brycewang-stanford

@brycewang-stanford source repo

5.3k skills
0 followers
1k repo stars
2 weeks ago last updated

▌
Gec Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use as the entry point for any Global Environmental Change (GEC) manuscript. Routes to the right GEC sub-skill based on where you are in the lifecycle and whether the paper fits a Research Article or a shorter format. GEC is interdisciplinary and social-science-leading; the router's first job is to make sure the human and policy dimensions are front and centre. It dispatches; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Hrm Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Human Resource Management (Wiley "HRM") manuscript via Wiley ScholarOne — double-blind anonymization, the title-page split, APA style, the data-availability statement, ORCID, and the dual-contribution check the EIC screens on. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Imfer Identification · brycewang-stanford
Use when the identification argument is the bottleneck for an IMF Economic Review (IMFER) manuscript — cross-country panel, high-frequency policy-surprise, crisis event study, narrative, or open-economy structural identification. Stress-tests the data-to-object mapping to IMFER's policy-relevant bar; it does not build the model (imfer-theory-model) or run the robustness suite (imfer-robustness).

1k repo stars
▌
Imfer Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when an IMF Economic Review (IMFER) manuscript's exhibits must communicate an international-macro result to a dual academic/policy audience — transparent country coverage, readable cross-country panels, no significance asterisks. Builds the exhibits; it does not run the robustness behind them (imfer-robustness) or write the prose (imfer-writing-style).

1k repo stars
▌
Isr Methods · brycewang-stanford
Use when choosing and stress-testing the research design for an Information Systems Research (ISR) manuscript — matching the genre (behavioral empirical, analytical-economic modeling, design-science, or multimethod) to the question, and ensuring the design can actually support the IS contribution. Designs the study; it does not execute the estimation/derivation (isr-data-analysis) or frame the contribution (isr-contribution-framing).

1k repo stars
▌
Io Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for International Organization (IO) via Editorial Manager — article-type selection, double-blind preparation (third-person self-citation), word caps, separate abstract/word-count/acknowledgments, short author-date footnotes, supplementary material (~20 pages), ORCID, and the Data Availability Statement. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Jcr Methods · brycewang-stanford
Use when choosing or stress-testing the research design for a Journal of Consumer Research (JCR) manuscript — multi-study behavioral experiments, interpretive Consumer Culture Theory (CCT) fieldwork, mixed designs, or a Registered Report — so the evidence matches the conceptual claim. Designs the studies; it does not analyze them (jcr-data-analysis).

1k repo stars
▌
Jhe Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) decision letter arrives (R&R or reject-and-resubmit) and a response-to-referees letter plus revision plan must be drafted. Plans and structures the response; it does not run the new analysis (jhe-identification / jhe-robustness) or the submission preflight.

1k repo stars
▌
Jhe Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which jhe-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic through rebuttal for a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Jole Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting a response letter to a Journal of Labor Economics (JOLE) revise-and-resubmit — addressing single-blind labor referees point by point under the journal's word economy. Strategy and structure; it does not run new estimations for you.

1k repo stars
▌
Jole Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which jole-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Journal of Labor Economics (JOLE) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Mgsci Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when shaping or stress-testing a research question for Management Science (INFORMS) — confirming the decision-relevance bar, choosing the right Department lane (analytical vs empirical), and testing fit against sister INFORMS journals (Operations Research, M&SOM, Marketing Science) so the paper is not desk-rejected as "better suited elsewhere".

1k repo stars
▌
Mind Conceptual Analysis And Method · brycewang-stanford
Use when sharpening the concepts, distinctions, and method of a Mind article — defining key terms precisely, drawing distinctions, deploying thought experiments, and choosing the right philosophical method. Analytic philosophy lives or dies on conceptual precision and parsimony. Tightens the conceptual machinery; it does not settle the substantive question for you.

1k repo stars
▌
Nbr China Context · brycewang-stanford
Use to contextualize theory for 《南开管理评论》 (Nankai Business Review) — showing how the China context changes construct meanings, mechanisms, or boundary conditions, rather than using China merely as a sampling site. Use when the China context appears only in the sample description, or when the paper asserts "Chinese characteristics" without specifying how the context alters the theory.

1k repo stars
▌
Ngeo Length Management · brycewang-stanford
Use when a Nature Geoscience manuscript exceeds the ~3,000-word Article limit, the 4-6 display-item ceiling, or the reference cap, where content must be relocated to online Methods or Supplementary Information. Triages what to cut, compress, or move; does not rewrite content from scratch.

