brycewang-stanford

@brycewang-stanford source repo

5.3k skills
0 followers
1k repo stars
3 weeks ago last updated

▌
Nbr Qualitative Case · brycewang-stanford
Use for qualitative theory-building submitted to 《南开管理评论》 (Nankai Business Review) — multi-case comparison (replication logic, case selection), grounded-theory coding (open / axial / selective), theoretical saturation, and trustworthiness (data triangulation, member checking, audit trail). Use when the contribution is built inductively from cases or interviews rather than from survey/experiment data.

1k repo stars
▌
Newms Research Design · brycewang-stanford
Use when defending the research design of a New Media & Society (NM&S) manuscript — informant/site logic for interviews and digital ethnography, sampling and coding for content/discourse analysis, data construction and validation for computational work, and integration logic for mixed methods. NM&S judges each tradition on its own terms. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.

1k repo stars
▌
Newms Theory Building · brycewang-stanford
Use when building the conceptual argument of a New Media & Society (NM&S) manuscript — turning a platform finding into a portable concept or mechanism drawing on media, communication, and social theory. Builds the argument; it does not collect data or run analyses.

1k repo stars
▌
Newms Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when judging whether a topic fits New Media & Society (NM&S) and how to frame it for an interdisciplinary digital-media-and-society readership. Tests fit and stakes; it does not design the study or write the paper.

1k repo stars
▌
Orgsci Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when choosing or sharpening a research question for an Organization Science manuscript — testing whether it is a theory-driven question about organizations spanning micro to macro, and whether Organization Science (rather than ASQ, AMJ, Management Science, or a field journal) is the right venue.

1k repo stars
▌
Orgstud Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when calibrating expectations for the Organization Studies (OS) review cycle — desk-screen odds, the developmental double-anonymized process, decision types, and how to read what reviewers and the handling editor are signalling. Sets expectations and reading strategy; it does not draft the response (see orgstud-rebuttal).

1k repo stars
▌
Orgstud Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building the exhibits for an Organization Studies (OS) manuscript — data structures, process-model figures, evidence tables, and (for quantitative work) results tables. Designs exhibits that make the inference auditable; it does not run the analysis (see orgstud-data-analysis).

1k repo stars
▌
Prl Results Framing · brycewang-stanford
Use when a Physical Review Letters result is correct but its central claim and broad significance are not yet sharp. Structures the one-claim narrative; does not run analysis or design figures.

1k repo stars
▌
Psychbull Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Psychological Bulletin via APA Editorial Manager — masking, the ≤ 250-word abstract, APA 7th style, MARS/PRISMA/JARS checklists, and the transparency package. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Psychrev Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when polishing a Psychological Review manuscript to APA house style and theory-paper register — mechanism-first prose, model vocabulary, no empirical-report framing. A late-stage polish; it does NOT build the theory (psychrev-theory-construction) or derive its predictions (psychrev-argument-development).

1k repo stars
▌
Pubar Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when writing the response to a Public Administration Review (PAR) revise-and-resubmit. PAR weighs both scholarly rigor and the practitioner "so-what," so the response must convert each reviewer, satisfy the handling editor, and keep the Evidence for Practice intact. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.

1k repo stars
▌
Pubar Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when starting or navigating any Public Administration Review (PAR) manuscript and unsure which skill applies. Routes to the right PAR sub-skill based on lifecycle stage and which article type (Scholarly Take, Conceptualizing PA, Early Career Intel, Practically Speaking, Public Administration in Print) fits. It dispatches; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Poq Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use to understand how Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ) evaluates a manuscript — double-blind review via ScholarOne Manuscripts, typically two to three referees, the survey-methodology and AAPOR-disclosure bar reviewers apply, and how associate editors may request code/data during review. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

1k repo stars
▌
Poq Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building tables and figures for a Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ) manuscript so exhibits are self-contained, accessible, and show survey-based uncertainty correctly. POQ word caps count text and notes but exclude figures and tables, so exhibits carry weight without costing the budget — but they must report design-based uncertainty and weighting. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Qje Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when a Quarterly Journal of Economics (QJE) decision letter arrives (R&R or reject-and-resubmit) and a response strategy and letter are needed. Structures the revision and response; it does not redo the analysis (route to the relevant qje-* skill for that).

