brycewang-stanford

@brycewang-stanford source repo

5.3k skills
0 followers
1k repo stars
3 weeks ago last updated

▌
Orgsci Theory Development · brycewang-stanford
Use when building or sharpening the theory for an Organization Science manuscript — articulating the organizational mechanism, bridging micro-macro levels, and deciding between a priori deductive theorizing and inductive grounded theory building. Develops the theory; it does not frame the contribution statement (orgsci-contribution-framing) or run the analysis (orgsci-data-analysis).

1k repo stars
▌
Phg Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when anticipating how a Progress in Human Geography (PiHG) review essay will be judged — the double-anonymous review model, decision categories, and the desk-reject triggers specific to a review journal. Explains what to expect; it does not draft the manuscript or the response letter.

1k repo stars
▌
Phg Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing the conceptual exhibits of a Progress in Human Geography (PiHG) review essay — typologies, framework diagrams, concept genealogies, and synthesis tables that do argumentative work. For a review journal these are conceptual, not data graphics. Designs exhibits; it does not build the argument itself.

1k repo stars
▌
Psychbull Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting and polishing a Psychological Bulletin manuscript so it reads as an integrative synthesis and meets APA 7th-edition style plus MARS/PRISMA/JARS reporting structure, including the ≤ 250-word abstract. Guides prose and structure; it does not run the analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Qe Contribution Framing · brycewang-stanford
Use to sharpen the one-sentence contribution of a Quantitative Economics (QE) manuscript so a general-interest Econometric Society reader sees the quantitative payoff immediately. Frames the claim and its scope; it does not redo estimation or write full prose.

1k repo stars
▌
Revacc Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when a Review of Accounting Studies (RAST) manuscript is close to submission and needs the Editorial Manager preflight — anonymization for double-blind review, the submission fee and its deadline, file completeness, and format compliance. Runs the preflight; it does not polish prose (revacc-writing-style) or plan the review cycle (revacc-review-process).

1k repo stars
▌
Red Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when understanding or planning around the Review of Economic Dynamics (RED) editorial process — the editor desk/suitability screen, single-anonymized refereeing with a minimum of two reviewers, and RED's fast-review orientation without promising a fixed decision date. Sets expectations and timelines; it is not the submission preflight (see red-submission).

1k repo stars
▌
Red Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing the exhibits of a Review of Economic Dynamics (RED) manuscript — impulse-response functions, calibration tables, moment-matching (model-vs-data) tables, policy-experiment figures, and accuracy diagnostics — so a quantitative dynamic paper communicates its mechanism and fit clearly to the SED readership.

1k repo stars
▌
Restud Theory Model · brycewang-stanford
Use when building, sharpening, or stress-testing the theoretical model in a The Review of Economic Studies (REStud) manuscript — whether a pure-theory paper or an empirical paper with a model — and when routing proofs to the online appendix. Develops the model and its economic payoff; does not run the empirics.

1k repo stars
▌
Rfs Identification · brycewang-stanford
Use when the causal-inference or asset-pricing identification strategy is the bottleneck for a The Review of Financial Studies (RFS) manuscript — quasi-experiments (DID, IV, RDD, event study) and factor-model identification. Stress-tests the design before drafting tables.

1k repo stars
▌
Rfs Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when main-paper exhibits are the bottleneck for a The Review of Financial Studies (RFS) manuscript — table layout, standard-error reporting, and publication-grade figures. Finalizes exhibits; does NOT decide robustness content or move material to the appendix.

1k repo stars
▌
Ssi Camera Ready · brycewang-stanford
当稿件被《中国科学：信息科学》(Scientia Sinica Informationis, SSI) 录用、需要完成定稿、校样（清样）校对与最终提交时调用。覆盖录用后清样一校/二校、中英文摘要与作者信息/单位/基金的最终核对、参考文献与图表的清样级检查、版权协议与版面费缴纳、样刊、DOI 与卷期信息、以及与英文姊妹刊 Science China Information Sciences 的区分。适用于从"录用通知"到"正式见刊"之间的定稿阶段，确保清样与作者预期一致、零遗留错误。

