brycewang-stanford

@brycewang-stanford source repo

5.3k skills
0 followers
1k repo stars
2 weeks ago last updated

▌
Io Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use as the entry point for any International Organization (IO) manuscript. Routes to the right IO sub-skill based on where you are in the lifecycle and which article type (Research Article, Research Note, Essay) fits. IO is the IR-specialist flagship, so the router's first job is to confirm the paper is an international-relations contribution, not a domestic-politics paper with an international label. It dispatches; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Interspeech Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when reasoning about how INTERSPEECH review actually works — area-based assignment inside ISCA's scientific program, multi-reviewer scoring and meta-review on CMT, what the rebuttal can and cannot move, oral/poster allocation, ISCA best student paper selection, and reading a decision letter for next-cycle strategy.

1k repo stars
▌
Joe Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Journal of Econometrics (JoE) — live portal routing, the USD $75 fee, ScienceDirect source-file rules, Editorial Express resubmission norms, 250-word abstract, single-anonymized review, and track selection. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Jf Empirical Design · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or stress-testing an asset-pricing test for a The Journal of Finance (JF) manuscript — factor models, Fama–MacBeth vs. panel, standard-error corrections, out-of-sample discipline. For corporate causal claims use jf-identification.

1k repo stars
▌
Jf Referee Strategy · brycewang-stanford
Use when anticipating referee objections and selecting suggested/opposed reviewers before or during a The Journal of Finance (JF) submission. Plans for review; it does not write the rebuttal (use jf-rebuttal).

1k repo stars
▌
Jmgmt Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Journal of Management (JOM) via SAGE/ScholarOne — the 50-page limit, 15-word title, 250-word abstract, masked review, the anonymized data transparency table, APA 7th style, and required declarations. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Jm Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when understanding how Journal of Marketing (JM) review and decisions work — the double-anonymized process, the Coeditor structure, the substantive-and-relevance evaluation bar, and how to read a decision letter. Explains the process and reads the letter; it does not draft the response (jm-rebuttal).

1k repo stars
▌
Jm Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building the tables and figures for a Journal of Marketing (JM) manuscript — exact-statistic result tables, interaction/mechanism plots, and managerial-takeaway exhibits in AMA house style, all counting against the 50-page limit. Finalizes exhibits; it does not run the analysis (jm-data-analysis) or polish the prose (jm-writing-style).

1k repo stars
▌
Jop Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use to understand how The Journal of Politics (JOP) evaluates a manuscript — double-blind review, desk screening for fit and general interest, an efficiency-minded review process, and acceptance that is contingent on replicability checked by a JOP replication analyst. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

1k repo stars
▌
Jop Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing tables and figures for a The Journal of Politics (JOP) manuscript. JOP counts pages (not words) and includes tables and figures in the page limit, so exhibits must be self-contained, legible, regenerated by code, and economical with space. Designs exhibits; it does not run analyses.

1k repo stars
▌
Jos Review Process · brycewang-stanford
当你要理解《软件学报》(Journal of Software, JOS) 的审稿流程、稿件状态含义与作者可施力点时使用。覆盖在线投稿系统的状态链（投稿→领域/责任编委初审→外审→复审→主编终审→修回→定稿→录用）、多轮修回机制、6 个月内通知结果的时序、专刊评审差异、以及每个阶段作者能做什么，帮助你在《软件学报》(Journal of Software) 的中文同行评审各环节把握节奏与预期，不误判稿件状态。

1k repo stars
▌
Mgsci Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when executing and reporting the analysis for a Management Science (INFORMS) manuscript — proving and numerically verifying analytical results, or estimating and validating empirical models (identification, robustness, inference) to the standard of the relevant Department, and preparing a Data-and-Code-Disclosure-ready replication package. It executes; it does not design the study (mgsci-methods) or frame the contribution (mgsci-contribution-framing).

1k repo stars
▌
Mgsci Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when polishing the prose of a Management Science (INFORMS) manuscript — front-loading the result, keeping notation lean, writing for a cross-department reader, and conforming to author-year citation house style and the journal's preference for short, focused papers. It polishes prose and style; it does not frame the contribution (mgsci-contribution-framing) or build exhibits (mgsci-tables-figures).

1k repo stars
▌
Mksc Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when choosing or sharpening the research question for a Marketing Science manuscript — testing whether a marketing problem is important AND admits a formal model (structural or analytical), and whether Marketing Science (not JCR/JMR/Management Science) is the right venue.