1k repo stars
▌
Qje Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which qje-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Quarterly Journal of Economics (QJE) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Rje Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when executing and stress-testing the empirical analysis for a RAND Journal of Economics (RJE) industrial-organization manuscript — estimating structural demand/supply, entry, auction, or reduced-form models, then running the robustness, counterfactual, and inference checks IO referees expect. Analysis discipline, not study design.

1k repo stars
▌
Rje Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use to make a manuscript conform to The RAND Journal of Economics (RJE) Style Guide — author-date citations with no page numbers, references with no issue numbers, numbered sections with unnumbered subsections, flush-right equation numbering, and the journal's distinctive house usage rules. Style and usage polish, not content drafting.

1k repo stars
▌
Respol Contribution Framing · brycewang-stanford
Use when the one-sentence "so what" is the bottleneck for a Research Policy (RP) manuscript — converting solid results into an explicit advance for innovation theory/evidence that usually carries a policy or managerial implication. Frames the claim; it does not build the mechanism (respol-theory-development) or polish prose (respol-writing-style).

1k repo stars
▌
Revacc Methods · brycewang-stanford
Use when research design and identification are the bottleneck for a Review of Accounting Studies (RAST) manuscript — choosing the setting, shock, and design that credibly identify an accounting effect, or fixing the primitives and solution concept of an analytical model. Designs the study; it does not run the estimation and robustness (revacc-data-analysis) or frame the contribution (revacc-contribution-framing).

1k repo stars
▌
Socs Abstract Keywords · brycewang-stanford
Use to write the abstract and keywords for 《社会学研究》 (Sociological Studies) per the journal's norms — Chinese abstract ≤ 200 characters, 3–5 Chinese keywords, English abstract ≤ 150 words, leading with the sociological problematic and the mechanism/concept rather than background. Facts from resources/journal-profile.md.

1k repo stars
▌
Soctheory Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or polishing a Sociological Theory (ST) manuscript so it reads as an argument for a broad theoretical readership, follows the ASA Style Guide, and fits ST's length cap (max ~14,500 words inclusive of footnotes, references, tables, figures, and appendices — verify current). Tightens prose and format; it does not invent content.

1k repo stars
▌
Smj Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Strategic Management Journal (SMJ) manuscript via ScholarOne — format, anonymization, files, and cover letter. Checks readiness; it does not write the paper or the rebuttal.

1k repo stars
▌
Ectj Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or auditing The Econometrics Journal (EctJ) Monte Carlo simulations, empirical applications, estimator comparisons, robustness checks, computation, seeds, and applied-value evidence.

1k repo stars
▌
Ectj Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when revising a The Econometrics Journal (EctJ) manuscript for compact RES/OUP style covering the 150-word summary, the roughly 20-page printed-paper discipline, theorem readability, one-page simulation summaries, applied-value clarity, and template-conformant prose that survives the desk screen.

1k repo stars
▌
Worlddev Referee Strategy · brycewang-stanford
Use when anticipating the objections a World Development (WD) manuscript will draw under double-anonymized, multidisciplinary review. Pre-empts referee pushback before submission; it does not invent evidence or citations.

1k repo stars
▌
Amj Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — ScholarOne portal, anonymization for double-blind review, AOM house-style formatting, files, and ethics declarations. Checks readiness to submit; it does not handle the post-decision response (amj-rebuttal).

1k repo stars
▌
Asq Methods · brycewang-stanford
Use when choosing and justifying the research design for an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript — qualitative (grounded-theory, ethnographic, historical) or quantitative — and setting the rigor bar. Designs the study; it does not run the analysis (see asq-data-analysis).

1k repo stars
▌
Agsy Figures And Tables · brycewang-stanford
Use when building figures and tables for an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript so exhibits communicate interactions, dynamics, trade-offs, and model performance clearly. AgSy is a systems journal, so the best exhibits show trade-off frontiers, observed-vs-simulated fit, resource flows, and conceptual system diagrams — not just a bar chart of one treatment. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Ahr Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or polishing the prose of an American Historical Review (AHR) manuscript so it reads with clarity and authority for historians across all fields. The AHR rewards lucid, narrative-aware scholarly prose, not jargon. Tightens voice and readability; it does not invent content or argument.

