brycewang-stanford

@brycewang-stanford source repo

5.3k skills
0 followers
1k repo stars
2 weeks ago last updated

▌
Joe Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing the Monte Carlo study and empirical illustration that demonstrate a Journal of Econometrics (JoE) method works in finite samples. Covers size/power simulation design, DGP stress tests, and the role of the applied illustration relative to the theory.

1k repo stars
▌
Joe Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use to make a Journal of Econometrics (JoE) manuscript read in house style — a precise abstract under 250 words, a contribution-first introduction, legible theorem-and-proof exposition, and Elsevier elsarticle/[dataset] reference conventions. Late-stage polish; it does not invent results.

1k repo stars
▌
Jeg Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when running the final Journal of Economic Growth submission preflight through Springer Nature, including abstract length, title-page metadata, LaTeX or Word source files, declarations, data availability, and Open Choice fee checks.

1k repo stars
▌
Jet Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Journal of Economic Theory (JET) via Elsevier Editorial Manager — editable Word/LaTeX source (no PDF source), 250-word abstract, 1-7 keywords, optional Highlights, author-year proof-stage references, Option C data statement, generative-AI disclosure, and the APC-vs-submission-fee distinction. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Jfm Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting the response to an R&R or referee report for a Journal of Financial Markets (JFM) manuscript — turning microstructure objections into a point-by-point response and a revised draft. Plans and drafts the rebuttal; it does not invent evidence or citations.

1k repo stars
▌
Jfm Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which jfm-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing work on a Journal of Financial Markets (JFM) manuscript from topic selection through rebuttal. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized microstructure-focused skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Jhr Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Journal of Human Resources (JHR) via the msubmit.net portal — the page-count limit, the nonrefundable upfront fee, the per-author disclosure statement, the data-archive footnote, and scope fit. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Jle Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when a The Journal of Law and Economics (JLE) decision letter arrives (R&R or conditional accept) and a response-to-referees letter plus a revision plan must be drafted. Plans and structures the response; it does not run the new analysis (jle-identification / jle-robustness) or the submission preflight (jle-submission).

1k repo stars
▌
Jle Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which jle-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a The Journal of Law and Economics (JLE) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Jmgmt Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when estimation and results are the bottleneck for a Journal of Management (JOM) manuscript — SEM/CFA, HLM/multilevel, regression and interactions, mediation/moderation, and meta-analytic estimation with artifact corrections. Runs and validates the analysis; it does not design the study (jmgmt-methods) or frame the contribution (jmgmt-contribution-framing).

1k repo stars
▌
Jmgmt Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when the prose, introduction, or abstract is the bottleneck for a Journal of Management (JOM) manuscript — the theory-forward intro, the 250-word abstract, the 15-word title, APA voice, and enforcing the 50-page (inclusive) limit. Polishes the writing; it does not build the contribution (jmgmt-contribution-framing) or fix exhibits (jmgmt-tables-figures).

1k repo stars
▌
Jms Methods · brycewang-stanford
Use when the research design is the bottleneck for a Journal of Management Studies (JMS) manuscript — matching design (qualitative case/ethnography, process/longitudinal, survey, archival, experiment, multi-method) to the theoretical question, with qualitative rigor treated as first-class. Designs the study; it does not run the estimation or trustworthiness checks (jms-data-analysis).

1k repo stars
▌
Mw Submission · brycewang-stanford
用于《管理世界》投稿前的最终 preflight 检查，规避因形式问题在初审被技术性退稿。Use when "明天就要投了"、点提交按钮前做最后核对、不确定投稿系统需要哪些附件、或担心双盲与查重不合规时使用。锚定《管理世界》国务院发展研究中心主办、规范实证大刊的投稿要求，覆盖格式、字数、双盲（致谢/基金单独提交、自引去身份化）、中英文参考文献规范、知网查重、研究类型勾选、作者信息与补充材料的逐项检查，具体阈值以编辑部最新稿约为准。本技能服务于《管理世界》(Management World, MW)。

1k repo stars
▌
Jmr Methods · brycewang-stanford
Use when matching the research design to the claim for a Journal of Marketing Research (JMR) manuscript — experimental design (lab and field), causal identification (IV/DiD/RDD/matching), or structural/analytical estimation. Adapts to JMR's dominant genres and to its journal-level rigor and replication expectations. It designs; jmr-data-analysis executes and reports.