1k repo stars
▌
Nbr Measurement · brycewang-stanford
Use for measurement rigor in 《南开管理评论》 (Nankai Business Review) survey studies — reliability (Cronbach's α, composite reliability), validity (convergent via AVE, discriminant via Fornell-Larcker / HTMT), and common-method-bias diagnosis (Harman single-factor, marker variable, common latent factor). Use whenever a paper uses self-report scales, especially if measures were borrowed or single-source.

1k repo stars
▌
Ngeo Results Framing · brycewang-stanford
Use when a Nature Geoscience result is correct but its headline advance and cross-disciplinary significance are not yet sharp. Structures the one-advance narrative and the "Here we show" abstract; does not run analysis or design figures.

1k repo stars
▌
Newms Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use for the final preflight before submitting a New Media & Society (NM&S) manuscript via Sage Track — word target, abstract, keywords, masking, SAGE Harvard referencing, ethics statement, and ORCID. Runs the checklist; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Ors Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when navigating the Operations Research (OR) editorial process — the departmental area-editor routing, the soft double-anonymous model with asymmetric transparency, decision types, and how to read a decision letter from the handling Area Editor. Explains how review works and how to read a decision; it does not draft the response (ors-rebuttal) or run the preflight (ors-submission).

1k repo stars
▌
Ors Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building the exhibits for an Operations Research (OR) manuscript — theorem/assumption layout, comparison tables against prior work, computational-results tables, and convergence/scaling plots in INFORMS house style. Lays out exhibits; it does not generate the numbers (ors-data-analysis) or prove the results (ors-methods).

1k repo stars
▌
Orgsci Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when preparing the final Organization Science submission package — the ScholarOne preflight covering the cover-letter contribution case, double-blind manuscript preparation, the all-inclusive ~50-page length norm, the separate standalone anonymized appendix, abstract/keyword and ORCID requirements, INFORMS formatting, transparency checklist, and the optional post-acceptance open-access option.

1k repo stars
▌
Prl Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Physical Review Letters manuscript — length check, format, files, Supplemental Material, classification, author info, and metadata. Verifies submission readiness; does not write content.

1k repo stars
▌
Psychrev Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when a Psychological Review decision letter (usually a major revision) has arrived and you must write the response document and revise the theory. Drafts the response and revision plan; it does NOT run the resubmission preflight (psychrev-submission) or build new theory from scratch (psychrev-theory-construction).

1k repo stars
▌
Psychrev Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which psychrev-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a theory or formal-model manuscript from problem framing through masked-review revision for a Psychological Review submission. Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Rje Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when responding to a revise-and-resubmit from The RAND Journal of Economics (RJE) — answering the two anonymous referees and the handling Editor on an industrial-organization manuscript while respecting the hard page caps and RJE house style. Strategy for the response letter; it does not rewrite the article.

1k repo stars
▌
Rje Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when routing a RAND Journal of Economics (RJE) manuscript to the right rje-* skill across the industrial-organization lifecycle — from IO topic fit through structural or reduced-form identification, exhibit design, Wiley Research Exchange submission, the editor screen, and the two-referee response. Use this as the entry-point dispatcher when you are unsure which RJE specialist skill a task needs; it dispatches, it does not itself frame, estimate, or write.

1k repo stars
▌
Respol Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when scoping or sanity-checking the research question for a Research Policy (RP) manuscript — deciding whether it is a genuine innovation-studies question RP owns versus an economics/strategy paper that will desk-reject as out of scope. Frames the question; it does not build the theory (respol-theory-development) or stake the gap (respol-literature-positioning).

1k repo stars
▌
Sf Data And Transparency · brycewang-stanford
Use when preparing the data, code, and transparency materials for a Social Forces (SF) manuscript. SF requires a data availability statement on every published paper and encourages deposit in a public repository where ethically feasible. Covers quantitative and qualitative transparency and restricted-data paths; it does not waive requirements.

1k repo stars
▌
Socs Quantitative · brycewang-stanford
Use for the quantitative path in 《社会学研究》 (Sociological Studies) — analyzing survey data (CGSS/CFPS/CLDS) with regression / Logit / multilevel / event-history (survival) / sequence analysis, and interpreting results as a sociological mechanism rather than entering an econometric identification arms race. Use when the draft only reports coefficients.