1k repo stars
▌
Ssi Related Work · brycewang-stanford
当需要为《中国科学：信息科学》(Scientia Sinica Informationis, SSI) 稿件撰写相关工作与文献综述、明确本文与已有工作的差异（delta）时调用。覆盖差异优先的定位写法、国内外文献的均衡覆盖（不只引英文也不只引中文）、按技术脉络组织综述、评述栏目与论文相关工作节的不同要求、自引与利益关系处理、以及参考文献著录规范。作为国家级大信息学科综合旗舰，本刊看重创新高度，相关工作是论证"新在哪里"的关键，需客观、充分、有观点。

1k repo stars
▌
Spq Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use to understand how Social Psychology Quarterly (SPQ) evaluates a manuscript — masked (blinded) review, the blinding check that temporarily rejects under-blinded papers, what reviewers from different sociological-social-psychology traditions weigh, and the reject / revise-and-resubmit / accept decision pattern. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

1k repo stars
▌
Spq Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building tables and figures for a Social Psychology Quarterly (SPQ) manuscript so exhibits are self-contained, accessible, and formatted to the ASA Style Guide. SPQ exhibits must communicate the structure–individual link clearly to a mixed sociology/psychology readership and fit within the word budget. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Ssc Abstract Keywords · brycewang-stanford
Use when writing or fixing the abstract and keywords for 《中国社会科学》 (Social Sciences in China) — a 200–300 Chinese-character abstract that leads with the original proposition and contribution (not background), 3–5 keywords, and an aligned high-quality English abstract. Use at the polishing stage.

1k repo stars
▌
Ssc Topic Problematic · brycewang-stanford
Use when framing or sharpening the research problem (问题意识 / problematic) for 《中国社会科学》 (Social Sciences in China) — elevating a topic from a narrow empirical question to a 重大理论与现实问题, locating the live scholarly controversy, and tying it to China's development / 时代之问. Use before writing the introduction.

1k repo stars
▌
Smr Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when responding to a Sociological Methods & Research (SMR) decision letter — drafting the point-by-point response and revision plan for properties, simulations, the empirical illustration, software, and exposition under SMR's verbatim-comment response format. Plans the response; does not run new analyses itself.

1k repo stars
▌
Smr Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when sequencing a Sociological Methods & Research (SMR) manuscript from method-contribution fit through derivation and properties, Monte Carlo simulation, real-data empirical illustration, released software, ScholarOne submission, double-anonymized review, and rebuttal. Routes to the right SMR skill; does not itself draft sections.

1k repo stars
▌
Smj Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when estimating models and defeating endogeneity for a Strategic Management Journal (SMJ) manuscript — the single highest bar at SMJ. Executes and stress-tests the identification design from smj-methods; it does not design the study or build exhibits.

1k repo stars
▌
Smj Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use for late-stage prose polish of a Strategic Management Journal (SMJ) manuscript — clarity, structure, and house style. Improves the writing; it does not change the theory, analysis, or contribution claim.

1k repo stars
▌
Tar Contribution Framing · brycewang-stanford
Use when results exist but the accounting contribution is thin or implicit for a The Accounting Review (TAR) manuscript — turning findings into an explicit statement of what the field now knows, with credible bounds and implications. Frames the contribution; it does not build the mechanism (tar-theory-development) or position against the literature (tar-literature-positioning).

1k repo stars
▌
Artbull Revision And Response · brycewang-stanford
Use when revising an Art Bulletin manuscript after a decision and writing the response to referees — converting double-blind reviewers without diluting the art-historical contribution, while keeping anonymity and the image/permissions plan on track. Structures the response; it does not fabricate new evidence.

1k repo stars
▌
Artbull Scholarly Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use when situating an Art Bulletin article in the historiography and scholarly literature of art history. The Art Bulletin expects engagement with prior interpretation, methods, and debates across the field, not just the literature on one object. Positions the contribution; it does not do the looking or the archival work.

1k repo stars
▌
Webconf Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanford
Use when packaging datasets, models, or code for the Web Conference (WWW) Artifacts Available badge or for reviewer scrutiny, covering archival-repository choice, the light-verification bar, web-data licensing and takedown realities, anonymized artifacts during review, and what the badge does and does not certify.

