brycewang-stanford

@brycewang-stanford source repo

5.3k skills
0 followers
1k repo stars
2 weeks ago last updated

▌
Ijoc Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which ijoc-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a manuscript from idea through rebuttal for an INFORMS Journal on Computing (IJOC) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Ier Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when an International Economic Review (IER) decision letter or referee report needs a response strategy and a revision plan. Triages comments and structures the response letter to a rigor-leaning, theory-tilted review; it does not invent new results.

1k repo stars
▌
Ier Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which ier-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic through rebuttal for an International Economic Review (IER) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Jar Methods · brycewang-stanford
Use when the research design and identification strategy are the bottleneck for a Journal of Accounting Research (JAR) manuscript — choosing the setting, source of identifying variation, and sample to support a causal accounting claim. Designs the study; it does not run the estimation, clustering, or robustness (jar-data-analysis).

1k repo stars
▌
Jbv Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use after a Journal of Business Venturing (JBV) R&R to plan revisions and draft the point-by-point response letter — prioritizing the handling editor's concerns, defending or strengthening the entrepreneurship contribution, and addressing selection/survivorship/identification threats across multiple rounds. Drafts the revision plan and response; interpret the letter first with jbv-review-process.

1k repo stars
▌
Jbv Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which jbv-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Journal of Business Venturing (JBV) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Joc Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when executing and reporting the analysis for a Journal of Communication (JoC) manuscript so it survives expert, double-anonymous review — honest uncertainty, robustness, reliability, and triangulation appropriate to quantitative, computational, or content-analytic work. Guides analysis norms; it does not fabricate results.

1k repo stars
▌
Joc Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or polishing a Journal of Communication (JoC) manuscript so it reads for the whole field, follows APA 7th edition, and fits the limits (main document <= 35 pages including references/tables/figures/endnotes; abstract <= 150 words). Tightens prose and format; it does not invent content.

1k repo stars
▌
Jcp Methods · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or stress-testing the experiments for a Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) manuscript — manipulations, controls and confounds, manipulation checks, power, the multi-study chain, and pre-registration. Designs the studies that test the process; it does not analyze them (jcp-data-analysis).

1k repo stars
▌
Joe Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use to understand and navigate the Journal of Econometrics (JoE) editorial process — single-anonymized review, editor screening before a minimum of two referees, the three submission tracks (Regular/Annals/Themed), Guest Associate Editors, and what referees of a methods paper look for.

1k repo stars
▌
Joe Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building the Monte Carlo tables and theory-illustrating figures for a Journal of Econometrics (JoE) manuscript. Covers size/power table conventions, estimator-comparison layout, and figures that make asymptotic and finite-sample behavior legible.

1k repo stars
▌
Cfe Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when polishing the language and rhetoric of a 《财经研究》 (Journal of Finance and Economics) manuscript — eliminating empty-significance phrases, fixing vague policy talk, replacing method-flexing with mechanism, and aligning tense / person / hedging with CSSCI house style.

1k repo stars
▌
Jfr Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use to draft the response letter for a 《金融研究》 (Journal of Financial Research) revise-and-resubmit — organizing point-by-point replies to reviewers, prioritizing identification and financial-mechanism concerns, and recording exactly where the manuscript changed. Run only after the manuscript itself has been revised.

1k repo stars
▌
Jfr Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which jfr-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from fit positioning through rebuttal for 《金融研究》 (Journal of Financial Research). Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills, and cross-refs sibling journal packs.

1k repo stars
▌
Jhe Robustness · brycewang-stanford
Use when a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) result must be shown stable to specification, sample, inference, and mechanism threats before submission or in response to referees. Organizes robustness by identifying threat; it does not establish the design (jhe-identification) or build exhibits.

1k repo stars
▌
Jhe Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) manuscript via Elsevier Editorial Manager — single-anonymized review, keywords, declarations, data-availability statement, and the no-length-limit/short-paper allowance. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Jole Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Journal of Labor Economics (JOLE) via Editorial Manager — single-blind NON-anonymized format, title page with all co-authors, 100-word abstract, the 20,000-word soft cap, Chicago author-date references, and the non-refundable submission fee. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Jmgmt Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when you need to understand or set expectations for the Journal of Management (JOM) editorial and masked-review process — desk screening, the developmental R&R culture, the Review Issue track, and reading a decision letter. Explains the process; it does not draft the response letter (jmgmt-rebuttal).