1k repo stars
▌
Jpe Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when a Journal of Political Economy (JPE) decision letter (R&R or reject-with-encouragement) has arrived and you need to draft the response-to-referees letter and revision plan. Structures the response and the diff; it does not redo the analysis (route back to jpe-identification / jpe-theory-model / jpe-robustness first).

1k repo stars
▌
Jpe Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which jpe-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Journal of Political Economy (JPE) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Jue Robustness · brycewang-stanford
Use when a Journal of Urban Economics (JUE) manuscript's headline spatial estimate must be shown to survive specification, spatial-scale, sorting, spillover, and inference choices before submission or in an R&R. Builds the spatially-aware robustness suite a JUE referee expects; it does not establish the identification (jue-identification) or format the maps (jue-tables-figures).

1k repo stars
▌
Jwe Data Sources · brycewang-stanford
Use when choosing or defending the data behind a 《世界经济》 (The Journal of World Economy) manuscript — customs micro data (firm-product-destination), cross-country panels, and GVC / input-output decomposition (KWW value-added, ADB / WIOD MRIO). Steers away from generic provincial panels toward internationally-credible sources.

1k repo stars
▌
Jonc Submission · brycewang-stanford
在向《通信学报》(Journal on Communications, JOC) 正式提交稿件前做投稿就绪审计时调用。覆盖官网 infocomm-journal.com/txxb 与 CBPT 在线投稿系统 cbpt.infocomm-journal.com、行文次序（中文题名≤20字/中英文结构式摘要/关键词≥4/中图分类号 TN/文献标识码/文章编号）、约 12000 字符篇幅、GB/T 7714 参考文献、知网查重重复率 20% 红线、不收稿件处理费但审稿费 300 元/篇与版面费 600 元/面、栏目归属与一稿多投禁令，并在提交前做退稿风险分诊。适用于把一份通信/网络/信息安全/信号处理方向的中文原创长文打磨到符合本刊三审制门槛的场景。

1k repo stars
▌
Lang Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when responding to a Language (LSA) decision — a revise-and-resubmit response letter, or an author Rejoinder in the Perspectives target-article-and-commentaries format. Turns reviewer objections into a point-by-point revision plan that engages rival frameworks and firms up evidence. Structures the response; it does not fabricate new results.

1k repo stars
▌
Mksc Theory Development · brycewang-stanford
Use when building the formal model for a Marketing Science manuscript — turning a marketing phenomenon into an analytical (game-theoretic) model or a structural econometric model with a clear identification argument. Develops the model and mechanism; it does not run the estimation (mksc-data-analysis) or pick the empirical genre at a high level (mksc-methods).

1k repo stars
▌
Misq Literature Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use when positioning a MIS Quarterly manuscript inside the right information-systems conversation — engaging canonical IS work, showing the IT artifact is central, and distinguishing the paper from adjacent IS venues (ISR, JMIS, JAIS) and from the parent reference disciplines (management, economics, computer science).

1k repo stars
▌
Newms Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when conducting and reporting the analysis of a New Media & Society (NM&S) manuscript across qualitative, content/discourse, computational, and mixed methods — making inference transparent and defensible on each tradition's own terms. Strengthens analysis and reporting; it does not collect data.

1k repo stars
▌
Newms Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or polishing the prose of a New Media & Society (NM&S) manuscript for an interdisciplinary readership within the ~8,000-word target, using SAGE Harvard referencing. Shapes the writing; it does not generate findings or design the study.

1k repo stars
▌
Orgsci Data Analysis · brycewang-stanford
Use when analyzing and reporting results for an Organization Science manuscript across its eclectic methods — establishing trustworthiness for qualitative work, the right estimator for quantitative/multilevel data, transparency for simulation/formal models, and mechanism-supported inference where causal identification is impossible. Executes and reports the analysis; it does not design the study (orgsci-methods) or frame the contribution (orgsci-contribution-framing).

1k repo stars
▌
Orgsci Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when polishing the prose of an Organization Science manuscript — front-loading the organizational argument and contribution, writing for an interdisciplinary micro-to-macro audience, and conforming to INFORMS author-date house style. Late-stage polish; do not invoke while the theoretical contribution is still unsettled.

