← all publishers

brycewang-stanford

@brycewang-stanford source repo

Report this profile Claim this profile

• 5.3k skills
• 0 followers
• 1k repo stars
• 2 weeks ago last updated

1. ▌
   Analysis · brycewang-stanford

   Use when targeting Analysis or deciding whether a short, focused philosophy manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's identity as a home for crisp, single-point articles, counterexamples, and replies; the argument-rigor bar; the brevity-and-focus house style and double-blind norms; official-submission re-check; and desk-reject heuristics.
   1k repo stars
2. ▌
   Language · brycewang-stanford

   Use when targeting Language (the Linguistic Society of America journal) or deciding whether a linguistics manuscript fits this discipline-wide flagship. Encodes the journal's fit across all subfields, the claim-plus-data bar, theoretical and cross-linguistic expectations, house style, glossing and double-blind norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
   1k repo stars
3. ▌
   Cell · brycewang-stanford

   Use when targeting Cell (Cell Press) or deciding whether a cell/molecular-biology manuscript fits this flagship venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
   1k repo stars
4. ▌
   Chem · brycewang-stanford

   Use when targeting Chem (Cell Press) or deciding whether a chemistry manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
   1k repo stars
5. ▌
   Jama · brycewang-stanford

   Use when targeting JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) or deciding whether a clinical medicine manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
   1k repo stars
6. ▌
   Nejm · brycewang-stanford

   Use when targeting The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) or deciding whether a clinical medicine manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, practice-changing evidence bar, CONSORT/registration requirements, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
   1k repo stars
7. ▌
   Pnas · brycewang-stanford

   Use when targeting Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) or deciding whether a multidisciplinary manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
   1k repo stars
8. ▌
   Eurosys Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanford

   Use when preparing a EuroSys artifact for the sysartifacts-run evaluation — choosing among the Available, Functional, and Reproduced badges, timing the post-notification artifact submission, building for an evaluator on foreign hardware, and aiming at the Gilles Muller Best Artifact Award rather than a minimal pass.
   1k repo stars
9. ▌
   Fcr Submission · brycewang-stanford

   Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Field Crops Research (FCR) via Editorial Manager — article-type selection, abstract (<=400 words) and highlights (3-5 bullets of <=85 characters), complete agronomic reporting, data-availability statement, generative-AI declaration, Elsevier formatting, and the cover letter. Final checks; it does not draft content.
   1k repo stars
10. ▌
    Infocom Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanford

    Use when packaging IEEE INFOCOM code, simulators, and datasets for credibility and optional IEEE reproducibility badges, given that INFOCOM runs no standing artifact-evaluation track, covering DOI-issuing archives, evaluator-proof documentation, what the absence of a formal track changes, and how a released package strengthens a no-rebuttal submission.
    1k repo stars
11. ▌
    Interspeech Experiments · brycewang-stanford

    Use when designing or auditing the experimental evidence for an INTERSPEECH paper — task-correct metrics (WER/CER, MOS/CMOS, EER/minDCF, PESQ/STOI), baselines reviewers accept, significance testing over utterances and seeds, condition coverage across speakers/noise/languages, and data hygiene for speech corpora.
    1k repo stars
12. ▌
    Jf Writing Style · brycewang-stanford

    Use when polishing the prose of a The Journal of Finance (JF) manuscript for accessible, general-interest exposition that reaches the broad AFA flagship readership. Tightens the introduction so question, finding, and economic magnitude land on page one, trims hedging, and offloads notation to the Internet Appendix; it does not change results or run analyses.
    1k repo stars
13. ▌
    Jmgmt Methods · brycewang-stanford

    Use when research design and measurement are the bottleneck for a Journal of Management (JOM) manuscript — matching design to the theoretical claim, construct validity, common-method bias, endogeneity, multilevel structure, and (for meta-analyses) coding/artifact corrections. Designs the study; it does not run the estimation (jmgmt-data-analysis).
    1k repo stars
14. ▌
    Jos Experiments · brycewang-stanford

