Results for “find”

Reviews a PR or diff through three independent lenses—correctness, security, and test coverage—then deduplicates and validates findings before persisting them, reducing noise while catching more real bugs.

Performs STRIDE-A threat model analysis of repositories and systems, producing architecture overviews, DFD diagrams, prioritized findings, and executive assessments. Supports both single analysis and incremental updates with change tracking.

Audits trending open-source repos for exploitable vulnerabilities using Semgrep, TruffleHog, osv-scanner, and Slither, then routes findings to responsible disclosure channels (PVR for code flaws, public PRs for dependency CVEs).

Correlate findings across OSINT sources—username enumeration, email lookups, social media profiles, domain records, breach databases, and dark-web mentions—into unified intelligence profiles with confidence scoring and link analysis.

Aggregate security findings across AWS accounts, enable compliance standards like CIS and PCI DSS, configure automated remediation with EventBridge and Lambda, and create custom security insights for organizational risk management.

Cross-page UX audit for user stories, task completion, and information architecture — the layer audit-ux (per-page heuristics) skips. Use when "audit user flows", "IA audit", "can users find X", "navigation audit", or "funnel drop-off". Full DS burndown → plan-uiux-unification.

Scan a codebase, live app, or site and find the features that obviously should exist but don't — missing exports, bulk actions, search/filter, undo, history, notifications, dead-end workflows, data collected but never surfaced, backend endpoints with no UI, and half-built features that stopped partway. Produces an evidence-backed, ranked punch list (top 10 max) with a portable gap_packet JSON. Use whenever the user asks "what features are missing", "what's this app lacking", "find gaps", "run gap-scan", "feature audit", or wants proposal ammo from a prospect's app. Also use it to recheck an existing gap_packet — "what's left to do", "recheck the gaps", "what got built since" — re-verifying findings against current code and marking stale ones superseded. Flags ABSENCE only — broken code goes to code-audit, confusing flows to ux-audit, weak persuasion to conversion-audit, underexploited assets to a WWBD-style analysis. If something exists but is bad, it's not a gap — hand it off.

Scans installed or specified agent skills for advertising, covert commercial intent, task hijacking, suspicious external calls, and sensitive-data access. Reports findings first and quarantines only after explicit user confirmation.

Search past WhatsApp/chat conversations stored in the audit log PostgreSQL database. Use when the user asks about past conversations, what was discussed, what someone said, finding a specific message, or referencing previous discussions. Also use to reply to or quote specific past messages.

Launches four parallel read-only sub-agents to review a git diff or file scope for regressions, security risks, performance issues, and contract gaps, then aggregates findings into a prioritized fix path.

Find over-permissive RBAC roles and service-account token abuse paths in Kubernetes using kubectl auth can-i, rbac-police, kubectl-who-can, and rakkess during authorized cluster security reviews.

Hunt for threats in AWS environments using Detective behavior graphs, entity investigation timelines, GuardDuty finding correlation, and automated entity profiling across IAM users, EC2 instances, and IP addresses.

Runs a deep cross-layer consistency audit across a codebase, tracing features from UI to database to find broken wiring, missing handlers, model mismatches, and security gaps, then auto-fixes critical and warning issues.

Review pull requests or audit repositories for correctness, security, performance, test risk, architecture, dependencies, developer experience, documentation, and grounded product direction. Use for code review, repository audits, evidence-backed findings, false-positive vetting, risk assessment, prioritization, or deciding which improvements should become implementation plans.

Trace every user-facing button through its full state change sequence to find bugs where functions individually work but cancel each other out, produce wrong final state, or leave the UI inconsistent.

Design and run a k6/Artillery load profile that measures throughput, latency percentiles, error rate, and the breaking point under concurrent traffic. Use when "load test this", "will it handle launch traffic", or "find the breaking point". Resilience-by-reading-code → audit-resilience. Never hit prod unsigned.

Establishes recurring vulnerability scanning workflows using Nessus, Qualys, or OpenVAS, prioritizes findings with risk scoring and CISA KEV data, integrates with SIEM for exploitation detection, and tracks remediation via SLA-based dashboards and automated ticketing.

End-to-end performance audit composite — baseline the slow metric, profile to find the real hotspot, implement the smallest targeted fix, re-benchmark to confirm improvement, capture in ADR. Use when users report slowness, CI shows runtime regression, or before a release. Never optimize without profiling first.

Audit a full-stack app against the RealWorld ("Conduit") reference — its formal API spec, shared Bruno/Hurl E2E suite, and closest-stack reference implementation — to find what is. Use when "audit against realworld", "compare my app to realworld", "conduit conformance", "is my full-stack app complete", "full-stack gap.

