brycewang-stanford
- 5.3k skills
- 0 followers
- 1k repo stars
- 2 weeks ago last updated
- ▌ Jonc Workflow · brycewang-stanford当需要为一次《通信学报》(Journal on Communications, JOC) 投稿规划从选题到见刊的完整时间线、并把 12 个技能按顺序编排调度时调用。给出选题定位、写作、实证准备、投稿审计、初审→外审→终审三审制应对、修回、录用定稿各阶段的里程碑、预计周期与检查点,帮助作者把握约 1~3 个月的审稿节奏与月刊出版排期,识别每个环节的作者杠杆与常见卡点,并指明在每一步应调用本包中的哪一个具体技能,适用于统筹一篇通信/网络/信息安全/信号处理方向中文长文的整体投稿工程。
- ▌ Mgsci Review Process · brycewang-stanfordUse to understand how Management Science (INFORMS) review and decisions work — the Department/area-editor desk screen, double-anonymized refereeing, the cross-department fit bar, official turnaround targets, and how to read a decision letter — before or after submitting. It explains the process; it does not draft the response (mgsci-rebuttal).
- ▌ Mgsci Tables Figures · brycewang-stanfordUse when building exhibits for a Management Science (INFORMS) manuscript — propositions and numerical-illustration figures for analytical papers, or result/identification tables and effect plots for empirical papers — keeping notation clean, exhibits self-contained, and the page budget tight for the invited-revision limit. It builds exhibits; it does not run the analysis (mgsci-data-analysis).
- ▌ Mathfin Submission · brycewang-stanfordUse when running the final Mathematical Finance submission preflight through Wiley Research Exchange, including LaTeX source, compiled PDF, supplementary files, classifications, data availability statement, and single-blind review considerations.
- ▌ Misq Contribution Framing · brycewang-stanfordUse when turning results or a built artifact into an explicit contribution for a MIS Quarterly manuscript — stating what new IS knowledge the paper produces (behavioral mechanism, design principles, economic effect, or organizational insight), why it matters for both IS theory and practice, and why it justifies its page budget. Frames the contribution; it does not run the analysis (misq-data-analysis).
- ▌ Ngeo Referee Strategy · brycewang-stanfordUse when choosing suggested and excluded referees for a Nature Geoscience submission and pre-empting the objections Earth-science referees are likely to raise. Plans referee handling; does not write the manuscript or the rebuttal.
- ▌ Ors Topic Selection · brycewang-stanfordUse when deciding whether a problem is a fit for Operations Research (OR) and which of its editorial areas it belongs to — testing for a genuine OR/MS methodological contribution and picking the correct area before formulating. Scopes and routes the problem; it does not build the model (ors-theory-development) or position it in the literature (ors-literature-positioning).
- ▌ Orgstud Submission · brycewang-stanford bundleUse when running the final pre-submission preflight for Organization Studies (OS) via ScholarOne — double-anonymization, the 13,000-word cap, the 300-word unstructured abstract, the keyword rule, and SAGE house format. Final checks; it does not draft content.
- ▌ Psci Study Design · brycewang-stanfordUse when designing studies for a Psychological Science manuscript so they meet the journal's standards for power, sample-size justification, preregistration, and confound control. Strengthens the design and pre-analysis plan; it does not write code.
- ▌ Poq Submission · brycewang-stanfordUse when running the final pre-submission preflight for Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ) via ScholarOne Manuscripts — submission-type selection, double-blind preparation, word caps, AAPOR-standard Appendix A disclosure, the Data Availability Statement, and the replication package. Final checks; it does not draft content.
- ▌ Qe Data Analysis · brycewang-stanfordUse when executing or auditing the quantitative core of a Quantitative Economics (QE) manuscript — estimation (structural/GMM/MSM or causal), moment construction, data cleaning, computation, and inference — so results are credible and reproducible for the ES Data Editor. Runs and checks the analysis; for the identification argument route to qe-identification-strategy.
- ▌ Qe Writing Style · brycewang-stanfordUse when polishing prose, abstract, and introduction for a Quantitative Economics (QE) manuscript so a quantitative method and its economic payoff land for a general-interest Econometric Society readership. Reflects QE house rules (no significance asterisks; report SEs/coverage sets). Polishes exposition; it does not change results or estimation.