1k repo stars
▌
Ajs Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the American Journal of Sociology (AJS) via Editorial Manager — the $30 submission fee (waived for sole-author grad students), the separate cover page for double-blind review, the ~150-word abstract, mandatory figure alt text, AJS house style, and the originality statement. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Anmath Results Framing · brycewang-stanford
Use when stating the main theorem(s) of a pure-mathematics manuscript precisely, establishing their significance, and positioning them against prior work for an Annals of Mathematics submission. Crafts statements and positioning; does not write the proof (see anmath-methods).

1k repo stars
▌
Arecon Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final delivery preflight for a commissioned Annual Review of Economics (ARE) review via the Annual Reviews production system — disclosure statements, reference/format compliance, figure permissions, and the transparency/reproducibility of any meta-analysis the review itself contains. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Arpsych Revision · brycewang-stanford
Use when responding to the Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) Editor's or Committee's peer-review letter on a delivered review, or to copyediting/proof queries. Handles the post-delivery revision loop; it does not run the pre-delivery preflight (arpsych-submission) or re-audit balance from scratch (arpsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance).

1k repo stars
▌
Arpsych Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which arpsych-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing an invited review article from topic through revision for an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Ceq Fit Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use to judge whether a manuscript is on-target for 《经济学(季刊)》 (China Economic Quarterly, CEQ) before investing in revision — CEQ is the strictest Chinese econ journal on identification and the most internationally legible. If the fit is weak, re-route to economic-research / china-industrial-economics / journal-of-financial-research / journal-of-world-economy.

1k repo stars
▌
Ceq Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when shaping or sharpening a 《经济学(季刊)》 (China Economic Quarterly, CEQ) research question — turning data/correlation into a clean causal, model-able, internationally-legible topic that a field economist can recognize as a contribution. Use before literature review and identification.

1k repo stars
▌
Cie Heterogeneity · brycewang-stanford
Use when the heterogeneity analysis of a 《中国工业经济》 (China Industrial Economics) manuscript is thin — only one crude cut (e.g. east/central/west). Pushes multi-dimensional cuts (ownership, size, industry, factor intensity, market structure, region) each tied to an economic interpretation, not just a significant subsample.

1k repo stars
▌
Cjc Experiments · brycewang-stanford
在为投向《计算机学报》(Chinese Journal of Computers, CJC) 的长文设计与呈现实验、评估或理论验证时调用。覆盖如何按贡献类型(算法/系统/理论/实证/学习类)匹配证据、如何设立评估问题与公平基线、如何选数据集与指标、如何做消融与显著性分析、如何报告均值方差与统计检验而非单点最优、如何防数据泄漏与评测污染、以及如何用图表在长文中充分而不冗余地呈现结果。适用于让计算机全学科中文原创研究的实验部分经受本刊三审专家对"数据充分真实、结论可信"的审查。

1k repo stars
▌
Cpa Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for 《中国行政管理》 — format, anonymity, references, anti-plagiarism, author info, ethics for human-subject / qualitative data, and supplementary files. Points to the online submission system; defers exact numeric limits to the journal's current author guidelines. 本技能服务于《中国行政管理》(Chinese Public Administration, CPA)。

1k repo stars
▌
Macroeconomics · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting 《宏观经济研究》(Macroeconomics — 国家发改委主管、中国宏观经济研究院主办的综合性经济理论 CSSCI 月刊, 1955 年创刊) or deciding whether a Chinese social-science/econ/management manuscript fits this journal. Applies the journal's fit, macro-policy framing, house-style, official-submission-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Annals Of Oncology · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Annals of Oncology (ESMO) or deciding whether a clinical or translational oncology study fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the practice-changing trial and ESMO-guideline evidence bar, reporting-guideline and registration requirements, ESMO house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics. Venue-fit aid only, not clinical advice.