1k repo stars
▌
Prl Supplementary · brycewang-stanford
Use when partitioning content between the Physical Review Letters body and its Supplemental Material, ensuring the Letter stands alone while derivations and extended data live in the SM. Organizes the SM; does not write the Letter body.

1k repo stars
▌
Prl Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when polishing the prose of a Physical Review Letters manuscript for APS house style, concision, precise notation, and out-of-subfield readability. Polishes language; does not restructure the result or manage length budget.

1k repo stars
▌
Psychbull Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when writing the response to a Psychological Bulletin revise-and-resubmit. A synthesis R&R often demands re-running the search, adding studies, or new bias/moderator analyses, so the response must satisfy every reviewer and the editor while keeping the meta-analysis internally consistent. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate results.

1k repo stars
▌
Psychbull Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use as the entry point for any Psychological Bulletin manuscript. Routes to the right psychbull sub-skill based on where you are in the research-synthesis lifecycle and which synthesis type (meta-analysis, systematic review, meta-review/meta-synthesis, qualitative review) fits. Psychological Bulletin publishes syntheses, not original studies — it dispatches; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Psci Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when you need to understand how Psychological Science evaluates a manuscript — anonymized peer review, editorial weighting of robustness, transparency, and preregistration quality, desk-reject and decline-without-review patterns, and the Registered Reports route. Use when stress-testing a paper before submission or interpreting a decision letter. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

1k repo stars
▌
Psci Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building tables and figures for a Psychological Science manuscript. The journal uses APA 7th-edition style and asks that tables and figures be embedded within the main text near where they are discussed, and exhibits should show effect sizes and uncertainty. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis.

1k repo stars
▌
Qe Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when first judging whether a project fits Quantitative Economics (QE) — a substantive economic question answered with serious quantitative methods (empirical, structural/computational, experimental, or simulation), sister to Econometrica and Theoretical Economics. Tests fit and sharpens the question; it does not design the estimation.

1k repo stars
▌
Respol Theory Development · brycewang-stanford
Use when the conceptual argument is the bottleneck for a Research Policy (RP) manuscript — building an innovation-studies mechanism or framework that an interdisciplinary readership will accept as a contribution. Builds the theory; it does not run the analysis (respol-data-analysis) or write the final contribution paragraph (respol-contribution-framing).

1k repo stars
▌
Sigmetrics Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanford
Use when packaging an ACM SIGMETRICS artifact for the ACM Artifact Review and Badging scheme (Artifacts Available, Evaluated Functional and Reusable, Results Reproduced), covering what performance-evaluation evaluators check first (does the simulation regenerate the figures and match the analysis?), DOI-issuing archives, evaluator-proof documentation, and confirming whether an artifact track runs this cycle.

1k repo stars
▌
Socs Fit Positioning · brycewang-stanford
Use to judge whether a manuscript fits 《社会学研究》 (Sociological Studies) — distinguishing a genuine sociological problematic from an economics-style policy-evaluation paper, and re-routing the latter to economics or cross-disciplinary journals. Use first, before drafting, when discipline fit is uncertain.

1k repo stars
▌
Socs Theory Dialogue · brycewang-stanford
Use to build genuine dialogue with classic and contemporary sociological theory for 《社会学研究》 (Sociological Studies) — entering a theoretical lineage (stratification, networks, institutions, culture, action) rather than piling up recent empirical citations. Use when the literature review is a variable list, not a conversation.

1k repo stars
▌
Smj Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting the response letter and revising a Strategic Management Journal (SMJ) manuscript after an R&R decision. Structures the point-by-point response; it assumes the revision plan from smj-review-process is set.

1k repo stars
▌
Smj Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which smj-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Strategic Management Journal (SMJ) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Tar Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when choosing or sharpening a research question for a The Accounting Review (TAR) manuscript — testing whether the question is contribution-driven, identifiable with accounting data, and a fit for TAR versus JAR/JAE or a specialist AAA section journal. Selects and scopes the question; it does not build the model (tar-theory-development) or design identification (tar-methods).

1k repo stars
▌
Ecj Referee Strategy · brycewang-stanford
Use when running a pre-submission pre-mortem on a The Economic Journal (EJ) manuscript to anticipate the broad-interest, identification, and mechanism objections a demanding general-interest referee will raise. Builds the threat list and pre-empts it; it does not write the R&R response (see ecj-rebuttal).