1k repo stars
▌
Soctheory Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when writing the response document for a Sociological Theory (ST) Revise & Resubmit — structuring point-by-point replies that show the theory was genuinely strengthened, not just defended. Drafts the response; revise the manuscript's theory FIRST (soctheory-theory-construction / soctheory-argument-development) before writing the letter.

1k repo stars
▌
Soctheory Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which soctheory-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a Sociological Theory manuscript from theoretical-problem framing through peer-review revision for a Sociological Theory (ST) submission. Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Ectj Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting a The Econometrics Journal response letter and revision plan after a referee report, especially for assumptions, proofs, Monte Carlo evidence, empirical application, 20-page compression, resubmission timing, and replication-package conditions.

1k repo stars
▌
Ectj Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when sequencing a The Econometrics Journal manuscript from venue fit through leading-case framing, asymptotic identification, Monte Carlo, empirical application, 20-page compression, submission, review, replication package, and rebuttal.

1k repo stars
▌
Ecj Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when polishing the prose of a The Economic Journal (EJ) manuscript into its clear, generalist-legible, economics-first register. Tightens voice, structure, and citation/format house style; it does not fix the economic argument itself (see ecj-theory-model / ecj-identification).

1k repo stars
▌
Webconf Experiments · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or auditing the empirical section of a Web Conference (WWW) paper — matching evidence to the claim's scale, choosing datasets with provenance and freshness, blocking temporal and popularity leakage, running honest baselines from the sibling circuit, and deciding when live-platform or user-study evidence is required.

1k repo stars
▌
Usenixsec Camera Ready · brycewang-stanford
Use when preparing final papers for the USENIX Security Symposium after acceptance — de-anonymizing, keeping the Ethical Considerations and Open Science appendices current, clearing the mandatory Phase-1 artifact availability check before finals are due, and meeting USENIX's open-access publication and presentation obligations.

1k repo stars
▌
Usenixsec Related Work · brycewang-stanford
Use when positioning a USENIX Security Symposium paper against prior work — covering the Big-Four security venues plus specialty conferences, handling concurrent submissions across the multi-cycle calendar, citing your own work double-blind, and using USENIX's open-access proceedings for verification.

1k repo stars
▌
Acr Fit Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use when judging whether a manuscript's landing point is an ACCOUNTING issue (accounting information / disclosure / audit / standards) versus a corporate-finance mechanism, before drafting for 《会计研究》 (Accounting Research). Use this to decide fit and to re-route finance-mechanism papers to a finance journal before any other acr-* skill.

1k repo stars
▌
Acr Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when framing or sharpening a topic for 《会计研究》 (Accounting Research) — turning a generic "X affects Y" empirical idea into an accounting contribution anchored in China's institutional setting, accounting theory, and standard-setting / practice relevance. Use before literature review.

1k repo stars
▌
Aas Camera Ready · brycewang-stanford
当你在稿件被《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 录用后、需要完成定稿、清样校对、补齐署名与基金、按本刊体例排版并处理稿酬与出版排期时调用。覆盖录用后从匿名稿恢复作者信息、套用本刊定稿模板、中英文摘要与参考文献终校、校样(清样)逐处核对、样刊与稿酬安排，帮助作者在 Acta Automatica Sinica 见刊前把清样打磨到零差错并理解稿酬与出版流程。

1k repo stars
▌
Aas Related Work · brycewang-stanford
当你在为《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 撰写相关工作、文献综述或确立创新性(delta)时调用。给出以差异为先的文献组织法、控制/自动化/模式识别方向代表作的覆盖策略、与最接近工作的对比表、避免"重复前人/无新意"初审退稿的自检，以及综述栏目所需的分类框架与批判性评价方法，帮助在 Acta Automatica Sinica 的中英文双语与综述长文传统下清晰界定本文相对已有研究的增量。

1k repo stars
▌
Aes Experiments · brycewang-stanford
当你为《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 稿件设计与呈现实验/仿真时使用。覆盖电子/信息/信号处理/通信类工作的实验目标与假设、数据集与仿真设置、基线与对比公平性、评价指标(SNR/BER/误差/准确率/资源占用)、消融与参数敏感性、统计显著性与多次运行、图表呈现规范、以及硬件/FPGA/测量实验的条件报告。帮助作者用严谨、可复现、对比公平的实验证据支撑创新点，抵御《电子学报》外审专家对"实验不充分、对比不公平、结果偶然"的质疑。

1k repo stars
▌
Advmat Supplementary · brycewang-stanford
Use when partitioning content between an Advanced Materials main text and its Supporting Information, ensuring the paper stands alone while extended data, full experimental detail, and secondary characterization live in the SI. Organizes the Supporting Information; does not write the main text.

