brycewang-stanford

@brycewang-stanford source repo

5.3k skills
0 followers
1k repo stars
3 weeks ago last updated

▌
Ijoc Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when calibrating expectations for the INFORMS Journal on Computing (IJOC) review cycle — the Area-Editor desk-reject gate, the undisclosed associate editor, single-blind reviewing, decision types, and whether a sibling journal fits better. Sets expectations and strategy; it does not draft the rebuttal (see ijoc-rebuttal).

1k repo stars
▌
Ijoc Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when the computational exhibits — performance profiles, runtime-vs-size plots, and results tables — are dense, misleading, or do not answer the question for an INFORMS Journal on Computing (IJOC) manuscript. Designs exhibits that make the computational claim legible; it does not generate the underlying results.

1k repo stars
▌
Ier Identification · brycewang-stanford
Use when the identification argument is the bottleneck for an International Economic Review (IER) manuscript — structural parameter identification, empirical causal identification, or for a theory result, what makes it tightly pinned. Stress-tests the data-to-object mapping to IER's rigor bar; it does not run the estimation.

1k repo stars
▌
Ier Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when exhibits in an International Economic Review (IER) manuscript are dense, do not carry the argument, or do not present structural/theory results well. Makes each exhibit answer one question; it does not generate the data.

1k repo stars
▌
Jae Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when planning revisions and drafting the point-by-point response for a Journal of Accounting and Economics (JAE) revise-and-resubmit — prioritizing the editor's identification and contribution concerns, satisfying economics-trained reviewers with new tests, and noting that resubmissions carry no submission fee.

1k repo stars
▌
Jae Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which jae-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Journal of Accounting and Economics (JAE) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Jar Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when running and reporting the empirical-archival analysis for a Journal of Accounting Research (JAR) manuscript — standard-error clustering, endogeneity execution, construct measurement, and the robustness battery referees expect, plus the reproducible data-and-code package JAR requires. Executes and reports; it does not choose the identification strategy (jar-methods) or frame the contribution (jar-contribution-framing).

1k repo stars
▌
Jar Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when polishing the prose of a Journal of Accounting Research (JAR) manuscript — a design-forward, economically literate style that states the question, setting, and identification early and reads like recent empirical-archival accounting papers. Polishes prose and house style; it does not build the contribution (jar-contribution-framing) or format exhibits (jar-tables-figures).

1k repo stars
▌
Joap Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when analyzing and reporting results for a Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) manuscript using SEM, multilevel (HLM) models, mediation/moderation, or meta-analysis. JAP requires effect sizes with confidence intervals, model-based indirect effects with bootstrap CIs, fit indices, full disclosure, and a clean confirmatory/exploratory split. Guides analysis norms; it does not fabricate results.

1k repo stars
▌
Joap Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or polishing a Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) manuscript to fit APA 7th-edition style, the I-O contribution-forward narrative arc, and the article-type length norms (Feature Article commensurate with contribution; tighter Research Report). Tightens prose, structure, and style; it does not invent content.

1k repo stars
▌
Jbf Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when building or auditing the empirical data and estimation pipeline for a Journal of Banking & Finance manuscript, including financial datasets, bank panels, winsorization, fixed effects, robustness, and reproducible scripts.

1k repo stars
▌
Jbf Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when polishing Journal of Banking & Finance prose, structure, abstracts, introductions, variable definitions, result paragraphs, and Elsevier numbered-reference readiness for a concise finance-journal manuscript.

1k repo stars
▌
Jbv Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when understanding how the Journal of Business Venturing (JBV) review process works — Co-EIC / area-editor routing, double-anonymized review by a minimum of two reviewers, desk-reject risk for off-phenomenon work, and reading a JBV decision letter. Explains the process and reads the letter; the response is drafted with jbv-rebuttal.

1k repo stars
▌
Jbv Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building or cleaning the exhibits for a Journal of Business Venturing (JBV) manuscript — venture descriptive/correlation tables, survival curves, interaction plots, process models, and qualitative data structures in Elsevier house style. Late-stage polish; do not invoke while the entrepreneurial mechanism or identification is still unsettled (use jbv-theory-development / jbv-data-analysis first).

1k repo stars
▌
Jcp Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when analyzing experimental data for a Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) manuscript — ANOVA/regression on the effect, measured and experimental mediation, moderation and moderated mediation, measurement of the process, and the rigor-era reporting standards. Analyzes the studies; it does not design them (jcp-methods).