1k repo stars
▌
Cogpsych Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when you need to understand how Cognitive Psychology (Elsevier) evaluates a manuscript — editorial triage for theoretical impact and fit, expert review weighing model rigor, recovery, design, and reproducibility, and the long revision cycles typical of a model-driven journal. Use when stress-testing a paper before submission or interpreting a decision letter. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

1k repo stars
▌
Cogpsych Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building tables and figures for a Cognitive Psychology (Elsevier) manuscript. Exhibits here carry the experiment-to-model-fit argument — they should overlay model predictions on data, show distributions and uncertainty, and report parameter estimates, not just bars of means. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis or fit the model.

1k repo stars
▌
Commres Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when executing and reporting the analysis for a Communication Research (CR) manuscript so it survives expert, double-anonymized review — ANOVA/regression/SEM, mediation/moderation with honest uncertainty, reliability, and APA statistical reporting. Guides analysis norms; it does not fabricate results.

1k repo stars
▌
Commres Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or polishing a Communication Research (CR) manuscript so it reads as cumulative social science, follows APA style, and fits the limits (manuscript no more than 45 double-spaced pages inclusive of references). Tightens prose and format; it does not invent content.

1k repo stars
▌
Cps Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when preparing the final Comparative Political Studies (CPS) submission package for SAGE Track (ScholarOne) — anonymization, word count, abstract, ORCID, title page, and data availability statement. Runs the submission preflight; it does not draft the manuscript.

1k repo stars
▌
Pacific Graphics · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Pacific Graphics (Pacific Graphics) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for computer graphics.

1k repo stars
▌
Csj Author Response · brycewang-stanford
在为《计算机科学》(Computer Science, JSJKX) 撰写审稿意见答复(response letter)与修回说明时调用。本刊是计算机全学科中文综合月刊(CCF 会刊、B 类、T2 级)，单盲审稿、期刊式多轮修回(小修/大修)。技能帮助逐条回应外审与编辑意见、区分小修与大修策略、在正文标注改动位置、礼貌而有据地处理分歧、组织补充实验的呈现，并给出中文答复信的标准结构与模板。适用于收到修回通知后系统化准备答复与修改稿、争取下一轮通过的场景。

1k repo stars
▌
Csj Reproducibility · brycewang-stanford
在为《计算机科学》(Computer Science, JSJKX) 提升实验可复现性与可重复性时调用。本刊是计算机全学科中文综合月刊(CCF 会刊、B 类、T2 级)，单盲审稿，未见独立 artifact 徽章制度(待核实)，故复现工作主要服务于让外审专家更快确认方法可信。技能覆盖环境/依赖/随机种子/数据划分固定、数据泄漏与污染防范、复现包结构、外链数据与校验和、可复现性自查清单。适用于让稿件的主结果可被他人从原始数据一键复现、经得起外审追问的场景。

1k repo stars
▌
Csj Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
在为《计算机科学》(Computer Science, JSJKX) 选题定位、判断稿件是否契合本刊时调用。本刊是重庆西南信息有限公司主办、创刊 1974 年的计算机全学科中文综合月刊(CCF 会刊、B 类、T2 级)，覆盖面广、发文量大、专题(专栏)与综述活跃。技能帮助判断选题属于哪个栏目(理论/体系结构/软件/数据库/AI/网络/信息安全/图形多媒体/交叉前沿)、是否对接正在征稿的专题、稿件类型(研究长文/综述/应用)如何选择，以及与《计算机学报》《软件学报》等兄弟刊的分工。适用于动笔前确定选题与投稿定位的场景。

1k repo stars
▌
Car Methods · brycewang-stanford
Use when the research design and identification are the bottleneck for a Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR) manuscript — choosing and defending an archival, experimental, analytical, field, or survey design and, for human-participant work, meeting CAR's mandatory ethics-approval verification. Designs the study; it does not run the estimation (car-data-analysis).