1k repo stars
▌
Jmgmt Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when exhibits are the bottleneck for a Journal of Management (JOM) manuscript — the means/SD/correlation table, CFA/SEM and HLM result tables, the theoretical-model figure, interaction plots, and meta-analytic forest/funnel plots, all in APA style and under the 50-page guillotine. Builds exhibits; it does not run the analysis (jmgmt-data-analysis).

1k repo stars
▌
Jm Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when running and reporting the statistical analysis for a Journal of Marketing (JM) manuscript — the right estimator for a big-tent design, JM's exact p-value / standard-error / effect-size reporting mandate, identification and robustness, and the JM Dataverse replication packet. Executes and reports the analysis; it does not design the study (jm-methods) or frame the contribution (jm-contribution-framing).

1k repo stars
▌
Jm Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when polishing the prose of a Journal of Marketing (JM) manuscript — front-loading the substantive argument, writing for a general managerial-and-scholarly audience, and conforming to AMA author-date house style and formatting. Polishes the writing; it does not build the contribution (jm-contribution-framing) or run the submission preflight (jm-submission).

1k repo stars
▌
Jop Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use for analysis-stage decisions on a The Journal of Politics (JOP) manuscript — uncertainty, robustness, and reporting norms — written so the work is reproducible from line one. JOP makes acceptance contingent on replicability and a JOP replication analyst re-runs the code, so every reported number must come from a script. Guides analysis; it does not fabricate results.

1k repo stars
▌
Jop Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when shaping prose, length, and formatting for a The Journal of Politics (JOP) manuscript. JOP counts pages, not words — Research Article <= 35 and Short Article <= 10, double-spaced 12-point, inclusive of notes, references, and exhibits — and follows the JOP Style Guide under double-blind review. Polishes and fits to length; it does not draft the substance.

1k repo stars
▌
Jos Supplementary · brycewang-stanford
当你要为投向《软件学报》(Journal of Software, JOS) 的稿件组织附录、补充材料与多媒体附件时使用。覆盖正文与附录的内容切分原则（决定录用的内容不得移出正文）、补充材料的类型与格式、多媒体/在线附件的引用方式、与可复现材料的关系、以及附录在评审与出版两阶段的不同处理，帮助你把《软件学报》(Journal of Software) 稿件的核心留在正文、把支撑细节稳妥地放进补充材料。

1k repo stars
▌
Jos Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
当你要按《软件学报》(Journal of Software, JOS) 的中文科技写作规范撰写或打磨稿件时使用。覆盖中英文题目、结构化中文摘要与 English Abstract、关键词、中图分类号、引言首页弧线（问题→不足→贡献→证据→意义）、术语一致性、图表与公式规范、以及参考文献 GB/T 7714 著录细则，帮助你把稿件写成《软件学报》(Journal of Software) 审稿人一眼认可的软件学科中文论文，而不是英文论文的生硬直译。

1k repo stars
▌
Jwe Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when responding to 《世界经济》 (The Journal of World Economy) referee reports (R&R) — structuring a point-by-point response letter that addresses the journal's characteristic challenges (open-economy fit, shift-share / gravity inference, transmission channel, GVC measurement). Use after the manuscript has actually been revised.

1k repo stars
▌
Jwe Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which jwe-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from open-economy positioning through rebuttal for 《世界经济》 (The Journal of World Economy). Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills, and cross-refers to economic-research / china-economic-quarterly / journal-of-financial-research / china-industrial-economics when the paper is really domestic.

1k repo stars
▌
Mksc Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when understanding how Marketing Science evaluates a manuscript — the double-anonymous Senior-Editor / Associate-Editor routing, what the first-pass and review look for, and how to read a decision letter. Explains the process; it does not draft the revision response (mksc-rebuttal).

1k repo stars
▌
Mksc Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building the exhibits for a Marketing Science manuscript — estimate tables, model-fit tables, comparative-statics figures, and counterfactual/policy-simulation exhibits in INFORMS house style. Designs the exhibits; it does not run the estimation (mksc-data-analysis) or write the prose (mksc-writing-style).

1k repo stars
▌
Mathfin Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when responding to a Mathematical Finance (Wiley) revise-and-resubmit — triages referee comments on theorem novelty, proof gaps, martingale and integrability conditions, assumption scope, counterexamples, exposition, numerical support, and financial-modelling relevance into a point-by-point letter plus aligned manuscript edits.