1k repo stars
▌
Jcp Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when writing or revising the prose of a Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) manuscript — the process-led intro, the abstract, the theory build, and the APA-style voice — so the mechanism, not the effect, is the story. Polishes the writing; it does not change the design or analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Jcr Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when shaping or stress-testing a research question for the Journal of Consumer Research (JCR) — confirming it is a genuine consumer-behavior question with a conceptual contribution, and that JCR (not JCP, JMR, or JM) is the right venue.

1k repo stars
▌
Jcf Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when judging whether a corporate-finance question fits the Journal of Corporate Finance (JCF) and whether it suits a full-length or "shorter format" paper. Helps scope the idea to JCF's empirical/theoretical corporate-finance remit; it does not run analysis or draft text.

1k repo stars
▌
Joe Contribution Framing · brycewang-stanford
Use when a Journal of Econometrics (JoE) manuscript has a correct result but fails to articulate why it matters to econometrics. Frames the methodological contribution as a general, reusable advance rather than a narrow technical fix.

1k repo stars
▌
Jegeo Theory Model · brycewang-stanford
Use when the model or conceptual frame is the bottleneck for a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) manuscript — NEG / quantitative-spatial models OR conceptual frameworks from human geography. Makes the mechanism legible to both communities; it does not invent results.

1k repo stars
▌
Jel Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when revising a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey for the JEL voice — authoritative, accessible to non-specialist economists, long-form, signposted, with a strong opening and abstract. Polishes prose and structure; it does not design the framework (jel-organizing-framework) or assign codes (jel-classification-system).

1k repo stars
▌
Jfe Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when the prose of a Journal of Financial Economics (JFE) manuscript needs to reach the journal's register — precise, evidence-forward, and free of hedging or overclaiming. Polishes language and structure; it does not change the empirics or the contribution.

1k repo stars
▌
Jfi Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when planning an R&R response letter for the Journal of Financial Intermediation (JFI) — single-blind review where referees know you, often a small number of expert reports, a narrow appeal path, and pushback centered on the intermediation channel. It structures the response; it does not fabricate results.

1k repo stars
▌
Jfi Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when routing a Journal of Financial Intermediation (JFI) manuscript through its lifecycle — given where you are in the banking/intermediation paper pipeline, it names the next jfi-* skill to invoke and separates the theory-led path from the empirics-led path. It coordinates; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Jfm Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether a question belongs at the Journal of Financial Markets (JFM) — i.e., whether it is genuinely about market microstructure / how markets trade rather than broad asset pricing or corporate finance. Scopes and reroutes; it does not invent evidence or citations.

1k repo stars
▌
Jfr Identification · brycewang-stanford
Use when the identification strategy is the bottleneck for a 《金融研究》 (Journal of Financial Research) manuscript — policy shocks (MPA / 资管新规 / LPR / 注册制), high-frequency monetary-policy surprises, DID, IV, RDD — stress-testing the design before drafting tables.

1k repo stars
▌
Jfr Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use to finalize the main tables and figures of a 《金融研究》 (Journal of Financial Research) manuscript to journal house style — trimming over-wide regression tables, standardizing significance/standard-error notes, and ensuring continuous numbering of tables, figures, equations, and footnotes.

1k repo stars
▌
Jhe Referee Strategy · brycewang-stanford
Use when pre-morteming a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) manuscript against the objections its health-economist referees raise before submission. Anticipates and disarms likely pushback; it does not draft the response letter after a decision (jhe-rebuttal) or run the submission preflight.

1k repo stars
▌
Jle Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether a law-and-economics project belongs at The Journal of Law and Economics (JLE) rather than the Journal of Legal Studies, JLEO, or the American Law and Economics Review, and what its central legal/regulatory question should be. Sets venue fit and question scope; it does not design the identification (see jle-identification).

1k repo stars
▌
Jmgmt Contribution Framing · brycewang-stanford
Use when turning results into an explicit theoretical contribution for a Journal of Management (JOM) manuscript — the "what new theory do we learn?" statement and the discussion section. Frames the contribution; it does not build the original theory (jmgmt-theory-development) or run the analysis (jmgmt-data-analysis).

1k repo stars
▌
Jms Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when you need to understand or set expectations for the Journal of Management Studies (JMS) editorial and peer-review process — desk screening, double-blind developmental review, and reading a decision letter. Explains the process and how to read decisions; it does not draft the response letter (jms-rebuttal).