1k repo stars
▌
Prl Cover Letter · brycewang-stanford
Use when writing the cover letter for a Physical Review Letters submission, which must justify to APS editors why the work meets PRL's importance-and-broad-interest criteria. Drafts the editorial case; does not edit the manuscript itself.

1k repo stars
▌
Phg Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when responding to a Progress in Human Geography (PiHG) decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the editor and referees that strengthens the review's argument and coverage. Structures the response and revisions; it does not fabricate literature or claims.

1k repo stars
▌
Phg Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when starting or navigating any Progress in Human Geography (PiHG) manuscript and you need the entry point. Routes to the right sub-skill based on lifecycle stage and whether the piece is a free-standing review article or a commissioned Progress Report. It dispatches; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Psychrev Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Psychological Review manuscript — Editorial Manager portal, APA format and length, abstract, masking, references, ethics, and (for computational models) sharing the author's own model code. Theory journal; there is no empirical data-availability/replication-package step.

1k repo stars
▌
Psci Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when analyzing and reporting results for a Psychological Science manuscript. The journal requires effect sizes with confidence intervals, full disclosure of exclusions/conditions/measures, and a clear confirmatory/exploratory split, with analysis scripts and data shared. Guides analysis norms; it does not fabricate results.

1k repo stars
▌
Psci Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or polishing a Psychological Science manuscript to fit its distinctive word format (Introduction + Discussion + footnotes + acknowledgments + appendices <= 2,000 words combined; Method + Results excluded; 150-word structured abstract) in APA 7th-edition style. Tightens prose and format; it does not invent content.

1k repo stars
▌
Qe Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use to understand and plan around the Quantitative Economics (QE) editorial timeline — desk-reject risk, external refereeing, ~4-5 month target turnaround, 12-month revise windows, the Econometrica-transfer route, and the pre-acceptance ES Data Editor check. Sets expectations; it does not draft the paper.

1k repo stars
▌
Qe Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building or auditing tables and figures for a Quantitative Economics (QE) manuscript so exhibits follow QE house rules — no significance asterisks or boldface, standard errors and coverage sets shown, figures/tables placed in-text, and final files as .eps/.jpg. Shapes exhibits; it does not redo the estimation.

1k repo stars
▌
Rje Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for The RAND Journal of Economics (RJE) via the Wiley Research Exchange portal — hard page caps (40/50 pp, double-spaced), the <=100-word abstract, the non-refundable submission fee, Word/LaTeX files, and RJE Style Guide compliance. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Rt Response To Referees · brycewang-stanford
Use after an R&R (or the simulated rehearsal) to turn a referee report into a point-by-point response letter plus a revision plan — editor first, every comment answered, each empirical fix backed by a real re-run via the target pack's skill and the execution bridge. Defers the venue's response format to the pack + source-map.

1k repo stars
▌
Red Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when planning the response-to-referees after a Review of Economic Dynamics (RED) revise-and-resubmit — structuring a point-by-point reply for a single-anonymized, two-referee process, prioritizing model/quantitative concerns, and remembering that second-and-later resubmissions are exempt from the submission fee. Strategy; it does not write the paper.

1k repo stars
▌
Red Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when mapping the end-to-end lifecycle of a Review of Economic Dynamics (RED) manuscript — from confirming dynamic/quantitative scope, through the current Elsevier Guide's USD 195 fee and ScienceDirect/Editorial Manager submission, the single-anonymized two-reviewer process, the code-first data/code archive plus Option C data statement, to the revise-and-resubmit. Orchestration; it routes to the other red- skills rather than drafting content.

1k repo stars
▌
Rfs Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use after a decision letter (R&R or reject-and-resubmit) on a The Review of Financial Studies (RFS) manuscript, to structure the response letter and revision plan. Writes the rebuttal; assumes the manuscript itself is being revised in parallel.

1k repo stars
▌
Rfs Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which rfs-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a The Review of Financial Studies (RFS) manuscript. Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Spq Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when writing the response to a Social Psychology Quarterly (SPQ) revise-and-resubmit. SPQ reviewers come from different sociological-social-psychology traditions and may pull in different directions, so the response must convert each reviewer without alienating the editor while protecting the structure–individual contribution. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.