1k repo stars
▌
Mathfin Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Router for a Mathematical Finance (Wiley) manuscript — decides which mathfin sub-skill to use next across the theorem-first lifecycle, from problem selection through Wiley Research Exchange submission and revision. Use when orienting a financial-mathematics paper built on stochastic analysis and full proofs, or when unsure which stage is the current bottleneck.

1k repo stars
▌
Misq Theory Development · brycewang-stanford
Use when building the theoretical engine of a MIS Quarterly manuscript — a behavioral mechanism and hypotheses, a design theory and testable design propositions for a design-science artifact, an economic mechanism for an economics-of-IS study, or an organizational process theory. Adapts the form of "theory" to the paper's IS tradition; does not run the analysis (misq-data-analysis) or frame the contribution (misq-contribution-framing).

1k repo stars
▌
Nbr Experiment · brycewang-stanford
Use for experimental studies submitted to 《南开管理评论》 (Nankai Business Review) — design (between/within, scenario/vignette, lab/field), manipulation checks, randomization and confound control, effect sizes and power, and mediation/moderation via experimental-causal-chain or measurement-of-mediation designs. Use when a hypothesis is tested by manipulating an independent variable rather than measuring it.

1k repo stars
▌
Nbr Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use for the pre-submission preflight to 《南开管理评论》 (Nankai Business Review) — checking abstract/keyword limits, manuscript length, bilingual title/abstract, reference style (GB/T 7714 plus the journal's 来稿规范说明), the online submission system at nbr.nankai.edu.cn, anonymity, and document hygiene. Use right before submitting; verify every rule against the journal's current 来稿规范说明.

1k repo stars
▌
Nbr Survey Sem · brycewang-stanford
Use for survey-based structural equation modeling in 《南开管理评论》 (Nankai Business Review) — CFA/SEM fit indices, mediation and moderation, moderated mediation with bootstrap indirect effects and the index of moderated mediation, and multilevel models (HLM) for nested data. Use when testing construct-relationship hypotheses (mediation / moderation / moderated mediation) on questionnaire data.

1k repo stars
▌
Nbr Theory Gap · brycewang-stanford
Use to articulate the theoretical gap and contribution for 《南开管理评论》 (Nankai Business Review) — turning a set of construct relationships into a statement of what existing management theory cannot explain and what this paper adds (concept / proposition / framework / boundary condition). Use when the contribution still reads as "we test whether X affects Y".

1k repo stars
▌
Ors Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when running and reporting the computational study for an Operations Research (OR) manuscript — benchmark instances, baselines, reproducible experiments, statistical care for stochastic output, and the ORJournal code-and-data reproducibility workflow. Executes and reports the numerical evidence; it does not prove the results (ors-methods) or lay out the exhibits (ors-tables-figures).

1k repo stars
▌
Ors Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when polishing the prose and notation of an Operations Research (OR) manuscript — enforcing the equation-free introduction, the text-only abstract under 200 words, clean theorem-proof exposition, and INFORMS author-year house style. Polishes language and house style; it does not formulate the model (ors-theory-development) or run the submission preflight (ors-submission).

1k repo stars
▌
Orgstud Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting the response to reviewers and the revision plan for an Organization Studies (OS) R&R — turning developmental, theory-level reviewer comments into a credible point-by-point reply and revised manuscript. Plans and drafts the response; it does not redo the underlying analysis (route back to the specialist skills).

1k repo stars
▌
Orgstud Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which orgstud-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic through rebuttal for an Organization Studies (OS) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Prl Scope Fit · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether a physics result clears Physical Review Letters' importance-and-broad-interest gate, or whether it belongs in Physical Review A–E / PR Research. Diagnoses venue fit; does not write or frame the result.

1k repo stars
▌
Psci Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Psychological Science via Manuscript Central — word-format compliance, the 150-word structured abstract, APA 7th-edition style, anonymization, the Research Transparency Statement, and open data/materials with DOIs. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Poq Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when writing the response to a Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ) revise-and-resubmit. POQ referees are survey methodologists who often push on Total Survey Error and AAPOR disclosure, so the response must satisfy each referee on substance and method while keeping the associate editor confident the revision converges. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.

