Results for “prd”

Guides users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation, proposals, technical specs, and decision docs across three stages: context gathering, iterative refinement, and reader testing.

Creates detailed technical implementation plans for features based on a Feature PRD, including system architecture, database schema, API design, and frontend component hierarchy.

围绕具体产品、产品想法或存量方案，产出用于产品进入、定位、竞争策略、上市路径、能力建设与路线图决策的证据型分析报告。适用于“值不值得做或发布”“进入哪个细分”“目标用户和市场是否成立”“竞品为何这样设计”“该借鉴、差异化或放弃什么”“核心能力与 Roadmap 怎么定”“如何调整已有产品”等请求，也适用于将用户研究、市场信息、竞品实测、内部资料和业务约束整合为决策建议。支持 0→1、存量产品调整、竞品专项与组合分析；默认交付为可独立阅读的飞书云文档，并用正文内 HTML5 block 呈现必要的产品定位图或能力路线图。不用于只需罗列功能、直接撰写实施 PRD，或在缺少依据时给出确定性预测的任务。

PIV workflow orchestrator - Plan, Implement, Validate loop for systematic multi-phase software development. Use when building features phase-by-phase with PRPs, automated validation loops, or multi-agent orchestration. Supports PRD creation, PRP generation, codebase analysis, and iterative execution with validation.

Break a plan, spec, or PRD into independently-grabbable issues on the project issue tracker using tracer-bullet vertical slices. Use when user wants to convert a plan into issues, create implementation tickets, or break down work into issues.

Co-author structured documents (specs, PRDs, RFCs) through a 3-stage workflow: context gathering, drafting, and reader testing. Use when writing proposals, technical specs, or similar structured content. Repo decision-memory system (INDEX.md, rejected alternatives, agent rules) → docs-adr.

Break a plan, spec, or PRD into independently-grabbable issues on the project issue tracker using tracer-bullet vertical slices. Use when user wants to convert a plan into issues, create implementation tickets, or break down work into issues.

Automatically maintain skill library consistency whenever a structural change occurs — new skill added, skill renamed, skill deprecated, call graph rewired, or category changed. Updates SKILL-INDEX.md, AGENTS.md, README.md, skill graph, docs/prd/PRD.md, and docs/architecture.md. Load when universal-skill-creator finishes creating a skill, split-skill extracts a child, deprecate-skill retires a skill, improve-skills makes a structural change, or the user manually renames or restructures skills. Also triggers on "update the skill index", "sync skill references", "refresh the skill graph", "fix broken skill cross-references", or "update docs after skill change".

Takes a PRD, reference URL, screenshot, or keywords to produce a DESIGN.md specification, then generates production-ready web code that meets UI/UX, visual, motion, and responsive standards.

专家团总路由器。用于 Codex CLI 的 $expert-team 调用。 自动在软件开发团队、设计原型专家团、产品战略团队、基础设施运维专家、安全专家和数据库优化专家之间路由，也支持显式指定 software/design/product/ops/security/database。 触发词：专家团、团队协作、软件开发、设计原型、产品战略、基础设施运维、安全专家、数据库专家、威胁建模、代码审计、SRE、PRD、竞品、路线图、监控、部署、安全加固、SQL、索引、慢查询、迁移

Guides the agent to act as a product manager, collecting context, proposing three requirement plans (bug fix, new feature, iteration), scoring them by ROI, and recommending one with an MVP slice and timeline.

Breaks a plan, spec, PRD, or conversation into independently-grabbable GitHub issues using tracer-bullet vertical slices, then publishes them as native sub-issues under a parent tracking issue via the gh CLI.

Use when delivery work needs structuring into epics — defining a new epic, refining or superseding an existing one, or decomposing a PRD's requirements into durable delivery structures that feed issue decomposition. Writes docs/product/epics/NN-<slug>.md (durable, id-stable, superseded-never-deleted), each epic tracing to the JTBD ids it serves and the PRD requirement IDs it bundles. In the A-Team pipeline this is a definition-phase output ("the Epics"). Do not use for full roadmap/portfolio planning across quarters (deliberately not ported), for delivery tickets or acceptance criteria (ticket-writer), or to create or revise jobs (jobs-to-be-done).

Reviews a product document (PRD, spec, design brief) BEFORE implementation to surface holes — undefined edge cases, missing states, policy gaps — by attacking what the document is SILENT about (things unwritten, and things written only for the happy path). Acts as a strict "sign-off manager," ruling Approve / Conditional / Reject and producing a polite, forwardable question list. Works for planners/PMs (self-review before sharing), engineers (blocking questions before coding), and designers (screen states with no mockup). Use whenever the user wants a spec/PRD/plan/brief checked for readiness or gaps, or says "review this spec", "find holes in this PRD", "poke holes in this", "is this plan good to build?", "can I start implementing this?", "what states/edge cases am I missing?", "what should I ask the PM before coding?", "run devil", or pastes/links a planning document and asks whether it's ready to act on. Do NOT use it to: write or draft a new spec, summarize or translate a document, estimate/break down tic

Turn raw ideas into one clear pre-planning concept artifact by choosing the right framing mode: problem framing, audience and value framing, concept shaping, game concept framing, or story packaging. Use when the user needs the next artifact before PRDs, sprint plans, launch execution, or game-production routing.

