Results for “style”

Provides reviewer-style audit and deep review for academic papers in LaTeX, Typst, and PDF formats, producing structured issue bundles, pass/fail gates, and revision roadmaps.

Generate comprehensive market research reports (50+ pages) in the style of top consulting firms (McKinsey, BCG, Gartner). Professional LaTeX formatting, strategic analysis frameworks (Porter's Five Forces, PESTLE, SWOT, TAM/SAM/SOM, BCG Matrix), and deep research integration.

Simulates a NeurIPS/SC/ICSE-style peer review with five reviewer personas (HPC, ML, Stats, Reproducibility, Devil's Advocate) that verify every claim against actual result data before submission.

Use this skill when the user asks to "analyze my content", "learn my writing style", "research competitors", "find content angles", "improve my blog", "write like me", "embody my brand voice", or mentions content strategy, voice analysis, competitive research, or iterative content improvement.

Generate publication-quality infographics using Nano Banana Pro AI with Gemini 3 Pro quality review and optional Perplexity Sonar research. Supports 10 infographic types, 8 industry styles, and colorblind-safe palettes.

Analyzes Stockbee-style Day 1 Episodic Pivot candidates by scoring catalyst quality alongside price/volume confirmation, gap/range expansion, volume shock, neglect/revaluation context, liquidity, and risk to the EP-day low.

Screen US stocks for Stockbee-style short-term momentum burst setups using 4% breakout, dollar breakout, range expansion, volume expansion, prior range contraction, close-location, failure filters, and risk-distance scoring.

Run STORM phase 2 — outline generation. This skill should be used when the user asks to "generate an outline for a storm article", "draft a wikipedia-style outline", or invokes /storm:outline. Produces a draft outline from parametric knowledge then refines it using the research information table.

Build and maintain a model book for Stockbee-style Momentum Burst setups by ingesting screener candidates, updating 3-day and 5-day forward outcomes with MFE/MAE and stop-hit status, and summarizing cohort statistics to improve setup recognition.

Generate academic research proposals for PhD applications. Use when user asks to "write a research proposal", "create PhD proposal", "generate research plan", "撰写研究计划", "写博士申请", "doctoral proposal", or mentions specific research topics for PhD application. Supports STEM, humanities, and social sciences with field-specific adaptations. Follows Nature Reviews-style academic writing conventions. Supports both English and Chinese output based on user preference.

Communications-domain literature review with Claude-style knowledge-base-first retrieval. Use when the task is about communications, wireless, networking, satellite/NTN, Wi-Fi, cellular, transport protocols, congestion control, routing, scheduling, MAC/PHY, rate adaptation, channel estimation, beamforming, or communication-system research and the user wants papers, related work, a survey, or a landscape summary. Search Zotero, Obsidian, and local paper folders first when available, then search IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, ACM Digital Library, and broader web in that order.

Supervises theses and dissertations end to end — structure guidance from proposal through defense, chapter-by-chapter writing support (introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion), supervision strategies, committee management, defense and viva voce preparation, timeline planning, feedback integration, examiner-expectation guidance, and formatting (APA 7, Chicago, university styles). Use when the request mentions thesis, dissertation, supervision, defense preparation, viva, proposal defense, thesis structure, thesis chapter, literature review chapter, methodology chapter, results chapter, discussion chapter, thesis timeline, committee, thesis formatting, or dissertation proposal. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.

Evidence-based investigation of issues, bugs, API calls, integrations, and other aspects of software development that need a deep dive to find the root cause and solutions. Use when you need to debug, troubleshoot, diagnose, or figure out why something is broken. Does not review code for quality or style — use code-review for auditing changes or post-code-review-to-pr for posting review feedback to GitHub. Does not assess architectural health or structural risk — use architectural-analysis for architectural concerns. Does not research open-ended options, prior art, or how something works when nothing is broken — use research for that. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback for that.