    当你要为投向《软件学报》(Journal of Software, JOS) 的稿件设计或打磨实验与评测时使用。覆盖研究问题 (RQ) 契约、真实系统与数据集的选取、可信基线、评价指标与统计显著性/效应量、消融与抗污染的大模型评测、挖掘类研究的出处锁定、以及威胁有效性 (threats to validity) 的分类论证，帮助你把证据与论点对齐，达到《软件学报》(Journal of Software) 软件学科同行评审对实证严谨性的要求。
    1k repo stars
15. ▌
    Mgsci Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Management Science (INFORMS) manuscript — ScholarOne seven-step upload, double-anonymization, author-year house style, the $79 submission fee and waivers, the Data and Code Disclosure package and project-page URL, and conference-proceedings disclosure. It checks readiness to submit; it does not handle the post-decision response (mgsci-rebuttal).
    1k repo stars
16. ▌
    Mobicom Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanford

    Use when packaging a MobiCom artifact for the evaluation committee — choosing among the three ACM badges as a calibration of what you can prove, building a hardware-optional reproduction path for evaluators without radios, writing the smoke run that establishes functionality, and making code, data, and traces available.
    1k repo stars
17. ▌
    Mobisys Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanford

    Use when packaging a MobiSys artifact for the Artifact Evaluation Committee — choosing among the three independent ACM badges (Available, Evaluated–Functional, Results Reproduced), building the workflow scripts the single-blind AEC runs on its own machines, and providing a hardware-optional path for evaluators who lack the exact phone, wearable, or board.
    1k repo stars
18. ▌
    Molcell Star Methods · brycewang-stanford

    Use to build Molecular Cell's mandatory STAR Methods — the Key Resources Table, the Resource Availability subsections, Experimental Model and Subject Details, Method Details, and Quantification and Statistical Analysis, in the required order and with the reagent transparency Molecular Cell reviewers demand.
    1k repo stars
19. ▌
    Nbr Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford

    Use to draft the revise-and-resubmit (R&R) response letter for 《南开管理评论》 (Nankai Business Review) — addressing reviewer concerns on theoretical contribution, mechanism logic, measurement (reliability/validity/CMV), analysis (mediation/moderation/HLM or experiment/qualitative rigor), and contextualization. Use only after the manuscript itself has been revised, not before.
    1k repo stars
20. ▌
    Nbr Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding which nbr-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from fit judgment through rebuttal for 《南开管理评论》 (Nankai Business Review). Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills, and re-routes math-model or macro-policy papers to sibling journal stacks.
    1k repo stars
21. ▌
    Ngeo Cover Letter · brycewang-stanford

    Use when writing the cover letter for a Nature Geoscience submission, which must convince an in-house editor that the work is a broad-interest Earth-system advance appropriate for a diverse readership. Drafts the editorial case; does not edit the manuscript itself.
    1k repo stars
22. ▌
    Neurips Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanford

    Use when packaging NeurIPS code, data, models, demos, benchmarks, or other research artifacts for anonymous review, reproducibility, public release, or MLRC-style artifact scrutiny.
    1k repo stars
23. ▌
    Orgsci Methods · brycewang-stanford

    Use when choosing and defending the research design for an Organization Science manuscript — matching one of the journal's eclectic methods (qualitative/inductive, quantitative/archival, experimental, computational/simulation, formal-analytical) to the question and level of analysis, and justifying design without requiring causal identification.
    1k repo stars
24. ▌
    Prl Figures · brycewang-stanford

    Use when designing or auditing figures for a Physical Review Letters manuscript, where a few high-impact figures must carry the central result and count against the length limit. Designs figure strategy; does not run the analysis or write prose.
    1k repo stars
25. ▌
    Prl Methods · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding what methodological detail belongs in a Physical Review Letters body versus Supplemental Material, so a physicist can trust the result without the Letter becoming a long paper. Partitions methods; does not design figures or run analysis.
    1k repo stars
26. ▌
    Psci Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford

    Use when writing the response to a Psychological Science revise-and-resubmit. Reviews here often demand added robustness, fuller disclosure, or stronger transparency, so the response must address every point and strengthen credibility without breaking the tight format. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.
    1k repo stars
27. ▌
    Psci Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when starting or navigating any Psychological Science manuscript and you are unsure which sub-skill applies. Use when choosing among manuscript types or returning with a decision letter. Routes by lifecycle stage and manuscript type (Research Article, Registered Report Stage 1/2, Registered Report with Existing Data, Commentary), and flags the journal's tight word format and open-science requirements. It dispatches; it does not draft content.
    1k repo stars
28. ▌
    Rt Venue Integrity · brycewang-stanford

    Use before submitting to a venue this repository does not cover, one that arrived by email solicitation, or one whose indexing status matters for a tenure or degree requirement. Runs a source-by-source verification protocol — indexing, publisher, editorial board, fees, retraction history — and reports what each primary source says. It never labels a journal; it reports checks.
    1k repo stars
29. ▌
    Rof Writing Style · brycewang-stanford

    Use when revising a Review of Finance manuscript for a 150-word abstract, double-blind wording, Chicago-style references, first-order finance framing, two-round review discipline, and 60-page total manuscript constraint.
    1k repo stars
30. ▌
    Sigcomm Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanford

    Use when packaging an ACM SIGCOMM paper's code, traces, topologies, and configuration for the artifact-evaluation committee — choosing ACM badges (Artifacts Available, Evaluated, Results Reproduced) as claim calibration, building downscaled topologies and trace substitutes, and making a networking testbed result rebuildable by a reviewer.
    1k repo stars
31. ▌
    Sigmetrics Supplementary · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding what belongs in an ACM SIGMETRICS paper body versus its appendices and anonymized artifact, covering the 20-page single-column acmsmall budget, the rule that decision-critical claims (theorem statements, assumptions, headline validation) stay inside the reviewed pages, full proofs in appendices, double-anonymous supplementary material, and how to split a proof-plus-measurement paper.
    1k repo stars
32. ▌
    Sigmetrics Writing Style · brycewang-stanford

    Use when revising an ACM SIGMETRICS paper for a rigorously stated performance contribution on the first page, explicit modeling assumptions and their validity, theorems paired with numerical/empirical validation, evidence proportional to the claim, double-anonymous wording, and disciplined use of the 20-page single-column acmsmall budget.
    1k repo stars
33. ▌
    Artbull Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for The Art Bulletin — double-blind anonymization, the required Word files (manuscript, abstract, illustrations, captions, cover sheet), word/abstract/illustration caps, Chicago formatting, and the permissions status. Final checks; it does not draft content.
    1k repo stars
34. ▌
    Ecj Robustness · brycewang-stanford

    Use when the main result of a The Economic Journal (EJ) manuscript rests on a single specification and you need to pre-empt the alternative-explanation and fragility objections a demanding referee will raise. Builds the robustness battery and the falsification logic; it does not establish the primary identification (see ecj-identification).
    1k repo stars
35. ▌
    Ecj Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle

    Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a The Economic Journal (EJ) manuscript via Editorial Express — single PDF format, author-date references, single-blind review, JEL codes and keywords, full-length vs. short-paper choice, submission-fee awareness, funding disclosure, and the RES/EJ data-and-code policy. Final mechanical gate; it does not improve the economic argument.
    1k repo stars
36. ▌
    Webconf Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when planning a team's calendar around the Web Conference (WWW) annual cycle — the autumn abstract/paper deadlines, the holiday-week rebuttal, January decisions, the short-paper and Web4Good fallback windows inside the same edition, venue-volatility contingencies, and rerouting after rejection.
    1k repo stars
37. ▌
    Worlddev Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford

    Use when responding to a World Development (WD) decision letter — major/minor revision or reject-and-resubmit — under double-anonymized, multidisciplinary review. Builds the response-letter strategy; it does not invent evidence or citations.
    1k repo stars
38. ▌
    Worlddev Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding which worlddev-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic through rebuttal for a World Development (WD) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
    1k repo stars
39. ▌
    Acr Implications · brycewang-stanford