1k repo stars
▌
Poq Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use as the entry point for any Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ) manuscript. Routes to the right POQ sub-skill based on where you are in the lifecycle and which submission type (Original Article, Research Note, Polls in Context, Research Synthesis, Book Review) fits. It dispatches; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Respol Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when calibrating expectations and choreography for the Research Policy (RP) review cycle — the double-blind process, the out-of-scope desk screen, handling-editor routing, the Research Note option, and what RP referees reward versus reject. Sets expectations; it does not draft the response letter (respol-rebuttal).

1k repo stars
▌
Respol Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when exhibits are the bottleneck for a Research Policy (RP) manuscript — designing tables and figures (regression tables, patent/bibliometric maps, event-study plots, case data structures) that carry the innovation mechanism for an interdisciplinary readership. Builds exhibits; it does not run the analysis (respol-data-analysis) or write prose (respol-writing-style).

1k repo stars
▌
Rt Simulated Referee · brycewang-stanford
Use to rehearse peer review before submitting — a calibrated Associate Editor desk-screen plus 2–3 distinct-lens referees for the target venue, adversarially verified and synthesized into a referee report, a decision band, and a prioritized, skill-mapped fix list. A rehearsal that predicts the attack surface; it does not replace real review.

1k repo stars
▌
Rof Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when judging whether a finance idea clears the Review of Finance (RoF) general-interest bar before any estimation or modeling — first-order question, fit with the journal's empirical-and-theoretical scope, and the top-three-finance-journal standard RoF referees apply.

1k repo stars
▌
Siggraph Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanford
Use when pursuing the Graphics Replicability Stamp (GRSI) or Code Replicability in Computer Graphics (CRCG) recognition for an accepted SIGGRAPH / TOG paper, covering how graphics replicability differs from ACM artifact badging, what volunteers actually run, deterministic result reproduction, Software Heritage archiving, and the separate post-acceptance timing.

1k repo stars
▌
Sigmetrics Author Response · brycewang-stanford
Use when responding to ACM SIGMETRICS reviews, covering any initial rebuttal and — distinctively — the one-shot revision response letter that must map every item on the reviewers' required-changes list to a concrete change in the revised POMACS paper, resubmitted to a subsequent rolling deadline and re-reviewed once by the original reviewers under double-anonymity.

1k repo stars
▌
Sigmetrics Reproducibility · brycewang-stanford
Use when strengthening ACM SIGMETRICS reproducibility, covering proofs and their assumptions as reproducible artifacts, seeded simulators whose figures regenerate and match the analysis, measurement/trace provenance, claim-to-evidence mapping, honest degrees of reproducibility, and consistency between what the paper proves/measures and what the artifact contains.

1k repo stars
▌
Sigmetrics Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether a computer-systems performance project belongs at ACM SIGMETRICS or should be routed to IMC, SIGCOMM/NSDI/OSDI, INFOCOM, a learning venue (NeurIPS/ICML), or a performance journal (Performance Evaluation/TON/QUESTA), and when picking the right SIGMETRICS track (Theory / Measurement & Applied Modeling / Learning / Operational Systems).

1k repo stars
▌
Ssc Evidence · brycewang-stanford
Use when handling empirical evidence in a 《中国社会科学》 (Social Sciences in China) manuscript — choosing among quantitative, qualitative, and historical-comparative methods so the method serves the proposition, and translating any analysis (including regressions) into a thesis-level finding rather than a coefficient dump. Use when evidence feels disconnected from the argument or reads as method-flexing.

1k repo stars
▌
Ssc Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when responding to external-review (外审) comments from 《中国社会科学》 (Social Sciences in China) — drafting a point-by-point response letter that defends or strengthens the original proposition, deepens theory and cross-disciplinary dialogue, and revises the manuscript before writing replies. Use after revising the text, not before.

1k repo stars
▌
Ssc Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which ssc-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from problematic framing through rebuttal for 《中国社会科学》 (Social Sciences in China). Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Socs Problematic · brycewang-stanford
Use to build a sociological problem consciousness (问题意识) for 《社会学研究》 (Sociological Studies) — turning a variable relationship or a pile of fieldwork into a question about how a social mechanism, structure, or process works. Use when the manuscript still reads as "X affects Y" without a sociological stake.

1k repo stars
▌
Socs Qualitative · brycewang-stanford
Use for the qualitative path in 《社会学研究》 (Sociological Studies) — fieldwork ethnography, in-depth interviews, the extended case method, or grounded theory. Ensures material richness, coding transparency, reflexivity, and trustworthiness, and pushes from story-retelling toward concept building. Use when the draft is a narrative without analytic traction.