1k repo stars
▌
Advmat Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when polishing the prose of an Advanced Materials manuscript for Wiley house style, concision, precise materials nomenclature and units, and readability across materials subfields. Polishes language; does not restructure the advance or manage the length budget.

1k repo stars
▌
Agsy Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or polishing an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript so it reads clearly for a systems-science audience, follows the journal's format, and meets front-matter requirements (abstract <= 250 words, Highlights, graphical abstract). Research papers run to about 8,000 words (no hard cap). Tightens prose and format; it does not invent content.

1k repo stars
▌
Geology · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Geology (GSA) or deciding whether a short, high-impact geoscience research letter fits this venue. Encodes the journal's broad-significance-in-tight-length fit, the novelty and rapid-communication bar, GSA house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Ahr Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use as the entry point for any American Historical Review (AHR) manuscript. Routes to the right AHR sub-skill based on where you are in the lifecycle of a history article — from significance and historiography through archives, interpretation, Chicago-style prose, review, and revision. It dispatches; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Anmath Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Annals of Mathematics manuscript — AMS-LaTeX compile, theorem environments, abstract and MSC, references, arXiv, figures, and portal logistics. Checks readiness; does not assess significance (anmath-scope-fit) or correctness (anmath-referee-strategy).

1k repo stars
▌
Ceq Modern Did · brycewang-stanford
Use when a 《经济学(季刊)》 (China Economic Quarterly, CEQ) manuscript uses difference-in-differences with staggered adoption or heterogeneous treatment effects — to bring it into compliance with modern estimators (Callaway–Sant'Anna, de Chaisemartin–D'Haultfœuille, Sun–Abraham) instead of bare two-way fixed effects. Bare TWFE on staggered timing is a near-certain reject at CEQ.

1k repo stars
▌
Ceq Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use for the pre-submission preflight to 《经济学(季刊)》 (China Economic Quarterly, CEQ) — checking the online system (oaj.pku.edu.cn / ccj.pku.edu.cn), in-text author-date citation style (页内夹注, not footnotes), abstract limits (≤200字中文 / ≤100词英文), three keywords, three JEL codes, the 15,000-word length cap, reproducibility, and double-blind anonymity. Use right before submitting; verify every rule against the journal's current 投稿须知.

1k repo stars
▌
Cie Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when responding to external-review / R&R comments for 《中国工业经济》 (China Industrial Economics). Builds a point-by-point response letter that prioritizes identification and the robustness arms race, revises the manuscript first, and supplies the data/code the journal requires. Do not generate the letter before the text is revised.

1k repo stars
▌
Cie Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which cie-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for 《中国工业经济》 (China Industrial Economics). Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills, and cross-references sibling journal packages.

1k repo stars
▌
Cre Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when a 《中国农村经济》 manuscript is at the topic-selection stage and the 三农 scope fit, theoretical grounding, marginal-contribution sentences, or venue match are unsettled. Produces the contribution-sentence template and the 三农-fit checklist. 本技能服务于《中国农村经济》(China Rural Economy, CRE)。

1k repo stars
▌
Cpa Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when polishing the language and rhetoric of a 《中国行政管理》 manuscript — eliminating the four-verb policy filler, anchoring claims in the PA theory frame, replacing narrative-only case writing with evidence-linked argument, and aligning person / hedging with CSSCI house style. 本技能服务于《中国行政管理》(Chinese Public Administration, CPA)。

1k repo stars
▌
Jama Oncology · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting JAMA Oncology or deciding whether a clinical-oncology study fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the cancer-trial and outcomes-research evidence bar, reporting-guideline and trial-registration requirements, JAMA Network house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics. Venue-fit aid only, not clinical advice.

1k repo stars
▌
Commres Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when revising a Communication Research (CR) manuscript after a revise-and-resubmit. CR requires two independent reviews to advance, so the hard problem is satisfying two quantitatively demanding referees — often on measurement, mediation, and confounds — inside the 45-page limit. Plans the revision and response memo; it does not fabricate new results.