1k repo stars
▌
Webconf Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use when reasoning about how the Web Conference (WWW) evaluates papers — track-scoped double-blind review, the rebuttal-to-notification pipeline, how the ten research tracks shape reviewer expectations, main versus companion proceedings outcomes, and what authors can and cannot influence at each stage.

1k repo stars
▌
Usenixsec Author Response · brycewang-stanford
Use when reviews arrive from a USENIX Security Symposium cycle and the authors must respond — writing the rebuttal that survives online PC discussion, handling required ethics-content revisions flagged mid-review, and working with a shepherd after an "Accepted on Shepherd Approval" decision.

1k repo stars
▌
Usenixsec Reproducibility · brycewang-stanford
Use when strengthening reproducibility for a USENIX Security Symposium paper — writing the mandatory Open Science appendix, deciding what can and cannot be shared (exploit code, vulnerable-device data, human-subjects material), and making measurement, attack, and defense results independently regenerable.

1k repo stars
▌
Usenixsec Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding whether a project belongs at the USENIX Security Symposium or a sibling venue — routing among USENIX Security, IEEE S&P, ACM CCS, NDSS, and specialty venues (PETS, SOUPS, RAID, WOOT), and confirming the work has the artifact/measurement/systems evidence USENIX Security rewards.

1k repo stars
▌
Worlddev Identification · brycewang-stanford
Use when the inference logic is the bottleneck for a World Development (WD) manuscript — credible causal design for quantitative work, or a transparent inferential logic for qualitative and mixed-methods work. Stress-tests the strategy to WD's pluralist bar before exhibits are finalized.

1k repo stars
▌
Worlddev Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when exhibits in a World Development (WD) manuscript are dense, asterisk-laden, or fail a multidisciplinary reader — including maps and qualitative displays. Makes every exhibit answer a development question; it does not invent evidence or citations.

1k repo stars
▌
Ylj Revision And Editing · brycewang-stanford
Use when working through The Yale Law Journal (YLJ) post-acceptance editing cycle and answering author queries, or when preparing a shorter YLJ Forum piece. It covers the intensive student edit + the online companion path; it does not run the final cite verification (ylj-footnotes-and-cite-check).

1k repo stars
▌
Ylj Sources And Bluebook · brycewang-stanford
Use when building and formatting the citation apparatus for a The Yale Law Journal (YLJ) piece — pinpoint cites, Bluebook form, and source support for every assertion. It governs cite construction; the final editorial cite-check and source-pull is ylj-footnotes-and-cite-check.

1k repo stars
▌
Amj Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting the revision and response letter after an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) revise-and-resubmit — structuring point-by-point responses to the action editor and reviewers across a multi-round developmental process. Drafts the response after revisions; it does not interpret the decision letter (amj-review-process).

1k repo stars
▌
Amj Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which amj-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Aas Author Response · brycewang-stanford
当你在收到《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 的外审意见、需要撰写退修说明与逐条答复信时调用。给出逐条对应审稿意见的答复结构、修改对照(改前→改后)、大修/小修的不同策略、对分歧意见的礼貌据理回应、保持双盲的匿名口径、以及按编辑部期限组织修改稿，帮助作者在 Acta Automatica Sinica 的多轮退修与重新送审中最大化被录用的机会。

1k repo stars
▌
Aas Reproducibility · brycewang-stanford
当你在为《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 提升实验可复现性、组织复现包、防范数据污染时调用。覆盖环境与依赖固定、随机种子与多次运行、数据划分与防泄露、控制仿真的求解器/步长/系统参数记录、超参数与调参协议披露、以及配合双盲的匿名化复现材料，帮助控制/自动化/模式识别方向的中文稿在 Acta Automatica Sinica 外审中经得起"结果能否复现"的追问。

1k repo stars
▌
Aas Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
当你在为《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 确定选题、判断稿件是否契合本刊控制与自动化学科定位、以及在综述/论文/短文三类栏目间定位时调用。帮助辨析本刊与兄弟中文刊(计算机学报/软件学报/电子学报/计算机研究与发展/计算机科学)的学科分工，评估创新性与贡献可数性，避免"主题超范围""无新意""重复前人"等初审退稿理由，并把选题打磨到匹配 Acta Automatica Sinica 的控制/模式识别/机器人/智能系统侧重与中英文双语综述长文传统。