1k repo stars
▌
Ecj Theory Model · brycewang-stanford
Use when a The Economic Journal (EJ) manuscript needs an explicit economic model or mechanism — either a theory paper's model, or the framework that gives a reduced-form empirical result its economic meaning. Builds and disciplines the economic argument; it does not run estimation (see ecj-identification).

1k repo stars
▌
Webconf Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when auditing a Web Conference (WWW) research-tracks submission before the abstract or full-paper deadline, covering track choice among the ten research tracks, the single-PDF 8+references+appendix page arithmetic within 12 pages, EasyChair profile completeness, the author-list freeze, the 7-submission cap, and double-blind checks.

1k repo stars
▌
Usenixsec Experiments · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or auditing the evaluation of a USENIX Security Symposium paper — building threat-model-faithful experiments, adaptive-attacker analysis for defenses, false-positive and vantage-point rigor for detection and measurement, ethical experimentation on live systems, and honest baselines.

1k repo stars
▌
Worlddev Robustness · brycewang-stanford
Use when results may be sensitive — to specification, sample, measurement, or inference for quantitative work, or to interpretation and triangulation for qualitative work — in a World Development (WD) manuscript. Organizes checks by threat; it does not invent evidence or citations.

1k repo stars
▌
Worlddev Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for World Development (WD) via Elsevier Editorial Manager — double-anonymized formatting, abstract/keyword limits, declarations, data statement, and house style. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Ylj Preemption Check · brycewang-stanford
Use when verifying that a The Yale Law Journal (YLJ) claim is genuinely novel and not preempted by prior scholarship. It runs the systematic SSRN/Westlaw/HeinOnline search and writes the "what's new" paragraph; it does not draft the thesis (use ylj-thesis-and-contribution).

1k repo stars
▌
Acr Identification · brycewang-stanford
Use when the empirical identification strategy is the bottleneck for a 《会计研究》 (Accounting Research) manuscript — exogenous standard / regulatory changes (event study, DID), PSM, Heckman, IV — and you need to stress-test the design before drafting tables. Prefers standard/regulatory shocks as the cleanest accounting identification source.

1k repo stars
▌
Acr Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when finalizing tables and figures for a 《会计研究》 (Accounting Research) manuscript — keeping the main table lean, reporting coefficients with the right precision, and interpreting economic magnitude (not just significance stars) for accounting measures. Use after robustness is settled.

1k repo stars
▌
Aas Experiments · brycewang-stanford
当你在为《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 设计与呈现实验、仿真或实物验证时调用。覆盖研究问题(RQ)驱动的实验设计、公平基线与对照、控制类的稳定性/收敛性/鲁棒性分析、模式识别类的指标与统计显著性、消融实验、仿真与实物平台的报告要素，帮助为控制理论、机器人、智能系统方向的中文稿搭建经得起 Acta Automatica Sinica 双盲外审的实证与理论证据链。

1k repo stars
▌
Aes Submission · brycewang-stanford
在向《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 正式提交稿件前做投稿就绪审计时调用。覆盖官网 ejournal.org.cn 在线投稿系统、注册与稿件同步、官方 Word/LaTeX 模板、中英文摘要与关键词、中图分类号(TN 为主)、GB/T 7714 参考文献、双盲评审的匿名化要求、稿件评审费(中文约 199 元/英文约 260 元待核实以系统为准)、涉密脱敏、栏目归属与稿件类型选择，并在上传前做退稿风险分诊。适用于把一份电子/信息/通信/信号处理方向的中文原创论文打磨到符合本刊四级审理门槛的场景。

1k repo stars
▌
Advmat Cover Letter · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting the cover letter for an Advanced Materials submission, whose core job is to convince the editor that the work is a genuine materials advance of broad impact worthy of the journal. Argues the impact case; does not fix the science or format the manuscript.

1k repo stars
▌
Anmath Scope Fit · brycewang-stanford
Use when judging whether a pure-mathematics result clears the Annals of Mathematics importance and originality bar and falls within scope, before investing in framing or submission. Assesses fit and significance; does not evaluate whether the proof is correct (that is the proof's job).