1k repo stars
▌
Commres Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use as the entry point for any Communication Research (CR) manuscript. Routes to the right CR sub-skill based on lifecycle stage and study type (experiment, survey/panel, or content analysis). It dispatches; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Acm Mobicom · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting ACM MobiCom (MobiCom) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for mobile networking.

1k repo stars
▌
Acm Mobisys · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting ACM MobiSys (MobiSys) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for mobile systems.

1k repo stars
▌
Acm Sigcomm · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting ACM SIGCOMM (SIGCOMM) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for networking flagship.

1k repo stars
▌
Interspeech · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting INTERSPEECH (INTERSPEECH) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for speech processing.

1k repo stars
▌
Csj Submission · brycewang-stanford
在向《计算机科学》(Computer Science, JSJKX) 正式提交稿件前做投稿就绪审计时调用。覆盖官网 www.jsjkx.com "作者投稿"在线系统的唯一投稿通道、稿件六件套(题名/中英文摘要/中英文关键词/中图分类号/正文/GB-T 7714 参考文献)、栏目与专题(专栏)归属选择、单盲审稿下的署名与利益冲突声明、学术不端查重、第一作者 CCF 会员版面费 8.5 折、建议不少于 8000 字等要点，并在提交前做退稿风险分诊。适用于把一份计算机全学科的中文稿件打磨到符合本刊体例与外审门槛的场景。

1k repo stars
▌
Crim Literature Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use when positioning a Criminology (ASC / Wiley) manuscript against the literature so it reads as a contribution to the field's live debates, not a citation pile. Criminology readers expect engagement with the relevant theoretical tradition and the closest prior empirical work across the field's many disciplines. Stakes the contribution; it does not write the lit review.

1k repo stars
▌
Demog Literature Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use when positioning a Demography (PAA / Duke University Press) manuscript against the population-science literature so it reads as a contribution of general interest to demographers. Demography readers span fertility, mortality, migration, family, and health, so the paper must engage the demographic literatures they expect. Stakes the contribution; it does not write the lit review.

1k repo stars
▌
Ecopol Referee Strategy · brycewang-stanford
Use when preparing an Economic Policy (EP) manuscript for its panel review — the two named discussants and the conference debate that replace standard anonymous refereeing. War-games the discussants; it does not invent evidence or citations.

1k repo stars
▌
Er Robustness · brycewang-stanford
Use when building or writing the robustness-check section of an Economic-Research manuscript — organizes checks by the identification threat each one answers, not as an undifferentiated pile.

1k repo stars
▌
Er Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for 《经济研究》 — anonymization, author rules, abstract & keywords, reference style, anti-plagiarism, supplementary files, and the submission portal. Distinguishes officially-verified rules [官] from convention/经验值. 本技能服务于《经济研究》(Economic Research Journal, ERJ)。

1k repo stars
▌
Acs Nano · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting ACS Nano or deciding whether a nanoscience / nanotechnology manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Immunity · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Immunity or deciding whether an immunology manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Eer Robustness · brycewang-stanford
Use when a European Economic Review (EER) result must be shown to survive specification, sample, measurement, and inference changes — the robustness battery referees demand. Builds the stress tests and organizes them; it does not establish the core identification or write the prose.

1k repo stars
▌
Eer Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the European Economic Review (EER) via Editorial Manager — submission fee, single-anonymized review, Elsevier format and house-style rules, declarations, and the data/replication policy. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Expecon Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when responding to a revise-and-resubmit or referee report for an Experimental Economics (ExpEcon) manuscript — including when a referee demands a new treatment, more sessions, or raises a deception/power concern. Plans the response; it does not run the new analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Expecon Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which expecon-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from design through rebuttal for an Experimental Economics (ExpEcon) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Fcr Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use to understand how Field Crops Research (FCR) evaluates a manuscript — initial editor screening against the journal's scope boundary, the single-anonymized review model with typically two or more reviewers, and the common reasons for desk rejection (controlled-environment-only, single-site single-season, descriptive/local, out-of-scope species). Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

1k repo stars
▌
Gcb Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when executing and reporting the analysis for a Global Change Biology (GCB) manuscript — mixed/hierarchical models, time-series and spatial analysis, meta-analysis, and model evaluation with honest uncertainty. GCB reviewers and data archiving demand reproducible, well-quantified inference. Guides analysis norms; it does not fabricate results.

