression tactics for proofs, prompts, and hyperparameter tables under WSDM's historically tight budget.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when auditing an ACM CoNEXT submission for HotCRP readiness, covering the choice between the December and June cycles, the mandatory paper-registration step, the ACM acmart page budget (long ≤16 + ≤4 appendix; short ≤10 + ≤2 appendix), double-anonymous review, the reproducibility badge opt-in due at submission, PACMNET publication, and desk-reject triage before the cutoff.

brycewang-stanford Skill

Use when preparing an accepted IEEE ICSME paper for its IEEE Xplore camera-ready, covering de-anonymization, the IEEEtran two-column format and page budget, the IEEE eCopyright form, integrating the reviewer-required and author-response changes without scope creep, permanentizing data-availability links, and the ROSE-Festival artifact handoff.