1k repo stars
▌
Wber Identification · brycewang-stanford
Use when the causal identification argument is the bottleneck for a The World Bank Economic Review (WBER) manuscript — RCT/program evaluation, DiD/event study around a reform, regression discontinuity, or IV in a developing-country setting. Stress-tests the data-to-estimate mapping AND the external-validity/policy-interpretation step to the WBER bar; it does not write prose or build the package.

1k repo stars
▌
Wber Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building the exhibits for a The World Bank Economic Review (WBER) manuscript so they read cleanly for a mixed economist + policymaker audience, fit the 40-page cap, and carry the policy magnitude. Designs and audits tables/figures; it does not run the analysis or write the prose.

1k repo stars
▌
Worlddev Replication Package · brycewang-stanford
Use when preparing the data/code or qualitative-transparency materials for a World Development (WD) manuscript under Elsevier's research-data policy and double-anonymized review. Assembles the package; it does not invent evidence or citations.

1k repo stars
▌
Wp Transparency And Data Policy · brycewang-stanford
Use when preparing replication / transparency materials for a World Politics manuscript. World Politics requires authors who rely on quantitative data to deposit replication materials in the World Politics Dataverse after acceptance and before publication, with an explanatory file that lets others replicate the exact numerical results; embargoes up to two years may be approved by the editorial committee. Prepares the package; it does not waive requirements.

1k repo stars
▌
Amj Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when running and reporting the statistical analysis for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — measurement validity, common-method bias, the right estimator (HLM, SEM, panel, experiments), endogeneity, and robustness. Executes and reports the analysis; it does not design the study (amj-methods) or frame the contribution (amj-contribution-framing).

1k repo stars
▌
Amj Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use for full-manuscript prose polish of an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — front-loading the argument, active voice, structure, and AOM house style. Polishes language and structure; it does not create the theoretical contribution (amj-contribution-framing) or fix the analysis (amj-data-analysis).

1k repo stars
▌
Amr Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when you need to understand the Academy of Management Review (AMR) developmental, multi-round review and interpret a decision letter focused on theoretical novelty and logical soundness. Explains the process and decision types; it does NOT draft the response document (that is amr-rebuttal).

1k repo stars
▌
Amr Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building the conceptual exhibits of an Academy of Management Review (AMR) manuscript — process models, 2x2 typologies, multi-level frameworks, and propositions tables that carry theoretical work. These are CONCEPTUAL figures, NOT data plots; AMR has no charts of results because it has no data.

1k repo stars
▌
Acr Institutional Standards · brycewang-stanford
Use when writing or verifying the institutional / accounting-standard / regulatory background for a 《会计研究》 (Accounting Research) manuscript — getting standard clauses, regulatory rules, and effective dates exactly right, since precise institutional detail is a defining bar of this journal. Use before measurement and identification.

1k repo stars
▌
Aes Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanford
当你为《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 投稿准备代码、数据与硬件设计等研究制品(artifact)的可用性说明时使用。中文学报暂无独立的 artifact evaluation 徽章委员会，本技能说明本刊现状、如何自愿开放代码/数据以增强稿件可信度、如何在正文与附录中规范披露制品、如何在双盲阶段匿名托管仓库、以及电子/信号处理类工作(算法、电路、FPGA、数据集)的制品打包要点。帮助作者在没有强制徽章的前提下最大化《电子学报》稿件的可复现说服力。

1k repo stars
▌
Asq Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript — fit, anonymization, format, exhibits, references, and the editorial-system submission. Checks readiness; it does not write or revise the manuscript.

1k repo stars
▌
Agsy Revision And Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when writing the response to an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) revision decision. AgSy review is single anonymized with at least two expert systems reviewers and an editor decision, and revisions often turn on model evaluation, sensitivity/uncertainty, and trade-off framing. The response must convert each reviewer without alienating the editor. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.

1k repo stars
▌
New Phytologist · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting New Phytologist or deciding whether a plant-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the integrative conceptual-advance and whole-plant/ecosystem-scale bar, evidence and data-deposition expectations, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Amanthro Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when you need to understand how American Anthropologist (AA) evaluates a manuscript — editorial screening, anonymous peer review under an ethics of care, the four-field editorial board, decision categories, and how section choice shapes the path. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

1k repo stars
▌
Amanthro Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building exhibits for an American Anthropologist (AA) manuscript — photographs, maps, site plans, artifact images, kinship diagrams, transcripts, evidence tables, and multimodal media — so they are self-contained, accessible (alt text), ethically cleared (consent, permissions), and count toward the word budget. Designs exhibits; it does not run analysis or clear permissions for you.