1k repo stars
▌
Gcb Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or polishing the prose of a Global Change Biology (GCB) manuscript so it reads for a broad ecology / biogeochemistry / Earth-system audience within the journal's length and abstract limits. GCB rewards a clear mechanism, quantified results, and global-change significance. Guides style; it does not ghost-write the science.

1k repo stars
▌
Hlr Preemption Check · brycewang-stanford
Use when verifying that a Harvard Law Review (HLR) argument has not already been made — the law-review "preemption check" run across SSRN, Westlaw/Lexis, HeinOnline, and Google Scholar BEFORE drafting. Confirms originality and refines the claim; it does not draft the thesis (hlr-thesis-and-contribution) or the literature engagement in the body.

1k repo stars
▌
Imfer Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when an IMF Economic Review (IMFER) manuscript's prose must land for its dual academic/policy audience — a tight intro, an italicized abstract with JEL codes, Chicago style, and a clear policy "so what." Sharpens the writing; it does not build the exhibits (imfer-tables-figures) or run the submission preflight (imfer-submission).

1k repo stars
▌
Interspeech Author Response · brycewang-stanford
Use when INTERSPEECH reviews arrive on CMT and a rebuttal is due — triaging three-or-more speech reviewers with mixed science/engineering instincts, answering WER/MOS evidence doubts with material already in the 4-page record, keeping replies anonymous, and writing for the meta-reviewer who decides in June.

1k repo stars
▌
Interspeech Reproducibility · brycewang-stanford
Use when hardening the reproducibility of an INTERSPEECH paper — pinning corpus versions and official splits, publishing text-normalization and scoring rules that WER/EER silently depend on, documenting MOS listening-test protocols, reporting seeds and variance within 4 pages, and making toolkit recipes rerunnable.

1k repo stars
▌
Interspeech Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether a project belongs at INTERSPEECH, the ISCA flagship speech conference, or should be routed to ICASSP, ASRU/SLT, Odyssey, SSW, ACL/EMNLP, or a speech journal — testing whether spoken language is the contribution, matching subfields to the reviewer pool, and choosing between the 4-page and Long Paper tracks.

1k repo stars
▌
Joc Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Journal of Communication (JoC) via Manuscript Central — format selection, double-anonymous preparation, page/abstract caps, APA-7th formatting, Word (.docx), the Data Availability Statement, and declarations. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Jeg Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when responding after a Journal of Economic Growth revise-and-resubmit to organize responses about growth mechanisms, model assumptions, empirical identification, calibration sensitivity, data availability, and Springer revision files.

1k repo stars
▌
Jeg Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when orienting and sequencing a full manuscript lifecycle for the Journal of Economic Growth (JEG) — a specialist Springer Nature outlet for economic growth and dynamic macroeconomics spanning theory and empirics. Routes to the other eleven jeg skills and branches by paper type.

1k repo stars
▌
Jet Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when building the response letter for a Journal of Economic Theory (JET) revise-and-resubmit — address each single-anonymized referee's correctness, generality, and exposition points, supply corrected or strengthened proofs or counterexamples, and show exactly where the .tex was changed. For R&Rs; it does not invent referee taste.

1k repo stars
▌
Jet Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when routing a Journal of Economic Theory (JET) manuscript — decides which jet- sub-skill to invoke next across the theorem-proof lifecycle, from theory-first scope check through Editorial Manager submission and single-anonymized R&R. Use first when unsure where to start.

1k repo stars
▌
Jf Internet Appendix · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding what belongs in the Internet Appendix vs. the main text of a The Journal of Finance (JF) manuscript. Allocates content and structures the appendix per JF's actual policy; it does not generate the results.

1k repo stars
▌
Jhr Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when a Journal of Human Resources (JHR) revise-and-resubmit arrives and you must plan the response letter — answering referees and the handling editor, satisfying the reconciliation and sensitivity demands, and confirming no fee applies to invited revisions. Strategy and structure; it does not write your results.