1k repo stars
▌
Aes Review Process · brycewang-stanford
当你需要理解《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 审稿流程、稿件状态与时限时使用。覆盖投稿受理→编辑初审→双盲外审(同行评议)→复审→主编/编委会终审→退修与再审轮次→录用的多级审理链路，各阶段可能的决定(录用/退修/退稿)、6 个月未答复红线、如何解读稿件状态、如何礼貌催稿、以及本刊与英文姊妹刊 Chinese Journal of Electronics 的分流关系。帮助电子/信息/通信方向作者对《电子学报》的审理节奏与决策点建立准确预期，合理规划投稿与修回。

1k repo stars
▌
Advmat Referee Strategy · brycewang-stanford
Use when choosing suggested and opposed referees for an Advanced Materials submission and pre-empting the objections materials reviewers most often raise. Plans referee selection and objection defense; does not write the manuscript or the rebuttal.

1k repo stars
▌
Ajs Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when responding to an American Journal of Sociology (AJS) decision — an R&R response letter to multiple double-blind reviewers and the editor, or an author Reply to a published Comment in AJS's Comment-and-Reply tradition. Structures a persuasive, evidence-based response; it does not fabricate results or contact editors.

1k repo stars
▌
Ajs Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use as the entry point for any American Journal of Sociology (AJS) manuscript. Routes to the right AJS sub-skill based on where you are in the lifecycle and whether the piece is a research article, a Comment/Reply, or a book-review response. It dispatches; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Anmath Supplementary · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding what belongs in appendices versus the main text of a pure-mathematics manuscript for Annals of Mathematics — technical/auxiliary results, long computations, and machine-assisted computation. Math journals generally have no science-style "supplemental material"; everything essential stays in the main text.

1k repo stars
▌
Anmath Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when polishing the prose and rigor of a pure-mathematics manuscript for Annals of Mathematics — eliminating gaps, removing "clearly"/"it is easy to see", precise quantifiers, and consistent mathematical English. Late-stage polish; run only after the proof and architecture are fixed.

1k repo stars
▌
Arecon Revision · brycewang-stanford
Use when responding to Editorial Committee and referee feedback on an Annual Review of Economics (ARE) review — coverage gaps, balance/accuracy complaints, framework/structure asks, and accessibility. Drafts the response and revision plan; it does not run the delivery preflight (arecon-submission) or redesign the spine from scratch (arecon-organizing-framework).

1k repo stars
▌
Arecon Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which arecon-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing an invited review article from topic through revision for an Annual Review of Economics (ARE) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
Cre Policy Implication · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or strengthening the policy-implications section of a 《中国农村经济》 manuscript. Frames implications at the significance / institutional level but anchored in concrete 三农 scenarios — not the empty "加强完善推进" formula.

1k repo stars
▌
Cpa Abstract · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting or revising the 中文摘要 or 英文 abstract for a 《中国行政管理》(Chinese Public Administration, CPA) manuscript — the journal run by the Chinese Public Administration Society. 当摘要写成"具有重要意义"套话、看不出研究问题方法发现、或中英文不对齐时使用。Enforces the question→method→finding→significance four-part pattern, forbids empty-significance phrases, and keeps the abstract anchored in a public-administration theory frame.

1k repo stars
▌
Cpa Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when responding to reviewer reports for a 《中国行政管理》 revision. Produces the point-by-point response letter and aligned manuscript edits, with special attention to theory-frame and method-fit comments common at PA journals. 本技能服务于《中国行政管理》(Chinese Public Administration, CPA)。

1k repo stars
▌
Cpa Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when deciding which cpa-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for 《中国行政管理》 (Chinese Public Administration). Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.

1k repo stars
▌
E Government · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting 《电子政务》(E-Government — 中国科学院主管、中国科学院文献情报中心主办, 2004 年创刊) or deciding whether a Chinese digital-government/e-governance manuscript fits this journal. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, abstract/citation house style, multi-stage review, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Economist Cn · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting 《经济学家》(Economist — 西南财经大学/四川社科学术基金会主办的理论经济学月刊, 1989 年创刊, CSSCI) or deciding whether a Chinese econ/policy manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, abstract house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Soft Science · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting 《软科学》(Soft Science — 四川省科技促进发展研究中心主办的软科学/管理决策月刊) or deciding whether a Chinese innovation-policy/management manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, bilingual house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Tax Research · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting 《税务研究》(Taxation Research — 中国税务杂志社主办的税务学术月刊, 在线投约稿系统 tg.ctax.org.cn) or deciding whether a Chinese tax/public-finance manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, abstract/keyword/citation house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
European Urology · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting European Urology or deciding whether a urology clinical/surgical study fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the high-impact clinical-and-surgical-outcomes evidence bar, reporting-guideline and registration requirements, EAU/Elsevier house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics. Venue-fit aid only, not clinical advice.