    Use when writing the contribution and implications section for a 《会计研究》 (Accounting Research) manuscript — articulating both the accounting-theory contribution (role of accounting information) and concrete implications for standard-setters, regulators, and audit/reporting practice. Use after results and tables are final.
    1k repo stars
40. ▌
    Aes Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    当你需要《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 投稿全流程总览与阶段调度时使用。把选题、写作、投稿、双盲外审、多级审理、修回、录用、校样到出版串成一条端到端时间线，指明每个阶段该调用哪个 aes-* 技能、关键决策点、6 个月答复红线、与英文姊妹刊 Chinese Journal of Electronics 的分流时机、以及常见时间陷阱。适合电子/信息/通信方向作者在动笔前或投稿中做整体规划，避免顺序错乱、错过时限或在错误阶段做错误的事。
    1k repo stars
41. ▌
    Advmat Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle

    Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Advanced Materials manuscript — article type, format, files, Supporting Information, TOC graphic, ORCID, and metadata for the Wiley submission system. Verifies submission readiness; does not write content.
    1k repo stars
42. ▌
    Agsy Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Agricultural Systems (AgSy) via the current Elsevier submission path / Editorial Manager — article-type selection, abstract <= 250 words, Highlights, graphical abstract, CRediT and declaration-of-interest statements, funding/AI disclosures, reference style, and data/code/model availability. Final checks; it does not draft content.
    1k repo stars
43. ▌
    Anmath Figures · brycewang-stanford

    Use when organizing the exposition and structure of a pure-mathematics manuscript for Annals of Mathematics — sectioning, notation, statements-before-proofs, commutative diagrams, and readability for an expert non-specialist. Figures are optional and rare; this skill is about exposition first. Does not assess the proof's correctness.
    1k repo stars
44. ▌
    Anmath Methods · brycewang-stanford

    Use when laying out the proof strategy of a pure-mathematics manuscript for Annals of Mathematics — the architecture of the argument, the key lemmas and propositions, the novel technique, and where the difficulty lies. Designs and exposes the proof plan; does not check final correctness line-by-line (see anmath-referee-strategy).
    1k repo stars
45. ▌
    Ceq Figures · brycewang-stanford

    Use when building or auditing the exhibits of a 《经济学(季刊)》 (China Economic Quarterly, CEQ) manuscript — favoring figures over tables (event-study plots, bin-scatter, model-fit / counterfactual figures) so the main result is legible at a glance, since many readers consume the English abstract plus figures. Use after identification and mechanism are settled.
    1k repo stars
46. ▌
    Reform · brycewang-stanford

    Use when targeting 《改革》(Reform — 重庆社会科学院主管主办的改革政策类 CSSCI 月刊, 1988 年创刊, 不收版面费) or deciding whether a Chinese social-science/econ/management manuscript fits this journal. Applies the journal's fit, framing, GB/T 7714 citation house-style, official-submission-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
    1k repo stars
47. ▌
    Hepatology · brycewang-stanford

    Use when targeting Hepatology or deciding whether a liver-biology or liver-disease study fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the AASLD clinical-and-basic/translational evidence bar, reporting-guideline and registration requirements, AASLD/Wiley house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics. Venue-fit aid only, not clinical advice.
    1k repo stars
48. ▌
    Conbio Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use as the entry point for any Conservation Biology manuscript. Routes to the right conbio sub-skill based on where you are in the science lifecycle and which article type (Contributed Paper, Research Note, Review, Essay, Conservation Practice and Policy, Comment) fits. It dispatches; it does not draft content.
    1k repo stars
49. ▌
    Ectheory Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford

    Use when an Econometric Theory (ET) decision letter arrives and a response strategy and letter are needed — handling proof-checking referee objections, fixing assumptions and gaps, and using the online Supplement, then writing a point-by-point response. It structures the revision, not the proofs themselves.
    1k repo stars
50. ▌
    Ectheory Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use as the router for an Econometric Theory (ET) manuscript — decides which ectheory-* skill to invoke next across the theorem-proof lifecycle, from topic selection through single-anonymous review and rebuttal. Start here when unsure where you are.
    1k repo stars
51. ▌
    Ecopol Writing Style · brycewang-stanford

    Use when an Economic Policy (EP) manuscript's prose reads like a technical report instead of accessible policy writing. Rewrites for the EP dual audience — non-technical main text, rigor in the appendix; it does not invent evidence or citations.
    1k repo stars
52. ▌
    Blood · brycewang-stanford

    Use when targeting Blood (ASH) or deciding whether a hematology manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
    1k repo stars
53. ▌
    Elife · brycewang-stanford

    Use when targeting eLife or deciding whether a life-sciences manuscript fits this open-access life-sciences journal. Encodes eLife's unique Reviewed-Preprint model, fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
    1k repo stars
54. ▌
    Joule · brycewang-stanford

    Use when targeting Joule (Cell Press) or deciding whether a sustainable-energy manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
    1k repo stars
55. ▌
    Finman Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford

    Use when a Financial Management (FM) decision letter arrives (R&R or conditional accept) and a response-to-referees letter plus a revision plan must be drafted. Plans and structures the response; it does not run the new analysis (finman-identification / finman-robustness) or the resubmission preflight (finman-submission).
    1k repo stars
56. ▌
    Finman Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding which finman-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Financial Management (FM) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
    1k repo stars
57. ▌
    Gcb Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Global Change Biology (GCB) via ScholarOne / Manuscript Central — article-type selection, word/abstract caps, graphical abstract, data availability statement, and required files. Final checks; it does not draft content.
    1k repo stars
58. ▌
    Hlr Writing Style · brycewang-stanford

    Use when shaping the prose and structure of a Harvard Law Review (HLR) piece for a generalist, student-edited audience — clear introductions, disciplined Parts, and the heavy-footnote register of legal scholarship. Polishes how it reads; it does not forge the claim (hlr-thesis-and-contribution) or format citations (hlr-sources-and-bluebook).
    1k repo stars
59. ▌
    Humrel Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford

    Use when executing and reporting the analysis for a Human Relations (HR) manuscript — qualitative coding and data-to-theory construction, critical interpretation, or quantitative estimation and robustness. Makes the evidence-to-theory link transparent; it does not design the study (see humrel-methods).
    1k repo stars
60. ▌
    Humrel Writing Style · brycewang-stanford

    Use when polishing full-manuscript prose and narrative craft on a Human Relations (HR) manuscript — the reflexive, theoretically-engaged HR voice, intro/abstract, and structure within the 13k cap. Polishes the writing; it does not change the theory or analysis.
    1k repo stars
61. ▌
    Imfer Robustness · brycewang-stanford

    Use when an IMF Economic Review (IMFER) manuscript's headline cross-country estimate must be shown to survive specification, sample, country-composition, and inference choices before submission or in an R&R. Builds the robustness suite a dual academic/policy referee expects; it does not establish identification (imfer-identification) or format exhibits (imfer-tables-figures).
    1k repo stars
62. ▌
    Imfer Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle

    Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an IMF Economic Review (IMFER) manuscript via Editorial Manager — double-blind anonymization, italicized abstract with JEL codes, Chicago style, separate author-bio file, and the data-availability statement. Final checks; it does not draft content (imfer-writing-style) or plan the rebuttal (imfer-rebuttal).
    1k repo stars
63. ▌
    Interspeech Camera Ready · brycewang-stanford

    Use when an INTERSPEECH paper is accepted and the camera-ready, registration, and presentation chain begins — de-anonymizing for the ISCA Archive, restoring acknowledgments on the references page, meeting the author-registration requirement for proceedings inclusion, DOI metadata, and oral/poster preparation for the conference week.
    1k repo stars
64. ▌
    Interspeech Related Work · brycewang-stanford