1k repo stars
▌
Ajs Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when planning or auditing the analysis of an American Journal of Sociology (AJS) manuscript so the evidence credibly supports the theoretical claim. Covers analysis norms, uncertainty, robustness, and triangulation across quantitative, comparative-historical, and ethnographic work. Improves the analysis chain; it does not fabricate results.

1k repo stars
▌
Ajs Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when shaping the prose, structure, and citations of an American Journal of Sociology (AJS) manuscript to AJS's own author-date house style (NOT the ASA Style Guide). AJS rewards theoretically ambitious, generalist-legible writing and has specific notes/references conventions. Polishes the writing; it does not invent content.

1k repo stars
▌
Apsr Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when writing the response to an American Political Science Review (APSR) revise-and-resubmit. APSR reserves R&R for papers close to publishable, and decisions weigh strong support from all or nearly all reviewers, so the response must convert each reviewer without alienating the editor. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.

1k repo stars
▌
Apsr Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use as the entry point for any American Political Science Review (APSR) manuscript. Routes to the right APSR sub-skill based on where you are in the lifecycle and which of the five tracks (Regular Article, Research Note, Replication/Reappraisal, Synthesis, Registered Report) fits. It dispatches; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Asr Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use to understand how the American Sociological Review (ASR) evaluates a manuscript — masked (anonymous) peer review, what reviewers across sociological traditions weigh, decision categories, and the ethics rules (no simultaneous submission). Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

1k repo stars
▌
Asr Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building tables and figures for an American Sociological Review (ASR) manuscript. ASR excludes tables and figures from the 15,000-word count but still expects them to be clear, self-contained, and ASA-formatted. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Arecon Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when revising an Annual Review of Economics (ARE) review for the ARE voice — authoritative, accessible to economists outside the subfield, signposted, with a strong opening, a forward-looking close, and a survey-style abstract. Polishes prose and structure; it does not design the framework (arecon-organizing-framework) or appraise evidence (arecon-evidence-standards).

1k repo stars
▌
Arsoc Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building exhibits for an Annual Review of Sociology (ARSoc) review — summary "who-found-what" tables, the conceptual/framework figure, and meta-evidence exhibits that synthesize across studies. Designs review exhibits; it does not produce original-estimate regression tables (an ARSoc review reports no new estimates of its own) or write prose (arsoc-writing-style).

1k repo stars
▌
Cjc Review Process · brycewang-stanford
在需要理解或预判《计算机学报》(Chinese Journal of Computers, CJC) 审稿流程、以便安排投稿节奏与修回策略时调用。覆盖本刊三审制的完整链路(编辑初审→专家外审→复审退修→主编终审)、初审退稿的常见理由(不符宗旨/无新意/重复前人/观点模糊/学术不端总重复率超 30%)、外审的双盲(删除作者信息)与 2~3 名同行评议约 20 天、多轮退修与重新送审、第一轮约 3~4 个月的审理周期与全程约半年的经验时长，以及作者在各环节的可用杠杆。适用于为计算机全学科中文长文规划评审预期的场景。

1k repo stars
▌
Cpa Heterogeneity · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or writing heterogeneity / conditionality analysis for a 《中国行政管理》(Chinese Public Administration, CPA) manuscript — variation across regions, administrative levels, and governance contexts. 当主结果只笼统适用、只切了一个维度、或审稿人要求差异化分析时使用。Enforces theory-guided cuts and significance-of-difference discipline for this Chinese-Public-Administration-Society journal.

1k repo stars
▌
Auditing Research · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting 《审计研究》(Auditing Research — 审计署主管、中国审计学会主办、匿名审稿、不收版面费的审计权威核心双月刊) or deciding whether a Chinese auditing manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, abstract/keyword/citation house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Economic Problems · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting 《经济问题》(Economic Problems — 山西省社会科学院主管主办的综合性经济理论学术月刊, 1979 年创刊) or deciding whether a Chinese econ/management manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, fee-free policy and review timeline, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Economic Research · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting 《经济研究》(Economic Research Journal) or deciding whether a Chinese social-science/econ/management manuscript fits this journal. Applies the journal's fit, framing, method, house-style, official-submission-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Management Review · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting 《管理评论》(Management Review — 中国科学院大学主办的管理学术月刊, 全程匿名审稿) or deciding whether a Chinese management manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, abstract/keyword/citation house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Journal Of Hepatology · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Journal of Hepatology or deciding whether a liver-disease study fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the EASL clinical-and-translational evidence bar, reporting-guideline and registration requirements, Elsevier/EASL house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics. Venue-fit aid only, not clinical advice.