1k repo stars
▌
Jms Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when exhibits are the bottleneck for a Journal of Management Studies (JMS) manuscript — regression/SEM tables and interaction plots for quantitative work, and data-structure, representative-quotes, and process-model figures for qualitative work. Builds and audits exhibits; it does not run the analysis (jms-data-analysis) or polish prose (jms-writing-style).

1k repo stars
▌
Mw Literature Review · brycewang-stanford
用于撰写或修改《管理世界》稿件的文献综述章节，建立国际脉络—本土研究—本文位置的三层对话式结构。Use when 中英文文献配比失衡、综述写成罗列式而非对话式、缺关键中文经典综述（《管理世界》《经济研究》《中国工业经济》同主题积累）、或审稿人指出本土文献覆盖不足时使用。锚定《管理世界》国务院发展研究中心主办、管理学与经济学并重、国家战略导向的三层综述规范、中英文配比阈值与本刊审稿期待，确保综述与边际贡献四句式首尾呼应。本技能服务于《管理世界》(Management World, MW)。

1k repo stars
▌
Jmr Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when understanding how the Journal of Marketing Research (JMR) review process works — initial editorial evaluation and possible desk rejection, double-anonymized review, the EIC-plus-Coeditor domain-routing model, the requirement of two independent reviews to reach a Revise/Accept decision, and how to read a JMR decision letter. Sets expectations; jmr-rebuttal drafts the response.

1k repo stars
▌
Jmr Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building exhibits for a Journal of Marketing Research (JMR) manuscript — result tables, study-flow figures, interaction plots, and model summaries in AMA style, and deciding the split between main-text exhibits (inside the 50-page limit) and 'W'-prefixed Web Appendix exhibits (outside it). Enforces JMR's exact-statistics conventions inside every table.

1k repo stars
▌
Jmf Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when executing and reporting the analysis for a Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) manuscript so it survives expert double-blind review — honest uncertainty, robustness, attention to selection and non-independence, and correct handling of complex-survey, longitudinal, and dyadic data. Guides analysis norms; it does not fabricate results.

1k repo stars
▌
Jmf Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or polishing a Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) manuscript so it reads for an interdisciplinary family-science audience, follows modified APA style, includes the structured abstract (~200-225 words; Objective / Background / Method / Results / Conclusion / Implications), uses bias-free language, and fits the page limit. Tightens prose and format; it does not invent content.

1k repo stars
▌
Jme Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when you need to understand how the Journal of Monetary Economics (JME) review process actually works — single anonymized (single-blind) review with at least two reviewers, the distinctive "up or out" first-revision rule, the ~50% publication-likelihood threshold for an R&R, suggested referees, and reconsideration.

1k repo stars
▌
Jme Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing the main-text exhibits of a Journal of Monetary Economics (JME) manuscript under the strict 40-page / no-more-than-10-tables-and-figures-combined cap — impulse-response plots, FEVDs, moment tables — and deciding what to push to the online supplementary appendix.

1k repo stars
▌
Jpe Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when scoping or framing a research question for a Journal of Political Economy (JPE) manuscript and you need to test whether it is "JPE-shaped" — i.e., a mechanism-driven economic question, not an atheoretical correlation. Diagnoses fit and frames the contribution; it does not design the empirics.

1k repo stars
▌
Jpube Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when you need to understand or plan around the Journal of Public Economics (JPubE / JPubEc) editorial process — single anonymized review with a minimum of two reviewers, the Editorial Manager workflow, the Hendren–Kopczuk editorial leadership, SSRN preprint option, and the one-appeal policy. Explains the process; for the final file check use jpube-submission.

1k repo stars
▌
Jpube Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing the exhibits for a Journal of Public Economics (JPubE) manuscript — bunching density plots, event-study and RD/RKD graphs, incidence and distributional figures, and self-contained tables. Makes the public-finance design visible; it does not run the analysis (use jpube-data-analysis).

1k repo stars
▌
Jru Theory Model · brycewang-stanford
Use when the decision-theoretic representation is the bottleneck for a Journal of Risk and Uncertainty (JRU) manuscript — axioms, functional form, and behavioral content for choice under risk or uncertainty. Strengthens the model; it does not invent evidence or citations.

1k repo stars
▌
Jwe Topic International · brycewang-stanford
Use to sharpen a 《世界经济》 (The Journal of World Economy) topic into a causal question seen through an international / open-economy lens — turning a vague "global" angle into a well-posed open-economy treatment-effect or general-equilibrium question. Use after fit is confirmed, before the literature review.

