brycewang-stanford

@brycewang-stanford source repo

5.3k skills
0 followers
1k repo stars
3 weeks ago last updated

▌
Restud Robustness · brycewang-stanford
Use when the main results of a The Review of Economic Studies (REStud) manuscript exist but referee-anticipating checks — robustness, heterogeneity, mechanism, placebo, alternative specifications — are missing or fragile. Hardens the result against demanding referees; does not redesign identification.

1k repo stars
▌
Restud Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a The Review of Economic Studies (REStud) manuscript — double-anonymity, the ~45-page limit, Harvard author-date references, online appendix, the USD submission fee, and the Editorial Express portal. Last gate before submitting; does not assess the science. Verify current limits and fee on the journal's official page.

1k repo stars
▌
Rof Literature Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use when positioning a Review of Finance (RoF) manuscript against the finance frontier — citing the right top-three work, honoring RoF's strict author-responsibility citation norm, and staking the contribution without a standalone survey.

1k repo stars
▌
Ssi Submission · brycewang-stanford
当需要按《中国科学：信息科学》(Scientia Sinica Informationis, SSI) 的要求对一篇中文稿件做投稿前完整审计时调用。覆盖官网作者账户注册与 PDF 上传、LaTeX 官方模板排版、栏目自选（评述/论文/快报/学术介绍）、中英文双语摘要与关键词、参考文献与中图分类号、基金著录、版面费与样刊、伦理与学术规范（一稿多投与中英文姊妹刊 Science China Information Sciences 择一投稿），以及退稿/退修高风险项的排查。适用于投稿前最后一轮把关。

1k repo stars
▌
Soctheory Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when you need to understand Sociological Theory (ST)'s double-anonymous peer review and interpret a decision letter focused on conceptual novelty and logical soundness. Explains the process and decision types; it does NOT draft the response document (that is soctheory-rebuttal).

1k repo stars
▌
Tar Theory Development · brycewang-stanford
Use when the economic mechanism, analytical model, or predictions are the bottleneck for a The Accounting Review (TAR) manuscript — articulating why an accounting effect occurs and deriving testable predictions or model propositions. Builds the argument; it does not design identification (tar-methods) or run the estimation (tar-data-analysis).

1k repo stars
▌
Ectj Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when interpreting or planning around The Econometrics Journal's one-week editorial screen, editor assignment, three-month decision target, resubmission window, conformance rejection, and replication checks.

1k repo stars
▌
Ectj Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when compressing The Econometrics Journal (EctJ) tables, figures, Monte Carlo displays, empirical-application exhibits, theorem summaries, and appendix references under a roughly 20-page printed-paper constraint.

1k repo stars
▌
Ecj Replication Package · brycewang-stanford
Use when assembling the data and code replication package for a The Economic Journal (EJ) manuscript to the RES / EJ Data Editor standard (DCAS-endorsed, Zenodo deposit, reproducibility check before final acceptance). Builds the package and README; it does not run the analysis itself.

1k repo stars
▌
Wber Theory Model · brycewang-stanford
Use when a development model is needed to interpret an empirical result or to run a policy counterfactual for a The World Bank Economic Review (WBER) manuscript, or when deciding whether a formal model is needed at all. Disciplines the model-to-data link and the counterfactual; it does not run estimation or write prose.

1k repo stars
▌
Ylj Thesis And Contribution · brycewang-stanford
Use when sharpening the central legal-scholarly claim and contribution for a The Yale Law Journal (YLJ) piece. It forces a falsifiable, generalist thesis and names the contribution type; it does not search prior literature (use ylj-preemption-check) or build the argument (use ylj-argument-structure).

1k repo stars
▌
Amann Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) proposal or invited full review via the Manuscript Central portal — proposal-vs-invited-review route, deadlines, formatting, CV, and anonymity. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Asq Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting the response to an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) R&R after the manuscript has been revised — structuring the response letter and handling reviewer/editor comments. Drafts the response; it does not perform the underlying revisions (do those first).

1k repo stars
▌
Asq Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which asq-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Nature Plants · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Nature Plants or deciding whether a plant-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the broad-significance and Nature-framing bar, evidence and reproducibility expectations, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Ahr Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use to understand how The American Historical Review (AHR) evaluates a manuscript — double-blind anonymous review by at least six scholars, a six-to-eight-month timeline, an 8-10% acceptance rate, and the large commissioned book/media review section. Sets expectations and shapes the article to survive review; it does not contact editors.

