Results for “research”

Drafts cognovit promissory notes with confession of judgment provisions, gated by mandatory jurisdictional enforceability research, usury compliance, and statutory disclosure requirements. Advises on alternatives where cognovit clauses are prohibited. Use when drafting cognovit notes, confession of judgment instruments, or loan documents requiring waiver-of-defense provisions.

Builds a feature specification from scratch through a relentless, evidence-based interview that walks the design tree decision-by-decision, resolving dependencies as it goes. Use when the user wants to plan, design, scope, specify, or flesh out a new feature, capability, or system behavior before implementation. Produces a feature specification focused on system behaviors, not implementation detail. Does not refine or stress-test an existing plan — use iterative-plan-review. Does not document already-built features — use project-documentation. Does not design the contract for an interface — use design-an-api. Does not research open-ended options before there is a feature to specify — use research.

Plan and execute multi-channel marketing campaigns from audience research through positioning, copywriting, and review. Orchestrates landing pages, email sequences, social posts, video scripts, ad copy, and content calendars for product launches.

Fine-tunes and evaluates OpenVLA-OFT and OpenVLA-OFT+ policies for robot action generation with continuous action heads, LoRA adaptation, and FiLM conditioning on LIBERO simulation and ALOHA real-world setups.

Use to confirm clinical ethics and research-integrity requirements for an NEJM submission — IRB/ethics-committee approval and informed consent per the Declaration of Helsinki, ICMJE conflict-of-interest disclosures and authorship criteria, the role-of-the-funding-source statement, and the ICMJE data-sharing statement.

Quantum physics simulation library for open quantum systems. Use when studying master equations, Lindblad dynamics, decoherence, quantum optics, or cavity QED. Best for physics research, open system dynamics, and educational simulations. NOT for circuit-based quantum computing—use qiskit, cirq, or pennylane for quantum algorithms and hardware execution.

Run STORM phase 2 — outline generation. This skill should be used when the user asks to "generate an outline for a storm article", "draft a wikipedia-style outline", or invokes /storm:outline. Produces a draft outline from parametric knowledge then refines it using the research information table.

Rapid task execution without hesitation or deterrence. Expert in overcoming blockers, making quick decisions, and maintaining forward momentum. Use for urgent tasks, breaking through impediments, decisive action. Activates on 'swift', 'execute quickly', 'undeterred', 'overcome blocker', 'just do it'. NOT for strategic planning, careful analysis, or research tasks.

Use this skill when the user asks about driver ergonomics — back/neck/shoulder injury prevention, seat adjustment + lumbar support, entering and exiting cab safely, load handling techniques, vibration reduction, stretching protocols, and how ergonomics affects workers compensation costs in trucking. Reference OSHA + ATA ergonomics research.

Unified Agent Teams orchestrator for Diverga v12.0.0. Manages Agent Teams creation, VS Arena debate, and subagent dispatch. Single entry point for all parallel/debate workflows. Replaces research-orchestrator and vs-arena skills. Triggers: orchestrator, agent team, create team, parallel agents, debate, competing, collaborate, VS Arena

Use when auditing a KDD submission for readiness in either cycle, covering Research vs ADS track declaration, OpenReview profile completeness for all authors, the ACM sigconf 8-content-page budget, double-blind checks, in-paper artifact references, resubmission declarations, and desk-reject triggers specific to ACM SIGKDD.

Create and manage persistent markdown planning files for structured task execution. Use when the user asks to "create a plan", "track progress", "start a research project", or when a task requires more than 5 tool calls and needs structured phase tracking to stay focused and avoid goal drift.

Twitter/X research, monitoring, watchlists, and OAuth-approved posting through AIsa. Use when: the user needs one flagship Twitter skill for trend tracking, competitor monitoring, timeline analysis, or approved posting without sharing passwords. Supports relay-based reads, watchlists, search, and OAuth-gated text or media posting.