1k repo stars
▌
Lang Research Design · brycewang-stanford
Use when defending the empirical design of a Language (LSA) manuscript on the terms of its subfield — elicitation and fieldwork, corpus construction, phonetic measurement, experiment, or the diachronic/typological sample. Language judges each kind of evidence by its own standards, and the design must support the theoretical claim. Defends the design; it does not run the analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Lang Theory Building · brycewang-stanford
Use when turning a linguistic pattern into a theoretically grounded claim for a Language (LSA) manuscript — an analysis with explicit assumptions, observable predictions, and engagement across competing frameworks rather than inside one formalism. Structures the argument; it does not gloss data or run the statistics.

1k repo stars
▌
Lang Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether a linguistics project fits Language (Linguistic Society of America) and how to frame it. Language is a generalist flagship spanning every subfield; the test is a theoretically grounded contribution legible to the whole discipline, not a description of one language or a result inside one framework. Helps frame the question; it does not collect or gloss data.

1k repo stars
▌
Orgsci Contribution Framing · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting the mandatory <500-word contribution statement and the discussion section for an Organization Science manuscript — articulating the overall contribution to organization research from any of the journal's accepted sources, not novelty for its own sake. This is the single most decisive skill for desk-survival at this venue.

1k repo stars
▌
Pom Methods · brycewang-stanford
Use when selecting or auditing the method for a Production and Operations Management (POM) manuscript — analytical modeling (optimization, stochastic models, game theory), empirical identification, behavioral experiments, simulation, or operations data science. Matches method to the operations question; it does not execute the analysis (pom-data-analysis).

1k repo stars
▌
Psychbull Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether a question is review-worthy and meta-analyzable for Psychological Bulletin and which synthesis type fits (meta-analysis, systematic review, meta-review/meta-synthesis, qualitative review). Tests fit for an APA research-synthesis flagship; it does not write the review.

1k repo stars
▌
Psci Theory And Hypotheses · brycewang-stanford
Use when stating the theory and hypotheses for a Psychological Science manuscript. The journal's credibility norms require a clear separation of confirmatory (preregistered) from exploratory analyses and theory stated before results. Structures the argument; it does not run analyses.

1k repo stars
▌
Pubar Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when executing and reporting the analysis for a Public Administration Review (PAR) manuscript so it survives expert, double-blind review and supports honest Evidence for Practice — uncertainty, robustness, and triangulation appropriate to quantitative, experimental, or mixed work. Guides analysis norms; it does not fabricate results.

1k repo stars
▌
Pubar Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or polishing a Public Administration Review (PAR) manuscript so it reads for scholars AND practitioners, carries strong Evidence for Practice, and fits the limits (≤ 8,000 words incl. abstract/endnotes/references; abstract ≤ 150 words). Tightens prose and format; it does not invent content.

1k repo stars
▌
Qe Literature Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use to stake a Quantitative Economics (QE) manuscript's contribution against the frontier — what quantitative gap it closes relative to prior empirical, structural, and methodological work, and against its Econometric Society siblings. Positions the paper; it does not write a standalone literature survey.

1k repo stars
▌
Qje Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when polishing prose, abstract, and introduction for a Quarterly Journal of Economics (QJE) manuscript so the big idea lands fast for a general-interest reader. Reflects QJE's house style — long, ambitious, narrative-driven empirical papers. Polishes exposition; it does not change results or design.

1k repo stars
▌
Restud Identification · brycewang-stanford
Use when selecting, implementing, or stress-testing the causal identification strategy for an empirical The Review of Economic Studies (REStud) manuscript — DID (incl. staggered), IV (incl. weak-IV-robust inference), RDD, synthetic control, shift-share, or RCT. Apply before writing results; for theory papers route to restud-theory-model.

1k repo stars
▌
Restud Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when the exhibits in a The Review of Economic Studies (REStud) manuscript need to be made publication-grade — regression tables that are oversized or footnote-bloated, or figures that do not carry the result. Finalizes exhibits to REStud house standard; does not run the underlying analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Revedres Revision · brycewang-stanford
Use when an editor/reviewer decision letter arrives on a Review of Educational Research (RER) review or meta-analysis and you must plan the revision and response. Turns the letter into action and a point-by-point reply; it does not run the submission preflight (revedres-submission) or re-architect the framework from scratch (revedres-organizing-framework).