1k repo stars
▌
Anmath Referee Strategy · brycewang-stanford
Use when anticipating how an expert Annals of Mathematics referee will verify a proof — stress-testing the argument for gaps, checking external dependencies, and pre-empting the questions a careful reader will ask. Hardens the manuscript before submission; does not write the rebuttal (anmath-revision).

1k repo stars
▌
Ceq Abstract English · brycewang-stanford
Use when writing or polishing the English abstract and contribution statement for a 《经济学(季刊)》 (China Economic Quarterly, CEQ) manuscript — producing a tight English abstract (≤ ~100 words per the journal's guideline) that reads to a field economist and benchmarks the contribution against specific papers. Use at the polish stage, after identification and results are final.

1k repo stars
▌
Cie Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when finalizing regression tables and figures for a 《中国工业经济》 (China Industrial Economics) manuscript. Enforces three-line tables, footnote conventions, column discipline, event-study/figure aesthetics — and the journal's hallmark requirement that every key table is followed by an economic-magnitude interpretation, not just significance stars.

1k repo stars
▌
Cjc Camera Ready · brycewang-stanford
在稿件被《计算机学报》(Chinese Journal of Computers, CJC) 录用后处理定稿、校样与清样时调用。覆盖录用后的版权协议与著作权转让、按官方模板做最终排版、中英文摘要与作者简介的定稿核对、中图分类号与 DOI/基金信息的完善、参考文献 GB/T 7714 最终校订、校样(proof)阶段的勘误纪律与仅限编辑性改动的原则，以及版面费缴纳与出版排期确认。适用于把一篇已录用的计算机全学科中文长文安全送到正式出版的场景。

1k repo stars
▌
Cjc Related Work · brycewang-stanford
在为投向《计算机学报》(Chinese Journal of Computers, CJC) 的长文撰写相关工作与文献综述时调用。覆盖综合性期刊读者跨学科的特点下如何组织文献脉络、如何写"delta 优先"的定位段把本文与已有工作的差异讲清、如何兼顾国内外文献与经典—前沿的平衡、如何规范引用(GB/T 7714 与中文文献中英文对照)、如何避免过度自引与堆引、以及综述型稿件与研究论文中相关工作的不同写法。适用于让计算机全学科中文原创研究在三审中清晰确立创新性与学术坐标的场景。

1k repo stars
▌
Cogpsych Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether a cognition project fits Cognitive Psychology (Elsevier) and what contribution shape to target. The journal favors longer, integrative, model-driven work that produces a substantial theoretical advance — not a single isolated effect. Frames the question and the model-or-theory payoff; it does not collect data.

1k repo stars
▌
Commres Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use to understand how Communication Research (CR) evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymized review, editorial screening for quantitative/theory fit, external review, and the requirement that two independent positive reviews back a Revise or Accept decision. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

1k repo stars
▌
Commres Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building tables and figures for a Communication Research (CR) manuscript so exhibits are self-contained, accessible, and formatted to APA. CR is quantitative, so exhibits must show effect sizes and uncertainty, not just stars. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Acm Siggraph Asia · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting ACM SIGGRAPH Asia (SIGGRAPH Asia) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for computer graphics flagship.

1k repo stars
▌
Car Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when a Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR) revise-and-resubmit arrives — planning the revision and drafting a point-by-point response to two reviewers and the subject Editor, including any new analyses, robustness, and updated Data Integrity/code-sharing materials. Drafts the response; it does not run the new estimation (car-data-analysis) or the final preflight (car-submission).

1k repo stars
▌
Car Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which car-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
CI Argument And Intervention · brycewang-stanford
Use to forge the central argument of a Critical Inquiry (CI) essay into a genuine intervention. CI rewards a bold claim that reorients a conversation in criticism and theory, with stakes that cross disciplines — not a competent reading, a survey, or a method demonstration. Sharpens the thesis and its stakes; it does not fabricate evidence or theory.

1k repo stars
▌
Curranthro Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when executing and reporting the analysis/interpretation for a Current Anthropology (CA) manuscript so it survives expert review and the published CA✩ Comments — disciplined ethnographic/qualitative inference, honest interpretation, and (for biological/archaeological work) sound quantitative analysis. Guides analysis and interpretation norms; it does not fabricate evidence or quotations.

1k repo stars
▌
Curranthro Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or polishing a Current Anthropology (CA) manuscript so it reads across all subfields for a worldwide audience, follows CA house style (free-format accepted; final files use Chicago author-date), fits the article-type word caps (Major Article 6,000–10,000 words; Report 3,000–5,000; abstract ≤ 200 words), and uses clear, jargon-light, inclusive language. Tightens prose and format; it does not invent content.