1k repo stars
▌
CI Structure And Exposition · brycewang-stanford
Use to architect a Critical Inquiry (CI) essay — the order in which intervention, objects, and theory unfold so a reader from another field can follow an ambitious argument. CI essays are long-form humanistic prose, not IMRaD reports; this skill shapes the opening, the build, the turn, and the close. It structures the essay; it does not draft full sections.

1k repo stars
▌
Devpsych Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Developmental Psychology (APA) via Editorial Manager — length-tier compliance, the abstract and Public Significance Statement, APA 7th + JARS reporting, masked-review anonymization, the data-availability statement, and preregistration/data DOIs. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Er Reproducibility · brycewang-stanford
Use when organizing a reproducible research package (folder structure, master do-file, data availability statement) so empirical results survive 《经济研究》 referee scrutiny and录用后的扩展资料提交.

1k repo stars
▌
Er Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when an Economic-Research manuscript is at the topic-selection stage and the theoretical grounding, marginal-contribution sentence, or venue match are unsettled. Produces the contribution-sentence template and the theoretical-grounding checklist.

1k repo stars
▌
Aiche Journal · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting AIChE Journal or deciding whether a chemical-engineering manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the fundamental-and-generalizable contribution bar, modeling-plus-experiment rigor, house style, the fundamentals-vs-applied routing, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Acs Catalysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting ACS Catalysis (ACS Catal) or deciding whether a catalysis manuscript fits this primary-research venue spanning heterogeneous, homogeneous, bio-, electro-, and photocatalysis. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Diabetes Care · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Diabetes Care (ADA) or deciding whether a diabetes/endocrinology manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Earths Future · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Earth's Future (Earth's Future) or deciding whether an Anthropocene, Earth-system-futures, or sustainability manuscript fits this AGU open-access venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Nature Energy · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Nature Energy or deciding whether an energy research manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Plos Medicine · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting PLOS Medicine or deciding whether a medicine or public-health manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Eer Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether a question is a fit for the European Economic Review (EER) — general-interest across all of economics — rather than a field journal, JEEA, or The Economic Journal. Diagnoses fit and reframes for breadth; it does not build the identification or the model.

1k repo stars
▌
Expecon Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when the prose of an Experimental Economics (ExpEcon) manuscript buries the design or the result, or when the intro/abstract do not land for an experimentalist reader. Polishes structure and voice; it does not change the analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Fcr Experimental Design · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or defending the field-experiment or modelling design of a Field Crops Research (FCR) manuscript — multi-environment trials, randomization and replication, blocking and split-plot layouts, genotype-by-environment (G×E) structure, and crop-model calibration/validation. FCR expects field experiments to span at least two seasons and/or multiple environments. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.

1k repo stars
▌
Finman Empirical Design · brycewang-stanford
Use when the sample construction, variable measurement, panel structure, or inference of a Financial Management (FM) manuscript is fragile — before identification can be trusted or exhibits finalized. Hardens the data layer; it does not establish the causal claim (finman-identification) or run robustness (finman-robustness).

1k repo stars
▌
Finman Referee Strategy · brycewang-stanford
Use when pre-empting the objections a Financial Management (FM) referee is likely to raise, before pressing submit — red-teaming the paper from the perspective of an applied-finance reviewer who weighs relevance, rigor, and the "so-what." Anticipates pushback; it does not run the submission preflight (finman-submission) or draft a response to an actual report (finman-rebuttal).

1k repo stars
▌
Gcb Figures And Tables · brycewang-stanford
Use when building figures, tables, and the mandatory graphical abstract for a Global Change Biology (GCB) manuscript. GCB rewards mechanism-first, self-contained, accessible exhibits and requires a graphical abstract depicting the driver-to-response link. Guides exhibit design; it does not invent data.

1k repo stars
▌
Hlr Student Editor Review · brycewang-stanford
Use when working with Harvard Law Review (HLR) student editors after an offer — the intensive substantive and technical edit, the cite-check / source-pull, and author responsiveness. Manages the relationship and process; it does not run the pre-offer placement (hlr-placement-strategy) or the author-side cite apparatus build (hlr-footnotes-and-cite-check).