1k repo stars
▌
Revedres Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which revedres-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a systematic review, meta-analysis, or critical integrative synthesis from question-scoping through revision for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Rfs Empirical Design · brycewang-stanford
Use when sample construction, estimator choice, factor/portfolio design, or measurement is the bottleneck for a The Review of Financial Studies (RFS) manuscript. Settles design choices that make the identification credible; does NOT pick the identification strategy or run robustness.

1k repo stars
▌
Rfs Referee Strategy · brycewang-stanford
Use when choosing suggested/opposed referees or running an objection pre-mortem before submitting a The Review of Financial Studies (RFS) manuscript. Anticipates reviewer concerns; does NOT write the rebuttal (that is rfs-rebuttal).

1k repo stars
▌
Ssi Review Process · brycewang-stanford
当需要理解《中国科学：信息科学》(Scientia Sinica Informationis, SSI) 的审稿流程、校准评审预期、判断作者在各环节的可行动空间时调用。覆盖编辑部初审→编委送外审→外审专家评议→复审→主编/编委会终审的链路、三审三校制度（报道级，以官网为准）、审稿原则（公平公正公开客观）、退修（大修/小修）与录用/退稿决定、90 天未获意见可改投的条款、审稿周期与轮次，以及与英文姊妹刊 Science China Information Sciences 评审的异同。适用于投稿后到录用前的全过程校准。

1k repo stars
▌
Ssc Literature Dialogue · brycewang-stanford
Use when building or fixing the literature review for 《中国社会科学》 (Social Sciences in China) — entering the theoretical lineage (classic authors and schools) rather than piling up recent empirical citations, and positioning the paper as a move within an ongoing scholarly conversation. Use when references are a variable-list instead of a theory dialogue.

1k repo stars
▌
Ssc Theory Contribution · brycewang-stanford
Use when articulating the original theoretical contribution for 《中国社会科学》 (Social Sciences in China) — turning empirical findings into a concept / proposition / analytical framework, and positioning the work within China's autonomous knowledge system (自主知识体系) rather than verifying imported theory. Use when the contribution still reads as "we find that X affects Y".

1k repo stars
▌
Smr Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final Sociological Methods & Research (SMR) pre-submission check for ScholarOne — double-anonymization, separate title page, ASA style, ≤150-word non-parenthetical abstract, data-and-code availability statement, AI disclosure, and file formats. Preflights the submission; does not draft the science.

1k repo stars
▌
Smj Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when scoping or pressure-testing whether a research question is a genuine *strategy* question fit for the Strategic Management Journal (SMJ). Decides fit and sharpens the question; it does not build the theory or run analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Tar Literature Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use when the front end of a The Accounting Review (TAR) manuscript reads as gap-spotting or an incremental database extension — positioning the paper inside a live accounting conversation against the closest TAR/JAR/JAE/CAR work. Positions the contribution; it does not derive the mechanism (tar-theory-development) or write the contribution paragraph (tar-contribution-framing).

1k repo stars
▌
Wber Referee Strategy · brycewang-stanford
Use when anticipating referee and editor objections before submitting to The World Bank Economic Review (WBER) — pre-empting the predictable development-economics pushbacks (external validity, identification, data quality, policy relevance) and writing the cover letter. Plans defenses; it does not run new analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Amann Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when planning around the two-step proposal→invited-review process of the Academy of Management Annals (Annals) — the twice-yearly proposal cadence, double-blind proposal review, the editor-only full-review development, and timelines. Explains the process; it does not write the proposal (amann-proposal-framing) or run the portal preflight (amann-submission).

1k repo stars
▌
Amann Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building exhibits for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review — the signature framework figure, who-studied-what synthesis tables, and search/coverage exhibits that summarize across a literature. Designs review exhibits; it does not produce original-estimate regression tables (an Annals review reports no new data of its own).

1k repo stars
▌
Amj Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when scoping or sanity-checking a research question for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — fit, theory-drivenness, and feasibility. Decides whether the idea can earn a theoretical contribution; it does not build the theory itself (use amj-theory-development) or position the literature (amj-literature-positioning).

1k repo stars
▌
Aos Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) revise-and-resubmit arrives — planning revisions that may include recoding field data, new experimental conditions, or deepened theorizing, and drafting the point-by-point response to an interdisciplinary reviewer panel. Drafts the response; it does not run new analysis (aos-data-analysis) or the final preflight (aos-submission).