1k repo stars
▌
Spq Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use as the entry point for any Social Psychology Quarterly (SPQ) manuscript. Routes to the right SPQ sub-skill based on where you are in the lifecycle and which sociological-social-psychology tradition (symbolic interaction, social structure and personality, group processes, status/affect, identity) and article type (Article vs. Note) fit. It dispatches; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Soctheory Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Sociological Theory (ST) manuscript — Manuscript Central portal, ASA format and length cap, abstract, masking for double-anonymous review, ASA-style references, fee, ethics/originality, and required files. Theory-only journal; there is no data-availability or replication step.

1k repo stars
▌
Smj Methods · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing the research method for a Strategic Management Journal (SMJ) manuscript — sample, unit of analysis, measures, and the identification strategy. Designs the study; estimation and endogeneity execution live in smj-data-analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Tar Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when understanding how The Accounting Review (TAR) review and decisions work, or when reading a TAR decision letter — the editor routing, double-blind two-reviewer model, decision types, and post-publication integrity rules. Explains and interprets the process; it does not draft the revision and response (tar-rebuttal).

1k repo stars
▌
Tar Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building or cleaning the exhibits for a The Accounting Review (TAR) manuscript — descriptive, correlation, and regression tables, event-study and discontinuity figures, experimental cell means, and analytical-model exhibits in Chicago house style and within the page budget. Finalizes exhibits; it does not run the analysis (tar-data-analysis) or polish prose (tar-writing-style).

1k repo stars
▌
Artbull Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether an art-history project fits The Art Bulletin and how to frame its contribution. The Art Bulletin is the discipline's leading generalist journal across all periods and regions, so the test is a significant art-historical contribution, not a local description. Helps frame the question; it does not do the research.

1k repo stars
▌
Artbull Visual Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when performing the close visual and formal analysis that anchors an Art Bulletin article — describing and interpreting composition, form, medium, facture, scale, and viewing conditions of specific works, tied to numbered figures. Close looking is the discipline's core method. Guides the analysis; it does not invent what is not in the object.

1k repo stars
▌
Ectj Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when running the final The Econometrics Journal pre-submission check for Editorial Express, RES/OUP template compliance, 20-page printed-paper norm, 150-word summary, empirical application, proofs placement, submission fee, cover letter, and replication-policy disclosure.

1k repo stars
▌
Ecj Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when scoping or framing a research question for a The Economic Journal (EJ) manuscript and you need to test whether it is "EJ-shaped" — a substantial contribution of broad interest to economists at large, full-length or short-paper. Diagnoses fit and frames the contribution; it does not design the empirics.

1k repo stars
▌
Webconf Supplementary · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding what belongs in the Web Conference (WWW) appendix versus the 8 main pages versus an external artifact, under the single-PDF 12-page ceiling where references and appendix share the tail, reviewers need not read past page 8, and no separate supplementary upload exists in the research tracks.

1k repo stars
▌
Webconf Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or revising a Web Conference (WWW) paper's prose — building the web-native framing that answers "why is this a WWW paper" on page one, writing for a mixed computing/social-science/economics readership, compressing into 8 self-contained pages, and handling scale numbers and platform names with precision.

1k repo stars
▌
Usenixsec Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when reasoning about how a USENIX Security Symposium cycle actually decides — early-reject notifications, multi-round reviewing, the retirement of Major Revision in favor of shepherd-approval acceptances, resubmission restrictions between cycles, and what each notification email means for planning.

1k repo stars
▌
Wber Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when a The World Bank Economic Review (WBER) decision letter has arrived (R&R or reject-with-encouragement) and you need the response-letter strategy — triaging editor vs. referee asks, sequencing new analysis, and writing point-by-point replies for the identification and policy referee archetypes. Plans the revision; it does not run the new analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Wber Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which wber-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a The World Bank Economic Review (WBER) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Worlddev Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when the prose, intro, or abstract of a World Development (WD) manuscript fails to reach a multidisciplinary, policy-oriented, global readership. Tunes voice and structure to the WD reader; it does not invent evidence or citations.

1k repo stars
▌
Wp Literature Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use when positioning a World Politics manuscript against the comparative-politics and international-relations literatures so it reads as a contribution that travels across cases. World Politics expects engagement with both theoretical and substantive literatures; the move is to locate the paper in a live cross-case debate, not a single-country conversation. Stakes the contribution; it does not write the lit review.