1k repo stars
▌
Jhr Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which jhr-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Journal of Human Resources (JHR) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Mw Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
用于回应《管理世界》R&R 审稿意见，产出逐条回复信并同步修订正文。Use when 收到《管理世界》退修通知、已有 1—3 份审稿意见和编委意见、需要撰写逐条回复信并对齐正文修改、或处理多位审稿人意见冲突时使用。锚定《管理世界》国务院发展研究中心主办、管理学与经济学并重、规范实证大刊的审稿语境，落实"先修订正文、再写导览式回复信"的顺序原则，对识别、机制、政策三条线实质补强，逐条标注正文修订位置，并审慎控制不接受意见的比例。本技能服务于《管理世界》(Management World, MW)。

1k repo stars
▌
Mw Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which mw-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for 《管理世界》 (Management World). Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Jm Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when choosing or sharpening a research question for the Journal of Marketing (JM) — testing whether it is substantive, managerially/societally relevant, and JM-fit (vs. JMR, Marketing Science, or JCR). Locks the question; it does not build the conceptual logic (jm-theory-development) or frame the contribution (jm-contribution-framing).

1k repo stars
▌
Jop Research Design · brycewang-stanford
Use when defending the research design of a The Journal of Politics (JOP) manuscript — causal identification for quantitative work, experimental and survey-experimental design, formal-empirical linkage, or case selection and process tracing for qualitative work. JOP is methodologically diverse and makes acceptance contingent on replicability, so design with reproducibility in mind. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.

1k repo stars
▌
Jop Theory Building · brycewang-stanford
Use when turning a The Journal of Politics (JOP) idea into a theoretically innovative argument — formal/game-theoretic, empirical, or normative. JOP explicitly prizes theoretical innovation across all subfields and counts pages, so the argument must be sharp, general, and economical. Builds the argument; it does not run analyses.

1k repo stars
▌
Jop Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether a political-science project fits The Journal of Politics (JOP) and which category to target. JOP is a general-interest journal across all subfields that prizes theoretical innovation and methodological diversity, and it counts pages (Research Article <= 35, Short Article <= 10), not words. Helps frame the question and pick the category; it does not collect data.

1k repo stars
▌
Jos Author Response · brycewang-stanford
当你收到《软件学报》(Journal of Software, JOS) 的外审意见、需要撰写修回说明（答复审稿人）并修改稿件时使用。覆盖逐条回应的结构、"必须改/可讨论/礼貌不改"的分级策略、修回说明与稿件修改处的对应标注、补做实验的取舍、多轮修回之间的一致性维护、以及与责任编委和主编终审衔接的中文表达分寸，帮助你把《软件学报》(Journal of Software) 的"修改后再审"稳妥地做成录用，而不是在下一轮被退稿。

1k repo stars
▌
Jos Reproducibility · brycewang-stanford
当你要为投向《软件学报》(Journal of Software, JOS) 的软件学科稿件建立可复现性与实验可重复保障时使用。覆盖数据/代码可用性声明、环境与依赖固定、随机性与种子控制、挖掘与大模型实验的出处锁定与输出缓存、可复现材料的目录组织与 README，以及"可根据要求提供"这类弱表述的规避，帮助你让《软件学报》(Journal of Software) 审稿人相信你的实验结果可被他人重复得到。

1k repo stars
▌
Jos Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
当你要判断一个研究项目是否契合《软件学报》(Journal of Software, JOS)、还是更适合投向《计算机学报》《计算机研究与发展》《自动化学报》《电子学报》《计算机科学》或英文会议/期刊时使用。本技能给出软件学科定位判据、与兄弟刊的区分测试、栏目（研究论文/综述/专刊）选择、以及"模型可替换"与"改标题"两个改投信号，帮助你在动笔前把选题对准《软件学报》(Journal of Software) 的软件工程与系统软件侧重，并决定是否走 CCF ChinaSoft 联动的专刊通道。

1k repo stars
▌
Jue Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when a Journal of Urban Economics (JUE) decision letter (R&R or reject-and-resubmit) needs a response-letter strategy and a revision plan. Turns referee reports into a point-by-point response and routes the analytical work back through the pack; it does not run the new analysis itself.

1k repo stars
▌
Jue Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which jue-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic through rebuttal for a Journal of Urban Economics (JUE) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Jwe Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use for the pre-submission preflight to 《世界经济》 (The Journal of World Economy) — checking footnote (页下注) conventions, reference list at the end, 内容提要 ≤ 300 chars + 3–5 keywords, bilingual title, blind-review anonymity, and the official online submission site (www.jweonline.cn). Use right before submitting; verify every rule against the journal's current 投稿须知.

1k repo stars

5,264 published skills · page 36 of 53