    Use when positioning an INTERSPEECH paper in the literature — tracing lineage through the ISCA Archive and its DOIs, covering the ICASSP/ASRU/SLT sibling circuit and challenge series, handling the speech-versus-NLP crossover canon, citing corpora properly, and avoiding the venue misattributions speech reviewers notice instantly.
    1k repo stars
65. ▌
    Joe Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford

    Use after a Journal of Econometrics (JoE) revision request to plan the response letter and revised manuscript — handling technical referee objections on assumptions, asymptotics, and Monte Carlo, and resubmitting through the live official route (note the fee can re-trigger on resubmissions over one year old).
    1k repo stars
66. ▌
    Joe Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding which joe-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a Journal of Econometrics (JoE) manuscript from methodological topic selection through revision rebuttal. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
    1k repo stars
67. ▌
    Jf Identification · brycewang-stanford

    Use when the causal-identification strategy is the bottleneck for a corporate / empirical The Journal of Finance (JF) manuscript — natural experiments, IV, DID, RDD. Stress-tests the design; for asset-pricing tests use jf-empirical-design.
    1k repo stars
68. ▌
    Jf Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford

    Use when finalizing tables and figures for a The Journal of Finance (JF) manuscript for the AFA flagship. Enforces accessible, self-contained, general-interest exhibits with Roman-numeral tables, economic-magnitude reporting, and matching Internet Appendix numbering; it does not decide which results to run.
    1k repo stars
69. ▌
    Jmgmt Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford

    Use when drafting the response-to-reviewers for a Journal of Management (JOM) R&R — the point-by-point letter, the editor-first revision strategy, handling masked-reviewer conflicts, and staying within the 50-page limit across rounds. Drafts and structures the response; it does not run new analyses (jmgmt-data-analysis) or rebuild the theory (jmgmt-theory-development).
    1k repo stars
70. ▌
    Jmgmt Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding which jmgmt-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Journal of Management (JOM) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
    1k repo stars
71. ▌
    Jos Camera Ready · brycewang-stanford

    当你的稿件被《软件学报》(Journal of Software, JOS) 录用、需要完成定稿、校样与清样并交付出版时使用。覆盖录用后按 2021 版模板的最终排版、中英文摘要与关键词的终校、参考文献 GB/T 7714 复核、图表清晰度与版权、作者与基金信息核对、校样阶段的勘误纪律、以及版面费与版权协议等事务，帮助你把《软件学报》(Journal of Software) 的录用稿干净地送进出版流程。
    1k repo stars
72. ▌
    Jos Related Work · brycewang-stanford

    当你要为投向《软件学报》(Journal of Software, JOS) 的稿件撰写相关工作或文献综述、并需要把自己的增量讲清楚时使用。覆盖软件学科文献分线（软件工程/系统软件/程序设计语言/数据库/网络与分布式/安全）、以"差异优先"方式定位增量、中英文文献的均衡引用、避免遗漏本刊近期相关论文、以及综述类文章的分类框架构建，帮助你在《软件学报》(Journal of Software) 审稿人面前把"与已有工作的区别"论证到位。
    1k repo stars
73. ▌
    Mksc Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford

    Use when estimating and validating the model for a Marketing Science manuscript — running structural estimation (GMM/MLE/SMM/Bayes), checking identification empirically, assessing model fit, computing counterfactuals, and preparing the replication package. Executes the analysis; it does not design the model (mksc-theory-development) or choose the genre (mksc-methods).
    1k repo stars
74. ▌
    Mksc Writing Style · brycewang-stanford

    Use when polishing the prose of a Marketing Science manuscript — front-loading model intuition before notation, managing the formal apparatus for readability, and following INFORMS author-year style and formatting. Late-stage polish; do not invoke while the model or identification is still unsettled.
    1k repo stars
75. ▌
    Ngeo Supplementary · brycewang-stanford

    Use when partitioning content between the Nature Geoscience main text and its Supplementary Information, ensuring the Article stands alone while extended data, model output, and derivations live in the SI. Organizes the SI; does not write the main text.
    1k repo stars
76. ▌
    Ngeo Writing Style · brycewang-stanford