1k repo stars
▌
Aos Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which aos-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Agsy Impact And Implications · brycewang-stanford
Use when articulating why an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) result matters — its relevance for farm design, management, decision support, or policy. AgSy values systems analysis that informs a decision, so this is what separates an AgSy paper from a methods demo. It frames implications honestly within the model's scope; it does not over-claim or invent impact.

1k repo stars
▌
The Plant Journal · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting The Plant Journal or deciding whether a plant-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the mechanistic gene-to-function and molecular-rigor bar, evidence and data-deposition expectations, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Ahr Citation And Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when formatting citations and notes for an American Historical Review (AHR) manuscript. The AHR follows the Chicago Manual of Style with all references in footnotes/endnotes — no bibliography or works-cited list and no in-text parenthetical citation. Gets the note apparatus right; it does not write the prose or argument.

1k repo stars
▌
Ajs Research Design · brycewang-stanford
Use when defending the research design of an American Journal of Sociology (AJS) manuscript on its own methodological terms — quantitative, comparative-historical, ethnographic, network, or formal. AJS judges each kind of work by the standards of its tradition; the design must support the theoretical claim. Defends the design; it does not run the analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Ajs Theory Building · brycewang-stanford
Use when building the theoretical argument of an American Journal of Sociology (AJS) manuscript into a portable, discipline-level contribution. AJS prizes theoretical ambition above a bare finding — explicit concepts, mechanisms, and scope conditions, in the idiom of the work (quantitative, comparative-historical, ethnographic, or formal). Structures the argument; it does not run analyses.

1k repo stars
▌
Ajs Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether a sociology project fits the American Journal of Sociology (AJS) and how to frame it. AJS is the discipline's oldest generalist journal, with a premium on theoretical ambition and dialogue with current sociology; the test is general significance plus a portable theoretical payoff, not subfield novelty alone. Helps frame the question; it does not collect data.

1k repo stars
▌
Apsr Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the American Political Science Review (APSR) via Editorial Manager — track selection, double-anonymous preparation, word/abstract caps, APSA-style formatting, ORCID, and declarations. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Arecon Editor Strategy · brycewang-stanford
Use when working with the Annual Review of Economics (ARE) Editorial Committee and production team — negotiating the commissioned scope, anticipating what review referees evaluate, and the author–editor relationship on an invited article. Plans the interaction; it does not run the delivery preflight (arecon-submission) or draft the response letter (arecon-revision).

1k repo stars
▌
Arecon Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when judging whether a literature is an Annual Review of Economics (ARE)-scale review topic — mature, important, and genuinely in need of an authoritative, accessible synthesis — and framing the review's animating question. Decides fit; it does not gather the literature (arecon-literature-synthesis).

1k repo stars
▌
Jpube Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Journal of Public Economics (JPubE) via Editorial Manager — the US$165 submission fee (US$82.50 student / waived on transfer), single-anonymized review, 250-word abstract, author-date references, editable source files, SSRN option, and AI disclosure. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Jru Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when a Journal of Risk and Uncertainty (JRU) decision letter has arrived and you need a response-letter strategy. Triages referee reports into a revision plan and reply; it does not invent evidence or citations.

1k repo stars
▌
Jru Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which jru-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from question through rebuttal for a Journal of Risk and Uncertainty (JRU) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Jue Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when the prose of a Journal of Urban Economics (JUE) manuscript buries the spatial mechanism, or the intro/abstract do not land for an urban-economics audience. Sharpens the writing to JUE house voice; it does not run analysis or build exhibits. Late-stage — invoke after identification and the mechanism settle.

1k repo stars
▌
Jwe Fit Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use to judge whether a manuscript's international / open-economy dimension genuinely holds up for 《世界经济》 (The Journal of World Economy), or whether it is really a domestic paper that should be re-routed to 金融研究 / 中国工业经济 / 经济研究. Run this first, before drafting.