Agente final do time Code New Project Agents do Reversa. Decompõe um PRD em componentes lógicos e gera specs SDD (Spec-Driven Development) por componente, com score automático de qualidade. Use quando o usuário digitar "/reversa-spec-sdd", "reversa-spec-sdd" ou quando invocado pelo orquestrador `/reversa-new`. Lê `_reversa_sdd/prd.md` e produz `_reversa_sdd/sdd/<componente>.md`. Ao concluir, faz handoff para `/reversa-forward`. Também pode ser usado avulso para avaliar uma spec existente (modo de avaliação) ou para gerar spec única a partir de qualquer entrada que o usuário forneça. Entrega: arquivos `.md` no formato SDD com score de qualidade (0 a 100) e análise de gaps.

Write a Product Soul document — the strategic north star that sits above any PRD or feature spec. Captures the product's reason for existing across five lenses: user, business, strategy, product-market fit, and GTM distribution. Load when the user asks to write a product soul, product strategy doc, product north star, product positioning doc, product one-pager, or "why we exist" document. Also triggers on "write the soul of this product", "product strategy document", "what is this product really about", "capture the product vision", or when an agent needs strategic context before making product decisions. The output is docs/product-soul.md — a living document that brainstorming, prd-writing, and inversion can reference for grounding.

Run a pre-mortem risk analysis on a PRD or launch plan. Categorizes risks as Tigers (real problems), Paper Tigers (overblown concerns), and Elephants (unspoken worries), then classifies as launch-blocking, fast-follow, or track. Use when preparing for launch, stress-testing a product plan, or identifying what could go wrong.

Packet-first BMAD/BMM front door for idea notes, product briefs, PRDs, architecture drafts, review feedback, existing repo state, and milestone pressure. Use when the user wants to know what BMAD phase or artifact comes next, or needs a portable BMAD entrypoint before routing review, execution slicing, runtime setup, or game-production work outward.

Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up. References existing artifacts (PRDs, plans, ADRs, issues, commits, diffs) by path or URL instead of duplicating them. Use when user wants to hand off the conversation to a fresh agent or starts a new session that picks up prior work.

Expert product analytics advisor for Senior PMs. Use when defining success metrics for a PRD, designing an A/B experiment, setting up an analytics tracking plan, analyzing post-launch impact, or when data exists but there's no clarity on what to measure. Produces structured metrics frameworks that connect to product decisions, not dashboards.

Use when a project's durable context needs to be seeded or refreshed — creating or updating docs/product/context.md (overview + digest + source index + glossary + Know/Don't-Know ledger + design context + technical context) in the target repo; when a project has no context layer yet (Stage-0 setup); when domain terminology is still forming or has drifted; after a meeting, new evidence batch, or scope change that outdates the current context. Also use to ingest new docs/product/input/ batches into the digest. Do not use for repo scaffolding or CI setup, for writing the discovery plan, PRD, or epics (use discovery-plan, prd-writer, epics), or for creating or revising Jobs to be Done — this skill records finished JTBDs by id and marks missing ones TBD; jobs-to-be-done owns minting them.

Orquestrador do time Code New Project Agents do Reversa. Conduz o pipeline greenfield, partindo de uma ideia em linguagem natural e produzindo brainstorm, personas, PRD e specs SDD em `_reversa_sdd/`. Use quando o usuário digitar "/reversa-new", "reversa-new", "começar projeto novo", "criar projeto do zero" ou pedir para iniciar um produto greenfield. Não escreve código de aplicação, apenas specs.

Creates an outcome-backed product strategy memo from an Ideal Customer Profile markdown file, pasted ICP notes, discovery artifacts, product context, or PRD context. Use when asked to create product strategy, convert an UX Discovery and ICP into strategy, define vision-to-outcome strategy, turn discovery into strategic bets, clarify target customer outcomes, evaluate roadmap strategy, or avoid feature-factory planning.

Creates concise early UX discovery artifacts for PRD development, customer development, new product ideas, feature bets, and redesigns. Use when the user asks to hypothesize an ideal customer profile, generate proto-personas, write customer problem or jobs-to-be-done hypotheses, create journey maps, shape value propositions, or turn product context into design-sprint-style customer insight artifacts for product and engineering teams.

Produces a plain-language stakeholder summary from an existing feature specification, for sharing with non-technical stakeholders before implementation kicks off. Use when the user wants to draft a stakeholder summary, executive summary, or business summary of a feature spec or PRD. Does not write the spec itself — use plan-a-feature. Does not sequence the build into phases — use plan-a-phased-build. Does not produce an implementation plan — use plan-implementation.

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/PRD asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

Create a detailed, step-by-step implementation plan for a feature or project. Load when the user asks to plan a feature, create a technical roadmap, break down a PRD into tasks, design an implementation strategy, or sequence engineering work. Also triggers on "how should we build this", "implementation plan for", "technical breakdown", "task list for", or any request to turn a high-level requirement into a concrete execution plan. Supports phased rollouts, architecture-first, and MVP-focused planning.