1k repo stars
▌
Hrm Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when calibrating expectations for the Human Resource Management (Wiley "HRM") editorial process — the EIC fit/relevance screen, double-blind peer review, the developmental R&R culture, and reading a decision letter. Explains the process and how to read decisions; it does not draft the response (hrm-rebuttal).

1k repo stars
▌
Hrm Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when exhibits are the bottleneck for a Human Resource Management (Wiley "HRM") manuscript — the descriptives/correlation table, the model build-up, interaction and simple-slope plots, the theoretical-model figure, and (for qualitative work) the data-structure figure. Builds reader-ready exhibits; it does not run the analysis (hrm-data-analysis).

1k repo stars
▌
Ijoc Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an INFORMS Journal on Computing (IJOC) submission via ScholarOne — page limit, LaTeX template, single-blind rules, technical-area choice, and the GitHub code/data deposit. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Ier Robustness · brycewang-stanford
Use when an International Economic Review (IER) result may be sensitive to specification, sample, functional form, calibration, or inference choices. Organizes robustness by threat to the load-bearing assumption; it does not run the regressions.

1k repo stars
▌
Ier Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an International Economic Review (IER) manuscript via the Editorial Express portal — the submission fee gate, the ≤50-page limit, format and style, proprietary-data notification, and the AER data policy. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Io Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use to understand how International Organization (IO) evaluates a manuscript — double-blind peer review, expert IR referees, anonymous reviews returned to the author, the decision and revise-and-resubmit process, and IO's distinctive verification of quantitative results and formal proofs before final acceptance. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

1k repo stars
▌
Io Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building tables and figures for an International Organization (IO) manuscript so exhibits are self-contained, accessible, reproducible, and count toward the word budget correctly. IO word limits include tables, figures, and notes (but exclude the bibliography), and exhibits must survive IO's pre-publication result verification. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Jbv Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when preparing to submit a Journal of Business Venturing (JBV) manuscript through Elsevier Editorial Manager — double-anonymized preparation, required declarations (competing interest, CRediT, generative-AI when used), flexible first-submission references, the Option C data availability statement, open-access/APC choice, and optional Data in Brief / MethodsX co-submission. Handles the submission preflight; it does not write the paper (jbv-writing-style) or manage the review (jbv-review-process).

1k repo stars
▌
Joc Research Design · brycewang-stanford
Use when defending the research design of a Journal of Communication (JoC) manuscript — experimental and survey design, content analysis with intercoder reliability, computational/text-as-data validation, or qualitative/critical inquiry. JoC judges each tradition on its own terms. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.

1k repo stars
▌
Joc Theory Building · brycewang-stanford
Use when building the theoretical argument of a Journal of Communication (JoC) manuscript into a field-level contribution — whether the work is mechanistic-empirical, computational, interpretive, or critical. JoC rewards a clear, portable communication-theory argument over a bare finding. Structures the argument; it does not run analyses.

1k repo stars
▌
Joc Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether a communication project fits the Journal of Communication (JoC) and which format (original article vs. JoC Forum) to target. JoC is the field's generalist flagship, so the test is general significance across communication research, not platform novelty alone. Helps frame the question; it does not collect data.

1k repo stars
▌
Jegeo Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) decision letter arrives and you must plan a revision and response that satisfies a cross-disciplinary referee pair. Structures the rebuttal; it does not invent results or concede the core claim.

1k repo stars
▌
Jegeo Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which jegeo-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic through rebuttal for a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Jeg Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when building or auditing Journal of Economic Growth (JEG) empirical estimates, calibrated growth models, transition paths, cross-country and subnational panels, historical datasets, spatial (Conley) inference, robustness, and reproducibility for growth and comparative-development manuscripts.

1k repo stars
▌
Jeg Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when polishing Journal of Economic Growth (JEG) prose — abstract, introduction, model exposition, empirical-result and magnitude-translation paragraphs, APA author-year references, keywords, JEL codes, and Springer Nature declarations for growth and comparative-development manuscripts.

1k repo stars
▌
Jet Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when handling numerical, computational, or empirical content in a Journal of Economic Theory (JET) paper — JET is theory-first, so examples, simulations, and computed equilibria must stay subordinate to the theorem and reproducible.