- ▌ Rt Replication Package · brycewang-stanfordUse before final submission or on acceptance to assemble and validate the Data-Editor replication package against the target venue's data-and-code policy — master script, pinned environment, README/roadmap, restricted-data plan, and a script-to-exhibit output map, with a checklist that catches the numbers a Data Editor would fail to reproduce. Reads the venue policy live from the pack's source-map.
- ▌ Sf Literature Positioning · brycewang-stanfordUse when positioning a Social Forces (SF) manuscript against the literature so it reads as a contribution to a general social-science audience. Because SF caps the manuscript at 10,000 words including the reference list, positioning must be sharp and economical. Stakes the contribution; it does not write the lit review.
- ▌ Ssc Submission · brycewang-stanfordUse when running the pre-submission preflight for 《中国社会科学》 (Social Sciences in China) — checking footnote (页下注) conventions, abstract/keyword limits, bilingual title/abstract, the online submission system (sscp.portal.founderss.cn), anonymity, and document hygiene. Use right before submitting; verify every rule against the journal's current 投稿须知.
- ▌ Tar Data Analysis · brycewang-stanfordUse when running and reporting the estimation for a The Accounting Review (TAR) manuscript — the estimator, fixed effects, standard-error clustering, robustness, and the data-authenticity / code-access documentation TAR requires. Executes and reports the analysis; it does not design identification (tar-methods) or frame the contribution (tar-contribution-framing).
- ▌ Tar Writing Style · brycewang-stanfordUse when polishing the prose of a The Accounting Review (TAR) manuscript — front-loading the result, writing for an accounting audience, enforcing Chicago Manual of Style house conventions, the 150-word abstract, and full author anonymization for double-blind review. Polishes prose and style; it does not fix a thin contribution (tar-contribution-framing) or run the submission preflight (tar-submission).
- ▌ Artbull Review Process · brycewang-stanfordUse to understand how The Art Bulletin evaluates a submission — double-blind peer review, what referees and the editor look for in art-historical work, and the likely decision outcomes. Helps anticipate review; it does not contact editors or simulate a specific referee.
- ▌ Ecj Identification · brycewang-stanfordUse when the empirical identification strategy is the bottleneck for a The Economic Journal (EJ) manuscript — quasi-experimental designs (DID, IV, RDD, event study) or structural estimation. Stress-tests the design and its economic interpretation before drafting tables; it does not write the model from scratch (see ecj-theory-model).
- ▌ Ecj Tables Figures · brycewang-stanfordUse when finalizing the main exhibits (tables and figures) of a The Economic Journal (EJ) manuscript so each one carries economic content, reads to a general audience, and is self-contained. Sets exhibit design and notes standards; it does not decide which results to report (see ecj-robustness).
- ▌ Webconf Camera Ready · brycewang-stanfordUse when preparing a Web Conference (WWW) camera-ready after acceptance, covering the uniform 12-page/8-content proceedings budget, de-anonymization and restored acknowledgements, ACM e-rights and TAPS production, ACM Open cost exposure, author registration, and the artifact-badging submission that rides along with the final files.
- ▌ Webconf Related Work · brycewang-stanfordUse when positioning a Web Conference (WWW) submission against prior literature — tracing lineage through three decades of WWW proceedings, contrasting with the WSDM/CIKM/SIGIR/KDD sibling circuit, handling the venue's preprint-non-citation rule, and budgeting references against the shared 12-page PDF tail.
- ▌ Usenixsec Supplementary · brycewang-stanfordUse when deciding what goes where in a USENIX Security Symposium paper — the 13-page body, the two mandatory one-page appendices (Ethical Considerations, Open Science), optional appendices after the references, and external artifacts — so nothing decision-critical lands where reviewers won't look.
- ▌ Usenixsec Writing Style · brycewang-stanfordUse when drafting or revising prose for a USENIX Security Symposium paper — threat-model-first structure, calibrated security claims, disclosure narrative woven into the text, 13-page discipline in the USENIX template, and the plain systems-security register this program committee rewards.