1k repo stars
▌
Ecopol Literature Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use when staking an Economic Policy (EP) manuscript's contribution against the live policy debate and the adjacent academic literature. Sharpens the policy-and-academic positioning; it does not invent evidence or citations.

1k repo stars
▌
Applied Energy · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Applied Energy or deciding whether a systems-level energy manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the systems-scope-and-quantified-impact bar, modeling and assessment rigor, house style, the systems-vs-single-device routing, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
History And Theory · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting History and Theory or deciding whether a philosophy-of-history, historiography, or historical-method manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's meta-level theoretical bar, its historiographical and conceptual expectations, house style and double-blind norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Linguistic Inquiry · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Linguistic Inquiry (MIT Press) or deciding whether a generative-linguistics manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit in generative syntax and its interfaces, the formal-analysis bar, squib format, house style, glossing and double-blind norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Cell Stem Cell · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Cell Stem Cell or deciding whether a stem-cell or regenerative-biology manuscript fits this Cell Press venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Genome Biology · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Genome Biology or deciding whether a genomics or computational biology manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Molecular Cell · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Molecular Cell (Mol Cell) or deciding whether a molecular-biology manuscript fits this Cell Press venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Nature Methods · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Nature Methods or deciding whether a methods/tools manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Nature Physics · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Nature Physics (Nat Phys) or deciding whether a physics manuscript fits this conceptual-advance, broad-audience Nature-family venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
The Cryosphere · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting The Cryosphere (TC) or deciding whether a snow, ice, glacier, permafrost, or sea-ice manuscript fits this EGU open-access venue with interactive public peer review. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
The Innovation · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting The Innovation or deciding whether a cross-disciplinary breakthrough manuscript fits this Cell Press-partnered broad-science journal. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
The Plant Cell · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting The Plant Cell or deciding whether a plant biology manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Water Research · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Water Research (Water Res) or deciding whether a water-science or water-engineering manuscript fits this flagship water venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Economic Policy · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Economic Policy or deciding whether a policy-oriented economics manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, the panel-review route, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Human Relations · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Human Relations or deciding whether an interdisciplinary social-science-of-work / organizations manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Research Policy · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Research Policy or deciding whether an innovation-studies / science-technology-policy manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Eer Referee Strategy · brycewang-stanford
Use when anticipating the objections a European Economic Review (EER) referee will raise — under single-anonymized review across any field — and pre-empting them before submission. Maps likely pushback to fixes; it does not draft the response letter (use eer-rebuttal after a decision).

1k repo stars
▌
Eursr Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the European Sociological Review (ESR) via ScholarOne Manuscripts — anonymous-manuscript preparation, word/abstract caps, OUP author-date style, the Data Availability Statement, and replication-package readiness. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Expecon Identification · brycewang-stanford
Use when the credibility of an Experimental Economics (ExpEcon) manuscript rests on experimental control — incentive compatibility, randomization, the no-deception gate, and clean treatment contrasts. Stress-tests design-based identification before exhibits are finalized; it does not draft prose.

1k repo stars
▌
Expecon Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when an Experimental Economics (ExpEcon) manuscript's exhibits must make the treatment contrast and its uncertainty visible at a glance. Builds design-carrying tables and figures; it does not run analysis or draft prose.

1k repo stars
▌
Cte Heterogeneity · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or writing heterogeneity analysis for a 《财贸经济》 manuscript. Enforces China-finance-institution-relevant cut dimensions and theoretical-justification discipline. 本技能服务于《财贸经济》(Finance & Trade Economics, CTE)。

1k repo stars
▌
Finman Internet Appendix · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding what belongs in a Financial Management (FM) internet appendix vs. the main paper, and how to organize it so each supplementary exhibit maps to a main-text claim. Structures supporting material; it does not establish results (finman-identification / finman-robustness) or finalize the data/code package (finman-submission).

1k repo stars
▌
Geb Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when a Games and Economic Behavior (GEB) manuscript involves experimental data or numerical illustration — analyzing strategic-game experiments and building verified worked examples. Adapts analysis to GEB's game-theory nature, where data supports the theory rather than carrying a causal claim.

1k repo stars
▌
Geb Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when polishing prose, abstract, and introduction for a Games and Economic Behavior (GEB) manuscript so the model and result land for a general game-theory reader. Enforces the 250-word abstract cap and elsarticle conventions. Polishes exposition; it does not change results.

