Results for “adversarial-evaluation”

15 skills

Multi-perspective dialectical reasoning with cross-evaluative synthesis. Spawns parallel evaluative lenses (STRUCTURAL, EVIDENTIAL, SCOPE, ADVERSARIAL, PRAGMATIC) that critique thesis AND critique each other's critiques, producing N-squared evaluation matrix before recursive aggregation. Triggers on /critique, /dialectic, /crosseval, requests for thorough analysis, stress-testing arguments, or finding weaknesses. Implements Hegelian refinement enhanced with interleaved multi-domain evaluation and convergent synthesis.

More results

From The Other Side Anitta

Provides a rigorous thinking partner profile that challenges assumptions, calibrates claims to evidence, and improves decision quality under uncertainty.

Adversarial reviewer that stress-tests claims and conclusions. Use when the user asks to talk to KAY/O, requests an adversarial review, or needs claims validated before publication.

Adversarial Quality Gate

Decide whether an article deserves publication through hard checks and skeptical comparison.

Alphago Deep Rl

Strategic patterns for solving intractable problems through cascading approximation, self-improvement, and heterogeneous evaluation from DeepMind's AlphaGo system

leandrobenjaminl

Runs an adversarial code review with two blind judges analyzing the same code from opposing perspectives to find flaws before production.

Visuals Adversarial

Skeptical pushback on visual placement — both density and quality. Reads the annotated outline plus the visuals manifest and asks (a) whether the article hits the density target from editorial-principles-visuals.md, (b) whether each [VISUAL:...] earns its place, (c) whether sections without one would benefit. One revision pass on FAIL (BLOG_AGENT_VISUALS_REVISION_BUDGET, default 1).

Launches four parallel adversarial review agents covering security, scope, fidelity, and test gaps, then synthesizes findings into a ranked verdict for plans or feature branches.

Pressure-test any business idea with a five-angle adversarial panel (Critic, Champion, Analyst, Investigator, Customer) that returns a single GO/RESHAPE/KILL verdict with the cheapest test to de-risk it.

20.4k · bundle

Bmad Code Review

Adversarial code review using parallel review layers and structured triage. Use when the user says "run code review" or "review this code"

Outline Adversarial

Skeptical pushback on the outline before drafting starts. Asks whether the outline is MECE, BLUF, problem-agitate-solution; whether it covers the topic better than the SERP top-5; whether sections duplicate; whether each section earns its visual. One revision pass on FAIL (BLOG_AGENT_OUTLINE_REVISION_BUDGET, default 1).

Adversarially verify an implementation against its objective, acceptance criteria, definition of done, and prohibitions using fresh evidence. Use for completion gates, release readiness, or independent verification after implementation and review.

Spike Consumer Adversarial

Incident Post-Mortem Builder

Llava Critic Learning To Evaluate Multimodal Models Arxiv 24

LLaVA-Critic: Learning to Evaluate Multimodal Models

Idea Evaluation

Score an unbuilt business idea on desirability, viability, feasibility, distribution wedge, why-now, founder-market-fit, market size, alternatives, defensibility, capital intensity, and regulatory/ethical risk — and return a GO / ITERATE / KILL verdict with kill criteria and a next kill test. Load when the user asks to evaluate a business idea, score a startup idea, screen an idea, decide whether to pursue this venture, do an idea review, or says "is this a good business idea", "should I build this", "evaluate this startup", "screen this idea", "go/no-go on this idea", "kill or pursue". Sub-skill of `venture-exploration`. Calls `fermi` for sizing, `assumption-mapping` for hidden beliefs, optional `pre-mortem` / `adversarial-hat` for high-stakes ideas. Does NOT evaluate built products — for that use `reality-check`.