1k repo stars
▌
Cogpsych Study Design · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing the experiments for a Cognitive Psychology (Elsevier) manuscript so they tightly control confounds, discriminate competing models, and have adequate power across a multi-experiment program. Hardens stimulus construction, counterbalancing, design logic, and sample-size justification; it does not write analysis or modeling code.

1k repo stars
▌
Cps Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when responding to a Comparative Political Studies (CPS) revise-and-resubmit decision — structuring the response letter to multiple anonymous reviewers and the editor. Plans the revision and response; it does not fabricate results or relitigate the decision.

1k repo stars
▌
Cps Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when starting or navigating any Comparative Political Studies (CPS) manuscript and you need the right next sub-skill, chosen by lifecycle stage and whether the paper makes a genuinely comparative claim across countries or over time. It dispatches; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Acm Sigmetrics · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting ACM SIGMETRICS (SIGMETRICS) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for performance measurement.

1k repo stars
▌
Csj Supplementary · brycewang-stanford
在为《计算机科学》(Computer Science, JSJKX) 组织正文与附录/补充材料/多媒体附件的取舍时调用。本刊是计算机全学科中文综合月刊(CCF 会刊、B 类、T2 级)。技能帮助按"决定性"划分正文与附录：核心 RQ 证据留正文，完整超参表、额外数据集、证明细节、扩展实验、算法伪代码、代码与数据链接等放附录或补充材料；并规范补充材料的引用、命名与可访问性，兼顾本刊长文与综述的篇幅特点。适用于稿件内容多、需决定哪些进正文哪些进附录以保证正文可读性与外审效率的场景。

1k repo stars
▌
Csj Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
在为《计算机科学》(Computer Science, JSJKX) 撰写或审校中文稿件体例时调用。覆盖本刊要求的报道性中文摘要与英文摘要(Abstract)、中英文关键词、中英文题名、中图分类号(TP 类)、参考文献 GB/T 7714-2015 顺序编码制(正文上标、文后按序编号、中文文献中英文对照)、量与单位用法定计量单位、图表中英文题注、公式排版与语言风格。适用于把计算机全学科的中文稿件(研究长文或综述)打磨到符合本刊中文科技写作规范、可通过编辑初审的场景。

1k repo stars
▌
Conbio Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use to understand how Conservation Biology evaluates a manuscript — double-blind peer review (adopted 2014), editorial screening for scope/novelty/conservation relevance, the editorial-board structure, decision categories, and the Registered Reports route. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

1k repo stars
▌
Curranthro Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Current Anthropology (CA) via Editorial Manager — article-type selection, word/abstract caps, file formats (.doc/.rtf text + separate TIFF/EPS figures), Chicago author-date in final files, ethics statement, figure permissions, and the Wenner-Gren copyright assignment. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Devpsych Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when writing the response to a Developmental Psychology (APA) revise-and-resubmit. Reviews here often demand measurement-invariance tests, attrition analyses, added robustness, fuller JARS disclosure, or stronger transparency. The response must address every point and strengthen the developmental claim while staying in the length tier and masked. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.

1k repo stars
▌
Devpsych Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use when starting or navigating any Developmental Psychology (APA) manuscript and you are unsure which sub-skill applies. Use when choosing a manuscript length tier or returning with a decision letter. Routes by lifecycle stage and by the developmental design (cross-sectional, longitudinal/cohort, micro-genetic, experiment with minors); it dispatches, it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Ectheory Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use to understand and prepare for the Econometric Theory (ET) review process — single-anonymous refereeing (reviewers see the author), the Article/Miscellanea/ET-Interview article types, and war-gaming the proof-checking referee before submitting.