1k repo stars
▌
Gec Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when executing and reporting the analysis for a Global Environmental Change (GEC) manuscript so it survives expert, interdisciplinary review — honest uncertainty, robustness, and triangulation appropriate to quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods work. Guides analysis norms; it does not fabricate results.

1k repo stars
▌
Gec Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or polishing the prose of a Global Environmental Change (GEC) manuscript so it reads for an interdisciplinary, policy-relevant audience within the word and abstract caps. GEC values clarity and rigor that travel across disciplines. Polishes the writing; it does not draft the analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Humrel Literature Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use when staking a Human Relations (HR) manuscript's contribution against the relevant scholarly conversation and adjacent journals. Positions the paper; it does not develop the theory or run analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Hrm Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when scoping or stress-testing the research question for a Human Resource Management (Wiley "HRM") manuscript — confirming an HR-system/practice phenomenon with both a scholarly advance and a workforce-policy or HRM-practice payoff. Locks the question; it does not build the theory (hrm-theory-development).

1k repo stars
▌
Imfer Replication Package · brycewang-stanford
Use when an IMF Economic Review (IMFER) manuscript's data and code must be packaged for reproducibility — including restricted IMF/central-bank data paths, cross-country source lineage, and a runnable environment. Builds the package; it does not produce the exhibits (imfer-tables-figures) or run the submission preflight (imfer-submission).

1k repo stars
▌
Io Research Design · brycewang-stanford
Use when defending the research design of an International Organization (IO) manuscript on international-level questions — causal identification with dyadic/TSCS/network data, case selection and process tracing for international cases, survey/conjoint experiments on foreign-policy attitudes, or formal-empirical linkage. IO judges each IR tradition on its own terms and verifies results and proofs before final acceptance. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.

1k repo stars
▌
Io Theory Building · brycewang-stanford
Use when building the theoretical argument of an International Organization (IO) manuscript into a generalizable theory of international politics — whether rationalist/formal (bargaining, signaling, delegation, cooperation), constructivist/ideational, or empirical with explicit international mechanisms. IO rewards a portable IR theory over a bare finding. Structures the argument; it does not run analyses.

1k repo stars
▌
Io Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether an international-relations project fits International Organization (IO) and which article type to target. IO is the IR-specialist flagship, so the test is a generalizable theory about international politics where an international or cross-border phenomenon is a major cause or effect — not subfield novelty and not a domestic-politics result. Helps frame the IR question; it does not collect data.

1k repo stars
▌
Jar Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Journal of Accounting Research (JAR) manuscript — the Wiley Research Exchange portal, double-anonymization, the tiered submission fee and one-week payment window, the article-type choice, and the data-and-code package JAR requires. Checks readiness to submit; it does not handle the post-decision response (jar-rebuttal).

1k repo stars
▌
Jape Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting the response letter for a Journal of Applied Econometrics (JAE) revise-and-resubmit — replying to single-blind anonymous referees and the Editor-in-Chief on applied-econometrics objections (identification on real data, inference, robustness) while keeping the JAE Data Archive package in sync with every revised result.

1k repo stars
▌
Jape Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when planning the full Journal of Applied Econometrics (JAE) manuscript lifecycle end to end — confirming an applied (not pure-theory) fit, running reproducible analysis under the 35-page limit, and staging the mandatory JAE Data Archive deposit. Orchestrator skill; routes to the other eleven.

1k repo stars
▌
Joap Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) via Editorial Manager — APA 7th-edition style, the APA submission/masking checklist, anonymization for masked review, the structured abstract, the data-availability/TOP statement, and persistent identifiers for data/materials/code. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Jbf Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Journal of Banking & Finance (JBF) via Elsevier Editorial Manager — the USD 350 submission fee, double-anonymized manuscript plus separate title page, 250-word abstract, keywords, Highlights, SSRN posting, data statement, and the generative-AI declaration. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Jcp Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) manuscript — manuscript type and length, APA formatting, double-blind anonymization, the open-science / data-materials package, and the Wiley ScholarOne portal. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Jde Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when responding to a Journal of Development Economics (JDE) decision — drafting the response letter and revision plan for a single-anonymized R&R, including the short-paper track's limited-revision structure. Strategy for the response; it does not rewrite the manuscript.

1k repo stars
▌
Jde Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which jde-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Journal of Development Economics (JDE) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Jeg Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when navigating the Journal of Economic Growth (JEG) editorial process — the Springer Nature submission path, editor screening for growth-and-development fit, theory and empirics referee expectations, desk-reject patterns, and decision-stage planning across review rounds.