- ▌ Worlddev Theory Model · brycewang-stanfordUse when the conceptual or analytical framework is the bottleneck for a World Development (WD) manuscript — development theory that organizes the evidence, not necessarily a formal model. Makes the framework do real analytical work; it does not invent evidence or citations.
- ▌ Ylj Argument Structure · brycewang-stanfordUse when organizing the Parts of a The Yale Law Journal (YLJ) article into a doctrine→theory→normative arc. It sequences the argument and pressure-tests counterarguments; it does not polish prose (use ylj-writing-style) or format citations (use ylj-sources-and-bluebook).
- ▌ Ylj Placement Strategy · brycewang-stanfordUse when planning where and when to submit a law-review piece and how to handle an expedite, with The Yale Law Journal (YLJ) as a target. It covers multi-submission timing, season strategy, and YLJ's specific expedite rules; it does not run the final upload preflight (ylj-submission).
- ▌ Amr Methods · brycewang-stanfordUse when choosing and applying a theory-construction method for an Academy of Management Review (AMR) manuscript — building constructs, defining their domain, specifying relationships, articulating the underlying logic/mechanisms, and setting boundary conditions. This is the THEORY-CONSTRUCTION craft, NOT empirical method; AMR publishes no datasets, no measures, and no statistical tests.
- ▌ Aas Supplementary · brycewang-stanford当你在为《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 组织正文与附录/补充材料、决定哪些内容进正文哪些进附录时调用。给出按"决定性"划分正文与附录的原则、冗长证明与额外仿真的安置、补充材料/多媒体附件的组织与命名、以及配合双盲的匿名化,帮助控制/自动化/模式识别方向的中文长文在 Acta Automatica Sinica 的篇幅与体例约束下保持正文紧凑而证据完整。
- ▌ Aas Writing Style · brycewang-stanford当你在为《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 撰写或打磨中文稿件体例时调用。覆盖报道性中英文摘要(目的/方法/结果/结论四要素)、中英文关键词、中图分类号(自动化/计算机类 TP 打头)、参考文献 GB/T 7714 顺序编码制著录、量与单位法定计量、控制类公式与图表规范、以及综述/论文/短文三类栏目的体例差异,帮助把控制理论、模式识别、机器人、智能系统方向的中文长文写到符合 Acta Automatica Sinica 的双语传统与编排要求。
- ▌ Aes Camera Ready · brycewang-stanford当稿件被《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 录用后进入定稿、校样与清样阶段时使用。覆盖录用通知后的版权协议签署、按最终排版规范核对中英文题名/摘要/关键词/中图分类号、补全双盲阶段隐去的作者信息与基金编号、GB/T 7714 参考文献终校、图表与公式的印刷级质量、校样(清样)一校二校流程、版面费缴纳、DOI 与出版时序确认。帮助电子/信息/通信方向作者把已录用稿件零差错地送到《电子学报》正式出版。
- ▌ Aes Related Work · brycewang-stanford在为《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 稿件撰写相关工作与文献综述时调用。覆盖如何界定领域范围、系统检索中外文献(CNKI/万方/IEEE/dblp)、按技术脉络而非流水账组织综述、突出与本文的区别与本文创新点、恰当引用本刊及英文姊妹刊 Chinese Journal of Electronics 的相关论文、GB/T 7714 引用规范、以及双盲阶段自引匿名化。帮助电子/信息/信号处理方向作者写出既显示学科视野、又清晰定位本文贡献的相关工作章节,避免因综述薄弱或漏引关键文献被外审质疑创新性。
- ▌ Agsy Review Process · brycewang-stanfordUse to understand how Agricultural Systems (AgSy) evaluates a manuscript — single-anonymized peer review with a minimum of two reviewers and an editor decision, desk screening for fit and systems content, what reviewers weigh, and the rapid-review track for Perspectives. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.
- ▌ Cie Mechanism · brycewang-stanfordUse when a 《中国工业经济》 (China Industrial Economics) manuscript needs mechanism evidence. Prefers split-channel and moderation (heterogeneity-by-mechanism) regressions and treats the three-step mediation method as suspect — per Jiang (2022, CIE 2022:5), the journal's own methodological-norm guide. Use after the main effect is identified.