    Use when polishing the prose of a Nature Geoscience manuscript for Nature house style, accessibility to non-specialists, precise terminology, and calibrated Earth-science claims. Polishes language; does not restructure the result or manage the length budget.
    1k repo stars
77. ▌
    Newms Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford

    Use when responding to a New Media & Society (NM&S) revise-and-resubmit decision — building a point-by-point response letter to multiple interdisciplinary reviewers plus the editor. Structures the response; it does not fabricate new results.
    1k repo stars
78. ▌
    Newms Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use as the entry point for any New Media & Society (NM&S) manuscript. Routes to the right NM&S sub-skill based on the lifecycle stage and the method (qualitative interviews/ethnography, critical-theoretical, content/discourse analysis, computational, or mixed). It dispatches; it does not draft content.
    1k repo stars
79. ▌
    Orgsci Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford

    Use after an Organization Science R&R to plan the revision and draft the point-by-point response letter, following the journal's codified author-response norms — verbatim italic quoting of each comment, no duplicated responses across reviewers, and a non-combative, non-effusive tone, while prioritizing the autonomous senior editor's concerns.
    1k repo stars
80. ▌
    Orgsci Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding which orgsci-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for an Organization Science manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
    1k repo stars
81. ▌
    Orgstud Methods · brycewang-stanford

    Use when choosing and justifying the research design for an Organization Studies (OS) manuscript — qualitative/ethnographic, process, historical, or quantitative — and setting the rigor bar OS reviewers expect. Designs the study; it does not run the analysis (see orgstud-data-analysis).
    1k repo stars
82. ▌
    Prl Revision · brycewang-stanford

    Use when responding to Physical Review Letters referee reports or editor decisions — point-by-point reply, resubmission, and the APS appeal route. Structures the response and revision; does not redraft the science from scratch.
    1k repo stars
83. ▌
    Prl Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding which prl-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from scope-fit through revision for a Physical Review Letters (PRL) manuscript. Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.
    1k repo stars
84. ▌
    Qe Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle

    Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Quantitative Economics (QE) via the Econometric Society online portal — membership gate, submission fee, PDF format rules, the Econometrica-transfer option, public-posting requirement, and the no-asterisks house style. Final checks; it does not draft content.
    1k repo stars
85. ▌
    Respol Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford

    Use when executing and stress-testing the empirical analysis for a Research Policy (RP) manuscript — building bibliometric/patent variables, running estimation or qualitative coding, and assembling robustness that an innovation-studies referee will accept. Executes the analysis; it does not choose the design (respol-methods) or present exhibits (respol-tables-figures).
    1k repo stars
86. ▌
    Respol Writing Style · brycewang-stanford

    Use when prose and structure are the bottleneck for a Research Policy (RP) manuscript — making an interdisciplinary innovation-studies argument land for economists, management scholars, and policymakers at once. Polishes the writing; it does not change the contribution (respol-contribution-framing) or run the submission preflight (respol-submission).
    1k repo stars
87. ▌
    Rt Desk Reject Risk · brycewang-stanford

    Use before submitting to score a manuscript against a specific venue's own desk-reject triggers and return a ranked, fixable risk report. Venue-conditional — it reads the target's documented triggers rather than applying generic advice. Run it after rt-submission-readiness clears the mechanical bar and before the paper is uploaded.
    1k repo stars
88. ▌
    Rt Execution Bridge · brycewang-stanford

    Use when an empirical analysis should be RUN and audited, not just advised — DiD, IV, RDD, synthetic control, DML, multiple-testing, sensitivity. Maps the design to the concrete StatsPAI / Stata MCP tools in this environment and reports the fitted, audited number. Defers result placement and house style to the target journal's pack.
    1k repo stars
89. ▌
    Rof Review Process · brycewang-stanford

    Use when interpreting Review of Finance desk screening, Screen Reports, double-blind review, top-three-finance-journal referee standards, two-round decision philosophy, Fast-Track timing, and sanctions for undisclosed resubmission or dual submission.
    1k repo stars
90. ▌
    Rof Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford

    Use when designing Review of Finance tables and figures under the 60-page total cap, including empirical-finance exhibits, theory figures, robustness tables, data-description tables, and replication-friendly notes.
    1k repo stars
91. ▌
    Sigmetrics Review Process · brycewang-stanford

    Use when reasoning about how an ACM SIGMETRICS submission is evaluated, covering the hybrid conference-journal model, double-anonymous review, the three first-round outcomes (Accept-with-shepherding / One-Shot Revision / Reject), the one-shot revision resubmitted to a subsequent rolling deadline, the 12-month resubmission bar, and how SIGMETRICS differs from IMC, SIGCOMM, and NSDI.
    1k repo stars
92. ▌
    Socs Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use for the pre-submission preflight to 《社会学研究》 (Sociological Studies) — checking in-text author-date citation (作者, 年: 页) plus end references (GB/T 7714, A–Z, 中外文分列), explanatory footnotes, abstract/keyword limits, the official online system (the journal's only channel), anonymity, and document hygiene. Verify every rule against the journal's current 投稿指南.
    1k repo stars
93. ▌
    Tar Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a The Accounting Review (TAR) manuscript — the Editorial Manager portal, double-blind anonymization, AI disclosure statement, ORCID and Conflict-of-Interest forms, data-authenticity files, the submission caps, and AAA/Chicago formatting. Checks readiness to submit; it does not handle the post-decision response (tar-rebuttal).
    1k repo stars
94. ▌
    Usenixsec Submission · brycewang-stanford

    Use when finalizing a USENIX Security Symposium submission — the per-cycle HotCRP site, the registration deadline a week before the paper deadline, the 13-page body plus mandatory Ethical Considerations and Open Science appendices, double-blind sweeps, and the early-reject exposure of a weak upload.
    1k repo stars
95. ▌
    Ylj Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding whether a legal-scholarship idea is a fit for The Yale Law Journal (YLJ) and which track it belongs in. It tests generalist significance, timeliness, and novelty potential; it does not draft the thesis or run the formal preemption search.
    1k repo stars
96. ▌
    Aas Submission · brycewang-stanford

    当你在向《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 正式提交稿件前做投稿就绪审计时调用。覆盖官网 aas.net.cn 的 ScholarOne 投审稿系统(aas-cn)、双盲匿名化(删除页眉页脚/标题下方/尾注/文件名中的作者单位基金号)、全部作者签名加盖第一作者单位公章的《作者承诺》前置提交、只收原创非翻译稿与不接收 AI 署名、学术不端查重、栏目(综述/论文/短文)归属与退稿风险分诊。适用于把一份控制/自动化/模式识别方向的中文稿打磨到符合本刊双盲三审制门槛的场景。
    1k repo stars
97. ▌
    Anmath Revision · brycewang-stanford

    Use when responding to an Annals of Mathematics referee report — revising the manuscript to close gaps or strengthen results and writing a point-by-point reply. Drafts the revision and response after the text is fixed; does not invent significance the result lacks (see anmath-scope-fit).
    1k repo stars
98. ▌
    Anmath Workflow · brycewang-stanford

    Use when deciding which anmath-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing work on a pure-mathematics manuscript from scope check through major revision for an Annals of Mathematics submission. Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.
    1k repo stars
99. ▌
    Ceq Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford

    Use when drafting the response letter for a revise-and-resubmit (R&R) at 《经济学(季刊)》 (China Economic Quarterly, CEQ) — where reviewers are typically field-trained and press hardest on identification, modern-DID compliance, and inference. Structures a point-by-point reply that concedes or rebuts with evidence. Use only after the manuscript itself has been revised.
    1k repo stars
100. ▌
     Ceq Workflow · brycewang-stanford

     Use when deciding which ceq-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from fit judgment through rebuttal for 《经济学(季刊)》 (China Economic Quarterly, CEQ). Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.
     1k repo stars