1k repo stars
▌
Amj Methods · brycewang-stanford
Use when the research design and method are the bottleneck for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — matching design (archival, survey, experiment, multi-method, field) and level of analysis to the theoretical question. Designs the study; it does not run the estimation or validity checks (amj-data-analysis).

1k repo stars
▌
Amr Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when writing the response document for an Academy of Management Review (AMR) Revise & Resubmit — structuring point-by-point replies that show the theory was genuinely strengthened, not just defended. Drafts the response; revise the manuscript's theory FIRST (amr-theory-development / amr-data-analysis) before writing the letter.

1k repo stars
▌
Amr Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which amr-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a theory-building manuscript from theoretical-puzzle framing through developmental-review revision for an Academy of Management Review (AMR) submission. Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Acr Literature Review · brycewang-stanford
Use when building or repairing the literature review for 《会计研究》 (Accounting Research) — entering the accounting research lineage (earnings quality, conservatism, audit quality, disclosure, value relevance) rather than piling recent Chinese empirical citations, and positioning the gap as an accounting contribution.

1k repo stars
▌
Aas Review Process · brycewang-stanford
当你在需要理解《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 的双盲三审制审稿流程、各环节时间进度与作者可施加的杠杆时调用。建模编辑初审→双盲外审→退修/复审(多轮)→主编终审的完整链路，说明作者承诺前置、双盲对作者的约束、退修期限与重新送审、状态查询，帮助作者在 Acta Automatica Sinica 的评审各节点做出正确动作、管理预期并避免流程性失误。

1k repo stars
▌
Aes Supplementary · brycewang-stanford
当你为《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 稿件组织附录与补充材料时使用。覆盖哪些内容应放正文、哪些应下沉到附录/在线补充材料、多媒体附件(音视频/信号波形/大数据表)的提交方式、公式推导与完整证明的呈现、扩展实验与超参数表、双盲阶段补充材料的匿名化、以及与正文的引用对应关系。帮助电子/信息/信号处理方向作者在《电子学报》有限正文篇幅内保持主线清晰，同时用补充材料完整承载可复现细节与扩展证据。

1k repo stars
▌
Aes Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
当你按《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 规范打磨中文科技论文写作时使用。覆盖中英文题名、结构式中文摘要与英文 Abstract、中英文关键词、中图分类号(TN 大类)、量和单位与法定计量、公式与变量排版、图表规范、GB/T 7714 顺序编码制参考文献中英文著录、以及电子/信息/信号处理领域术语与数学表达的一致性。帮助作者写出符合《电子学报》体例、语言严谨、可被外审专家顺畅评阅的中文旗舰学报稿件，避免因写作不规范在初审或外审被扣分。

1k repo stars
▌
Advmat Results Framing · brycewang-stanford
Use when an Advanced Materials result is sound but its central advance and significance are not yet sharp, or when a Communication's opening paragraph must double as its abstract. Structures the one-advance narrative; does not run characterization or design figures.

1k repo stars
▌
Agsy Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether a project fits Agricultural Systems (AgSy) and which article type to target. AgSy is a systems-science journal, so the test is a genuine systems question — interactions among components, across hierarchical levels (field → farm → landscape → region → food system), trade-offs, and emergent behavior — analyzed with integrated modelling, NOT a single-factor field trial. Helps frame the question; it does not collect data.

1k repo stars
▌
Amanthro Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when writing the response to an American Anthropologist (AA) revise-and-resubmit. AA uses anonymous peer review under an ethics of care, often with cross-subfield reviewers, so the response must convert each reviewer while keeping the editor confident and the ethnographic contribution intact. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new evidence.

1k repo stars
▌
Amanthro Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when starting or navigating any American Anthropologist (AA) manuscript as the entry point. Routes to the right AA sub-skill based on lifecycle stage, subfield (sociocultural, archaeology, biological, linguistic), and section type (Research Article, Vital Topics Forum, World/Public/Multimodal Anthropologies, Review Essay). It dispatches; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Ahr Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for The American Historical Review (AHR) via ScholarOne — masked-author preparation, the roughly 8,000-word target, Chicago notes, manuscript formatting, image alt-text and permissions, and the exclusivity declaration. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Asr Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when writing the response to an American Sociological Review (ASR) revise-and-resubmit. ASR R&Rs typically demand substantial revision and reviewers may span different methodological traditions, so the response must convert each reviewer while keeping the editor confident. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.