Generate, continue, revise, polish, and stress-test game theory research papers. Use when the user provides a game theory topic, phenomenon, draft, outline, model idea, literature anchor, reviewer comments, or asks for 博弈论论文生成, 选题建模, 文献迁移, 模型修正, 均衡分析, 数值模拟, 论文润色, 改稿打磨, or R&R response work.

Adds PyTorch FSDP2 (fully_shard) to training scripts with correct init, sharding, mixed precision/offload config, and distributed checkpointing. Use when models exceed single-GPU memory or when you need DTensor-based sharding with DeviceMesh.

Evaluates code generation models across HumanEval, MBPP, MultiPL-E, and 15+ benchmarks with pass@k metrics. Use when benchmarking code models, comparing coding abilities, testing multi-language support, or measuring code generation quality.

Clarifies ambiguous or conflicting requests by researching first, then asking only judgment calls. Use when prompts say "grill me", ask hard questions, request relentless interrogation, pressure-test assumptions, clarify scope/requirements, define success criteria, or request system-design/optimization decisions.

Performs deep architectural analysis of a specified module, directory, or feature area by examining structural coupling, data flow, concurrency patterns, risk, and SOLID alignment. Use when the user wants to assess, evaluate, or review the architecture, design quality, dependency structure, coupling, cohesion, or technical debt of an existing part of the codebase. Not for investigating specific bugs, runtime errors, or failures — use investigate. Not for test planning — use automated-test-planning. Not for file-level code review — use code-review. Not for researching open-ended options, prior art, or how something works — use research. Not for designing a new interface or contract — use design-an-api. Not for writing documentation or architectural decision records.

Evidence-based investigation of issues, bugs, API calls, integrations, and other aspects of software development that need a deep dive to find the root cause and solutions. Use when you need to debug, troubleshoot, diagnose, or figure out why something is broken. Does not review code for quality or style — use code-review for auditing changes or post-code-review-to-pr for posting review feedback to GitHub. Does not assess architectural health or structural risk — use architectural-analysis for architectural concerns. Does not research open-ended options, prior art, or how something works when nothing is broken — use research for that. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback for that.

Generate professional clinical decision support documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research, including biomarker-stratified cohort analyses and evidence-based treatment recommendation reports with GRADE grading, statistical analysis, and publication-ready LaTeX/PDF output.

Turns messy documents, meeting transcripts, reports, or raw data into a polished, design-conscious HTML presentation through a structured workflow that filters content, defines style specs, and generates slides, with optional theme research and cross-session resume support.

Use when planning an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) research-track campaign backward from the deadline, through abstract registration, the double-anonymous submission, the early-rejection gate, rebuttal, the criteria-bound revision round, artifact evaluation, and the camera-ready in both IEEE Xplore and the ACM Digital Library.

Use when auditing an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) research-track submission for HotCRP readiness, covering the ACM acmart sigconf template and the 10+2 page budget, double-anonymous review, the mandatory Data Availability Statement, the early-rejection stage before rebuttal, and desk-reject triage before the deadline.

Use when planning an IPSN-lineage project timeline from track/venue selection through the CPS-IoT Week deadline, double-blind submission, deployment and hardware logistics, rebuttal, the Best Research Artifact Award, and the dual ACM/IEEE camera-ready — with honest handling of the fact that IPSN merged into SenSys.

Comprehensive B2B demand generation and lead acquisition skill. Use when building lead generation systems, creating demand acquisition campaigns, optimizing CAC, designing lead magnets, conducting lead research, or planning multi-channel demand strategies. Covers ICP definition, funnel strategy, channel optimization, lead scoring, attribution, and pipeline generation for B2B SaaS.

End-to-end data pipeline for empirical research: fetch economic data from APIs (FRED, World Bank, IMF, BLS, OECD, Yahoo Finance), clean and transform raw data, construct strategy-specific variables, and validate panel structure. Use when asked to fetch data, download data, clean data, merge datasets, prepare analysis-ready data.