1k repo stars
▌
Ceq Inference · brycewang-stanford
Use when scrutinizing statistical inference for a 《经济学(季刊)》 (China Economic Quarterly, CEQ) manuscript — choosing and justifying the clustering level, handling weak instruments with robust inference, correcting for multiple hypothesis testing, and reporting standard errors that survive a technical reviewer. Default robust SEs are rarely enough at CEQ.

1k repo stars
▌
Ceq Mechanism · brycewang-stanford
Use when a 《经济学(季刊)》 (China Economic Quarterly, CEQ) manuscript has a credible main effect but the channel/mechanism is asserted rather than evidenced — to design tests that distinguish competing channels and provide falsifiable mechanism evidence. Use after identification is settled.

1k repo stars
▌
Cre Identification · brycewang-stanford
Use when the empirical identification strategy is the bottleneck for a 《中国农村经济》 manuscript — micro-household / village-level quasi-experimental designs (DID, IV, RDD, PSM). Stress-tests the design and the rural-specific endogeneity before drafting tables.

1k repo stars
▌
Cre Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when finalizing regression tables and figures for a 《中国农村经济》 manuscript. Enforces three-line table style, footnote conventions, column-count discipline, and figure aesthetics. 本技能服务于《中国农村经济》(China Rural Economy, CRE)。

1k repo stars
▌
Diabetologia · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Diabetologia or deciding whether a diabetes clinical, epidemiological, or basic/translational study fits this venue. Encodes the journal's diabetes-focused fit across the evidence spectrum, the mechanistic and methodological bar, reporting-guideline and registration requirements, EASD house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics. Venue-fit aid only, not clinical advice.

1k repo stars
▌
Jama Surgery · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting JAMA Surgery or deciding whether a surgical-outcomes or surgical-trial study fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the surgical-trial and perioperative evidence bar, surgical-reporting challenges, reporting-guideline and trial-registration requirements, JAMA Network house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics. Venue-fit aid only, not clinical advice.

1k repo stars
▌
Cogpsych Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when writing the response to a Cognitive Psychology (Elsevier) major/minor revision. Reviews here often demand added experiments, more model comparisons, recovery analyses, or fuller reproducibility, so the response must address every point and strengthen the model-driven inference. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results or model fits.

1k repo stars
▌
Cogpsych Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when starting or navigating any Cognitive Psychology (Elsevier) manuscript and you are unsure which sub-skill applies. Use when choosing among manuscript types or returning with a decision letter. Routes by lifecycle stage and contribution type (multi-experiment empirical, experiment-plus-model, modeling-led, theoretical/review), and flags the journal's long-form, model-driven house style and code-transparency expectations. It dispatches; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Acm Conext · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting ACM CoNEXT (CoNEXT) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for networking.

1k repo stars
▌
Conbio Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Conservation Biology via Wiley's ScholarOne Manuscript Central — article-type selection, double-blind preparation, word/abstract caps, Style Guide formatting, data-availability statement, and declarations. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Crim Data And Transparency · brycewang-stanford
Use when preparing the data, replication, and transparency materials for a Criminology (ASC / Wiley) manuscript — data-availability statements, reproducibility packages, preregistration, and handling restricted criminal-justice data under DUAs. Criminology operates under growing open-science norms (Wiley open-science badges, ICPSR/NACJD archiving). Prepares the package; it does not waive requirements.

1k repo stars
▌
CI Citation And Style · brycewang-stanford
Use to format a Critical Inquiry (CI) essay's references and figures to journal standard — Chicago Manual of Style (17th ed.) footnotes numbered consecutively, no works-cited list, with all bibliographical information carried in the notes (and counted toward the word limit), plus images supplied as separate 300 ppi JPEG/TIFF with author-secured permissions. Formats the apparatus; it does not write the argument.

1k repo stars
▌
Ectheory Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Econometric Theory (ET) via ScholarOne / Manuscript Central — single embedded-font PDF, single-anonymous (no double-blind anonymization), APA author-date references, the 50-page ceiling, the optional cover letter, and the Supplementary Material file.

1k repo stars
▌
Ecopol Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when judging whether a topic is a timely, important policy question the Economic Policy (EP) Panel would commission and want to debate. Tests Panel-worthiness and policy timeliness; it does not invent evidence or citations.

1k repo stars
▌
Er Mechanism · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or writing the mechanism analysis for an Economic-Research empirical manuscript. Enforces the post-江艇(2022) paradigm — estimate D→M with the main identification strategy and argue M→Y from theory, instead of running mediation step-wise / Sobel tests.