1k repo stars
▌
Asr Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use as the entry point for any American Sociological Review (ASR) manuscript. Routes to the right ASR sub-skill based on the lifecycle stage and the manuscript type (Article up to 15,000 words vs. Comment/Reply up to 3,000). It dispatches; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Anmath Cover Letter · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting the cover note to the editors for an Annals of Mathematics submission — concisely conveying the main result, its significance, scope fit, and any priority/overlap disclosures. Frames the submission; does not write the paper. Verify whether a cover letter is requested on the official submission page.

1k repo stars
▌
Arsoc Revision · brycewang-stanford
Use when responding to Editorial Committee and referee feedback on an Annual Review of Sociology (ARSoc) review — coverage gaps, balance/accuracy complaints, framework/structure asks, and accessibility. Drafts the response and revision plan; it does not run the delivery preflight (arsoc-submission) or redesign the spine from scratch (arsoc-organizing-framework).

1k repo stars
▌
Arsoc Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which arsoc-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing an invited review article from topic through revision for an Annual Review of Sociology (ARSoc) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Cie Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use for the pre-submission preflight to 《中国工业经济》 (China Industrial Economics) — checking length (~2.5万字/18+ pages), 450–500-char abstract + 3–5 keywords, the five abstract components, three-level headings, footnote (页下注) + 实引 reference conventions, the data/code-on-acceptance requirement, double-blind anonymity, and the online system. Verify every rule against the journal's current 投稿（修改）指南.

1k repo stars
▌
Cre Literature Review · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or revising the literature-review section for a 《中国农村经济》 manuscript, when the Chinese / English reference balance is off, or when canonical 三农 theory references are missing. 本技能服务于《中国农村经济》(China Rural Economy, CRE)。

1k repo stars
▌
Cjc Workflow · brycewang-stanford
在需要为一篇投向《计算机学报》(Chinese Journal of Computers, CJC) 的中文长文规划从选题到见刊的完整流程时调用。把 12 个子技能编排成一条时间线：选题栏目定位→写作与实验搭建→相关工作与创新性确立→投稿自审→三审制评审(初审/外审/复审退修/主编终审)→多轮修回答复→录用定稿与校样→出版，并给出各阶段的检查点、经验周期与并行安排。适用于第一次投本刊、或需要把一次投稿全周期系统化管理、避免在任一环节踩坑的场景。

1k repo stars
▌
Jama Cardiology · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting JAMA Cardiology or deciding whether a cardiovascular-medicine study fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the cardiovascular-trial and outcomes evidence bar, reporting-guideline and trial-registration requirements, JAMA Network house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics. Venue-fit aid only, not clinical advice.

1k repo stars
▌
Jama Pediatrics · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting JAMA Pediatrics or deciding whether a child- or adolescent-health study fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the pediatric clinical and population-research evidence bar, pediatric design and ethics requirements, reporting-guideline and trial-registration expectations, JAMA Network house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics. Venue-fit aid only, not clinical advice.

1k repo stars
▌
Jama Psychiatry · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting JAMA Psychiatry or deciding whether a clinical-psychiatry or mental-health study fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the psychiatric-trial and observational/neuropsychiatric evidence bar, reporting-guideline and trial-registration requirements, JAMA Network house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics. Venue-fit aid only, not clinical advice.

1k repo stars
▌
Commres Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Communication Research (CR) via SAGE Track (ScholarOne) — double-anonymized preparation, the 45-page limit, APA reporting, the data-availability statement, ORCID, and declarations. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Csj Camera Ready · brycewang-stanford
在《计算机科学》(Computer Science, JSJKX) 稿件录用后做定稿、校样(清样)与出版排期时调用。本刊是计算机全学科中文综合月刊(CCF 会刊、B 类、T2 级)，见刊周期约 13 个月(待核实)。技能覆盖录用后的清稿定稿、中英文摘要与关键词终校、参考文献 GB/T 7714 与图表终检、版面费缴纳(第一作者 CCF 会员 8.5 折)、著作权与版权协议、校样核对与勘误、出版与排期沟通。适用于把录用稿打磨成可付印终稿、避免校样阶段出错的场景。