- ▌ Anesthesiology · brycewang-stanfordUse when targeting Anesthesiology or deciding whether an anesthesiology, perioperative-medicine, pain, or critical-care study fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the perioperative-trial and translational bar, reporting-guideline and registration requirements, ASA house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics. Venue-fit aid only, not clinical advice.
- ▌ Jama Neurology · brycewang-stanfordUse when targeting JAMA Neurology or deciding whether a clinical-neurology study fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the neurological-trial and observational evidence bar, reporting-guideline and trial-registration requirements, JAMA Network house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics. Venue-fit aid only, not clinical advice.
- ▌ Cogpsych Submission · brycewang-stanford bundleUse when running the final pre-submission preflight for Cognitive Psychology (Elsevier) via Editorial Manager — scope/length fit, abstract and keywords, APA-style reporting, model-comparison completeness, reproducible model/analysis code, and the Elsevier research-data and competing-interest declarations. Final checks; it does not draft content. Verify volatile specifics on the official guide for authors.
- ▌ Acm Siggraph · brycewang-stanfordUse when targeting ACM SIGGRAPH (SIGGRAPH) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for computer graphics flagship.
- ▌ Eurographics · brycewang-stanfordUse when targeting Eurographics Annual Conference (Eurographics) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for computer graphics.
- ▌ Ieee Infocom · brycewang-stanfordUse when targeting IEEE INFOCOM (INFOCOM) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for networking.
- ▌ Csj Experiments · brycewang-stanford在为《计算机科学》(Computer Science, JSJKX) 设计与呈现实验章节时调用。本刊是计算机全学科中文综合月刊(CCF 会刊、B 类、T2 级),单盲审稿。技能帮助以研究问题(RQ)驱动组织实验、选择公平且有代表性的基线、规范数据集与评价指标、报告统计显著性与方差、设计消融与敏感性分析、给出中英文题注的图表,并覆盖不同栏目(AI/网络/信息安全/数据库/系统等)的证据惯例。适用于把实证证据搭到能通过本刊外审、支撑摘要中量化结论的场景。
- ▌ Conbio Study Design · brycewang-stanfordUse when defending the study design of a Conservation Biology manuscript — ecological sampling and inference (detection, spatial structure, pseudoreplication), comparative/observational and quasi-experimental designs (BACI), modeling and synthesis design, and human-dimensions methods. The journal judges each appropriate method on its own terms. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.
- ▌ CI Evidence And Objects · brycewang-stanfordUse to choose and read the objects a Critical Inquiry (CI) essay analyzes — texts, images, artworks, films, performances, events, or cases. In CI the "evidence" is not data but objects read closely through theory; this skill helps select objects that test and earn the intervention and handle images to journal standard. It guides selection and reading; it does not run statistics or build datasets.
- ▌ Curranthro Rebuttal · brycewang-stanfordUse when responding to a Current Anthropology (CA) decision OR writing the author's Reply to the published CA✩ Comments. CA has two distinct response tasks — a normal revise-and-resubmit letter to referees/editor before acceptance, and the public, signed Reply to invited commentators printed alongside an accepted Major Article. Structures both; it does not fabricate new evidence.
- ▌ Curranthro Workflow · brycewang-stanfordUse when starting or navigating any Current Anthropology (CA) manuscript as the entry point. Routes to the right CA sub-skill based on lifecycle stage, subfield (sociocultural, archaeology, biological, linguistic), and article type (Major Article under the CA✩ Treatment, Report, Forum, Discussion/Comment). It dispatches; it does not draft content.
- ▌ Ecta Literature Positioning · brycewang-stanfordUse when locating an Econometrica result precisely within the methods / theory lineage it extends, and when writing the related-work paragraphs that pre-empt "how does this differ from X?" Builds the positioning — it does not judge overall fit (use ecta-topic-selection) or state the theorem (use ecta-theory-model).
- ▌ Er Data Sample · brycewang-stanfordUse when writing the data and sample section of an Economic-Research manuscript — naming databases, building variable-definition and descriptive-statistics tables, and leaving an auditable sample-filtering trail to 发表级.