1k repo stars
▌
Ectheory Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use for the exhibits in an Econometric Theory (ET) paper — Monte Carlo size/power/coverage tables, finite-sample and limit-behavior plots, with self-contained notes, ET figure-format specs (TIFF/EPS/PDF), and legibility at 50% reduction.

1k repo stars
▌
Ecopol Replication Package · brycewang-stanford
Use when assembling the data, code, and verification materials for an Economic Policy (EP) manuscript so results are accessible and replicable to the journal's standard. Builds the verification-ready package; it does not invent evidence or citations.

1k repo stars
▌
Er Heterogeneity · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or writing the heterogeneity section of an 《经济研究》 (Economic Research Journal) manuscript — choosing which dimensions to cut, justifying each cut theoretically, presenting subsample results with coefficient-difference tests, and wiring at least one dimension back to the mechanism story so heterogeneity doubles as mechanism evidence. 使用时机：主结果已稳健但只切了"东中西"一类单一维度、审稿人要求补做异质性、或切分维度缺乏理论指引时。

1k repo stars
▌
Er Reviewer Lens · brycewang-stanford
Use when self-auditing a 《经济研究》 manuscript before submission against the high-frequency, structural reviewer criticisms recurrent at this journal.

1k repo stars
▌
Representations · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Representations or deciding whether a new-historicist or interdisciplinary cultural-analysis manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's new-historicism fit, the archive-driven argument bar, material-culture and contextual expectations, house style and double-blind norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Cancer Cell · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Cancer Cell or deciding whether a cancer-biology manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Circulation · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Circulation (AHA) or deciding whether a cardiovascular manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Prx Quantum · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting PRX Quantum or deciding whether a quantum information science or quantum technology manuscript fits this APS open-access flagship venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Siam Review · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting SIAM Review (SIAM Rev.) or deciding whether an applied- or computational-mathematics manuscript fits this expository, broad-readership SIAM venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, expository-and-rigor bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Econometrica · brycewang-stanford
Use when targeting Econometrica or deciding whether an economics manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

1k repo stars
▌
Eer Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when revising prose for a European Economic Review (EER) manuscript — the abstract, introduction arc, research highlights, and Elsevier house conventions. Makes the general-interest idea land; it does not establish identification, theory, or exhibits.

1k repo stars
▌
Cte Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for 《财贸经济》 — format, word count, blind review, references, anti-plagiarism, author info, transparent data sourcing, and supplementary files. 本技能服务于《财贸经济》(Finance & Trade Economics, CTE)。

1k repo stars
▌
Finman Identification · brycewang-stanford
Use when the causal or economic credibility of a Financial Management (FM) result is the bottleneck — endogenous corporate policy choices, staggered-event designs, weak instruments, or a "correlation dressed as a channel." Stress-tests the identification to FM's applied-finance bar before exhibits are finalized.

1k repo stars
▌
Finman Tables Figures · brycewang-stanford
Use when building or revising the exhibits of a Financial Management (FM) manuscript so the main finance result and its economic magnitude are legible at a glance and respect Wiley/finance house norms. Formats exhibits; it does not establish the result (finman-identification / finman-robustness) or write the surrounding prose.

1k repo stars
▌
Geb Submission · brycewang-stanford bundle
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Games and Economic Behavior (GEB) via Elsevier Editorial Manager — Word/LaTeX (elsarticle) source, 250-word abstract, the mandatory conference-version disclosure in the cover letter, and the generative-AI declaration. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Gec Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Global Environmental Change (GEC) via Elsevier's online submission system — format selection, double-anonymized files, word and abstract caps, Highlights, the Data Availability Statement, declarations, and ORCID. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1k repo stars
▌
Imfer Referee Strategy · brycewang-stanford
Use when anticipating the objections a dual academic/policy IMF Economic Review (IMFER) referee will raise, so a manuscript pre-empts them before submission or addresses them in revision. Plans the defense; it does not draft the response letter (imfer-rebuttal) or run the submission preflight (imfer-submission).

1k repo stars
▌
Ijoc Rebuttal · brycewang-stanford
Use when drafting the response to an INFORMS Journal on Computing (IJOC) decision letter — turning referee objections (especially about experiments and reproducibility) into a point-by-point response with re-run evidence. Builds the rebuttal and revision plan; it does not run new analysis on its own (route to ijoc-data-analysis).

1k repo stars

5,264 published skills · page 34 of 53