1k repo stars
▌
Csj Related Work · brycewang-stanford
在为《计算机科学》(Computer Science, JSJKX) 撰写相关工作章节或组织文献综述时调用。本刊是计算机全学科中文综合月刊(CCF 会刊、B 类、T2 级)，覆盖面广且综述活跃、鼓励综述投稿。技能帮助以 delta(增量) 优先的方式组织相关工作、确立创新性，并针对本刊的综述型稿件给出分类框架、批判性比较与趋势展望的写法；同时规范中外文献引用与 GB/T 7714 著录。适用于研究长文的相关工作章节，以及面向本刊专题/综述栏目的综述稿组织的场景。

1k repo stars
▌
Conbio Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when executing and reporting the analysis for a Conservation Biology manuscript so it survives expert, double-blind review — appropriate ecological/statistical models, honest uncertainty, robustness, and reproducibility. Covers detection, hierarchical models, spatial structure, and effect sizes that matter for conservation. Guides analysis norms; it does not fabricate results.

1k repo stars
▌
Conbio Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or polishing a Conservation Biology manuscript so it reads accessibly for a broad conservation audience, follows the journal Style Guide, and fits the per-type word caps (e.g., Contributed Papers ~6,000–7,000; abstract <= 300 words). Tightens prose and format; it does not invent content.

1k repo stars
▌
CI Revision And Response · brycewang-stanford
Use when revising a Critical Inquiry (CI) essay after a decision and writing the response to readers and editors. CI acceptance typically follows author revisions, and the editors-in-chief read closely, so the revision must strengthen the intervention and the response must address every point without diluting the argument. Structures the revision and response; it does not fabricate new readings or evidence.

1k repo stars
▌
CI Scholarly Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use to situate a Critical Inquiry (CI) essay within the conversations it enters across the arts and humanities. CI is interdisciplinary, so positioning means naming the critical and theoretical debates the essay joins — across literature, art, film, philosophy, politics, history — and the precise place where it intervenes, not a discipline-internal literature review. Frames the stakes; it does not write the prose.

1k repo stars
▌
Demog Data And Reproducibility · brycewang-stanford
Use when preparing the data-availability statement and reproducibility materials for a Demography (PAA / Duke University Press) manuscript. Demography requires a data availability statement at acceptance with persistent identifiers and encourages reproducible, commented code; it hosts no repository, so authors deposit in a FAIR repository. Covers restricted-data exemptions. Prepares the materials; it does not waive requirements.

1k repo stars
▌
Ectheory Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use for the Monte Carlo and numerical-illustration component of an Econometric Theory (ET) paper — designing simulations that show finite-sample behavior tracks the asymptotics, plus any illustrative empirical example. Lighter than empirical journals; the spine stays the theory.

1k repo stars
▌
Ectheory Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use to polish the prose, notation, and proof exposition of an Econometric Theory (ET) manuscript — theorem-proof clarity, consistent notation, APA author-date references, and ET manuscript-prep specs (11pt, 1.5 spacing, 1.25in margins, 200-word abstract, 40-char running head).

1k repo stars
▌
Er Introduction · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or revising the 引言 (introduction) of an 《经济研究》 manuscript — when the opening starts from a remote macro backdrop, when contributions read like "丰富了相关研究", or when the introduction fails to spoil the core finding. 本技能服务于《经济研究》(Economic Research Journal, ERJ)。

1k repo stars
▌
Automatica · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Automatica or deciding whether a systems-and-control manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the methodological-breadth-with-guarantees bar, theory rigor, the Automatica-vs-TAC routing, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
The Lancet · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting The Lancet or deciding whether a clinical medicine or global-health manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Eer Theory Model · brycewang-stanford
Use when a European Economic Review (EER) manuscript needs a theoretical model built or tightened — a pure-theory result, a quantitative/structural macro model, or a conceptual frame disciplining an empirical paper. Sharpens the model's contribution, assumptions, and link to data; it does not run the empirical identification or robustness.

1k repo stars
▌
Expecon Robustness · brycewang-stanford
Use when an Experimental Economics (ExpEcon) result may be a power artifact, multiple-comparisons artifact, or sensitive to the inference unit, exclusions, or design choices. Hardens the statistical case; it does not design the experiment or draft prose.