- ▌ One Earth · brycewang-stanfordUse when targeting One Earth or deciding whether a sustainability manuscript fits this Cell Press venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
- ▌ Fcr Topic Selection · brycewang-stanfordUse when deciding whether an agronomy or crop-science project fits Field Crops Research (FCR) and which article type to target. FCR's defining test is field-based agronomic significance with multi-season/-environment relevance — it rejects controlled-environment-only, single-site single-season, horticultural/woody-perennial, and corroborative/descriptive/local-only work. Helps frame the question; it does not collect data.
- ▌ Cte Abstract · brycewang-stanfordUse when drafting or revising the 中文摘要 or 英文 abstract for a 《财贸经济》(Finance & Trade Economics, CTE) manuscript — the CSSCI 财经权威期刊 run by 中国社会科学院财经战略研究院. 当摘要写成"为高质量发展提供新思路"式套话、缺核心数据 / 识别策略 / 量化发现、或中英文语义不对齐时使用。Enforces the five-sentence pattern, requires quantified findings with named data sources (CSMAR / WIND / CEIC / 统计年鉴), and forbids empty-significance phrases.
- ▌ Cte Rebuttal · brycewang-stanfordUse when responding to reviewer reports for a 《财贸经济》 R&R. Produces the point-by-point response letter and aligned manuscript edits. 本技能服务于《财贸经济》(Finance & Trade Economics, CTE)。
- ▌ Wp Topic Selection · brycewang-stanfordUse when deciding whether a project fits World Politics and whether it should be a research article or a review article. World Politics is a comparative-politics + international-relations specialist, so the test is a substantive question that travels across cases or systems — not subfield novelty, and not a single-case description. Helps frame the question; it does not collect data.
- ▌ Acr Robustness · brycewang-stanfordUse when building the robustness section for a 《会计研究》 (Accounting Research) manuscript — replacing accounting measures with alternatives, adding governance / institutional controls, placebo tests, and endogeneity follow-ups — so the main result survives an accounting referee's scrutiny. Use after mechanism is settled.
- ▌ Acr Submission · brycewang-stanfordUse for the pre-submission preflight to 《会计研究》 (Accounting Research) — checking footnote (当页下注) conventions, the 著者—出版年制 reference style, abstract/keyword limits, article length, the online-only submission system via the Accounting Society of China site, double-blind anonymity, and document hygiene. Use right before submitting; verify every rule against the journal's current 投稿指南.
- ▌ Advmat Revision · brycewang-stanfordUse when responding to Advanced Materials reviewer reports and an editor's decision — major or minor revision, or a rejection with a resubmission or transfer path. Structures the response and the manuscript changes; does not perform the underlying new experiments.
- ▌ Advmat Workflow · brycewang-stanfordUse when deciding which advmat-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from scope-fit through revision for an Advanced Materials (Adv. Mater.) manuscript. Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.
- ▌ Agsy Workflow · brycewang-stanfordUse as the entry point for any Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript. Routes to the right AgSy sub-skill based on where you are in the lifecycle and which article type (research paper, short communication, perspective, comment, review) fits. AgSy is a systems-science journal, so the router's first job is to confirm there is a real systems question — interactions, hierarchical levels, trade-offs — not a single-factor field trial. It dispatches; it does not draft content.
- ▌ Cc Ethics Registration · brycewang-stanfordUse when assembling ethics approvals and availability statements for a Cancer Cell (Cell Press) manuscript — IACUC animal approval, human-sample IRB/consent, biosafety, and data/code deposition statements. It governs compliance declarations; it does not design experiments or write methods detail.
- ▌ Cc Reporting Standards · brycewang-stanfordUse when assembling STAR Methods and the Key Resources Table for a Cancer Cell (Cell Press) manuscript, and when ensuring rigor / reproducibility (cell-line authentication, mycoplasma, antibody validation, ARRIVE animal reporting, data/code deposition). It governs reporting; it does not design experiments.
- ▌ Cc Structured Abstract · brycewang-stanfordUse when writing the Cancer Cell (Cell Press) front matter — the Summary, eTOC blurb, Highlights, and graphical abstract. It crafts these short items for accuracy and impact; it does not write Results or calibrate statistics.