1k repo stars
▌
Art History · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Art History (the Association for Art History journal) or deciding whether a theoretically engaged art-history manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit as a critically and methodologically reflective venue, the argument and close-analysis bar, primary-source command, Chicago house style, image-rights expectations, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Jacs Au · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting JACS Au or deciding whether a chemistry manuscript fits this gold open-access, broad, high-quality sister journal of JACS. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Science · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Science (AAAS) or deciding whether a multidisciplinary manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
The Bmj · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting The BMJ or deciding whether a clinical medicine or evidence-based medicine manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Fcr Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when executing and reporting the statistical analysis for a Field Crops Research (FCR) manuscript — mixed models for multi-environment, block-design, and split-plot designs, genotype-by-environment (G×E) and stability analysis, estimated marginal means with SED/LSD, and crop-model evaluation. FCR requires data analysed with appropriate statistics that match the design and address the objectives. Guides analysis norms; it does not fabricate results.

1k repo stars
▌
Fcr Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or polishing a Field Crops Research (FCR) manuscript so it reads for a general agronomy/crop-science audience, follows FCR structure, and meets the format expectations (abstract <=400 words, 3-5 highlights of <=85 characters, grammatically sound English, concise results, a discussion that interprets rather than repeats). Tightens prose and format; it does not invent content.

1k repo stars
▌
Finman Robustness · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which robustness checks a Financial Management (FM) paper actually needs — FM explicitly puts "less weight on trivial robustness tests," so the craft is selecting threat-targeted checks and demoting busywork. Curates the robustness layer; it does not establish identification (finman-identification) or format exhibits (finman-tables-figures).

1k repo stars
▌
Finman Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Financial Management (FM) via the FMA portal and ScholarOne — submission fee and membership tiers, format and anonymization rules, and the FMA-specific process quirks. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Gcb Cover Letter · brycewang-stanford
Use when writing the cover letter for a Global Change Biology (GCB) submission. The letter must convince the editor, in a paragraph or two, that the paper shows a mechanistic global-change advance of broad relevance that fits GCB's scope and article type. Structures the letter; it does not overstate the findings.

1k repo stars
▌
Gcb Study Design · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing the study behind a Global Change Biology (GCB) manuscript — manipulative experiments, observational/gradient studies, or process modelling of biological responses to global change. GCB reviewers probe scale, replication, realism, and causal inference. Guides design choices; it does not collect or simulate data.

1k repo stars
▌
Hlr Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when choosing or sharpening a topic for a Harvard Law Review (HLR) Article, Essay, or Book Review so it is timely, generalist-legible, and placeable in the student-edited law-review market. Judges fit and timing; it does not run the preemption search (that is hlr-preemption-check) or draft the claim.

1k repo stars
▌
Humrel Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether a question belongs in Human Relations (HR) and how to frame it for the journal's interdisciplinary work-and-society audience. Tests fit and sharpens the question; it does not develop the theory or invent evidence.

1k repo stars
▌
Hrm Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting the revision and response letter after a Human Resource Management (Wiley "HRM") revise-and-resubmit — structuring point-by-point responses to the action editor and reviewers across the journal's developmental, multi-round, double-blind process. Drafts the response after revisions; it does not interpret the decision letter (hrm-review-process).

1k repo stars
▌
Hrm Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which hrm-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Human Resource Management (Wiley "HRM") submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Imfer Theory Model · brycewang-stanford
Use when an IMF Economic Review (IMFER) manuscript needs an open-economy model to discipline, interpret, or generate counterfactuals for its evidence — whether a full international-finance model leads the paper or a light framework supports an empirical estimate. Right-sizes the theory to IMFER's policy-relevant bar; it does not design identification (imfer-identification) or run robustness (imfer-robustness).

1k repo stars
▌
Io Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when writing the response to an International Organization (IO) revise-and-resubmit. IO R&Rs come from expert IR referees whose anonymous reviews the editors return with a decision letter, and the editor adjudicates. The response must convert each reviewer on the IR theory and design without alienating the editor, keep the manuscript double-blind, and keep results and proofs re-runnable for IO's pre-final-acceptance verification. Structures the response; it does not fabricate new results.

1k repo stars

5,264 published skills · page 35 of 53