1k repo stars
▌
Jonc Supplementary · brycewang-stanford
当为《通信学报》(Journal on Communications, JOC) 稿件划分正文与附录/补充材料/多媒体附件时调用；用于在 Journal on Communications 约 12000 字符篇幅约束下控制正文信息密度。指导用"决定性"标准判断哪些内容（关键推导、主实验、核心算法）必须进正文，哪些（冗长证明、超参搜索、额外场景、大表、演示视频、数据集说明）宜放附录或补充材料，兼顾本刊约 12000 字符的篇幅约束与外审复核创新性/正确性的需要，规范补充材料的编号、引用与可获取性说明，帮助把一篇通信/网络/信息安全/信号处理方向的中文长文的篇幅与信息密度控制到既完整又不臃肿、经得起本刊格式与篇幅审查的程度。

1k repo stars
▌
Jonc Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
当撰写或润色《通信学报》(Journal on Communications, JOC) 中文科技长文的体例与规范时调用；用于让稿件符合 Journal on Communications 的排版与编辑规范、经得起初审格式审查。覆盖官方行文次序、中文题名≤20字、中英文结构式摘要（目的/方法/结果/结论，中文≤200字）、中英文关键词≥4、中图分类号 TN、文献标识码与文章编号、量与单位法定用法、数学符号与公式排版、图表规范、参考文献 GB/T 7714 著录（含中文文献著录与中英文对照），以及作者简介与基金项目标注，帮助把一篇通信/网络/信息安全/信号处理方向的稿件写到符合本刊排版与编辑规范、经得起初审格式审查的程度。

1k repo stars
▌
Mathfin Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when choosing or sharpening a problem for Mathematical Finance (Wiley) — tests whether the question is a methodologically novel, rigorously tractable contribution to financial modelling (stochastic analysis, pricing, risk, portfolio, microstructure) rather than a routine computational application to data.

1k repo stars
▌
Ors Contribution Framing · brycewang-stanford
Use when articulating the contribution of an Operations Research (OR) manuscript — especially the mandatory cover-letter contribution statement (since 1 June 2023, fewer than 500 words) and the discussion's significance claims. Frames why the work matters to OR; it does not position against specific prior papers (ors-literature-positioning) or run experiments (ors-data-analysis).

1k repo stars
▌
Orgstud Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when choosing or sharpening the phenomenon and research question for an Organization Studies (OS) manuscript — testing whether it is theoretically generative for OS's European organization-theory audience. Diagnoses fit and scope; it does not build the theory or run analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Prl Referee Strategy · brycewang-stanford
Use when choosing suggested and opposed referees for a Physical Review Letters submission and pre-empting the objections APS referees are likely to raise. Plans referee handling; does not write the manuscript or the rebuttal.

1k repo stars
▌
Pmla Textual Evidence And Close Reading · brycewang-stanford
Use when marshalling textual evidence and close reading as the evidence base of a PMLA (Publications of the Modern Language Association) essay. In literary studies the text is the data — claims are earned through careful reading of language, form, and context, quoted accurately and cited in MLA style. Strengthens the reading; it does not run analyses or invent passages.

1k repo stars
▌
Psychrev Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when anticipating how a Psychological Review manuscript will be evaluated — masked peer review, the kinds of decisions, article types (full article vs. Theoretical Note), and what reviewers at a theory journal actually probe. Explains the process; it does NOT write the response document (that is psychrev-rebuttal) or run the submission preflight (psychrev-submission).

1k repo stars
▌
Poq Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether a project fits Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ) and which submission type to target. POQ is the leading journal of public opinion and survey methodology, so the test is a contribution to opinion/communication theory, to current public opinion, or to survey validity — not a generic social-science finding. Helps frame the question; it does not collect data.

1k repo stars
▌
Rje Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use to understand and plan around The RAND Journal of Economics (RJE) review pipeline — the upfront editor screen (possible desk reject), peer review by two anonymous referees, and a final read by the handling Editor. Sets expectations and shapes a submission that clears the first screen.

1k repo stars
▌
Rje Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use to design tables and figures for a RAND Journal of Economics (RJE) industrial-organization manuscript — parameter, elasticity, markup, merger-simulation, and counterfactual-welfare exhibits — formatted under the RJE Style Guide (numbered sections, unnumbered subsections, flush-right equations) and disciplined by the hard page caps. Exhibit design, not estimation.

1k repo stars
▌
Revacc Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when a Review of Accounting Studies (RAST) revise-and-resubmit has arrived and you must plan the revision and draft the point-by-point response — resolving the editor's first-order concerns (identification, the channel, measurement, or the model) before writing the letter. Plans and drafts the response; it does not run the new analyses from scratch (revacc-data-analysis) or re-run the submission preflight (revacc-submission).

1k repo stars
▌
Revacc Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which revacc-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Review of Accounting Studies (RAST) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars

5,264 published skills · page 27 of 53