- ▌ Cre Submission · brycewang-stanford bundleUse when running the final pre-submission preflight for 《中国农村经济》 — format, word count, double-blind, references, anti-plagiarism, author info, and supplementary files. 本技能服务于《中国农村经济》(China Rural Economy, CRE)。
- ▌ CI Review Process · brycewang-stanfordUse to understand how Critical Inquiry (CI) evaluates a submission — peer review plus close reading by the editors-in-chief in consultation with the editorial team, the no-simultaneous-submission rule, the commissioned/special-issue routes, and the high ambition bar that defines the journal. Sets expectations and shapes the essay to survive review; it does not contact editors.
- ▌ Ecta Referee Strategy · brycewang-stanfordUse to red-team an Econometrica manuscript before submission and to anticipate co-editor and referee objections — proof gaps, generality, missing finite-sample evidence, and competing methods. Predicts and pre-empts attacks; it does not draft the response letter after reports arrive (use ecta-rebuttal).
- ▌ Er Style · brycewang-stanfordUse when polishing the language and rhetoric of an 《经济研究》 manuscript — eliminating empty-significance phrases, fixing vague policy talk, replacing method-flexing with mechanism, and aligning tense / person / hedging with CSSCI house style. 本技能服务于《经济研究》(Economic Research Journal, ERJ)。
- ▌ October · brycewang-stanfordUse when targeting October or deciding whether a modern/contemporary art, criticism, or theory manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit as the MIT Press venue for contemporary art, high theory, and the legacy of the avant-garde, the argument and critical bar, primary-source command, citation/house style, image-rights expectations, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
- ▌ Gut · brycewang-stanfordUse when targeting Gut (BMJ) or deciding whether a GI/hepatology manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
- ▌ Gcb Workflow · brycewang-stanfordUse as the entry point for any Global Change Biology (GCB) manuscript. Routes to the right GCB sub-skill based on where you are in the lifecycle and which article type (Primary Research Article, Technical Advance, Review / Research Review, Opinion / Perspective) fits. It dispatches; it does not draft content.
- ▌ Ieeesp Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanfordUse when preparing an IEEE S&P (Oakland) artifact-evaluation submission after acceptance, including choosing among the Available, Functional, and Results Reproduced badges, DOI-backed deposits, packaging exploits and malware-adjacent code responsibly, and scoping what evaluators can actually re-run.
- ▌ Imfer Rebuttal · brycewang-stanfordUse when an IMF Economic Review (IMFER) R&R or decision letter arrived and you need a response-letter strategy for a dual academic/policy referee panel. Plans and drafts the response; it returns to imfer-submission for the resubmission preflight and does not re-run the original identification (imfer-identification).
- ▌ Imfer Workflow · brycewang-stanfordUse when deciding which imfer-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic through rebuttal for an IMF Economic Review (IMFER) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
- ▌ Interspeech Submission · brycewang-stanfordUse when auditing an INTERSPEECH submission before the CMT deadline — the strict 4-page-plus-references format, double-anonymous rules and the pre-deadline anonymity period, scientific-area and metadata choices, the post-deadline paper-update window, dual-submission policy, and the desk-reject triggers specific to ISCA's flagship.
- ▌ Jm Submission · brycewang-stanfordUse when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Journal of Marketing (JM) manuscript — the ScholarOne (Sage Track) portal, double-anonymized formatting, the 50-page inclusive limit, exact-statistic reporting, the Data Availability Statement, and the JM Dataverse plan. Checks readiness to submit; it does not handle the post-decision response (jm-rebuttal).
- ▌ Jop Submission · brycewang-stanfordUse when running the final pre-submission preflight for The Journal of Politics (JOP) via Editorial Manager — category selection, double-blind preparation, the page budget (Research Article <= 35 / Short Article <= 10, double-spaced 12-point), the Online Appendix <= 25 pages, abstract and keywords, and JOP Style Guide formatting. Final checks; it does not draft content.