1k repo stars
▌
Jel Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) proposal or full survey via the AEA ScholarOne portal — proposal vs. full-paper route, disclosure statements, JEL codes, AEA data/code policy, and style-guide compliance. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Jep Revision · brycewang-stanford
Use when responding to Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP) editor feedback — accessibility, balance, length, and framing — on an invited or accepted article. Plans the revision and the reply to the editorial team; it does not draft the original article or run the submission preflight.

1k repo stars
▌
Jep Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which jep-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing work on an accessible synthesis article from topic idea through editor revision for a Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Jet Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when interpreting the Journal of Economic Theory (JET) review pipeline — editor desk-screening, single-anonymized refereeing, at least two reviewers, editor decisions, and the generative-AI bar on referees.

1k repo stars
▌
Jet Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing the exhibits in a Journal of Economic Theory (JET) paper — mostly schematic theory figures (best-response/phase diagrams, lattices, timing trees, mechanism flow) and small illustrative tables, kept consistent with the body's notation and rendered as vector graphics. Light for a theorem-proof journal; numerical tables only when grounded in theory.

1k repo stars
▌
Cfe Abstract · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or revising the 中文摘要 or 英文 abstract for a 《财经研究》 (Journal of Finance and Economics) manuscript. 使用时机：摘要写成"提供了新视角"式套话、五句要素（中国现实问题、数据与识别、量化发现、机制异质性、贡献启示）缺句、中英文摘要语义不对齐、或投稿前发现摘要未出现核心数据与识别策略时。Enforces the five-sentence pattern, 逐句打磨对照, 关键词配套, and the empty-significance blacklist.

1k repo stars
▌
Cfe Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when responding to reviewer reports for a Journal-of-Finance-and-Economics double-blind R&R. Produces the point-by-point response letter and aligned manuscript edits.

1k repo stars
▌
Cfe Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which cfe-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for 《财经研究》 (Journal of Finance and Economics). Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Jfe Robustness · brycewang-stanford
Use when a Journal of Financial Economics (JFE) result needs the exhaustive robustness battery the journal is known for — alternative measures, subsamples, specifications, and falsification. Builds the stress-test plan; it does not choose the core estimator (jfe-empirical-design) or the identification design (jfe-identification).

1k repo stars
▌
Jfe Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Journal of Financial Economics (JFE) manuscript — formatting, anonymity, references, exhibits, code/data deposit, the editorial system, and the submission fee. Checks submission readiness; it does not revise the science.

1k repo stars
▌
Jhe Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when the prose of a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) manuscript buries the question or the policy stakes — abstract, introduction, and the institutional setup. Shapes the writing so a health economist sees the contribution fast; it does not establish results or build exhibits.

1k repo stars
▌
Jhr Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when you need to understand and plan around the Journal of Human Resources (JHR) editorial process — single-anonymous review, the fast desk-reject without outside review, the reconciliation requirement, and the optional review-recycling shortcut. Sets expectations; it does not draft the paper.

1k repo stars
▌
Jhr Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when preparing Journal of Human Resources (JHR) tables, figures, online appendix exhibits, reconciliation tables, event-study and first-stage diagnostics, and policy-readable empirical displays that fit inside the page limit counting tables and figures.

1k repo stars
▌
Jole Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when executing the empirical analysis for a Journal of Labor Economics (JOLE) manuscript — labor sample construction (CPS/ACS/registers), wage decompositions, standard errors, and robustness to labor norms, with replicability built in from the start. Operational guidance; pairs with jole-identification-strategy.

1k repo stars
▌
Jole Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when polishing prose, the 100-word abstract, and the introduction for a Journal of Labor Economics (JOLE) manuscript — Chicago author-date references, the 20,000-word economy, and a general labor-economics audience. Polishes exposition; it does not change results or design.

1k repo stars
▌
Jle Theory Model · brycewang-stanford
Use when a The Journal of Law and Economics (JLE) manuscript needs a model of the legal rule — deterrence, liability, contracting, or regulation — to interpret estimates, generate testable predictions, or carry a theory contribution in the Chicago price-theory tradition. Calibrates how much theory belongs and where; it does not design the identification (jle-identification).

1k repo stars
▌
Mw Identification · brycewang-stanford
Use when the empirical identification strategy is the bottleneck for a Management-World manuscript — quasi-experimental designs (DID, IV, RDD, DML, event study) with Chinese policy shocks. Stress-tests the design before drafting tables.