1k repo stars
▌
The Lancet Psychiatry · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting The Lancet Psychiatry or deciding whether a psychiatry or mental-health study fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the clinical-trial, population, and policy evidence bar, reporting-guideline and registration requirements, Lancet specialty house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics. Venue-fit aid only, not clinical advice.

1k repo stars
▌
Cps Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when running and reporting the analyses for a Comparative Political Studies (CPS) manuscript — estimation, uncertainty, robustness, and multi-method triangulation on comparative data. Sets analysis norms; it does not choose the identification strategy (see cps-research-design).

1k repo stars
▌
Cps Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or polishing the prose of a Comparative Political Studies (CPS) manuscript so it reaches comparativists, fits the 11,000-word limit, and follows CPS house formatting. Improves writing and formatting; it does not change the analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Car Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR) manuscript — Editorial Manager files (blind manuscript, separate title page, author declaration, ethics-approval verification, proof of payment), the $250/$600 submission fee, length/abstract limits, and the Data Integrity items collected at submission. Checks readiness to submit; it does not handle the post-decision response (car-rebuttal).

1k repo stars
▌
Curranthro Research Design · brycewang-stanford
Use when defending the research design of a Current Anthropology (CA) manuscript — fieldwork and participant observation, interview and archival design for ethnographic/qualitative work, material/contextual analysis for archaeology, and appropriate lab/quantitative design for biological anthropology. CA judges each mode on its own terms with reflexivity, and the design must survive published CA✩ Comments. Strengthens the design; it does not write code or run fieldwork.

1k repo stars
▌
Curranthro Theory Building · brycewang-stanford
Use when building the conceptual/theoretical argument of a Current Anthropology (CA) manuscript into an agenda-setting, all-fields contribution that can anchor the CA✩ comment-and-reply Treatment — whether the work is ethnographic, archaeological, biological, or linguistic. CA rewards a portable, debatable concept and reflexive argument over a bare finding or thick description alone. Structures the argument; it does not run analyses or write fieldnotes.

1k repo stars
▌
Curranthro Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether an anthropology project fits Current Anthropology (CA) and which article type to target. CA is the transnational, all-fields Wenner-Gren journal whose Major Articles receive the CA✩ comment-and-reply Treatment, so the test is field-shaping significance worth international debate, not single-subfield novelty. Helps frame the question and pick an article type; it does not collect data or conduct fieldwork.

1k repo stars
▌
Devpsych Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when analyzing and reporting results for a Developmental Psychology (APA) manuscript. The journal expects analyses that model developmental change correctly — growth-curve/multilevel/SEM, mediation/moderation, measurement invariance — with effect sizes and confidence intervals, JARS-compliant disclosure, and a clear confirmatory/exploratory split. Guides analysis norms; it does not fabricate results.

1k repo stars
▌
Devpsych Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or polishing a Developmental Psychology (APA) manuscript to fit its house style — APA 7th edition, JARS-compliant reporting, the manuscript length tier (brief report to multi-study/longitudinal report), the abstract, and the required Public Significance Statement. Tightens prose and format; it does not invent content.

1k repo stars
▌
Er Policy Implication · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or strengthening the policy-implications section of an Economic-Research manuscript. Frames implications at the significance / institutional level rather than the actionable / ministry level used by Management-World.