- ▌ Jos Submission · brycewang-stanford当你要把一篇稿件投向《软件学报》(Journal of Software, JOS) 并需要在提交前做一次完整的在线投稿审计时使用。覆盖 jos.org.cn 在线投稿系统的账号与流程、2021 版排版模板与 GB/T 7714 参考文献、中英文题目/摘要/关键词/中图分类号、软件学科栏目定位(研究论文/综述/专刊)、一稿多投与学术规范承诺、基金与通信作者信息、以及退稿风险的自查,帮助你在提交前把《软件学报》(Journal of Software) 会立刻检查的项目逐条清干净。
- ▌ Mind Structure And Exposition · brycewang-stanfordUse when organizing a Mind article so the argument unfolds in the clearest possible order within the ~8,000-word limit. The job is architecture, not prose polish — a roadmap, the right order of premises, signposting, and a conclusion that claims exactly what was earned. Structures the paper; it does not write the sentences (see mind-writing-style).
- ▌ Misq Topic Selection · brycewang-stanfordUse when shaping or stress-testing a research question for MIS Quarterly — confirming it is a genuine information-systems question, naming which of the four IS traditions (behavioral, design science, economics, organizational) it lives in, and choosing the matching manuscript category before any data are collected or any artifact is built.
- ▌ Ors Submission · brycewang-stanfordUse when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Operations Research (OR) manuscript — INFORMS Author Portal/ScholarOne, area selection, recommending Associate Editors and reviewers, soft double-anonymous anonymization, the mandatory contribution statement, page-tier limits, and the code/data deposit plan. Checks readiness to submit; it does not handle the post-decision response (ors-rebuttal).
- ▌ Pmla Structure And Exposition · brycewang-stanfordUse when organizing a PMLA (Publications of the Modern Language Association) essay so the argument unfolds clearly within the 6,000–9,000-word range. PMLA prizes a concise, readable presentation that draws out implications; the structure must carry a generalist reader through close reading and argument. Shapes the architecture; it does not write the prose.
- ▌ Qe Rebuttal · brycewang-stanfordUse when a Quantitative Economics (QE) decision letter arrives (R&R or major/conditional revision) and a response strategy and letter are needed. Structures the revision and response; it does not redo the analysis (route to the relevant qe-* skill for that).
- ▌ Qe Workflow · brycewang-stanfordUse when deciding which qe-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Quantitative Economics (QE) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
- ▌ Sigmetrics Camera Ready · brycewang-stanfordUse when preparing an accepted ACM SIGMETRICS paper for its POMACS camera-ready, covering de-anonymization, the acmsmall template and POMACS journal metadata (DOI, ORCID, CCS concepts), incorporating the shepherd's required changes without scope creep, permanentizing artifact links, and the ACM artifact-badge handoff.
- ▌ Sigmetrics Related Work · brycewang-stanfordUse when positioning an ACM SIGMETRICS submission against the performance-evaluation literature across SIGMETRICS/POMACS, Performance Evaluation, QUESTA, TON, and the systems/learning/measurement neighbors (NSDI/OSDI, IMC, NeurIPS/ICML), writing delta-first contrast rather than a citation catalog, keeping self-citations double-anonymous, and handling concurrent and prior-version overlap.
- ▌ Ssc Style · brycewang-stanfordUse when polishing the language and rhetoric of a 《中国社会科学》 (Social Sciences in China) manuscript — replacing policy-report tone and empty-significance phrases with scholarly argument, keeping a grand-but-restrained register, and ensuring paragraph-leading topic sentences. Use after the proposition and argument are settled.
- ▌ Socs Rebuttal · brycewang-stanfordUse to draft the response letter for an R&R at 《社会学研究》 (Sociological Studies) — addressing reviewer concerns about sociological problematic, theory dialogue, mechanism/social process, qualitative trustworthiness, or quantitative interpretation, point by point, with respect and evidence. Use only after the manuscript itself has been revised.
- ▌ Socs Workflow · brycewang-stanfordUse when deciding which socs-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from problematic framing through rebuttal for 《社会学研究》 (Sociological Studies). Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills, and re-routes off-discipline drafts to other journal packs.