Use this skill when the user asks about International Fuel Tax Agreement (IFTA) compliance — quarterly returns, jurisdiction reporting, fuel + miles reconciliation, IFTA-100/101 forms, base jurisdiction selection, IFTA license + decals, recordkeeping requirements, common IFTA audit findings, or how to handle non-IFTA jurisdictions. Cite IFTA Articles of Agreement.

Use to find where support routing is failing — misrouted contacts, reassignment chains, unassigned work, and queues nobody owns. Trigger for "why do tickets bounce between teams", "are we routing correctly", "tickets sitting unassigned", "how many tickets get reassigned", ticket ping-pong, or reviewing routing rules and queue design.

Integrates OWASP ZAP for Dynamic Application Security Testing in CI/CD pipelines, configuring baseline, full, and API scans, interpreting findings, tuning policies, and establishing quality gates in GitHub Actions and GitLab CI.

Deploy AWS Security Hub as a centralized cloud security posture management platform, aggregate findings from GuardDuty, Inspector, Macie, and third-party tools, enable security standards, configure automated remediation, and build compliance dashboards across multi-account AWS organizations.

This skill should be used when the user asks to "test for insecure direct object references," "find IDOR vulnerabilities," "exploit broken access control," "enumerate user IDs or object references," or "bypass authorization to access other users' data." It provides comprehensive guidance for detecting, exploiting, and remediating IDOR vulnerabilities in web applications.

This skill should be used when the user asks to "test for insecure direct object references," "find IDOR vulnerabilities," "exploit broken access control," "enumerate user IDs or object references," or "bypass authorization to access other users' data." It provides comprehensive guidance for detecting, exploiting, and remediating IDOR vulnerabilities in web applications.

Performs a static-analysis penetration test to find exploitable vulnerabilities, providing proof-of-concept payloads and fixes. Covers injection, XSS, authentication bypass, authorization flaws, path traversal, command injection, CSRF, SSRF, hardcoded secrets, and insecure deserialization, with a full attack surface.

Searches and extracts data from Burp Suite project files (.burp) using the burpsuite-project-file-parser extension, enabling regex searches on response headers and bodies, extraction of security audit findings, and analysis of proxy history and site map data.

Defamiliarization audit for empirical output. Systematically interrogates every feature of a figure, table, or set of results — not just the main finding. Named for Jason Fletcher, who asked about the spike at t=1 when everyone else was looking at t=2. Use when you have output and are about to interpret or report it.

Weed the Allium garden. Find where Allium specifications and implementation code have diverged, and help resolve the divergences. Use when the user wants to check spec-code alignment, compare specs against implementation, audit for spec drift or violations, sync specs with code or code with specs, or verify whether the implementation matches what the spec says.

Use to audit whether similar customers with similar failures received similar redress, and to find variation that could not be defended. Trigger for "are our refunds consistent", "do we compensate similar cases the same way", "audit our goodwill decisions", redress fairness review, customers who escalate getting more, or a complaint that someone else was treated better.

Use to compare a support data retention policy against what is actually still stored, and find both over-retention and premature deletion. Trigger for "are we deleting support data on time", "retention audit", "how long do we keep transcripts", "we still have data from 2018", conflicting retention obligations, or preparing for a data protection review.

Audit a repository, vet and prioritize evidence-backed findings, write drift-aware implementation plans, delegate bounded work, and independently verify results. Use when asked to improve, audit, modernize, harden, review, plan fixes for, or systematically reduce risk in a codebase. Use native isolated agents for implementation; use OpenRouter/free only for narrow advisory audit slices under its safety limits.

Trace every user-facing button/touchpoint through its full state change sequence to find bugs where functions individually work but cancel each other out, produce wrong final state, or leave the UI in an inconsistent state. Use when: systematic debugging found no bugs but users report broken buttons, or after any major refactor touching shared state stores.

Verify a GitHub pull request against a Jira issue's goals, requirements, and acceptance criteria, then post a PR comment with the findings. Use when a user asks Codex or MoonMind to compare a PR to a Jira story/task/bug, confirm whether a PR satisfies Jira requirements, audit implementation coverage from Jira, or publish a Jira-vs-PR verification summary.

Perform a static audit of an AL workspace for Business Central against the project's copilot-instructions.md contract. Reports findings by class (Compliance, Code quality, Test coverage, Permissions) and severity (Blocker, Major, Minor, Nit) with file:line citations. Never modifies code. Never invents rules. Use when asked to audit a workspace, run a compliance check, review before PR, or diagnose contract drift.

Load this skill when the user says "asvs security review", "asvs-security-review", "/asvs-security-review", or when invoked by reference from the review-issue skill's standards-review step. Performs a rule-by-rule walk of docs/security-standards.md against a diff, scoped to the ASVS sections the diff actually touches, and reports findings using the project's existing severity mapping.