1k repo stars
▌
Expecon Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Experimental Economics (ExpEcon) manuscript via the Editorial Manager portal — the no-deception/incentive gates, instructions-at-submission rule, anonymous review, and ESA data-deposit prep. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Cte Mechanism · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or writing mechanism analyses for a 《财贸经济》 empirical manuscript. Mechanism tests that open the "policy black box" and land on identifiable channels are near-mandatory for empirical submissions. 本技能服务于《财贸经济》(Finance & Trade Economics, CTE)。

1k repo stars
▌
Finman Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when the prose, abstract, or introduction of a Financial Management (FM) manuscript buries the idea or its managerial/market payoff — FM's brand is "articles people actually read." Shapes exposition for a general finance audience; it does not establish results (finman-identification) or run the submission preflight (finman-submission).

1k repo stars
▌
Gcb Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether a research idea fits Global Change Biology (GCB) and how to frame its significance. GCB wants a mechanistic link between a global-change driver and a biological response, of broad relevance across systems. Tests fit and sharpens the question; it does not generate data or guarantee acceptance.

1k repo stars
▌
Hlr Argument Structure · brycewang-stanford
Use when organizing the body of a Harvard Law Review (HLR) piece along the doctrine to theory to normative-prescription arc that legal scholarship rewards. Structures the argument and its internal logic; it does not forge the thesis (hlr-thesis-and-contribution) or format the citations (hlr-sources-and-bluebook).

1k repo stars
▌
Hlr Placement Strategy · brycewang-stanford
Use when planning where and when to submit a law-review article and how to leverage offers — the distinctive Scholastica multi-submit, expedite mechanics, and the February-March / August seasons, with the Harvard Law Review (HLR) as a top target. Plans placement and timing; it does not run the final upload preflight (hlr-submission).

1k repo stars
▌
Humrel Theory Development · brycewang-stanford
Use when building the theoretical engine for a Human Relations (HR) manuscript — mechanisms grounded in social theory, process vs. variance logic, constructs, and boundary conditions. Builds the argument; it does not choose methods or run analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Imfer Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether a question is right for an IMF Economic Review (IMFER) manuscript — international macro-finance with genuine policy relevance and an IMF-program or global-institution audience. Tests fit and scope; it does not run the identification (imfer-identification) or stake the contribution (imfer-literature-positioning).

1k repo stars
▌
Isr Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when planning and drafting the response to an Information Systems Research (ISR) revise-and-resubmit — prioritizing the Senior Editor's binding concerns, addressing genre-specific reviewer asks (assumptions/proofs, identification/validity, evaluation), updating the contribution statement, and using the electronic companion. Drafts the revision and response; it runs after isr-review-process.

1k repo stars
▌
Isr Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which isr-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for an Information Systems Research (ISR) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills. Knows ISR's sociotechnical, intradisciplinary mission and its co-equal behavioral and analytical genres.

1k repo stars
▌
Ijoc Methods · brycewang-stanford
Use when the method choice, baselines, and computational-experiment design need alignment for an INFORMS Journal on Computing (IJOC) manuscript — before the experiments are run at scale. Designs a fair, reproducible experimental protocol; it does not write the algorithm proofs (see ijoc-theory-development).

1k repo stars
▌
Jbv Methods · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or defending the research design for a Journal of Business Venturing (JBV) manuscript — matching a methodologically pluralistic but theory-first approach (venture panels, experiments, qualitative process work, mixed methods) to an entrepreneurial question, and handling selection, survival, and novel-dataset issues. Designs the study; it does not estimate it (jbv-data-analysis) or frame the contribution (jbv-contribution-framing).

1k repo stars
▌
Jcr Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when responding to a Journal of Consumer Research (JCR) revise-and-resubmit — planning the revision, running new studies or analyses, satisfying the transparency requirements that become mandatory at invited revision, and drafting a point-by-point response letter for double-anonymized re-review. Drafts the response after the revision is real; it does not interpret the decision (jcr-review-process).

1k repo stars
▌
Jcr Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which jcr-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Journal of Consumer Research (JCR) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Jcf Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when preparing a revise-and-resubmit response for the Journal of Corporate Finance (JCF) — a point-by-point reply to two-or-more single-anonymized reviewers and the handling editor, reconciling divergent demands without over-claiming. It structures the response letter and revision plan; it does not run new analysis on its own.

1k repo stars
▌
Jcf Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when orchestrating the full Journal of Corporate Finance (JCF) manuscript lifecycle — from a corporate-finance question through identification, robustness, the US$340 fee submission via Editorial Manager, single-anonymized review, and R&R. Routes to the other eleven jcf-* skills with stage gates; it coordinates, it does not draft content.

1k repo stars

5,264 published skills · page 33 of 53