Design and operate bounded multi-agent workflows with task decomposition, dependency graphs, ownership, handoff contracts, shared-state controls, approvals, recovery, and synthesis. Use when a task contains genuinely independent workstreams, specialized roles, parallel research or implementation, reviewer-worker loops, or coordination problems that one agent should not execute sequentially.

VS-Enhanced Evidence Quality Appraiser - Prevents Mode Collapse with context-adaptive quality assessment Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Avoids automatic tool application, delivers research-specific evaluation strategies Use when: appraising study quality, assessing risk of bias, grading evidence Triggers: quality appraisal, RoB, GRADE, Newcastle-Ottawa, risk of bias, methodological quality

Multi-source recency research skill that takes the pulse of any topic across Reddit, Hacker News, the open web, and optionally X/Twitter within a configurable recent window (default 30 days). Forcing intake clarifies topic specificity, angle (trend/sentiment/problems/opportunities/comparison), time window, and platform scope before searching. Returns a synthesized briefing with citations, engagement metrics, and cross-platform pattern analysis. Triggers: 'pulse on [topic]', 'what's happening with [topic]', 'what are people saying about [topic]', 'current conversation about [topic]', 'take the pulse of [topic]', 'trending: [topic]', 'find me info on [topic]', or any variation requesting multi-source recency intelligence on a topic. Also use for competitor research, trend discovery, tool comparisons, and audience sentiment analysis.

Multi-source recency research skill that takes the pulse of any topic across Reddit, Hacker News, the open web, and optionally X/Twitter within a configurable recent window (default 30 days). Forcing intake clarifies topic specificity, angle (trend/sentiment/problems/opportunities/comparison), time window, and platform scope before searching. Returns a synthesized briefing with citations, engagement metrics, and cross-platform pattern analysis. Use when the user requests multi-source recency intelligence on a topic (e.g., 'pulse on [topic]', 'what's happening with [topic]', 'what are people saying about [topic]', 'current conversation about [topic]', 'take the pulse of [topic]', 'trending: [topic]', 'find me info on [topic]'), and for competitor research, trend discovery, tool comparisons, and audience sentiment analysis.

Filters the last 24 hours of Hugging Face Papers to surface one must-read paper with a structured brief covering the central claim, why it's worth an hour, where it might be wrong, and a time-budgeted read order.

Use when planning an IEEE ICDE project timeline around the two-round-per-edition calendar, choosing between the June and November research deadlines, budgeting for a possible revise-and-resubmit window, and backward-planning a data-engineering systems paper from CMT submission through review, camera-ready, and IEEE Xplore publication.

Mine LITCOIN — a proof-of-comprehension and proof-of-research cryptocurrency on Base. Use when the user wants to mine crypto with AI, earn tokens through reading comprehension or solving optimization problems, stake LITCOIN, open vaults, mint LITCREDIT, manage mining guilds, deploy autonomous agents, or interact with the LITCOIN DeFi protocol.

Layer 1a of the keyword research pipeline. Generates seed keywords (broad niche terms) and modifiers (best, how-to, vs, calculator, etc.) from brand-config so the keyword multiplier has a real foundation to expand from. Replaces the "AI gives you generic keywords" problem with the structured 10-second hero prompt.

Systematic Review Pipeline Orchestrator - Coordinates systematic literature review automation Manages the complete 7-stage PRISMA 2020 pipeline from research question to RAG system Delegates to specialized agents (I1, I2, I3) while enforcing human checkpoints Use when: conducting systematic reviews, building knowledge repositories, PRISMA automation Triggers: systematic review, PRISMA, literature review automation

Use when planning a COLM submission campaign across the calendar — working backward from the late-March abstract and paper deadlines through the May-June rebuttal, July decisions, August camera-ready, and October conference, coordinating co-authors, compute, and reciprocal-reviewing duties, and slotting COLM into a multi-venue LM-research pipeline.