1k repo stars
▌
History Of Religions · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting History of Religions or deciding whether a comparative-historical religious-studies manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, its comparative-method and primary-source bar, textual/philological and morphological expectations, house style and review norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
New Literary History · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting New Literary History or deciding whether an essay on the theory, history, and method of literary study fits this venue. Encodes the journal's theory-of-literature fit, the conceptual-question bar, methodological-reflexivity expectations, house style and double-blind norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Acta Mathematica · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Acta Mathematica (Acta Math.) or deciding whether a pure-mathematics manuscript meets the bar of one of the most selective journals in the field. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, proof-and-rigor bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Cancer Discovery · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Cancer Discovery (AACR) or deciding whether a cancer biology or translational oncology manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Gastroenterology · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Gastroenterology (AGA) or deciding whether a GI/hepatology manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Nature Astronomy · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Nature Astronomy (Nat Astron) or deciding whether an astronomy or astrophysics manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Nature Catalysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Nature Catalysis (Nat Catal) or deciding whether a catalysis manuscript fits this Springer Nature venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Nature Chemistry · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Nature Chemistry (Nat Chem) or deciding whether a chemistry manuscript fits this Springer Nature venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Nature Materials · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Nature Materials or deciding whether a materials science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Nature Photonics · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Nature Photonics (Nat Photonics) or deciding whether an optics or photonics manuscript fits this high-impact, broad-significance Nature-family venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Jms Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting the response-to-reviewers and revision for a Journal of Management Studies (JMS) R&R — turning a developmental, often multi-round decision letter into a point-by-point response that satisfies the handling editor. Drafts the rebuttal; it does not re-plan the review reading (jms-review-process) or rebuild the theory from scratch (jms-theory-development).

1k repo stars
▌
Jms Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which jms-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic through rebuttal for a Journal of Management Studies (JMS) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Mw Replication · brycewang-stanford
Use when assembling the data-and-code replication package required by 《管理世界》 after conditional acceptance, drafting the README in Chinese, or auditing a deposit before editorial-office submission. Implements 《管理世界》"数据可获得性政策" (effective 2023, updated 2025), with explicit handling for CSMAR / Wind / 国泰安等受限商业数据库 and Chinese government micro-data. 本技能服务于《管理世界》(Management World, MW)。

1k repo stars
▌
Jmr Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when a Journal of Marketing Research (JMR) Revise-and-Resubmit arrives — planning the revision and drafting a point-by-point response that satisfies two independent reviewers and the Coeditor, addresses rigor-bar concerns (identification, exact statistics, replication) and substance-bar concerns (contribution), and uses the 'W'-prefixed Web Appendix to absorb new analyses without breaking the 50-page limit.

1k repo stars
▌
Jmr Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which jmr-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Journal of Marketing Research (JMR) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills, and classifies the paper as behavioral, modeling/econometric, or a methods contribution.

1k repo stars
▌
Jm Theory Development · brycewang-stanford
Use when building the conceptual logic for a Journal of Marketing (JM) manuscript — grounding theory in a real-world marketing phenomenon, deriving predictions, and accommodating an empirics-first route. Builds the argument; it does not select the question (jm-topic-selection) or run the analysis (jm-data-analysis).

1k repo stars
▌
Jme Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use after a Journal of Monetary Economics (JME) revise-and-resubmit to plan the response letter and revision — given JME's distinctive "up or out" rule (the resubmission ends in acceptance or rejection, no second R&R) and the ~50% publication-likelihood signal an R&R carries.

1k repo stars
▌
Jme Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which jme-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through the "up or out" rebuttal for a Journal of Monetary Economics (JME) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Jpube Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when a Journal of Public Economics (JPubE) decision letter arrives (revision or reject) and a response strategy, response letter, or appeal decision is needed. Structures the revision and response for single-anonymized specialist review; it does not redo the analysis (route to the relevant jpube-* skill).

1k repo stars
▌
Jpube Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which jpube-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Journal of Public Economics (JPubE) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Jonc Experiments · brycewang-stanford
在为《通信学报》(Journal on Communications, JOC) 稿件设计与呈现实验、仿真或实测证据时调用。覆盖通信学科特有的链路级/系统级仿真、标准信道模型（AWGN/Rayleigh/多径/多普勒）、SNR-BER 与容量/吞吐/时延曲线、蒙特卡洛置信区间、公平基线选取与消融实验、网络协议仿真（NS-3/OMNeT++）与信息安全实验（威胁模型下的安全性证明与开销量化），指导用研究问题 RQ 驱动实验、保证统计严谨与可复现，帮助把证据做到能经受本刊外审对实验充分性、公平性与统计显著性的质疑，适用于物理层、网络、安全、信号处理各方向的通信中文长文。

1k repo stars
▌
Mathfin Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or auditing the numerical-experiments part of a Mathematical Finance (Wiley) manuscript — at this theory-first venue that means illustrative computation that SUPPORTS a proof (convergence, error bounds, qualitative behavior), never empirical data analysis. Keeps numerics rigorous, reproducible, and subordinate to the theorems.