1k repo stars
▌
Jet Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when applying the Journal of Economic Theory (JET) house style to a manuscript — the Elsevier elsarticle theorem-proof format with definition/assumption/proposition/theorem/proof structure, disciplined notation, full references in the abstract, 250-word abstract, 1-7 keywords, optional Highlights, and author-year proof-stage references. For drafting and polishing JET prose; it does not check proofs.

1k repo stars
▌
Jf Literature Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use when the introduction and related-work sections of a The Journal of Finance (JF) manuscript fail to state a crisp marginal contribution against the finance literature. Positions the paper; it does not survey it.

1k repo stars
▌
Jfr Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use for the pre-submission preflight to 《金融研究》 (Journal of Financial Research) — checking word count (~20k chars), ~200-char abstract, 3–5 keywords, three JEL codes, note conventions (①②③ with continuous numbering), the online submission system (jryj.org.cn), double-blind anonymity, and document hygiene. Verify every rule against the journal's current 来稿须知.

1k repo stars
▌
Jhe Theory Model · brycewang-stanford
Use when a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) manuscript needs a model — insurance demand/selection, provider behavior under a payment rule, or a health-production/human-capital frame — to interpret estimates or run a counterfactual. Disciplines the conceptual frame; it does not establish identification (jhe-identification) or write prose.

1k repo stars
▌
Jhr Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when building or auditing Journal of Human Resources (JHR) empirical pipelines — sample construction, design-based causal estimates with correct clustering, robustness, comparative estimation against prior published work, online appendix material, and reproducible analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Jhr Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when polishing Journal of Human Resources (JHR) prose — abstract, introduction, results paragraphs that translate coefficients into policy units, reconciliation language against prior estimates, disclosure wording, and structure that respects the page-limited manuscript format.

1k repo stars
▌
Jms Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Journal of Management Studies (JMS) manuscript via the Wiley ScholarOne portal — anonymisation for double-blind review, Harvard referencing, the inclusive word count, article type, and the anonymous title page. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Jmr Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Journal of Marketing Research (JMR) manuscript — ScholarOne portal, double-anonymization, the 50-page page limit, the 'W'-prefixed Web Appendix PDF, the title-page Data Availability Statement, AMA formatting, and AI/ethics declarations. Checks readiness to submit; jmr-rebuttal handles the post-decision response.

1k repo stars
▌
Jm Contribution Framing · brycewang-stanford
Use when stating the contribution of a Journal of Marketing (JM) manuscript — making the substantive insight explicit and discharging JM's dual mandate of managerial, policy, and societal relevance. Frames the contribution; it does not run the analysis (jm-data-analysis) or polish the prose (jm-writing-style).

1k repo stars
▌
Jme Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Journal of Monetary Economics (JME) via Elsevier Editorial Manager — the US$350 (US$200 PhD) up-front fee, single-anonymized review, the 40-page / ≤10 tables-and-figures cap, 100-word abstract, line numbers, author-date references, JEL codes, and the supplementary-materials deposit. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Jom Methods · brycewang-stanford
Use when choosing and defending the research design for a Journal of Operations Management (JOM) empirical study — matching survey, archival/secondary, field, case, experimental, or intervention-based research to the operations question, anticipating the Empirical Research Methods Department's method check, and keeping the design observation-grounded rather than analytical.

1k repo stars
▌
Cte Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which cte-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for 《财贸经济》 (Finance & Trade Economics). Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Geb Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use after a Games and Economic Behavior revise-and-resubmit to organize responses on theory novelty, equilibrium/proof details, experiments, simulations, Editor-in-Charge priorities, and Elsevier revision files.

1k repo stars
▌
Geb Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which geb-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Games and Economic Behavior (GEB) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Gcb Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use to understand how a Global Change Biology (GCB) manuscript is judged — high desk-rejection screening for scope and significance, expert single-anonymous peer review with 2–3 reviewers, and the decision categories. Sets expectations and informs preparation; it does not contact editors or predict outcomes.

1k repo stars

5,264 published skills · page 32 of 53