Routing-first visual approval gate for AI agent plans, markdown specs, and diffs. Use when a human needs to review a concrete plan before execution, inspect a targeted diff in a browser, mark up a spec/PRD/architecture note, or set up the review loop on Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Codex CLI, or OpenCode. Route planning/spec creation to `task-planning` or `ralph`, broad PR-policy review to `code-review`, rendered-UI critique to `agentation`, and fresh-session browser verification to `browser-harness`.

Create OR review a page-brief — the artifact BETWEEN a wireflow and the full PRD. It turns each unique page/screen of a product into documented requirements TIED TO JOBS: a self-contained board card per page (what the page is accountable for, the job-tagged checklist of what it must let you do, the journeys it appears in, what it connects to, and the acceptance criteria that say how you'd know it's right). It is the "PRD per page", not a sitemap — and it stops ABOVE the screen: no components, no layout, no hierarchy. Use whenever the user wants to "spec the pages", "document each screen", turn a wireflow + live design into per-page requirements, or asks "what does this page need to do / which jobs pass through it" — even if they never say "page-brief". Natural NEXT STEP after the wireflow skill. ALSO use it to REVIEW an existing page-brief / screen catalog. In the A-Team pipeline this is a definition-phase skill: output lands in docs/features/<slug>/briefs/pages/, job codes are the durable [[NN]] ids from doc

Multi-agent autonomous startup system for Claude Code. Triggers on "Loki Mode". Orchestrates 100+ specialized agents across engineering, QA, DevOps, security, data/ML, business operations, marketing, HR, and customer success. Takes PRD to fully deployed, revenue-generating product with zero human intervention. Features Task tool for subagent dispatch, parallel code review with 3 specialized reviewers, severity-based issue triage, distributed task queue with dead letter handling, automatic deployment to cloud providers, A/B testing, customer feedback loops, incident response, circuit breakers, and self-healing. Handles rate limits via distributed state checkpoints and auto-resume with exponential backoff. Requires --dangerously-skip-permissions flag.

Multi-agent autonomous startup system for Claude Code. Triggers on "Loki Mode". Orchestrates 100+ specialized agents across engineering, QA, DevOps, security, data/ML, business operations, marketing, HR, and customer success. Takes PRD to fully deployed, revenue-generating product with zero human intervention. Features Task tool for subagent dispatch, parallel code review with 3 specialized reviewers, severity-based issue triage, distributed task queue with dead letter handling, automatic deployment to cloud providers, A/B testing, customer feedback loops, incident response, circuit breakers, and self-healing. Handles rate limits via distributed state checkpoints and auto-resume with exponential backoff. Requires --dangerously-skip-permissions flag.

Multi-agent autonomous startup system for Claude Code. Triggers on "Loki Mode". Orchestrates 100+ specialized agents across engineering, QA, DevOps, security, data/ML, business operations, marketing, HR, and customer success. Takes PRD to fully deployed, revenue-generating product with zero human intervention. Features Task tool for subagent dispatch, parallel code review with 3 specialized reviewers, severity-based issue triage, distributed task queue with dead letter handling, automatic deployment to cloud providers, A/B testing, customer feedback loops, incident response, circuit breakers, and self-healing. Handles rate limits via distributed state checkpoints and auto-resume with exponential backoff. Requires --dangerously-skip-permissions flag.

Generate a tailored AGENTS.md for any new project by interviewing the user about their skill gaps, project goals, and tech context. Load when the user asks to set up a project, initialize agents, create an AGENTS.md, bootstrap a repo, onboard agents to a codebase, or says "set up this project for agents". Also triggers on "write an AGENTS.md for this project", "configure agents for my repo", "project bootstrap", "agent onboarding", or when the user starts a new project and needs agent-ready configuration. Re-run when new context arrives (PRD written, stack changes, team changes) to update the AGENTS.md.

Set a deliberate visual direction before any UI is built — the single biggest lever against generic AI output. Derives a posture from product-soul/PRD/specs, scores a curated archetype palette, then generates 2-3 GENUINELY DISTINCT directions and compares them side-by-side before committing to one. Load when the user asks to pick an aesthetic, choose a design direction, decide what a UI should feel like, explore visual options, says "what should this look like", "make it feel like [Linear/Apple/ Duolingo]", "give me design directions", "explore some looks", or when frontend-design routes here. Replaces design-archetype. Sub-skill of frontend-design.

Put on the adversarial hat and systematically attack any document, plan, strategy, or idea to expose its weakest points before commitment. Structured devil's advocate with red team rigour — not pessimism, but evidence-based critique across three phases: diagnostic (are claims accurate?), creative (is the problem artificially constrained?), challenge (are solutions robust?). Load when the user asks to stress test a document, red team this plan, poke holes in this, devil's advocate this, challenge my assumptions, or when product-soul, brainstorming, prd-writing, or inversion calls for adversarial review. Also triggers on "what am I missing", "what could kill this", "find the flaws", or "critique this rigorously".