1k repo stars
▌
Mathfin Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when polishing a Mathematical Finance (Wiley) manuscript's theorem-first exposition — definitions, numbered assumptions, theorem statements, proof sketches, appendices, notation discipline for a stochastic-analysis readership, numerical-experiment prose, and the financial-modelling intuition that accompanies each formal result.

1k repo stars
▌
Nbr Fit Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use to judge whether a manuscript fits 《南开管理评论》 (Nankai Business Review) before investing in revision, and to re-route off-fit papers — math models to 管理科学学报, macro policy-evaluation to 管理世界 / 中国工业经济, capital-market governance to 会计研究 / 金融研究. Use when the topic, method, or framing might be a mismatch for a theory-building management journal.

1k repo stars
▌
Newms Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when anticipating how a New Media & Society (NM&S) manuscript will be judged — anonymous (double-anonymized) peer review, what interdisciplinary referees weigh, and the decision categories. Sets expectations; it does not write the paper or the response letter.

1k repo stars
▌
Newms Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building exhibits for a New Media & Society (NM&S) manuscript — quote/excerpt tables, coding-scheme tables, network and computational figures, and screenshots of platform interfaces. Makes exhibits clear and self-contained; it does not run the analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Ors Theory Development · brycewang-stanford
Use when formulating the model and stating results for an Operations Research (OR) manuscript — defining the optimization/stochastic/simulation model, assumptions, and the theorems, propositions, and lemmas that carry the contribution. Builds the mathematical object and its claimed results; it does not prove them in detail (ors-methods) or run the computational study (ors-data-analysis).

1k repo stars
▌
Orgsci Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when you want to understand how Organization Science review and decisions work before or after submitting — the decentralized senior-editor model with strong SE autonomy, the conflict-of-interest routing cascade, double-blind submission preparation, and how to read a decision letter at this venue.

1k repo stars
▌
Orgsci Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building the exhibits for an Organization Science manuscript — data-structure diagrams and process models for qualitative work, correlation/result tables and interaction plots for quantitative work, and simulation/network figures, all in INFORMS house style with self-explanatory titles and notes.

1k repo stars
▌
Orgstud Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when executing and reporting the analysis for an Organization Studies (OS) manuscript — qualitative coding and the data-to-theory ladder, process analysis, or quantitative estimation and robustness. Makes the evidence-to-theory link transparent; it does not design the study (see orgstud-methods).

1k repo stars
▌
Orgstud Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use for full-manuscript prose and the discursive European register of an Organization Studies (OS) manuscript — voice, theoretical texture, the argument's arc, and qualitative craft. Polishes the writing; it does not change the theory or analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Phg Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Progress in Human Geography (PiHG) via SAGE Track — genre selection, double-anonymous preparation, the ~8,000-word inclusive cap, the ~100-word abstract, 5+ keywords, SAGE Harvard style, ORCID, and ethics declarations. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Psci Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether an empirical psychology project fits Psychological Science and which manuscript type to target. The journal favors concise, high-impact, well-powered work whose claims are robust and broadly relevant. Frames the question; it does not collect data.

1k repo stars
▌
Poq Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when executing and reporting the analysis for a Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ) manuscript so it survives expert, double-blind review — design-based inference that respects survey weights, strata, and clusters, honest uncertainty, robustness, and reproducibility. POQ verifies that code reproduces every table and figure. Guides analysis norms; it does not fabricate results.

1k repo stars
▌
Poq Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or polishing a Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ) manuscript so it reads for a public-opinion and survey-methodology audience and fits the type caps (Original Article ≤ 6,500 words of text and notes; Research Note < 3,000; Polls in Context ≤ 2,500). POQ word counts cover text and notes but exclude figures, tables, references, and appendices. Tightens prose and format; it does not invent content.

1k repo stars

5,264 published skills · page 30 of 53