- ▌ Tar Rebuttal · brycewang-stanfordUse when drafting the revision and response letter after a The Accounting Review (TAR) revise-and-resubmit — structuring point-by-point responses to the editor and the (minimum two) reviewers across a multi-round developmental process, including identification, contribution, and data-authenticity demands. Drafts the response after revisions; it does not interpret the decision letter (tar-review-process).
- ▌ Tar Workflow · brycewang-stanfordUse when deciding which tar-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a The Accounting Review (TAR) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
- ▌ Usenixsec Workflow · brycewang-stanfordUse when planning a USENIX Security Symposium project end to end — choosing between the two annual cycles, mapping the registration-to-camera-ready calendar for a chosen cycle, sequencing artifact and ethics work early, and coordinating a team across the multi-deadline Big-Four calendar.
- ▌ Ylj Writing Style · brycewang-stanfordUse when revising prose to match The Yale Law Journal (YLJ) house style — clear, generalist-legible legal writing with a disciplined footnote-to-text balance. It governs voice and readability; it does not format citations (ylj-sources-and-bluebook) or sequence the argument (ylj-argument-structure).
- ▌ Acr Measurement · brycewang-stanfordUse when constructing or auditing accounting measures for 《会计研究》 (Accounting Research) — discretionary accruals (modified Jones), real earnings management (Roychowdhury), conservatism (Basu / C-Score), comparability, disclosure indices, audit-quality and tax-avoidance proxies — so each measure is built transparently and reproducibly. Use before identification.
- ▌ Aas Workflow · brycewang-stanford当你在为《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 规划一次完整投稿的时间线、把 12 个技能编排成从选题到见刊的流水线时调用。给出选题定位→写作→实验→匿名投稿→双盲三审→多轮退修→录用定稿的阶段划分、每阶段的准入准出、里程碑与常见延误点,帮助作者在 Acta Automatica Sinica 的双盲三审制与中英文双语综述长文传统下合理排期,避免作者承诺漏交、双盲泄露、退修超期等踩坑,并在每个节点指明应调用哪个 aas- 技能。
- ▌ Advmat Scope Fit · brycewang-stanfordUse when deciding whether a materials result clears Advanced Materials' advance-and-broad-impact gate, or whether it belongs in Advanced Functional Materials, Advanced Science, Small, or Advanced Materials Interfaces. Diagnoses venue fit; does not write or characterize the material.
- ▌ Aistats Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanfordUse when packaging AISTATS code, data, proofs, simulation scripts, notebooks, random seeds, and logs as anonymous supplementary evidence or public post-acceptance artifacts, even when there is no separate artifact badge. Covers what statistically minded AISTATS reviewers inspect first and how to make Monte Carlo studies turnkey.
- ▌ Cc Peer Review Revision · brycewang-stanfordUse when responding to Cancer Cell (Cell Press) reviewer reports — planning new experiments, writing a point-by-point response, and calibrating claims for revision. It structures the rebuttal and revision; it does not run the experiments or design them from scratch.
- ▌ Radiology · brycewang-stanfordUse when targeting Radiology (RSNA) or deciding whether a medical-imaging study fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the diagnostic-accuracy and imaging-methodology bar, STARD/CLAIM reporting and reproducibility expectations, RSNA house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics. Venue-fit aid only, not clinical advice.
- ▌ Eurosys · brycewang-stanfordUse when targeting EuroSys (EuroSys) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for systems.
- ▌ Eurovis · brycewang-stanfordUse when targeting EuroVis (EuroVis) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for visualization.
- ▌ Robocup · brycewang-stanfordUse when targeting RoboCup Symposium (RoboCup) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for robotics competitions.
- ▌ CI Topic Selection · brycewang-stanfordUse when deciding whether a project fits Critical Inquiry (CI) and which format to target. CI is the leading interdisciplinary journal of criticism and theory in the arts and humanities, associated with no single school and tied to no single discipline; the test is a theoretical intervention with stakes beyond one field, not subfield novelty or a competent close reading alone. Helps frame the project; it does not gather sources.
- ▌ Ecopol Theory Model · brycewang-stanfordUse when building or tightening the conceptual frame or quantitative model that disciplines an Economic Policy (EP) manuscript's policy logic. Keeps the model minimal-but-honest and legible to a policy audience; it does not invent evidence or citations.