1k repo stars
▌
Mw Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
用于最终化《管理世界》稿件的回归表与图形，使表图成为审稿专家判断"研究是否规范"的正向信号。Use when 主表列数过多（8 列以上）被吐槽信息密度高、表格用了边框/阴影/颜色不合本刊规范、标准误用了 t/z 值、或图形分辨率不足/配色不专业（彩虹色）时使用。锚定《管理世界》国务院发展研究中心主办、规范实证大刊的呈现传统，落实三线表（无竖线、≤6 列）、聚类标准误置于括号、注释含聚类层次与显著性定义、图形≥300dpi 与双主色克制，使表图达到本刊已刊论文形态。本技能服务于《管理世界》(Management World, MW)。

1k repo stars
▌
Jmf Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) — format selection (article vs. brief report), double-blind anonymization, page limit, structured abstract, modified APA, bias-free language, data availability statement, and the Wiley Research Exchange portal (migrated from ScholarOne). Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Jom Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when planning and drafting a revision and point-by-point response letter for a Journal of Operations Management (JOM) R&R — prioritizing the Department Editor/Associate Editor's decisive concerns, resolving Empirical Research Methods method-check issues, and documenting new operations analyses across multiple rounds.

1k repo stars
▌
Jom Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which jom-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Journal of Operations Management (JOM) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Jpe Theory Model · brycewang-stanford
Use when a Journal of Political Economy (JPE) manuscript needs an explicit economic model or mechanism — either a theory paper's model, or the framework that gives a reduced-form empirical result its economic meaning. Builds and disciplines the economic argument; it does not run estimation (see jpe-identification).

1k repo stars
▌
Jue Identification · brycewang-stanford
Use when the spatial identification argument is the bottleneck for a Journal of Urban Economics (JUE) manuscript — boundary discontinuity, shift-share/Bartik, historical or geographic IV, place-based DiD, or mobility experiment. Stress-tests the spatial design against sorting, spillovers, and spatial-autocorrelation confounds before exhibits are finalized.

1k repo stars
▌
Jue Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when the exhibits of a Journal of Urban Economics (JUE) manuscript must make the spatial pattern visible — maps, event-study plots, RD/boundary figures, and clean regression tables. Designs the spatial exhibits a JUE referee expects; it does not run the analysis (jue-robustness) or write the prose (jue-writing-style).

1k repo stars
▌
Jonc Review Process · brycewang-stanford
在需要理解《通信学报》(Journal on Communications, JOC) 的审稿流程、预测各环节结果与识别作者可用杠杆时调用。对本刊初审（编辑审查规范/对口性/知网查重）→ 外审（约 2~3 名专家评审通信学科贡献）→ 终审（由编委会负责给出最终结果）三审制建模，说明约 1~3 个月的审稿周期、修回（大修/小修）与退稿的常见判定，指导作者在每个环节采取的应对策略（对口性论证、实证补强、修回闭环、按月刊排期跟进），帮助把稿件顺利推进本刊三审制，适用于通信/网络/信息安全/信号处理方向的中文长文投稿。

1k repo stars
▌
Mgsci Contribution Framing · brycewang-stanford
Use when writing the explicit contribution statement for a Management Science (INFORMS) manuscript — turning an analytical result or empirical finding into a decision-relevant insight that travels across departments, and showing why it belongs in Management Science rather than a sister INFORMS journal. It frames the "so what"; it does not run the analysis (mgsci-data-analysis) or position the literature (mgsci-literature-positioning).

1k repo stars
▌
Mksc Literature Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use when positioning a Marketing Science manuscript in its literature — locating the contribution among structural and analytical modeling precedents and the relevant substantive stream (pricing, advertising/digital, channels/retail, branding, platforms, analytics), and disclosing self-overlap. Positions the paper; it does not state the headline contribution (mksc-contribution-framing).

1k repo stars
▌
Prl Length Management · brycewang-stanford
Use when a Physical Review Letters manuscript exceeds the strict deductible length limit, where figures, equations, and references all count against the budget. Triages what to cut, compress, or move to Supplemental Material; does not rewrite content from scratch.

1k repo stars
▌
Phg Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when polishing a Progress in Human Geography (PiHG) review essay to house style — the argument-forward review voice, SAGE Harvard referencing, the ~8,000-word inclusive cap, ~100-word unstructured abstract, and 5+ keywords. Polishes prose and format; it does not build the argument.

1k repo stars

5,264 published skills · page 28 of 53